Utah State Digest, Vol. 2012, No. 11 (June 1, 2012)

[NOTE:  The Utah State Digest (Digest) is created from the eRules filing 
database used to create the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin).  While a 
discrepancy between the Digest and the Bulletin is highly unlikely, any 
discrepancies will be resolved in favor of the Bulletin.  Please refer to the 
State Disclaimer ( http://www.utah.gov/disclaimer.html ) for more 
information.]

------------------------------------------------------------

UTAH STATE DIGEST
Summary of the Contents of the Utah State Bulletin


For information filed May 2, 2012, 12:00 AM through May 15, 2012, 11:59 PM


Volume 2012, No. 11
June 1, 2012


Prepared by
Division of Administrative Rules
Department of Administrative Services


The Utah State Digest (Digest) is an official electronic publication of the 
State of Utah, Department of Administrative Services, Division of 
Administrative Rules.  It is a summary of the information found in the Utah 
State Bulletin (Bulletin) of the same volume and issue number.  Inquiries 
concerning the substance or applicability of an administrative rule that 
appear in the Digest should be addressed to the contact person for the rule.  
Questions about the Digest or the rulemaking process may be addressed to:  
Division of Administrative Rules, 5110 State Office Building, Salt Lake City, 
Utah 84114-1201, telephone 801-538-3218, FAX 801-359-0759.  Additional 
rulemaking information, and electronic versions of all administrative rule 
publications are available at:  http://www.rules.utah.gov/ .  The Digest is 
available free of charge online at 
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm and by E-mail Listserv.  




************************************************
Division of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City  84114

Unless otherwise noted, all information presented in this publication is in 
the public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as 
desired.  Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted 
by their respective authors.  Citation to the source is requested.



Utah state digest.
  Semimonthly.
  1.  Delegated legislation--Utah--Digests. I.  Utah. Office 
of Administrative Rules.

KFU38.U8
348.792'025--DDC            86-658042
***********************************************



1.  EXECUTIVE DOCUMENTS

As part of his or her constitutional duties, the Governor periodically issues 
Executive Documents comprised of Executive Orders, Proclamations, and 
Declarations.  "Executive Orders" set policy for the Executive Branch; create 
boards and commissions; provide for the transfer of authority; or otherwise 
interpret, implement, or give administrative effect to a provision of the 
Constitution, state law or executive policy.  "Proclamations" call special or 
extraordinary legislative sessions; designate classes of cities; publish 
states-of-emergency; promulgate other official formal public announcements or 
functions; or publicly avow or cause certain matters of state government to 
be made generally known.  "Declarations" designate special days, weeks or 
other time periods;  call attention to or recognize people, groups, 
organizations, functions, or similar actions having a public purpose; or 
invoke specific legislative purposes (such as the declaration of an 
agricultural disaster).  

The Governor's Office staff files Executive Documents that have legal effect 
with the Division of Administrative Rules for publication and distribution.  
All orders issued by the Governor not in conflict with existing laws have the 
full force and effect of law during a state of emergency when a copy of the 
order is filed with the Division of Administrative Rules. (See Section 63K-4-
401).

Governor's Proclamation 2012/05/E:  Calling the Fifty-Ninth Legislature into 
the Fifth Extraordinary Session
- Cherilyn Bradford by phone at 801-538-1505, by FAX at 801-538-1528, or by 
Internet E-mail at Cbradford@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/execdocs/2012/ExecDoc152585.htm




2.  NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

A state agency may file a Proposed Rule when it determines the need for a new 
rule, a substantive change to an existing rule, or a repeal of an existing 
rule.  Filings received between May 2, 2012, 12:00 a.m., and May 15, 2012, 
11:59 p.m. are summarized in this, the June 1, 2012, issue of the Utah State 
Digest.

The law requires that an agency accept public comment on Proposed Rules 
published in the June 1, 2012, issue of the Utah State Bulletin until at 
least July 2, 2012 (the Bulletin is the parent publication of the Digest).  
The agency may accept comment beyond this date and will indicate the last day 
the agency will accept comment in the rule information published below.  The 
agency may also hold public hearings.  Additionally, citizens or 
organizations may request the agency hold a hearing on a specific Proposed 
Rule.  Section 63G-3-302 requires that a hearing request be received by the 
agency proposing the rule "in writing not more than 15 days after the 
publication date of the proposed rule."

From the end of the public comment period through September 29, 2012, the 
agency may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants to make 
the Proposed Rule effective.  The agency sets the effective date.  The date 
may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public 
comment period nor more than 120 days after the publication date in the Utah 
State Bulletin.  Alternatively, the agency may file a Change in Proposed Rule 
in response to comments received.  If the Division of Administrative Rules 
does not receive a Notice of Effective Date or a Change in Proposed Rule, the 
Proposed Rule lapses and the agency must start the process over.

The public, interest groups, and governmental agencies are invited to review 
and comment on the Proposed Rules listed below.  Comment may be directed to 
the contact person identified with each rule. 

Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-301; Rule R15-2; and Sections 
R15-4-3, R15-4-4, R15-4-5, R15-4-9, and R15-4-10.


AGRICULTURE AND FOOD
ANIMAL INDUSTRY
No. 36164 (Amendment): R58-21. Trichomoniasis.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The changes to the rule includes:   1) 
renumbering the subsections to be consistent with DAR guidelines; 2) 
rewording the definitions to be in alignment with DAR guidelines; 3) making 
the official test the PCR test; and 4) increasing the test age from 9 months 
to 12 months of age.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no change to state budget as existing workforce 
in the Division of Animal Industry currently handles all issues related to 
trichomoniasis and the proposed rule will not increase or decrease workload.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs to local government at this time 
under the current rule.  All costs to run the program are through the state 
general fund and local governments are not involved in the program.  The 
proposed changes made to the rule will not require local government 
involvement and will not require costs to be borne by local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Veterinarians and veterinary clinics under this rule 
change will no longer be able to culture the sample in the clinic.  This has 
the potential in saving time for staff that no longer need to observe each 
sample for a total of 4 times in a 96-hour period.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Cattle producers in the state may have increased test costs 
associated with the official test being changed from culture and PCR to just 
the PCR test.  The Utah Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory will make a 
determined effort to keep costs around $10 per bull.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Other then a possible increase in 
testing costs, there will be no additional costs to the producers.  The 
producers have been testing their bulls for over ten years and they are used 
to complying with the rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The change to the rule may not be cost neutral for the cattle 
producer but the Department feels that the test will produce more accurate 
results and will minimize the risks to the livestock industry and provide 
better disease control.  The increase in the test age will not have a fiscal 
impact on the producer.  This rule was reviewed by the Agriculture Advisory 
Board on 05/01/2012.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Bruce King by phone at 801-538-7162, by FAX at 801-538-7169, or by Internet 
E-mail at bking@utah.gov
- Kathleen Mathews by phone at 801-538-7103, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by 
Internet E-mail at kmathews@utah.gov
- Kyle Stephens by phone at 801-538-7102, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by 
Internet E-mail at kylestephens@utah.gov
- Wyatt Frampton by phone at 801-538-7165, by FAX at 801-538-7169, or by 
Internet E-mail at wframpton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36164.htm


