Utah State Digest, Vol. 2009, No. 17 (September 01, 2009) [NOTE: The Utah State Digest (Digest) is created from the eRules filing database used to create the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin). While a discrepancy between the Digest and the Bulletin is highly unlikely, any discrepancies will be resolved in favor of the Bulletin. Please refer to the State Disclaimer ( http://www.utah.gov/disclaimer.html ) for more information.] ------------------------------------------------------------ UTAH STATE DIGEST Summary of the Contents of the Utah State Bulletin For information filed August 1, 2009, 12:00 AM through August 14, 2009, 11:59 PM Volume 2009, No. 17 September 1, 2009 Prepared by Division of Administrative Rules Department of Administrative Services The Utah State Digest (Digest) is an official electronic publication of the State of Utah, Department of Administrative Services, Division of Administrative Rules. It is a summary of the information found in the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin) of the same volume and issue number. Inquiries concerning the substance or applicability of an administrative rule that appear in the Digest should be addressed to the contact person for the rule. Questions about the Digest or the rulemaking process may be addressed to: Division of Administrative Rules, 4120 State Office Building, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-1201, telephone 801-538-3218, FAX 801-538-1773. Additional rulemaking information, and electronic versions of all administrative rule publications are available at: http://www.rules.utah.gov/ . The Digest is available free of charge online at http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm and by E-mail Listserv. ************************************************ Division of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City 84114 Unless otherwise noted, all information presented in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as desired. Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted by their respective authors. Citation to the source is requested. Utah state digest. Semimonthly. 1. Delegated legislation--Utah--Digests. I. Utah. Office of Administrative Rules. KFU38.U8 348.792'025--DDC 86-658042 *********************************************** 1. EDITOR'S NOTES Correction to the Emergency Rule for Rule R986-400 (DAR No. 32856) Published in the August 15, 2009, Bulletin - Nancy Lancaster by phone at 801-538-3218, by FAX at 801-538-1773, or by Internet E-mail at nllancaster@utah.gov FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2009/20090901/ed148779.htm 2. SPECIAL NOTICES Public Hearing on Proposed Change to Rule R392-600 - Ronald Marsden by phone at 801-538-6191, by FAX at 801-538-6564, or by Internet E-mail at rmarsden@utah.gov FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2009/20090901/sn148751.htm 3. EXECUTIVE DOCUMENTS As part of his or her constitutional duties, the Governor periodically issues Executive Documents comprised of Executive Orders, Proclamations, and Declarations. "Executive Orders" set policy for the Executive Branch; create boards and commissions; provide for the transfer of authority; or otherwise interpret, implement, or give administrative effect to a provision of the Constitution, state law or executive policy. "Proclamations" call special or extraordinary legislative sessions; designate classes of cities; publish states-of-emergency; promulgate other official formal public announcements or functions; or publicly avow or cause certain matters of state government to be made generally known. "Declarations" designate special days, weeks or other time periods; call attention to or recognize people, groups, organizations, functions, or similar actions having a public purpose; or invoke specific legislative purposes (such as the declaration of an agricultural disaster). The Governor's Office staff files Executive Documents that have legal effect with the Division of Administrative Rules for publication and distribution. All orders issued by the Governor not in conflict with existing laws have the full force and effect of law during a state of emergency when a copy of the order is filed with the Division of Administrative Rules. (See Section 63K-4- 401). Governor's Executive Order 2009-0006: Wildland Fire Management - Colene Tucker by phone at 801-538-1404, by FAX at 801-538-1528, or by Internet E-mail at colenetucker@utah.gov FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/execdocs/2009/ExecDoc148760.htm 4. NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES A state agency may file a Proposed Rule when it determines the need for a new rule, a substantive change to an existing rule, or a repeal of an existing rule. Filings received between August 1, 2009, 12:00 a.m., and August 14, 2009, 11:59 p.m. are included in this, the September 1, 2009, issue of the Utah State Digest. The law requires that an agency accept public comment on Proposed Rules published in the September 1, 2009 issue of the Utah State Bulletin until at least October 1, 2009 (The Bulletin is the parent publication of the Digest). The agency may accept comment beyond this date and will indicate the last day the agency will accept comment in the rule information published below. The agency may also hold public hearings. Additionally, citizens or organizations may request the agency hold a hearing on a specific Proposed Rule. Section 63G-3-302 requires that a hearing request be received by the agency proposing the rule "in writing not more than 15 days after the publication date of the Proposed Rule." From the end of the public comment period through December 30, 2009, the agency may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants to make the Proposed Rule effective. The agency sets the effective date. The date may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period nor more than 120 days after publication date in the Utah State Bulletin. Alternatively, the agency may file a Change in Proposed Rule in response to comments received. If the Division of Administrative Rules does not receive a Notice of Effective Date or a Change in Proposed Rule, the Proposed Rule lapses and the agency must start the process over. The public, interest groups, and governmental agencies are invited to review and comment on the Proposed Rules listed below. Comment may be directed to the contact person identified with each rule. Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-301; and Rule R15-2, and Sections R15-4-3, R15-4-4, R15-4-5, R15-4-9, and R15-4-10. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FLEET OPERATIONS No. 32886 (Amendment): R27-4. Vehicle Replacement and Expansion of State Fleet. