|
|
DAR File No. 27670 |
| This filing was published in the 02/15/2005, issue, Vol. 2005, No. 4, of the Utah State Bulletin. |
| [ 02/15/2005 Bulletin Table of Contents / Bulletin Page ] |
|
Commerce, Occupational and Professional Licensing R156-1 General Rules of the Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing
|
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE |
|
DAR File No.: 27670
|
RULE ANALYSIS |
Purpose of the rule or reason for the change: |
|
The Division is proposing these amendments to conform with legislative changes being made in Section 58-1-501 as a result of the anticipated passage of S.B. 46 during the 2005 Legislative Session.
|
Summary of the rule or change: |
|
In Section R156-1-102, deleted definition for "branching questionnaire" and renumbered the remaining subsections. Deleted Section R156-1-601 in its entirety.
|
State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule: |
|
Section 58-1-308, and Subsections 58-1-106(1)(a) and 58-1-501(4)
|
Anticipated cost or savings to: |
the state budget: |
|
The Division will incur minimal costs, approximately $50, to reprint the rule once the proposed amendments are made effective. Any costs incurred will be absorbed in the Division's current budget.
|
local governments: |
|
The proposed amendments only affect licensed practitioners and not government agencies. To the Division's knowledge, no local health agency has been utilizing branching questionnaires and Internet prescribing; therefore, there would be no affect on local governments.
|
other persons: |
|
As a result of the proposed amendments, patients will no longer be able to receive any prescription drugs based on an Internet questionnaire. Also, any prescribing practitioner who is currently prescribing drugs to patients based on a branching questionnaire will no longer be able to practice in that manner. This may decrease the number of patients to whom the practitioner prescribes. The anticipated statute change and these proposed amendments will require patients to seek prescriptions via the traditional face-to-face appointment with a prescribing practitioner. As a result of a wide variety of circumstances, the Division is unable to determine any costs or savings as a result of these proposed amendments.
|
Compliance costs for affected persons: |
|
As a result of the proposed amendments, patients will no longer be able to receive any prescription drugs based on an Internet questionnaire. Also, any prescribing practitioner who is currently prescribing drugs to patients based on a branching questionnaire will no longer be able to practice in that manner. This may decrease the number of patients to whom the practitioner prescribes. The anticipated statute change and these proposed amendments will require patients to seek prescriptions via the traditional face-to-face appointment with a prescribing practitioner. As a result of a wide variety of circumstances, the Division is unable to determine any costs or savings as a result of these proposed amendments.
|
Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses: |
|
S.B. 46 is presently before the 2005 Legislative Session. This bill defines a "bona fide patient-practitioner relationship" and repeals the provision that authorized the Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing (DOPL) to grant exceptions to such a relationship by rule. Thus, this filing amends the Division rule which deal with branching questionnaire and online assessments, provisions that were useful only if there was an exception to a bona fide patient-practitioner relationship. No additional fiscal impact to businesses is foreseen beyond those addressed in S.B. 46. This filing is submitted now so as to complete the rulemaking process by the effective date of S.B. 46. If S.B. 46 does not pass, DOPL will not make this rule effective. Russell C. Skousen, Executive Director
|
The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at: |
|
Commerce Occupational and Professional Licensing HEBER M WELLS BLDG 160 E 300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111-2316
|
Direct questions regarding this rule to: |
|
Laura Poe at the above address, by phone at 801-530-6789, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet E-mail at lpoe@utah.gov
|
Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on: |
|
03/17/2005
|
This rule may become effective on: |
|
03/18/2005
|
Authorized by: |
|
J. Craig Jackson, Director
|
RULE TEXT |
|