REGULATORY SERVICES
No. 36147 (New Rule): R70-520. Standard of Identity and Labeling Requirements 
for Honey.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule defines raw honey, provides 
criteria for labeling raw honey, requires non-floral honey to be labeled non-
floral, and provides a standard of identity for honey.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Legislature allocated $8,000 for the enforcement of 
the new law.  Thus, any enforcement has, to this degree, been covered in the 
UDAF budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The rule places no responsibilities on local 
government.  There should be no cost or savings to them.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Honey producers will be the only impacted group.  The 
Department's research indicates that Utah honey producers already follow 
these requirements.  Honey producers from other states and nations may incur 
costs.  This was not able to be determined.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The proposed rule only applies to producers of honey.  No other 
persons will be impacted.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There could be compliance costs for 
honey producers not in Utah.  In our discussions with the industry thus far, 
no costs have been identified.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule is required by legislative amendments to the Utah 
Wholesome Food Act.  The Department has not identified any costs to Utah 
producers.  A public hearing was held on 02/13/2012.  This rule was reviewed 
and approved by the Agriculture Advisory Board on 05/01/2012.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Kathleen Mathews by phone at 801-538-7103, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by 
Internet E-mail at kmathews@utah.gov
- Kyle Stephens by phone at 801-538-7102, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by 
Internet E-mail at kylestephens@utah.gov
- Richard Clark by phone at 801-538-7150, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by 
Internet E-mail at richardwclark@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36147.htm



COMMERCE
OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING
No. 36157 (Amendment): R156-55a-602. Contractor License Bonds.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed amendments to this section allow 
contractors with the R100 classification to post a license bond as low as 
$25,000 instead of the $50,000 minimum in the existing rule.  The proposed 
amendments also allow contractors with lower subclassifications to post a 
license bond as low as $15,000 instead of the existing $50,000 minimum 
license bond amount required.  The proposed amendments also provide the 
amount of the license bond may be higher or lower than the amounts identified 
in particular circumstances.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Division will incur minimal costs of approximately 
$50 to print and distribute the rule once the proposed amendments are made 
effective.  Any costs incurred will be absorbed in the Division's current 
budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The proposed amendments only apply to licensed 
contractors and applicants for licensure as a contractor.  As a result, the 
proposed amendments do not apply to local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The proposed amendments only apply to licensed 
contractors  and applicants for licensure as a contractor.  The proposed 
amendments will allow lower bond costs for a limited number of contractors 
who must post a license bond in order to qualify for licensure as a 
contractor.  It is impossible for the Division to estimate the amount of 
savings that will result due to a wide range of circumstances with contractor 
applicants and licensees.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The proposed amendments only apply to licensed contractors  and 
applicants for licensure as a contractor.  The proposed amendments will allow 
lower bond costs for a limited number of contractors who must post a license 
bond in order to qualify for licensure as a contractor.  It is impossible for 
the Division to estimate the amount of savings that will result due to a wide 
range of circumstances with contractor applicants and licensees.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The proposed amendments only apply to 
licensed contractors  and applicants for licensure as a contractor.  The 
proposed amendments will allow lower bond costs for a limited number of 
contractors who must post a license bond in order to qualify for licensure as 
a contractor.  It is impossible for the Division to estimate the amount of 
savings that will result due to a wide range of circumstances with contractor 
applicants and licensees.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No fiscal impact to businesses is anticipated from this rule 
filing.  However, affected licensees may see a cost savings as a result of 
the change to license bond amount requirements.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Dan Jones by phone at 801-530-6720, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet 
E-mail at dansjones@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 06/28/2012 09:00 AM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S, Conference Room 474, 
Salt Lake City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36157.htm

No. 36189 (Amendment): R156-60a. Social Worker Licensing Act Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Updated various statute references throughout 
the rule.  In Section R156-60a-102, the proposed amendment renumbers 
subsections throughout this section.  In Subsection R156-60a-102(4), adds a 
definition of the human growth and development course required in Subsection 
58-60-205 (4)(d)(iii)(A).  The proposed definition provides needed 
clarification of subjects that the Board believes should be covered in an 
acceptable human growth and development course.  In Subsection R156-60a-
102(6), adds a definition of the social welfare policy course required in 
Subsection 58-60-205 (4)(d)(iii)(A).  The proposed definition provides needed 
clarification of subjects that the Board believes should be covered in an 
acceptable social welfare policy course.  In Subsection R156-60a-102(7), the 
definition of the social work practice methods course is clarified to require 
that the course be at a program accredited by the Council for Social Work 
Education.  In Section R156-60a-302a, the term "professional counseling" is 
replaced with "mental health counseling" due to H.B. 100's replacement of the 
title "professional counselor" with "clinical mental health counselor."  In 
Section R156-60a-302b, the proposed amendment updates an incorrect reference 
and makes some grammatical changes.  In Subsection R156-60a-302d(5), the 
proposed amendment outlines the process that a foreign born legal resident 
for whom English is a second language or an enrolled member of a federally 
recognized Native American tribe may request additional time on examinations 
under H.B. 100.  In Section R156-60a-302e, the proposed amendment updates an 
incorrect reference.  In Subsection R156-60a-304(2)(c), the proposed 
amendment clarifies acceptable course providers or sponsors of continuing 
education courses.  The current language was confusing for some licensees.  
Under the proposed amendment, county and federal agencies will join state 
agencies as acceptable providers of continuing education.  In Section R156-
60a-308, the proposed amendment replaces an incorrect reference.  In 
Subsection R156-60a-502(24), the proposed amendment replaces incorporation of 
the 1999 revised version of the Code of Ethics of the National Association of 
Social Workers (NASW) with the 2008 version.  The 2008 version differs from 
the 1999 version in that the former includes inclusive terminology regarding 
gender expression and immigration status.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Division will incur minimal costs of approximately 
$100 to print and distribute the rule once the proposed amendments are made 
effective.  Any costs incurred will be absorbed in the Division's current 
budget.  The proposed amendments to the definitions of courses required for 
the social service worker license are intended to clarify the social service 
worker (SSW) education requirement.  These changes have a savings impact on 
the Division and Department of Commerce because they will likely result in a 
decrease in the number of requests for agency review filed by applicants for 
the SSW license.  The proposed amendments also create a process by which a 
foreign born legal resident for whom English is a second language or an 
enrolled member of a federally recognized Native American tribe may request 
additional time on examinations.  Because only a few individuals are expected 
to submit a request, this new process will have minimal cost impact on the 
Divisions budget and work load.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The proposed amendments only apply to licensed social 
workers and applicants for licensure in various  social worker 
classifications.  As a result, the proposed amendments do not apply to local 
governments.  Some social work licensees work in local government; however, 
the proposed amendments would not directly affect local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The proposed amendments only apply to licensed social 
workers and applicants for licensure in various social worker 
classifications.  As a result, the proposed amendments do not apply to small 
businesses.  Some licensees may work in small businesses; however, the 
proposed amendments would not directly affect the business.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The proposed amendments only apply to licensed social workers and 
applicants for licensure in various social worker classifications.  The 
amendments to the definitions of courses and degrees required for the social 
service worker license are intended reflect how the Division already 
interprets the social service worker education requirement as established in 
the statute.  For this reason, these amendments will not cause applicants to 
experience any increased compliance costs.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The proposed amendments only apply to 
licensed social workers and applicants for licensure in various social worker 
classifications.  The amendments to the definitions of courses and degrees 
required for the social service worker license are intended reflect how the 
Division already interprets the social service worker education requirement 
as established in the statute.  For this reason, these amendments will not 
cause applicants to experience any increased compliance costs.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule filing implements a new statutory change, updates 
references, and clarifies existing provisions.  No fiscal impact to 
businesses is anticipated from these amendments.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Rich Oborn by phone at 801-530-6767, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet 
E-mail at roborn@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 06/07/2012 09:00 AM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S, Conference Room 474, 
Salt Lake City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36189.htm