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This rule creates a justification process for nonstandard state fleet vehicle purchased as expansion vehicles. It also removes obsolete language referring to the now defunct Fleet Vehicle Advisory Committee and the previous name of the Standard State Fleet Vehicle. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: This rule change has the potential to save the state budget by creating a process to ensure the proper size vehicle is purchased in expansion. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This rule change will have no anticipated cost or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: This rule change will have no anticipated cost or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: This rule change will have no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: This rule change will not create compliance costs. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This rule change will have no fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM ON 10/01/2009 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Brian Fay by phone at 801-538-3502, by FAX at 801-538-1773, or by Internet E-mail at bfay@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 10/08/2009 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2009/20090901/32886.htm COMMERCE OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING No. 32883 (Amendment): R156-75. Genetic Counselors Licensing Act Rules. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: Throughout the rule, the term "rules" has been replaced with "rule" where applicable. Also, statutory and rule citations have been updated where necessary. In Section R156-75-302b, the existing rule allows an individual to hold a temporary genetic counselor license for up to 42 months. The reason for making the temporary license available for such a long period of time was because, at one time, the American Board of Genetic Counseling (ABGC) certification examination was only administered once every three years. However, the certification exam is now offered every two years. Beginning in 2010, it will be offered once a year. The increase in the frequency of the certification exam offering provides a basis for decreasing the maximum term of the temporary license. Paragraph (3) is amended to allow a temporary license to be issued for up to 42 months until 04/30/2010. Subsection R156-75-302b(4) is added to provide that beginning 05/01/2010, a temporary license may be issued for a period of up to 15 months and to provide that if a temporary licensee fails the exam, the licensee can reapply for a second temporary license. In Section R156- 75-304, the number of required continuing education hours for each 2-year period is being increased from 30 hours to 50 hours. The Board felt this change was necessary in order to make the continuing education requirement consistent with ABGC certification requirements. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The Division will incur minimal costs of approximately $75 to print and distribute the rule once the proposed amendments are made effective. Any costs incurred will be absorbed in the Division's current budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: The proposed amendments only apply to licensed genetic counselors and applicants for licensure in that classification. As a result, the proposed amendments do not apply to local governments. - SMALL BUSINESSES: The proposed amendments only apply to licensed genetic counselors and applicants for licensure in that classification. Licensees and applicants for licensure may work in a small business; however, the proposed amendments would not directly affect the business. The proposed amendments require that licensed genetic counselors complete 20 more hours of continuing education every 2 years, which would cause an increase in the amount of money that a licensee spends on continuing education. The cost of continuing education for licensed genetic counselors ranges from $25 to $40 for every 10 hours of continuing education, plus registration and transportation costs if applicable. The Division currently has 35 licensed genetic counselors which would result in an aggregate cost of approximately $2,800 every 2 years due to the increased number of continuing education hours required. It should be noted that many licensees already complete 50 hours of continuing education every 2 years in order to maintain their ABGC certification, so that aggregate costs shown herein may be less. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: The proposed amendments only apply to licensed genetic counselors and applicants for licensure in that classification. The proposed amendments require that licensed genetic counselors complete 20 more hours of continuing education every 2 years, which would cause an increase in the amount of money that a licensee spends on continuing education. The cost of continuing education for licensed genetic counselors ranges from $25 to $40 for every 10 hours of continuing education, plus registration and transportation costs if applicable. The Division currently has 35 licensed genetic counselors which would result in an aggregate cost of approximately $2,800 every 2 years due to the increased number of continuing education hours required. It should be noted that many licensees already complete 50 hours of continuing education every 2 years in order to maintain their ABGC certification, so that aggregate costs shown herein may be less. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The proposed amendments only apply to licensed genetic counselors and applicants for licensure in that classification. The proposed amendments require that licensed genetic counselors complete 20 more hours of continuing education every 2 years, which would cause an increase in the amount of money that a licensee spends on continuing education. The cost of continuing education for licensed genetic counselors ranges from $25 to $40 for every 10 hours of continuing education, plus registration and transportation costs if applicable. It should be noted that many licensees already complete 50 hours of continuing education every two years in order to maintain their ABGC certification. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This rule filing decreases the length of time for temporary licenses as the required examination is offered more frequently, requires additional continuing education hours to become more consistent with national certification requirements and makes other technical amendments. No significant fiscal impact to businesses is anticipated given that most licensees already complete additional continuing education for national certification purposes. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM ON 10/15/2009 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Rich Oborn by phone at 801-530-6767, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet E-mail at roborn@utah.gov INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE: - 09/29/2009 1:00 PM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S, Conference Room 474 (fourth floor), Salt Lake City, UT THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 10/22/2009 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2009/20090901/32883.htm No. 32884 (Amendment): R156-77. Direct-Entry Midwife Act Rules. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: Throughout the rule the term "rules" has been replaced with "rule" where applicable. In Section R156-77-102, adds definitions for "approved continuing education", "C-section", "LDEM (licensed direct-entry midwife) Outcome Database", "TOLAC" (trial of labor after cesarean section), "VBAC" (vaginal birth after cesarean section), and "weeks gestation". In Section R156-77-303, the proposed amendments require specific continuing education hours in the area of intrapartum fetal monitoring to renew a direct-entry midwife license and provides that a licensee must be able to document completion of the continuing education hours upon request of the Division. In Section R156-77-502, updates the MANA (Midwives Alliance of North America) Standards which are incorporated by reference to the 2005 edition. In Section R156-77-601, clarifies, rearranges, and establishes conditions that require consultation, mandatory consultation, collaboration, referral, waiveable transfer, and mandatory transfer. Section R156-77-602 is a new section which adds informed consent. This section adds to the standards for informed consent that already exists in the rule. Ten additional pieces of information are being added for a client with a previous c-section who is attempting a vaginal delivery after the c-section to know to fully provide informed consent for treatment. Sections R156-77-603 and R156- 77-604 have been renumbered due to the addition of new Section R156-77-602. In Section R156-77-604, added that a licensee shall submit to the Division a copy of data submitted to MANA if so requested by the Division. Also added that a licensee must also submit outcome data to the LDEM Outcome Database at least annually. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The Division will incur minimal costs of approximately $75 to print and distribute the rule once the proposed amendments are made effective. Any costs incurred will be absorbed in the Division's current budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: The proposed amendments only apply to licensed direct- entry midwives, applicants for licensure in that classification and clients that utilize the services of a licensed direct-entry midwife. Local governments do not employ or utilize the services a licensed direct-entry midwives. As a result, the proposed amendments do not apply to local governments. - SMALL BUSINESSES: The proposed amendments only apply to licensed direct- entry midwives, applicants for licensure in that classification, and clients who utilize the services of a licensed direct-entry midwife. The governing statute, Title 58, Chapter 77, does not mandate reimbursement for the services of a licensed direct-entry midwife so there should be no general affect on a small business. However, a licensed direct-entry midwife could own a small business and the proposed changes to the standards may limit the type of clients accepted into the practice. The existing rule allows VBACs (vaginal birth after c-section); but the amended statute and proposed rule amendments establish some restrictions on the type or timing of a patient seeking a home birth after having had a c-section. This may cause a minimal loss of revenue to the licensed direct-entry midwife of approximately $1,500 - $2,000 per client. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: The proposed amendments only apply to licensed direct-entry midwives, applicants for licensure in that classification, and clients who utilize the services of a licensed direct-entry midwife. The governing statute, Title 58, Chapter 77, does not mandate reimbursement for the services of a licensed direct-entry midwife business. However, a licensed direct-entry midwife could own a small business and the proposed changes to the standards may limit the type of clients accepted into the practice. The existing rule allows VBACs (vaginal birth after c-section); but the amended statute and proposed rule amendments establish some restrictions on the type or timing of a patient seeking a home birth after having had a c-section. This may cause a minimal loss of revenue to the licensed direct-entry midwife of approximately $1,500 - $2,000 per client. A client who has had a c- section may not be able to attempt a home birth with a licensed direct-entry midwife because of the proposed amendments. Such a client would be required to birth in an acute care facility attended by a physician and therefore the costs of delivering the baby could increase to $4,000 - $6,000 on average. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The proposed amendments only apply to licensed direct-entry midwives, applicants for licensure in that classification, and clients who utilize the services of a licensed direct- entry midwife. As indicated above, the license direct-entry midwife may lose a few potential clients who would not be allowed to utilize the services of the midwife. This may cause a minimal loss of revenue to the licensed direct-entry midwife of approximately $1,500 - $2,000 per client. A client who has had a c-section may not be able to attempt a home birth with a licensed direct-entry midwife because of the proposed amendments. Such a client would be required to birth in an acute care facility attended by a physician and therefore the costs of delivering the baby could increase to $4,000 - $6,000 on average. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: No fiscal impact to businesses is anticipated beyond that considered in the passage of Chapter 365, Laws of Utah 2008 (S.B. 93) and that addressed in the rule filing summary. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM ON 10/15/2009 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Laura Poe by phone at 801-530-6789, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet E-mail at lpoe@utah.gov INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE: - 09/17/2009 3:00 PM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S, Conference Room 474 (fourth floor), Salt Lake City, UT THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 10/22/2009 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2009/20090901/32884.htm No. 32885 (Amendment): R156-78B-9. Action upon Request - Scheduling Procedures - Continuances. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: In Subsection R156-78B-9(2)(b), the amendment adds "and documentation that the notice was served in accordance with Section 78B-3-412". ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The Division will incur minimal costs of approximately $50 to print and distribute the rule once the proposed amendments are made effective. Any costs incurred will be absorbed in the Division's current budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: The proposed amendment only applies to the prelitigation panel review process and does not apply to local governments; therefore no costs or savings are anticipated. - SMALL BUSINESSES: The proposed amendment is only clarifying what documentation is required to be submitted with a Request for Prelitigation Hearing. The documentation has always been required to be submitted, but the change is now being added to the rule. No costs or savings are anticipated for either small business or other persons since this amendment is only clarifying what documentation is required with respect to a prelitigation proceeding. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: The proposed amendment is only clarifying what documentation is required to be submitted with a Request for Prelitigation Hearing. The documentation has always been required to be submitted, but the change is now being added to the rule. No costs or savings are anticipated for either small business or other persons since this amendment is only clarifying what documentation is required with respect to a prelitigation proceeding. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The proposed amendment is only clarifying what documentation is required to be submitted with a Request for Prelitigation Hearing. The documentation has always been required to be submitted, but the requirement is now being added to the rule. No costs or savings are anticipated for either small business or other persons since this amendment is only clarifying what documentation is required with respect to a prelitigation proceeding. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This proposed rule change clarifies that a person requesting a prelitigation panel must provide the Division documentation that a notice of intent to commence action has been properly served. No fiscal impact to businesses is anticipated from this amendment. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM ON 10/15/2009 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - W. Ray Walker by phone at 801-530-6256, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet E-mail at raywalker@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 10/22/2009 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2009/20090901/32885.htm HEALTH HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY No. 32882 (Repeal and Reenact): R414-501. Preadmission and Continued Stay Review. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: In contrast to the old rule, this new rule adds definitions that clarify standards and certification requirements for individuals that reside in long-term care facilities. It further adds language to clarify responsibilities of nursing facilities to meet Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) requirements. It also includes new subsections to separate and clarify preadmission and readmission criteria, and adds a new subsection with new information on retroactive authorization. The old rule, on the other hand, contains a section on grace days that is now replaced with a section on the retroactive authorization process to determine eligibility. It also contains a list of requirements for preadmission authorization that the Department no longer requires in making a medical determination for nursing facility care. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Allowing facilities to seek retroactive authorization may result in a small increase to the state's budget but it is small in comparison to the impact on small businesses that would otherwise be unable to bill for services provided during the period when Medicaid financial eligibility is granted, but medical eligibility for nursing facility services had not yet been determined. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no budget impact to local governments because they do not fund or provide nursing facility care to Medicaid clients. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Allowing facilities to seek retroactive authorization may result in minimal savings to small businesses that would have otherwise been unable to bill for services provided during the period when Medicaid financial eligibility had been granted, but medical eligibility for nursing facility services had not yet been determined. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Allowing facilities to seek retroactive authorization may result in minimal savings to businesses that would have otherwise been unable to bill for services provided during the period when Medicaid financial eligibility had been granted, but medical eligibility for nursing facility services had not yet been determined. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The changes to the rule will not result in compliance costs and will lessen the administrative activities required of both businesses and the Department. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This rule change will protect business from a loss of Medicaid reimbursement if a person is admitted that does not appear to meet Medicaid eligibility criteria, but application is made within 90 days. Small overall impact to Medicaid state funds, but a potentially significant impact on an individual business. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM ON 10/01/2009 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 10/08/2009 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2009/20090901/32882.htm INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION No. 32879 (Amendment): R590-196. Bail Bond Surety Fee Standards, Collateral Standards, and Disclosure Form. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The changes to the rule include spelling corrections, change in outlining, and the addition of a pass through fee that allows bondsmen to pass along jail or court processing fees. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The changes to this rule will not change the revenue flow or expenses of the department or state government. It will create a little additional work in the way of form filings made to the department if a bail bond agency adopts the pass through fee allowed in the rule. This however will be minimal and just for a short period of time. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: The changes to this rule will have no fiscal impact on local governments since it deals solely with the relationship between the department and their licensees, bail bond surety companies, agencies, and agents. - SMALL BUSINESSES: This rule will allow bail bond agencies and agents to pass along a processing fee charged to them by the court or jail. Currently they are unable to pass this cost along to their customers. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: The changes to this rule will have no effect on large businesses. If an agency decides to pass along the court or jail processing fee it will affect the consumer. The processing fees have been around $25. Only a few courts and jails are charging the fee so far. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Defendants or co-signers to a bail bond may be required to pay around $25 for jail or court processing fees if an agent decides to pass the charge on to their clients. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The changes to this rule will allow bail bondsmen to pass along to their clients court and jail processing fees. These fees are around $25 and not all jails or courts are charging them yet. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM ON 10/15/2009 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Jilene Whitby by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by Internet E-mail at jwhitby@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 10/22/2009 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2009/20090901/32879.htm No. 32878 (Amendment): R590-225. Submission of Property and Casualty Rate and Form Filings. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The purpose for these changes is to update the rule to comply with rate and form filing procedures: update incorporated documents; eliminate the reference to Sircon; change the time required to make filing corrections from 30 to 15 days; and require that the intent of the filing and purpose of each document be included with each filing. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: These changes will have no fiscal impact on the department. The changes will not increase the work load and no additional filings or fees will be required. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: The changes to this rule will have no effect on local government since the rule deals with the relationship between the department and its licensees, in this case, property and casualty insurance companies. - SMALL BUSINESSES: This rule affects property and casualty insurance companies, few, if any, would be considered small businesses. The changes to this rule update the procedures of the department and what is happening in the industry. At the request of the industry the language in the rule has been changed to clarify the filing requirements. The only fiscal impact may be the reduction in rejected filings, as a result of these clarifications, which would result in reduced filing fees paid by insurers. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: This rule affects property and casualty insurance companies, most of which are considered large businesses. The changes to this rule update the procedures of the department and what is happening in the industry. At the request of the industry the language in the rule has been changed to clarify the filing requirements. The only fiscal impact may be the reduction in rejected filings, as a result of these clarifications, which would result in reduced filing fees paid by insurers. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: This rule affects property and casualty insurance companies, most of which are considered large businesses. The changes to this rule update the procedures of the department and what is happening in the industry. At the request of the industry the language in the rule has been changed to clarify the filing requirements. The only fiscal impact may be the reduction in rejected filings, as a result of these clarifications, which would result in reduced filing fees paid by insurers. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The changes to this rule will have little, if any, fiscal impact on businesses in Utah. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM ON 10/15/2009 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Jilene Whitby by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by Internet E-mail at jwhitby@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 10/22/2009 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2009/20090901/32878.htm PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE MARSHAL No. 32880 (Amendment): R710-6. Liquefied Petroleum Gas Rules. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: A summary of the rule amendments are as follows: 1) in Subsection R710-6-1(1.2), the Board proposes to update an incorporated reference and use the 2009 edition of National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 54, National Fuel Gas Code and discontinue usage of the 2006 edition; 2) in Subsection R710-6-4(4.4.3), the Board proposes to delete the time limit of two hours to complete the certification examinations. The Board has found the newly rewritten examinations take longer than two hours to complete and the limiting time should not be in the rule; 3) in Subsection R710-6-8(8.6.9), the Board proposes to extend the time limit by one year for submittal of the Fire Safety Analysis to be completed by those with Liquefied Petroleum (LP) Gas containers having a capacity of more than 4,000 water gallons; and 4) in Section R710-6-8, the Board proposes to correct rule verbiage in several sections to make the rule more understandable. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There is an aggregate anticipated cost of approximately $368 to the state budget to enact these proposed rule amendments. This would be to purchase the needed copies of the 2009 NFPA 54 Standard, National Fuel Gas Code, for those that need the newly incorporated reference to enforce the requirements of this code. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no effect on local government because local government does not oversee the Liquefied Petroleum Gas Safety Act statewide. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There would be an aggregate anticipated cost of approximately $4,600 to small businesses to enact these rule changes if nearly every company purchased a 2009 NFPA 54 for approximately $46 each. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: The aggregate anticipated cost to persons other than small businesses, businesses, and local governmental entities would be to purchase the newly adopted 2009 edition of NFPA 54, National Fuel Gas Code at approximately $46 per volume. A total aggregate anticipated number to be purchased is unknown from this group and cannot be estimated. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The only compliance cost of affected persons is the cost of the 2009 NFPA 54 National Fuel Gas Code at approximately $46 per volume. If an affected person is to complete all accepted procedures and requirements with regard to the installation of LP Gas fueled equipment, they would need a copy of the 2009 NFPA 54 standard. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The only fiscal impact to this proposed rule amendment is the cost for the updated incorporated reference. The LP Gas industry has requested for an extended period of time to use the most up to date NFPA standards that allows the most recent code decisions to be implemented. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM ON 10/01/2009 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Brent Halladay by phone at 801-284-6352, by FAX at 801-284-6351, or by Internet E-mail at bhallada@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 10/08/2009 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2009/20090901/32880.htm PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ADMINISTRATION No. 32881 (New Rule): R746-312. Electrical Interconnection. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The rule gives the terms and conditions by which a person would apply for and make a connection of electricity generating resources with the electric distribution system of a public utility electrical corporation. The rule also gives the terms and conditions by which the public utility electrical corporation would respond to these interconnection applications and installations. The rule has application, with differing provisions, based upon the size of the interconnecting generating resources, viz., 25 kilowatts or less, 2 megawatts or less, and 20 megawatts or less. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: None are anticipated relative to the day-to-day operations of a state agency. To the extent a state agency may desire to install an electrical generating facility and interconnect with a public utility, this rule clarifies costs and procedural requirements. It is not anticipated that this rule will alter or change costs associated with interconnection as it follows general practices currently followed for installation of equipment and procedures used by entities operating in this state, in neighboring states or follows federal agency terms applicable to interconnection of customer-owned generating facilities with public utilities. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: None are anticipated relative to the day-to-day operations of local governments. To the extent a local governmental entity may desire to install an electrical generating facility and interconnect with a public utility, this rule clarifies costs and procedural requirements. It is not anticipated that this rule will alter or change costs associated with interconnection as it follows general practices currently followed for installation of equipment and procedures used by entities operating in this state, in neighboring states or follows federal agency terms applicable to interconnection of customer-owned generating facilities with public utilities. - SMALL BUSINESSES: None are anticipated relative to the day-to-day operations of small businesses. To the extent a local small business may desire to install an electrical generating facility and interconnect with a public utility, this rule clarifies costs and procedural requirements. It is not anticipated that this rule will alter or change costs associated with interconnection as it follows general practices currently followed for installation of equipment and procedures used by entities operating in this state, in neighboring states or follows federal agency terms applicable to interconnection of customer-owned generating facilities with public utilities. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: None are anticipated relative to the day-to-day operations of other entities. To the extent a customer may desire to install an electrical generating facility and interconnect with a public utility, this rule clarifies costs and procedural requirements. It is not anticipated that this rule will alter or change costs associated with interconnection as it follows general practices currently followed for installation of equipment and procedures used by entities operating in this state, in neighboring states or follows federal agency terms applicable to interconnection of customer-owned generating facilities with public utilities. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: See Persons other than small businesses, etc. above. This rule generally mirrors the interconnection requirements set by the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for utilities under its jurisdiction and which are generally followed by investor-owned utilities. Reporting requirements are minor and records required are similar to those which would be captured by a prudent public utility or may be required for compliance with a renewable energy portfolio standard imposed by state law. Specific portions of the rule may be waived for good cause. Required studies reflect those already necessary to ensure a safe, reliable interconnection. It is anticipated that compliance costs are similar to costs already incurred to do the same functions and activities already done to interconnect the generating resources which are the subject of the proposed rule. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: Utah law encourages the development of alternative and independent electric generation resources. The proposed rule establishes greater uniformity in the process and the means through which electricity generating resources, not owned by a public utility, may be connected with a public utility's electricity distribution system. It follows existing practices of affected utilities, the requirements of federal regulatory interconnection terms, or processes and procedures reasonably expected for safe and efficient interconnection of the size of resources subject to the proposed rule. As it provides for greater consistency on the terms and conditions for interconnection, it is expected to reduce transactions costs associated with interconnecting these types of facilities and represents a reasonable balancing of the interests of those individuals who wish to interconnect their facilities and public utilities with whom interconnection is sought. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM ON 10/01/2009 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Sandy Mooy by phone at 801-530-6708, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by Internet E-mail at smooy@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 10/08/2009 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2009/20090901/32881.htm 5. NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES After an agency has published a Proposed Rule, it may receive public comment that requires the Proposed Rule to be altered before it goes into effect. A Change in Proposed Rule allows an agency to respond to comments it receives. While the law does not designate a comment period for a Change in Proposed Rule, it does provide for a 30-day waiting period. An agency may accept additional comments during this period, and, at its option, may designate a comment period or may hold a public hearing. The 30-day waiting period for Changes in Proposed Rules published in this issue of the Utah State Bulletin ends October 01, 2009. From the end of the 30-day waiting period through December 29, 2009, an agency may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants to make the Change in Proposed Rule effective. When an agency submits a Notice of Effective Date for a Change in Proposed Rule, the Proposed Rule as amended by the Change in Proposed Rule becomes the effective rule. The agency sets the effective date. The date may be no fewer than 30 days nor more than 120 days after the publication of the Change in Proposed Rule. If the agency designates a public comment period, the effective date may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period nor more than 120 days after the publication date. Alternatively, the agency may file another Change in Proposed Rule in response to additional comments received. If the Division of Administrative Rules does not receive a Notice of Effective Date or another Change in Proposed Rule by the end of the 120 day period after publication, the Change in Proposed Rule(s), along with its associated Proposed Rule, lapses and the agency must start the process over. Changes in Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-303; Rule R15-2; and Sections R15-4-3, R15-4-5, R15-4-7, and R15-4-9. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION AND MANAGEMENT No. 32772 (Change in Proposed Rule): R23-23. Health Reform -- Health Insurance Coverage in State Contracts -- Implementation. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This rule change will correct an incorrect citation in Subsection R23-23-4(3). This change will delete SelectHealth contact information and insert the DFCM website address. (DAR NOTE: This change in proposed rule has been filed to make additional changes to a proposed new rule that was published in the July 15, 2009, issue of the Utah State Bulletin, on page 3. Underlining in the rule below indicates text that has been added since the publication of the proposed new rule mentioned above; strike out indicates text that has been deleted. You must view the change in proposed rule and the proposed new rule together to understand all of the changes that will be enforceable should the agency make this rule effective.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state budget as this is simply a change to an incorrect citation and relocation of information in the previously filed rule. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no anticipated cost or savings to local government as this is simply a change to an incorrect citation and relocation of information in the previously filed rule. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to small businesses as this is simply a change to an incorrect citation and relocation of information in the previously filed rule. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities as this is simply a change to an incorrect citation and relocation of information in the previously filed rule. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no anticipated compliance costs for affected persons because this is simply a change to an incorrect citation and relocation of information in the previously filed rule. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This change will not cause a fiscal impact because this simply corrects an incorrect citation. This change will not cause a fiscal impact because it is simply a relocation of information. It was determined it will be more efficient and appropriate to post the details of the benchmark plan on the DFCM website rather than having the contractors contact SelectHealth. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM ON 10/01/2009 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Alan Bachman by phone at 801-538-3105, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by Internet E-mail at abachman@utah.gov - La Priel Dye by phone at 801-538-3240, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by Internet E-mail at ldye@utah.gov - Priscilla Anderson by phone at 801-538-9595, by FAX at 801-538-3378, or by Internet E-mail at phanderson@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 10/08/2009 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2009/20090901/32772.htm CAPITOL PRESERVATION BOARD (STATE) ADMINISTRATION No. 32778 (Change in Proposed Rule): R131-13. Health Reform -- Health Insurance Coverage in State Contracts -- Implementation. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This rule change will correct an incorrect citation in Subsection R131-13-4(3). This change will delete SelectHealth contact information and insert the DFCM website address. (DAR NOTE: This change in proposed rule has been filed to make additional changes to a proposed new rule that was published in the July 15, 2009, issue of the Utah State Bulletin, on page 5. Underlining in the rule below indicates text that has been added since the publication of the proposed new rule mentioned above; strike out indicates text that has been deleted. You must view the change in proposed rule and the proposed new rule together to understand all of the changes that will be enforceable should the agency make this rule effective.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state budget as this is simply a change to an incorrect citation and relocation of information in the previously filed rule. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no anticipated cost or savings to local government as this is simply a change to an incorrect citation and relocation of information in the previously filed rule. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to small businesses as this is simply a change to an incorrect citation and relocation of information in the previously filed rule. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities as this is simply a change to an incorrect citation and relocation of information in the previously filed rule. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no anticipated compliance costs for affected persons because this is simply a change to an incorrect citation and relocation of information in the previously filed rule. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This change will not cause a fiscal impact because this simply corrects an incorrect citation. This change will not cause a fiscal impact because it is simply a relocation of information. It was determined it will be more efficient and appropriate to post the details of the benchmark plan on the DFCM website rather than having the contractors contact SelectHealth. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM ON 10/01/2009 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - David Hart by phone at 801-538-3074, by FAX at 801-538-3221, or by Internet E-mail at dhart@utah.gov - La Priel Dye by phone at 801-538-3240, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by Internet E-mail at ldye@utah.gov - Sarah Whitney by phone at 801-538-3074, by FAX at 801-538-3221, or by Internet E-mail at swhitney@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 10/08/2009 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2009/20090901/32778.htm 6. FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION Within five years of an administrative rule's original enactment or last five-year review, the agency is required to review the rule. This review is intended to remove obsolete rules from the Utah Administrative Code. Upon reviewing a rule, an agency may: repeal the rule by filing a Proposed Rule; continue the rule as it is by filing a Notice of Review and Statement of Continuation (Notice); or amend the rule by filing a Proposed Rule and by filing a Notice. By filing a Notice, the agency indicates that the rule is still necessary. The rule text that is being continued may be found in the most recent edition of the Utah Administrative Code. The rule text may also be inspected at the agency or the Division of Administrative Rules. Notices are effective upon filing. Notices are governed by Section 63G-3-305. PUBLIC SAFETY HIGHWAY PATROL No. 32868 (5-year Review): R714-600. Performance Standards for Tow-Truck Motor Carriers. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The department has set these performance standards for towing companies and continues to use them. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Joseph Vasquez by phone at 801-965-4889, by FAX at 801-322-1817, or by Internet E-mail at jvasquez@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 08/03/2009 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2009/20090901/32868.htm 7. NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES After a Proposed Rule or a Change in Proposed Rule has been published, and after any comment period has ended, the agency promulgating the rule may notify the Division of Administrative Rules of the effective date for the rule. Statute permits an agency to make a rule effective "on any date specified by the agency that is no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period . . . , nor more than 120 days after the publication date." If the agency has not designated a comment period for a Change in Proposed Rule, the agency may make that Change in Proposed Rule effective on the 30th day following publication. If an agency fails to file a Notice of Effective Date within 120 days from the publication of a Proposed Rule or a related Change in Proposed Rule the rule lapses and the agency must start the rulemaking process over. Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301(9), and Section R15-4-5. COMMERCE OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING No. 32722 (AMD): R156-1-308a. Renewal Dates Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/10/2009 No. 32715 (AMD): R156-11a. Barber, Cosmetologist/Barber, Esthetician, Electrologist, and Nail Technician Licensing Act Rule Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/10/2009 No. 32706 (AMD): R156-24a. Physical Therapist Practice Act Rules Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/10/2009 No. 32712 (AMD): R156-26a. Certified Public Accountant Licensing Act Rule Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/10/2009 No. 32690 (AMD): R156-60c. Professional Counselor Licensing Act Rules Published: 06/15/2009 Effective: 08/11/2009 No. 32707 (AMD): R156-67. Utah Medical Practice Act Rules Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/11/2009 No. 32710 (AMD): R156-68. Utah Osteopathic Medical Practice Act Rules Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/11/2009 REAL ESTATE No. 32725 (NEW): R162-150. Appraisal Management Companies Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/07/2009 EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION No. 32729 (AMD): R277-108-5. Assurances Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/07/2009 No. 32730 (AMD): R277-116. USOE Internal Audit Procedure Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/07/2009 No. 32731 (AMD): R277-402-1. Definitions Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/07/2009 No. 32732 (AMD): R277-473. Testing Procedures Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/07/2009 No. 32733 (AMD): R277-477. Distribution of Funds from the Interest and Dividend Account (School LAND Trust Funds) and Administration of the School LAND Trust Program Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/07/2009 No. 32734 (AMD): R277-491-1. Definitions Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/07/2009 No. 32735 (NEW): R277-516. Education Employee Required Reports of Arrests and Required Background Check Policies for Non-licensed Employees Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/07/2009 No. 32736 (AMD): R277-705. Secondary School Completion and Diplomas Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/07/2009 No. 32737 (AMD): R277-713. Concurrent Enrollment of High School Students in College Courses Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/07/2009 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE AND REMEDIATION No. 32696 (AMD): R311-201. Underground Storage Tanks: Certification Programs Published: 06/15/2009 Effective: 08/18/2009 HEALTH CENTER FOR HEALTH DATA, HEALTH CARE STATISTICS No. 32651 (AMD): R428-12. Health Data Authority Survey of Enrollees in Health Maintenance Organizations Published: 06/01/2009 Effective: 08/06/2009 INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION No. 32415 (AMD): R590-175-3. General Requirements Published: 03/15/2009 Effective: 08/13/2009 No. 32415 (CPR): R590-175-3. General Requirements Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/13/2009 Title and Escrow Commission No. 32701 (AMD): R592-2. Title Insurance Administration Hearings and Penalty Imposition Published: 06/15/2009 Effective: 08/10/2009 NATURAL RESOURCES WILDLIFE RESOURCES No. 32718 (AMD): R657-6. Taking Upland Game Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/10/2009 No. 32719 (AMD): R657-12. Hunting and Fishing Accommodations for People With Disabilities Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/10/2009 No. 32720 (AMD): R657-27. License Agent Procedures Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/10/2009 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT No. 32723 (AMD): R926-3. Class B and Class C Road Funds Published: 07/01/2009 Effective: 08/13/2009 8. RULES INDEX The Rules Index is a cumulative index that reflects all effective Utah administrative rules. The Rules Index is not included Digest. However, a copy of the current Rules Index is available http://www.rules.utah.gov/research.htm . <>