R156. Commerce, Occupational and Professional Licensing. R156-1. General Rules of the Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing. R156-1-102. Definitions. In addition to the definitions in Title 58, as used in Title 58 or these rules: (1) "Active and in good standing" means a licensure status which allows the licensee full privileges to engage in the practice of the occupation or profession subject to the scope of the licensee's license classification. (2) "Aggravating circumstances" means any consideration or factors that may justify an increase in the severity of an action to be imposed upon an applicant or licensee. Aggravating circumstances include: (a) prior record of disciplinary action, unlawful conduct, or unprofessional conduct; (b) dishonest or selfish motive; (c) pattern of misconduct; (d) multiple offenses; (e) obstruction of the disciplinary process by intentionally failing to comply with rules or orders of the Division; (f) submission of false evidence, false statements or other deceptive practices during the disciplinary process including creating, destroying or altering records after an investigation has begun; (g) refusal to acknowledge the wrongful nature of the misconduct involved, either to the client or to the Division; (h) vulnerability of the victim; (i) lack of good faith to make restitution or to rectify the consequences of the misconduct involved; (j) illegal conduct, including the use of controlled substances; and (k) intimidation or threats of withholding clients' records or other detrimental consequences if the client reports or testifies regarding the unprofessional or unlawful conduct. (3) [
([ ([ ([ ([ ([ ([ ([ ([ (a) at the expiration date shown upon a license if the licensee fails to renew the license before the expiration date; or (b) prior to the expiration date shown on the license: (i) upon the death of a licensee who is a natural person; (ii) upon the dissolution of a licensee who is a partnership, corporation, or other business entity; or (iii) upon the issuance of a new license which supersedes an old license, including a license which: (A) replaces a temporary license; (B) replaces a student or other interim license which is limited to one or more renewals or other renewal limitation; or (C) is issued to a licensee in an upgraded classification permitting the licensee to engage in a broader scope of practice in the licensed occupation or profession. ([ ([ ([ ([ (a) issued to an applicant for initial licensure, renewal or reinstatement of licensure, or relicensure; or (b) issued to a licensee in place of the licensee's current license or disciplinary status. ([ (a) Mitigating circumstances include: (i) absence of prior record of disciplinary action, unlawful conduct or unprofessional conduct; (ii) absence of dishonest or selfish motive; (iii) personal, mental or emotional problems provided such problems have not posed a risk to the health, safety or welfare of the public or clients served such as drug or alcohol abuse while engaged in work situations or similar situations where the licensee or applicant should know that they should refrain from engaging in activities that may pose such a risk; (iv) timely and good faith effort to make restitution or rectify the consequences of the misconduct involved; (v) full and free disclosure to the client or Division prior to the discovery of any misconduct; (vi) inexperience in the practice of the occupation and profession provided such inexperience is not the result of failure to obtain appropriate education or consultation that the applicant or licensee should have known they should obtain prior to beginning work on a particular matter; (vii) imposition of other penalties or sanctions; and (viii) remorse. (b) The following factors should not be considered as mitigating circumstances: (i) forced or compelled restitution; (ii) withdrawal of complaint by client or other affected persons; (iii) resignation prior to disciplinary proceedings; (iv) failure of injured client to complain; and (v) complainant's recommendation as to sanction. ([ ([ ([ ([ (a) issued to an applicant for initial licensure, renewal or reinstatement of licensure, or relicensure; or (b) issued to a licensee in place of the licensee's current license or disciplinary status. ([ ([ ([ ([ ([ ([ (a) issued to an applicant for initial licensure, renewal or reinstatement of licensure, or relicensure in accordance with Section 58-1-304; or (b) issued to a licensee in place of the licensee's current license or disciplinary status. ([ ([ ([ ([ ([ ([ (a) division concerns; (b) allegations upon which those concerns are based; (c) potential for administrative or judicial action; and (d) disposition of division concerns.
[
KEY: diversion programs, licensing, occupational licensing [ Notice of Continuation May 2, 2002 58-1-106(1)(a) 58-1-308 58-1-501(4)
|
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
|
PLEASE NOTE:
|
|
For questions regarding the content or application of this rule, please contact Laura Poe at the above address, by phone at 801-530-6789, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet E-mail at lpoe@utah.gov For questions about the rulemaking process, please contact the Division of Administrative Rules (801-538-3764). Please Note: The Division of Administrative Rules is NOT able to answer questions about the content or application of these administrative rules. |
| [ 02/15/2005 Bulletin Table of Contents / Bulletin Page ] |
| Last modified: 06/01/2005 6:08 PM |