No. 36181 (Amendment): R156-69-302d. Licensing of Dentist-Educators.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  A new Section R156-69-302d is being added to 
clarify that submission of information maintained in a practitioner data bank 
as required in Subsection 58-69-302.5(2)(a)(i) means submission to the 
National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Division will incur minimal costs of approximately 
$50 to print and distribute the rule once the proposed amendments are made 
effective.  Any costs incurred will be absorbed in the Division's current 
budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The proposed amendments only apply to applicants for 
licensure as a dentist-educator  As a result, the proposed amendments do not 
apply to local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The Legislature passed S.B. 202 during the 2012 General 
Session which permits licensure of dentist-educators.  For those applicants 
who apply for the newly created dental-educator license, their submission to 
the NPDB will cost $16.  The number of applicants for licensure as a dentist-
educator is unknown, but the Division expects it to be a small number, 
probably less than ten applicants.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The Legislature passed S.B. 202 during the 2012 General Session 
which permits licensure of dentist-educators.  For those applicants who apply 
for the newly created dental-educator license, their submission to the NPDB 
will cost $16.  The number of applicants for licensure as a dentist-educator 
is unknown, but the Division expects it to be a small number, probably less 
than ten applicants.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The Legislature passed S.B. 202 
during the 2012 General Session which permits licensure of dentist-educators.  
For those applicants who apply for the newly created dental-educator license, 
their submission to the NPDB will cost $16.  The number of applicants for 
licensure as a dentist-educator is unknown, but the Division expects it to be 
a small number, probably less than ten applicants.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This filing implements a recent statutory change by defining the 
practitioner data bank where applicants for dentist-educator licenses must 
submit their information.  No fiscal impact to businesses is anticipated 
beyond those addressed by the 2012 Legislative Session.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Noel Taxin by phone at 801-530-6621, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet 
E-mail at ntaxin@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36181.htm

No. 36183 (Amendment): R156-75. Genetic Counselors Licensing Act Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  In Section R156-75-102, the proposed 
amendment adds a definition of "unprofessional conduct".  In Section R156-75-
302b, the amendments made with respect to temporary licenses that can be 
issued to genetic counselor applicants.  Temporary licenses are currently 
issued for 15 months but are also required to expire 30 days after the 
licensee fails the next available exam; however, the applicant rarely 
notifies the Division after failing an exam.  As a result, an applicant who 
failed the exam often holds the active temporary license for several months 
after the temporary license should have expired.  The proposed amendments set 
the expiration date as December 31 immediately following the date of the next 
available American Board of Genetic Counseling (ABGC) certification exam 
date.  This way the temporary license will always expire soon after the exam 
results are reported to the applicant.  Under the proposed amendments, the 
Division will no longer need to rely on the applicant to report whether they 
passed the ABGC exam or not.  In Section R156-75-502, the proposed amendment 
adds and defines unprofessional conduct as violating any provision of the 
Code of Ethics established by the National Society of Genetic Counselors 
(NSGC), revised January 2006, and incorporates the Code of Ethics by 
reference.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Division will incur minimal costs of approximately 
$100 to print and distribute the rule once the proposed amendments are made 
effective.  Any costs incurred will be absorbed in the Division's current 
budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The proposed amendments only apply to licensed genetic 
counselors and applicants for licensure in that classification.  As a result, 
the proposed amendments do not apply to local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The proposed amendments only apply to licensed genetic 
counselors and applicants for licensure in that classification.  Small 
businesses that employ temporary genetic counselors may be impacted due to 
the automatic expiration of temporary licenses on December 31 after the next 
available ABGC certification exam date; however, the extent of any cost 
impact is insignificant.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The proposed amendments only apply to licensed genetic counselors 
and applicants for licensure in that classification.  Some temporary genetic 
counselors may experience some cost impact due to the automatic expiration of 
temporary licenses on December 31 after the next available ABGC certification 
exam date.  If a temporary licensee wants to continue to practice after their 
first temporary license expires, the applicant must pay a $50 application fee 
to obtain a second temporary license.  The Division is not able to determine 
an aggregate amount because it is unable to determine how many applicants 
will be impacted by this change.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The proposed amendments only apply to 
licensed genetic counselors and applicants for licensure in that 
classification. Some temporary genetic counselors may experience some cost 
impact due to the automatic expiration of temporary licenses on December 31 
after the next available ABGC certification exam date.  If a temporary 
licensee wants to continue to practice after their first temporary license 
expires, the applicant must pay a $50 application fee to obtain a second 
temporary license.  The Division is unable to determine how many applicants 
will be impacted by this change.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This filing's amendment of the temporary license provision and 
addition of a definition of unprofessional conduct to include violations of 
the professional code of ethics appear to be clarifying in nature.  No fiscal 
impact to businesses is anticipated from these amendments.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Rich Oborn by phone at 801-530-6767, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet 
E-mail at roborn@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 06/06/2012 09:00 AM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S, Conference Room 474, 
Salt Lake City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36183.htm



EDUCATION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36199 (Amendment): R277-407-3. Classes and Activities During the Regular 
School Day.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The new language provides that an elementary 
school or elementary school teacher may provide a suggested list of supplies 
(using express language in the law) for use during the regular school day to 
a student's parent or guardian.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  The new language provides procedures for elementary school teachers 
to follow when requesting classroom supplies from parents or guardians.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  The new language provides procedures for elementary school 
teachers to follow when requesting classroom supplies from parents or 
guardians.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  The amendments to this rule apply to public education and do not 
affect businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  In the past, 
elementary school teachers may have requested classroom supplies from parents 
and guardians.  The new language now requires that a teacher use express 
language in the law if making a request.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  Elementary school teachers must use the express lanaguage 
in the law if requesting classroom supplies from parents or guardians.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36199.htm

No. 36200 (Amendment): R277-437-3. Local School Board and District 
Responsibilities.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The new language provides for school 
districts to review and/or revise policies to provide for an extended early 
enrollment period if a school district is reconfiguring grades district-wide 
for its elementary, middle, junior, or senior high schools, and the grade 
reconfiguration will be implemented in the next school year.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  The new language applies to a school district requirement that 
allows greater flexibility.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  School districts must adjust open enrollment timelines under 
certain circumstances which results in more flexibility, not a cost or 
savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule applies to public schools and does not affect 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, business, or local government entities.  The new language in this 
rule applies to school districts.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance cost for 
affected persons.  School districts must adjust open enrollment timelines 
under specific circumstances.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36200.htm

No. 36201 (Amendment): R277-491. School Community Councils.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The amendments provide changes to school 
community council election procedures and membership.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  The amendments to this rule apply to school community councils.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated costs or savings to local 
government.  The changes to the rule provide clear direction regarding school 
community council election procedures and membership.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule applies to public education and does not affect 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  The amendments to this 
rule provide clear direction regarding school community council election 
procedures and membership.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  Schools/school districts and school community councils 
have clear guidance in this rule regarding school community council election 
procedures and membership.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36201.htm

No. 36202 (Amendment): R277-497-3. Board Responsibilities.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The amendments change implementation of the 
school grading system from 2011-2012 to 2012-2013.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  Delaying implementation of the Grading Schools System does not 
result in a cost or savings.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  Delaying implementation of the Grading Schools System does not 
result in a cost or savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule applies to public education and does not affect 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  Delaying 
implementation of the Grading Schools System does not result in a cost or 
savings.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  Implementation of the Grading Schools System has been 
delayed one year.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36202.htm

No. 36203 (Amendment): R277-500. Educator Licensing Renewal, Timelines, and 
Required Fingerprint Background Checks (Effective Beginning July 1, 2012).
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The amendments add a new definition, change 
"professional development" to "professional learning" throughout the rule, 
and provide clarification of timelines for educator license renewal.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  The amendments provide changes in terminology and clarification to 
licensing renewal procedures which do not result in a cost or savings.  The 
changes will make procedures more user-friendly.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  The amendments provide changes in terminology and clarification 
to licensing renewal procedures which do not result in a cost or savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule applies to public education employees and license-
holders and does not affect businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
business, businesses, or local government entities.  The amendments provide 
changes in terminology and clarification to licensing renewal procedures 
which do not result in a cost or savings.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  The amendments provide changes in terminology and 
clarification to licensing renewal procedures which do not result in 
compliance costs.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36203.htm

No. 36204 (Repeal): R277-501. Educator Licensing Renewal, Timelines, and 
Required Fingerprint Background Checks (Effective Through June 30, 2012).
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  Language necessary in Rule R277-501 has been incorporated into Rule 
R277-500.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated costs or savings to local 
government.  Language necessary in Rule R277-501 has been incorporated into 
Rule R277-500.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule applies to public education and does not affect 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  Language necessary in 
Rule R277-501 has been incorporated into Rule R277-500.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  Rule R277-500 will replace this rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36204.htm

No. 36205 (Amendment): R277-524. Paraprofessional Qualifications.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Changes include which Title I schools are 
eligible for funds to hire additional paraprofessionals, the allocation of 
those funds, and annual reporting requirements for schools that accept the 
funding.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  Legislative funding is provided to qualified schools to hire 
paraeducators.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  Legislative funding is provided to qualified schools to hire 
paraeducators.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule applies to public education and does not affect 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  Legislative funding is 
provided to qualified public schools to hire paraeducators.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  Legislative funding is provided to qualified schools to 
hire paraeducators.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36205.htm

No. 36206 (Amendment): R277-800. Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Changes included revisions to qualifications 
and duties of the USDB superintendent, and the addition of data collection 
and annual reporting on the performance and progress of current and past 
students who have received services from USDB.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  The qualifications and duties of the USDB Superintendent and USDB 
Advisory Council clarification do not result in a cost or savings.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  The qualifications and duties of the USDB Superintendent and 
USDB Advisory Council clarifications do not result in a cost or savings to 
local education agencies.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule applies to public education and does not affect 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  The qualifications and 
duties of the USDB Superintendent and USDB Advisory Council clarifications do 
not result in a cost or savings.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  The qualifications and duties of the USDB Superintendent 
and USDB Advisory Council clarification do not result in a cost or savings.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36206.htm



ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
AIR QUALITY
No. 36176 (Repeal and Reenact): R307-801. Asbestos.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rulemaking is being done as a repeal and 
reenactment because the proposed amendments to the current rule are so many 
that the resulting proposed rule could be difficult to understand by many 
people if the rulemaking was submitted as solely an amendment.  Substantive 
changes in the proposed reenacted rule include the following:  contractors 
performing renovation or demolition activities in or on residential 
facilities are subject to the requirements of Rule R307-801 when a tested 
sample contains greater than 1% asbestos.  The following definitions were 
added to the rule:  "AHERA Facility," "Asbestos Abatement Project," "Asbestos 
Abatement Supervisor," "Asbestos Abatement Worker," "Asbestos-Containing 
Waste Material," "Asbestos Inspection Report," "Asbestos NESHAP," "Category I 
Non-Friable Asbestos-Containing Material," "Category II Non-Friable Asbestos-
Containing Material," "Condominium," "General Building Remodeling 
Activities," "Government Official," "High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA)," 
"Inspector," "NESHAP Facility," "Non-Friable Asbestos-Containing Material," 
"Open Top Catch Bag," "Phased Project," "Preformed RACM Pipe Insulation," 
"Project Designer," "Regulated Facilities," "Regulated Facility Component," 
"Renovation Project," "Renovator," "Residential Facility," "Suspect or 
Suspected Asbestos-Containing Material," "Training Hour," and "TSCA."  The 
following definitions are being removed from the rule:  "Asbestos Project," 
"Asbestos Waste," "Division," "Facility," "HEPA Filtration," "NESHAP," 
"Renovation," and "Structure."  The rule adds language to clarify that prior 
to conducting regulated asbestos activities, all persons shall be properly 
certified.  The Renovator discipline is created and training, certification, 
and work practice requirements are established for it.  Residential 
structures of four units or less, built on or after 01/01/1981, are now only 
required to be inspected for sprayed-on acoustical ceiling material, asbestos 
cement siding, vinyl floor tile, thermal-system insulation or tape on duct or 
furnace, or vermiculite type insulation materials. Inspection reports of 
residential facilities are required to be submitted to the executive 
secretary.  The information required to be included in notification forms 
submitted to the executive secretary is updated and clarified.  
Decontamination units are now required to be attached to containment prior to 
disturbing RACM or commencing a NESHAP-sized asbestos abatement project, and 
a more concise definition of specifications in which a decontamination unit 
shall be constructed is added.  Drop cloths and the open top catch bag method 
are methods that are now allowed when RACM pipe insulation asbestos abatement 
project in a crawl space or pipe chase less than six feet high or less than 
three feet wide is conducted.  New work practices and procedures for the 
disposal and handling of asbestos waste are added to the rule.  The rule also 
adds new asbestos information distribution requirements.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is a potential cost to the state budget as this 
rule creates a new "Renovator" discipline.  Staff will be receiving, 
reviewing, and processing applications, and staff will also be conducting 
inspections on both the training providers and the Renovators.  The cost or 
savings to the state budget is unknown, as we do not know how many 
individuals and companies will be applying for this certification, and we 
also anticipate the fees that the division receives from applicants will 
offset much, if not all, of the cost associated with this rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no anticipated costs or savings to local 
government, as this rule does not create any more requirements for local 
government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is an anticipated cost to the small businesses who 
apply for the new renovator company certification.  The Renovator 
certification application fee for a company certification is $200, and 
companies are required to re-certify on a yearly basis.  If a small business 
chooses to pay for the individual certification and re-certification fees for 
its employees, that cost will be $100 per employee per year.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no anticipated costs or savings to persons other than 
small businesses, businesses, or local government entities, as this rule does 
not create any more requirements for them.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The compliance costs would be the 
same or less than existing requirements of this rule.  Asbestos information 
distribution requirements are estimated to be $10 to $20 per project.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The fiscal impact this rule may have on business should be 
minimal as compliance costs would be the same or less than existing 
requirements, and the information distribution requirements are estimated to 
be $10 to $20 per project.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/12/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36176.htm



HEALTH
HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY
No. 36186 (Amendment): R414-501-2. Definitions.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This amendment updates the definition of 
"Significant Change" to include a provision for a mental illness or an 
intellectual disability or related condition.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no impact to the state budget because this 
change only updates a definition in the rule text to reflect Medicaid policy 
on preadmission screening for nursing facility admission.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no impact to local governments because they 
neither evaluate residents for nursing facility admission nor provide nursing 
facility services to Medicaid recipients.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no impact to small businesses because this 
change only updates a definition in the rule text to reflect Medicaid policy 
on preadmission screening for nursing facility admission.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no impact to nursing facilities, providers and residents 
because this change only updates a definition in the rule text to reflect 
Medicaid policy on preadmission screening for nursing facility admission.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There is no impact to a single 
nursing facility, provider or resident because this change only updates a 
definition in the rule text to reflect Medicaid policy on preadmission 
screening for nursing facility admission.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Streamlining policy may have a positive fiscal impact on 
providers as reporting is simplified.  Public comment will be carefully 
evaluated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36186.htm

No. 36187 (Repeal and Reenact): R414-503. Preadmission Screening and Resident 
Review.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  All requirements of the repealed rule are 
reenacted in the proposed rule.  In contrast to the repealed rule, this new 
rule updates and clarifies preadmission and screening policies, removes the 
administrative requirement for nursing facilities to perform an annual 
resident review, updates terminology to the more appropriate term of 
"intellectual disability" instead of "mental retardation," and removes other 
ambiguous language throughout the text.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no impact to the state budget because this 
change only clarifies and updates preadmission and screening policies for 
health care professionals who evaluate and screen residents for nursing 
facility admission.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no impact to local governments because they 
neither evaluate residents for nursing facility admission nor provide nursing 
facility services to Medicaid recipients.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no impact to small businesses because this 
change only clarifies and updates preadmission and screening policies for 
health care professionals who evaluate and screen residents for nursing 
facility admission.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no impact to nursing facilities, providers and residents 
because this change only clarifies and updates preadmission and screening 
policies for health care professionals who evaluate and screen residents for 
nursing facility admission.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There is no impact to a single 
nursing facility, provider or resident because this change only clarifies and 
updates preadmission and screening policies for health care professionals who 
evaluate and screen residents for nursing facility admission.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Streamlining policy may have a positive fiscal impact on 
providers as reporting is simplified. Public comment will be carefully 
evaluated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36187.htm

FAMILY HEALTH AND PREPAREDNESS, EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
No. 36182 (Amendment): R426-16. Emergency Medical Services Ambulance Rates 
and Charges.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Fiscal Reporting Guides (FRGs) are financial 
and statistical data collected from all EMS agencies statewide.  The data 
collected showed EMS Rates need to be increased at 4.36% so agencies 
statewide will have revenues matching expenses.  Rule R426-16 needs to be 
amended to reflect these ground ambulance transport changes.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  State budget will not be impacted as this is a user fee.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local government budgets will not be impacted 
significantly.  The rates listed in the rule are increased 4.36%.  The EMS 
agency billings increase by 4.36% which will offset declining collections, 
wage increases, and the increased fuel and equipment costs.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Emergency Medical Service budgets will not be impacted.  
The ambulance transport rate increase is 4.36% from current ambulance rates 
to offset declining collections, wage increases, and the increased fuel and 
equipment costs.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Emergency Medical Service budgets will not be impacted.  The 
ambulance transport rate increase is 4.36% from current ambulance rates to 
offset declining collections, wage increases, and the increased fuel and 
equipment costs.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  EMS agencies are allowed to bill the 
rates listed in the proposed rule and there are no costs to the agency for 
compliance.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Based on accepted accounting measures, the proposed increase is 
needed to maintain the solvency of ambulance service within Utah.  Increase 
is based on a careful analysis of the cost of doing business.  Individuals 
that use this service will experience an added cost, some of which will be 
born by health insurers.  Public comment will be carefully evaluated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Allan Liu by phone at 801-273-6664, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at aliu@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36182.htm



HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36211 (Amendment): R477-6. Compensation.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  A phrase is added in Subsection R477-6-
4(2)(a) to clarify "employee."  A phrase is removed from Subsection R477-6-
4(2)(c).  Schedule AH is added to Subsection R477-6-4(4)(e).  Subsection 
R477-6-6(2)(a) is removed because of its impracticality since it is not 
always possible due to federal laws that limit its application.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  These changes are administrative and do not directly 
impact state budgets.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This rule only affects the executive branch of state 
government and will have no impact on local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This rule only affects the executive branch of state 
government and will have no impact on small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule only affects the executive branch of state government and 
will have no impact on other persons.  This rule has no financial impact on 
state employees.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There is no direct compliance cost 
for these amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Rules published by the Department of Human Resource Management 
(DHRM) have no direct effect on businesses or any entity outside state 
government.  DHRM has authority to write rules only to the extent allowed by 
the Utah Personnel Management Act, Title 67, Chapter 19.  This act limits the 
provisions of career service and these rules to employees of the executive 
branch of state government.  The only possible impact may be a very slight, 
indirect effect if an agency passes costs or savings on to business through 
fees.  However, it is anticipated that the minimal costs associated with 
these changes will be absorbed by agency budgets and will have no effect on 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- J.J. Acker by phone at 801-538-4297, by FAX at 801-538-3081, or by Internet 
E-mail at jacker@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36211.htm



INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36215 (Amendment): R590-162. Actuarial Opinion and Memorandum Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule affects all life insurance 
companies and fraternal benefit societies doing business in Utah. The 
amendments:  1) require that all life insurance companies and fraternal 
benefit societies, regardless of size, file an actuarial opinion based on an 
asset adequacy analysis; 2) require domestic life insurers to submit, by 
March 15th of each year, and all foreign licensed life insurers to complete 
and make available to the department upon request, the Regulatory Asset 
Adequacy Issues Summary (RAAIS), a confidential document, providing details 
regarding the asset adequacy analysis; and 3) provide a process for the 
foreign insurers to file actuarial opinions based on the laws of the state of 
their domicile.  These proposed amendments are intended to improve the 
regulatory oversight and to help Utah comply with the accreditation standards 
of the NAIC.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The department is already asking domestic life insurers, 
of which there are 16, to provide the department with the Regulatory Asset 
Adequacy Issues Summary (RAAIS) document noted in 6 above. Once received the 
department would put it in the company's file.  It would not require the 
department to hire additional employees or work overtime.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The changes to this rule will have no fiscal impact on 
local governments since they deal solely with the relationship between the 
department and its licensees.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This rule will not affect small businesses.  It will 
only affect life and fraternal life insurers doing business in Utah; all of 
which have over 50 employees.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The changes in this rule may affect at least four out of sixteen 
domestic life insurers that are not already complying with the requirements 
of the rule.  Of the four that are not complying yet, one said it could 
comply without any problem or added expense, and three others could possibly 
ask to be exempted from the rule since they have very little or no insurance 
business outside of the state, or they could hire a consultant to file the 
form for two to three years until their in-house actuary is able to do it, or 
they could just hire it out every year to a consultant to do it for them.  
Consultants may charge as much as $200 per hour.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The changes in this rule may affect 
at least four out of sixteen domestic life insurers that are not already 
complying with the requirements of the rule.  Of the four that are not 
complying yet, one said it could comply without any problem or added expense, 
and three others could possibly ask to be exempted from the rule since they 
have very little or no insurance business outside of the state, or they could 
hire a consultant to file the form for two to three years until their in-
house actuary is able to do it, or they could just hire it out every year to 
a consultant to do it for them.  Consultants may charge as much as $200 per 
hour.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The new requirements in this rule may financially impact one to 
three of our sixteen domestic life insurers.  Two of these could ask to be 
exempted from the rule and not be impacted at all.  It should be noted that 
the department has received no written comments from our domestic life 
insurers to the effect that the rule will have a negative impact on them or 
their business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jilene Whitby by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by 
Internet E-mail at jwhitby@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36215.htm

No. 36222 (New Rule): R590-264. Property and Casualty Actuarial Opinion Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule:  1) requires all property and 
casualty insurance companies doing business in Utah to prepare annually an 
Actuarial Opinion Summary providing details of the analysis performed by the 
appointed actuary;  2) requires all property and casualty insurance companies 
domiciled in Utah to file the Actuarial Opinion Summary with the Utah 
Insurance Commissioner; and 3) allows property and casualty insurance 
companies doing business in Utah the ability to request confidentiality for 
the Actuarial Opinion Summary.  The rule is intended to improve regulatory 
oversight and to help Utah comply with the accreditation standards of the 
NAIC.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  Domestic property and casualty insurers are already 
filing the actuarial opinion summary with the department.  As a result there 
will be no additional cost or savings.  It is being put into this rule to 
comply with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' 
Accreditation Standards.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This rule will have no fiscal impact on local 
governments since it deals solely with the relationship between the 
department and its licensees.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This rule requires all property and casualty insurers 
licensed to do business in Utah to file an actuarial opinion summary with the 
department.  All are already filing the form with the department.  Most 
insurers are large employers.  Seven of our twelve domestic property and 
casualty insurers are considered small employers.  The form requires 
disclosure of information related to reserve ranges and risks related to it.  
No additional analysis is required to complete the form.  It should be noted 
that Utah is one of the last states to put this law into effect.  This rule 
will create no additional cost or savings for property and casualty insurers 
doing business in Utah.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule requires all property and casualty insurers licensed to 
do business in Utah to file an actuarial opinion summary with the department. 
All are already filing the form with the department.  The form requires 
disclosure of information related to reserve ranges and risks related to it. 
No additional analysis is required to complete the form.  This rule will 
create no additional cost or savings for property and casualty insurers doing 
business in Utah.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  This rule requires all property and 
casualty insurers licensed to do business in Utah to file an actuarial 
opinion summary with the department. All are already filing the form with the 
department.  The form requires disclosure of information related to reserve 
ranges and risks related to it.  No additional analysis is required to 
complete the form.  This rule will create no additional cost or savings for 
property and casualty insurers doing business in Utah.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule will create no additional cost or savings to property 
and casualty insurers doing business in Utah since they are already complying 
with the rule.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jilene Whitby by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by 
Internet E-mail at jwhitby@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36222.htm



NATURAL RESOURCES
WILDLIFE RESOURCES
No. 36158 (Amendment): R657-5. Taking Big Game.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed revision to the above listed 
rule amends the requirement for smokeless powder in muzzleloaders, allows for 
the use of a blood tracking dog to track and locate wounded big game, and 
adds antlerless elk to the list of permits eligible to take wildlife during a 
second permits season.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This amendment adds additional opportunity to harvest an 
antlerless elk, as well as provides sportsmen with additional options for 
smokeless powder and aid in the retrieval of wounded big game animals.  It 
does not increase workload for the agency therefore, the Division of Wildlife 
Resources (DWR) determines that this amendment does not create a cost or 
savings impact to the state budget or DWR's budget, since the changes will 
not increase workload and can be carried out with existing budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This amendment only adds additional opportunity to 
harvest an antlerless elk, as well as provides sportsmen with additional 
options for smokeless powder and aid in the retrieval of wounded big game 
animals.  It does not place additional requirements on individual hunters or 
the local governments.  The division finds that this filing does not create 
any direct cost or savings impact to local governments.  Nor are local 
governments indirectly impacted because the rule does not create a situation 
requiring services from local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This amendment increases opportunity to harvest an 
antlerless elk, as well as provides sportsmen with additional options for 
smokeless powder and aid in the retrieval of wounded big game animals.  It 
does not have the potential to generate a cost or savings impact to small 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This amendment increases opportunity to harvest an antlerless elk, 
as well as provides sportsmen with additional options for smokeless powder 
and aid in the retrieval of wounded big game animals.  It does not have the 
potential to generate a cost or savings impact to sportsmen or other persons.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  This amendment increases opportunity 
to harvest an antlerless elk, as well as provides sportsmen with additional 
options for smokeless powder and aid in the retrieval of wounded big game 
animals.  DWR determines that this amendment will not create additional costs 
for those who participate in wildlife-related activities in Utah.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The amendments to this rule do not have a potential to create an 
impact on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by 
Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36158.htm

No. 36159 (Amendment): R657-62. Drawing Application Procedures.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is being amended to remove Section 
R657-62-9 "Bonus Point Forfeiture".
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This rule amendment removes criteria requiring sportsmen 
to apply every three years in order to keep bonus points; removing this 
requirement does not create a cost or savings to the division.  Therefore, 
the Division of Wildlife Resources (DWR) determines that theses amendments 
will not create any cost or savings impact to the state budget or DWR's 
budget, since the changes will not increase workload and can be carried out 
with existing budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Since this amendment simplifies existing criteria that 
have already been set by rule, this filing does not create any direct cost or 
savings impact to local governments since they are not directly affected by 
the rule.  Nor are local governments indirectly impacted because the rule 
does not create a situation requiring services from local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This amended rule will stop penalizing those who do not 
choose to apply in the big game draw every three years.  Because there are no 
additional requirements being added, it will not generate a cost or saving 
impact to small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This amended rule will stop penalizing those who do not choose to 
apply in the big game draw every three years.  There are no additional 
requirements being added and it will not generate a cost or saving impact to 
other persons.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  This amended rule will stop 
penalizing those who do not choose to apply in the big game draw every three 
years.  Because there are no additional requirements being added, it will not 
generate a cost or saving impact.  DWR determines that this amendment will 
not create a cost or savings impact to individuals who participate in hunting 
in Utah.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The amendments to this rule do not create an impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by 
Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36159.htm



PUBLIC SAFETY
FIRE MARSHAL
No. 36188 (Amendment): R710-7-2. Definitions.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  A summary of the rule amendment is as 
follows:  in Subsection R710-7-2(2.12), the Board proposes to modify the 
definition of the term "Service".  There was a concern of the industry that 
while cleaning and servicing the fire suppression hood system, during the 
maintenance and after the system was cleaned, the system would be properly 
maintained and able to function appropriately.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There would be no aggregate anticipated cost or savings 
to the state budget because any increase of time to complete certification 
would be completed by existing staff with no additional cost.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There would be no aggregate anticipated cost or savings 
to local government as this has no impact or bearing on local government 
functions.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There would be an aggregate cost to small businesses of 
$300 per business for the license and $40 for each individual certification.  
If the company was already licensed and certified to do portable fire 
extinguishers, the above costs would then be $150 for the license and $10 for 
the certifications.   It is impossible to make an informed competent 
aggregate estimate due to the unknown number of licenses which could be 
purchased and the unknown number of individual employees each business would 
want to become certified.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There would be an aggregate cost to an individual of $300 for the 
license and $40 for their own certification.  If the individual was already 
licensed and certified to do portable fire extinguishers, the above costs 
would then be $150 for the license and $10 for the certifications.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There is a cost for certification of 
individuals in the amount of $40.  If an individual is currently certified to 
service portable fire extinguishers, then the cost is reduced to $10.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There will be a $150 to $300 charge for licensing businesses and 
a $10 to $40 fee for individual certification.  The Kitchen/Exhaust 
Inspection and Cleaning Industry requested that the rule be amended to assist 
them with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) adopted requirement 
that they be certified to work on and/or clean automatic fire suppression 
hood systems.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Coy Porter by phone at 801-284-6358, by FAX at 801-284-6351, or by Internet 
E-mail at coyporter@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36188.htm



PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36195 (Amendment): R746-100. Practice and Procedures Governing Formal 
Hearings.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  In Subsection R746-100-3(C), the rule change 
removes the restriction on filing documents with the Commission in PDF 
format, while providing that any such documents for which PDF is not the 
original format be accompanied by the source document in original format with 
a footnoted cross-reference.  In Section R746-100-8, the current reference to 
"Rule 26(b)(4)" is corrected to "Rule 26(a)(4)."
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings to the state budget.  The 
rule was reviewed to update technological changes to be consistent with 
today's technology.  Nonsubstantive changes were made in the process.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings to local government.  The 
rule was reviewed to update technological changes to be consistent with 
today's technology.  Nonsubstantive changes were made in the process.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings to small businesses.  The 
rule was reviewed to update technological changes to be consistent with 
today's technology.  Nonsubstantive changes were made in the process.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings to small businesses, businesses or 
local government entities. T he rule was reviewed to update technological 
changes to be consistent with today's technology.  Nonsubstantive changes 
were made in the process.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The proposed changes do not generate 
compliance costs.  Any compliance costs associated with these rules are not 
adversely affected by the proposed changes in the existing rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In Subsection R746-100-3(C), because the change simplifies the 
preparation of some complex documents utilities prepare for commission 
filing, it may in some unquantified way reduce their costs of complying with 
the rule.  As noted above under "Purpose of the rule", the new language was 
developed in cooperation with the two utilities who recommended the rule 
change.  In Section R746-100-8, the proposed change is a nonsubstantive 
correction and does not have a fiscal impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- David Clark by phone at 801-530-6708, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by 
Internet E-mail at drexclark@utah.gov
- Sheri Bintz by phone at 801-530-6714, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by 
Internet E-mail at sbintz@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36195.htm

No. 36214 (New Rule): R746-313. Electric Service Reliability.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule requires each electric corporation 
and distribution electrical cooperative that is also a public utility as 
defined in Subsection 54-2-1(16) to have a written electric service 
reliability program approved by its governing authority to ensure reliable 
electric service is provided to each electric service customer in accordance 
with Section 54-3-1.  The rule requires these entities to provide annual 
reports on electric service reliability and major event reports to the 
commission and/or the board of directors of the distribution electrical 
cooperative.  This rule also identifies the standards (The Institute of 
Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Inc., Standard IEEE 1366 -- 2003 
Guide for Electric Power Distribution Reliability Indices and/or the United 
States Department of Agriculture Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Bulletin 
1730A-119 Interruption Reporting and Service Continuity Objectives for 
Electric Distribution Systems) for which electric service reliability indices 
will be calculated and provides requirements for addressing inquiries about 
electric service reliability.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This rule will have no cost effect on the state budget, 
however, to the extent electric service reliability is improved or does not 
degrade below that which is already provided, or adverse electric service 
reliability impacts are avoided, the rule benefits the State and the State 
budget in general.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This rule will have no cost effect on local governments 
who operate their own municipal electric utility systems.   This rule will 
have no cost effect on local governments who are supplied electricity via a 
rural electric cooperative or an investor-owned utility, however, to the 
extent electric service reliability is improved or does not degrade below 
that which is already provided, or adverse electric service reliability 
impacts are avoided, the rule benefits local governments and their 
constituents.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This rule will have no direct cost effect on small 
businesses.  Small businesses benefit to the extent electric service 
reliability is improved or does not degrade below that which is already 
provided, or adverse electric service reliability impacts are avoided.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Other than rural electric cooperatives and investor-owned electric 
utilities, this rule will have no direct cost affect on persons other than 
small businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  Persons other 
than rural electric cooperatives and investor-owned electric utilities 
benefit to the extent electric service reliability is improved or does not 
degrade below that which is already provided, or adverse electric service 
reliability impacts are avoided.  This rule formalizes the practices, 
commitments and standards related to evaluating, tracking and measuring 
electric service reliability, which generally are currently being utilized by 
electric corporations and distribution electrical cooperatives which are also 
public utilities.  Electric corporations could incur costs associated with 
penalties for violation of approved standards or electric service reliability 
program elements.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  This rule formalizes the practices, 
commitments and standards related to evaluating, tracking and measuring 
electric service reliability, which generally are currently being utilized by 
electric corporations and distribution electrical cooperatives which are also 
public utilities.  Electric corporations could incur costs associated with 
penalties for violation of approved standards or electric service reliability 
program elements.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule is important to ensure electric customers are provided 
electric service which is adequate, efficient, just and reasonable as 
required by Section 54-3-1.  This rule will have no fiscal impact on 
businesses and may provide a benefit in the form of electric service 
reliability.  This rule benefits businesses in general as reliable electric 
service is one of the cornerstones for reliable business operations.  
Previously, commitments to electric service reliability by electric 
corporations were parts of voluntary merger commitments.  This rule will 
ensure lasting requirements for electric service reliability which benefits 
businesses and the State of Utah in general.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- David Clark by phone at 801-530-6708, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by 
Internet E-mail at drexclark@utah.gov
- Sheri Bintz by phone at 801-530-6714, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by 
Internet E-mail at sbintz@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36214.htm

No. 36208 (Amendment): R746-405-2. Format and Construction of Tariffs.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The requirement for an electronic document 
that is an "exact copy" of the filed paper copy is deleted in favor of a 
requirement for an electronic document that is "substantially the same as" 
the filed paper copy.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No effect to state budget, only a change regarding 
filing requirements of electronic documents.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No effect to local government, only a change regarding 
filing requirements of electronic documents.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No effect to small businesses, only a change regarding 
filing requirements of electronic documents.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No effect to small businesses, businesses or local government 
entities, only a change regarding filing requirements of electronic 
documents.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The proposed changes do not generate 
compliance costs.  Any compliance costs associated with these rules are not 
adversely affected by the proposed changes in the existing rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule change makes compliance easier and more certain, and 
assures software differences between the systems of those filing documents 
and the commission will not adversely affect compliance.  Any fiscal impact 
of this change would be positive.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- David Clark by phone at 801-530-6708, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by 
Internet E-mail at drexclark@utah.gov
- Sheri Bintz by phone at 801-530-6714, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by 
Internet E-mail at sbintz@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36208.htm



REGENTS (BOARD OF)
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36165 (Amendment): R765-604. New Century Scholarship.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  If a scholarship recipient fails to maintain 
a 3.0 grade point average, or higher, in a single semester the recipient will 
be placed on probation the following semester to allow the recipient to earn 
the required GPA while still receiving the scholarship for that probationary 
semester.  If the necessary GPA is not achieved during the probationary 
semester, the scholarship will be revoked.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no associated cost nor savings to the state 
budget associated with this amendment.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This amendment does not affect any local government 
budget and therefore will not present a cost nor a savings to local 
governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This rule, and this proposed amendment has no affect on 
small business and therefore does not present a cost nor savings to small 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This entire rule pertains to students who qualify for scholarship 
funds.  This amendment does not provide additional costs or savings to such 
recipients since it merely clarifies the timeframe when a scholarship will be 
revoked if the recipient does not maintain the required academic grade point 
average as has been outlined in the rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs 
associated with this rule or this amendment for affected persons.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no fiscal impacts on businesses from this rule or this 
amendment.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Ronell Crossley by phone at 801-321-7291, by FAX at 801-321-7299, or by 
Internet E-mail at rcrossley@utahsbr.edu
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36165.htm



SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH GOVERNING AUTH.
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36156 (New Rule): R856-1. Formation and Funding of Utah Science 
Technology and Research Innovation Teams.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule relates to all funds allocated to 
Utah Science Technology and Research innovation teams by the Utah Science 
Technology and Research Governing Authority.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no anticipated cost to the state budget as 
this is an instruction detailing when and how the Utah Science Technology and 
Research Governing Authority allocates money appropriated to it by the 
Legislature.  Additionally, there will be no savings as this is a new process 
that will likely have no cost associated with it.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no anticipated cost to local government 
as this is an instruction detailing when and how the Utah Science Technology 
and Research Governing Authority allocates money appropriated to it by the 
Legislature.  Additionally, there will be no savings as this is a new process 
that will likely have no cost associated with it.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no anticipated cost to small businesses as 
this is an instruction detailing when and how the Utah Science Technology and 
Research Governing Authority allocates money appropriated to it by the 
Legislature.  Additionally, there will be no savings as this is a new process 
that will likely have no cost associated with it.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no anticipated cost to other persons as this is an 
instruction detailing when and how the Utah Science Technology and Research 
Governing Authority allocates money appropriated to it by the Legislature.  
Additionally, there will be no savings as this is a new process that will 
likely have no cost associated with it.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no compliance cost to 
any affected persons as this is an instruction detailing when and how the 
Utah Science Technology and Research Governing Authority allocates money 
appropriated to it by the Legislature.  Additionally, there will be no 
savings as this is a new process that will likely have no cost associated 
with it.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  As there will be no aggregate anticipated costs or savings to 
the state budget, local government, or other persons, and no compliance costs 
for affected persons, the department anticipates no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Ronda Robbins Jones by phone at 801-538-8622, by FAX at 801-538-8881, or by 
Internet E-mail at rljones@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36156.htm

No. 36155 (New Rule): R856-2. Distribution of Utah Science Technology and 
Research Commercialization Revenues.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule relates to all revenues generated 
through the Utah Science Technology and Research Project.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no anticipated cost to the state budget as 
this is an instruction detailing when and how the Utah Science Technology and 
Research Governing Authority allocates money earned through any innovation 
team technology commercialization process.  Additionally, there will be no 
savings as this is a new process that will likely have no cost associated 
with it.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no anticipated cost to local government 
as this is an instruction detailing when and how the Utah Science Technology 
and Research Governing Authority allocates money earned through any 
innovation team technology commercialization process.  Additionally, there 
will be no savings as this is a new process that will likely have no cost 
associated with it.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no anticipated cost to small businesses as 
this is an instruction detailing when and how the Utah Science Technology and 
Research Governing Authority allocates money earned through any innovation 
team technology commercialization process.  Additionally, there will be no 
savings as this is a new process that will likely have no cost associated 
with it.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no anticipated cost to other persons as this is an 
instruction detailing when and how the Utah Science Technology and Research 
Governing Authority allocates money earned through any innovation team 
technology commercialization process.  Additionally, there will be no savings 
as this is a new process that will likely have no cost associated with it.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no compliance cost to 
any affected persons as this is an instruction detailing when and how the 
Utah Science Technology and Research Governing Authority allocates money 
earned through any innovation team technology commercialization process.  
Additionally, there will be no savings as this is a new process that will 
likely have no cost associated with it.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  As there will be no aggregate anticipated costs or savings to 
the state budget, local government, or other persons, and no compliance costs 
for affected persons, we anticipate no fiscal impact on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Ronda Robbins Jones by phone at 801-538-8622, by FAX at 801-538-8881, or by 
Internet E-mail at rljones@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36155.htm



TAX COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36172 (Amendment): R861-1A-20. Time of Appeal Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. 
Sections 59-1-301, 59-1-501, 59-2-1007, 59-7-517, 59-10-532, 59-10-533, 59-
10-535, 59-12-114, 59-13-210, 63G-4-201, 63G-4-401, 68-3-7, and 68-3-8.5.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed amendment clarifies that Motor 
Vehicle Division and Motor Vehicle Enforcement Division actions must be 
appealed within 30 days of the date of a notice that creates the right to 
appeal, and indicates when an appeal is deemed to be timely filed.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--The proposed amendment matches long-standing 
agency practice.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--The proposed amendment matches long-standing 
agency practice.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--The proposed amendment matches long-standing 
agency practice.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: None--The proposed amendment matches long-standing agency practice.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--The proposed amendment mirrors 
the direction the Motor Vehicle  Division and Motor Vehicle Enforcement 
Division have included on notices of action.  There is no change in practice.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This amendment conforms the rule to agency practice this 
creating no fiscal impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or by 
Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36172.htm


AUDITING
No. 36170 (Amendment): R865-6F-6. Application of Corporation Franchise or 
Income Tax Acts to Qualified Corporations and to Nonqualified Foreign 
Corporations Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Section 59-7-104.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed amendment deletes language 
providing that delivery of goods in a seller's own vehicle, if above a de 
minimis level, creates nexus for corporation income, and franchise tax 
purposes.  This change reflects current agency practice and results from case 
law and amendments to the corresponding Multistate Tax Commission model rule.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--The proposed amendment amends the rule to match 
long-standing agency practice.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--The proposed amendment amends the rule to match 
long-standing agency practice.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--The proposed amendment amends the rule to match 
long-standing agency practice.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: None--The proposed amendment amends the rule to match long-standing 
agency practice.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--The proposed amendment amends 
the rule to match long-standing agency practice.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This change conforms the rule with law and practice thus 
creating no fiscal impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or by 
Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36170.htm

No. 36173 (Amendment): R865-9I-49. Higher Education Savings Incentive Program 
Administration Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Sections 53B-8a-112, 59-10-114, and 
59-10-1017.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed amendment revises the date by 
which the trustee of the Utah Educational Savings Plan Trust must file 
information with the Tax Commission concerning amounts contributed to or 
disbursed from the trust from January 31 to March 31.  This change is made at 
the request of the Utah Educational Savings Plan management.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--The proposed amendment delays the time for filing 
a report with the Tax Commission.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--The proposed amendment delays the time for filing 
a report with the Tax Commission.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--The proposed amendment delays the time for filing 
a report with the Tax Commission.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: None--The proposed amendment delays the time for filing a report 
with the Tax Commission.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--The proposed amendment delays 
the time for filing a report with the Tax Commission and results from a 
request from the one entity that files the report.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The delayed report deadline should have no fiscal impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or by 
Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36173.htm

No. 36171 (Amendment): R865-12L-14. Local Sales and Use Tax Distributions and 
Redistributions Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Sections 59-12-210 and 59-12-
210.1.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed amendment updates the current 
rule on sales tax redistributions to reflect that under H.B. 476 (2012), 
telecommunications charges may only be redistributed in certain 
circumstances.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in 
H.B. 476 (2012).
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in 
H.B. 476 (2012).
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in 
H.B. 476 (2012).
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in H.B. 476 
(2012).
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--The proposed amendment 
indicates the instances in which the Tax Commission may redistribute 
telecommunications charges.  Telecommunications charges will now be 
redistributed under the same circumstances as sales taxes.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule change reflects a statutory change thus creates no 
independent fiscal impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or by 
Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36171.htm

No. 36175 (Amendment): R865-19S-123. Specie Legal Tender Pursuant to Utah 
Code Ann. Section 59-12-107.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed section indicates the London 
fixing price that a seller shall use to determine the amount of sales tax due 
in specie legal tender and in dollars when the London fixing price is not 
available for the day on which a purchase is made in specie legal tender.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in 
H.B. 157 (2012).
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in 
H.B. 157 (2012).
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in 
H.B. 157 (2012).
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in H.B. 157 
(2012).
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--The proposed rule indicates to 
use the latest available London fixing price to determine the tax on a 
transaction conducted in specie legal tender if there is no London fixing 
price available for the day on which the transaction occurs.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This proposal adopts the same standard as the amendments made to 
statute by H.B. 157 (2012), therefore, there is no fiscal impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or by 
Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36175.htm


COLLECTIONS
No. 36168 (Amendment): R867-2B-2. Jeopardy Assessment Pursuant to Utah Code 
Ann. Sections 59-1-701 and 59-1-702.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The section is removed since the statute that 
authorizes it has been repealed in S.B. 243 (2012).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in 
S.B. 243 (2012).
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in 
S.B. 243 (2012).
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in 
S.B. 243 (2012).
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in S.B. 243 
(2012).
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--This section is removed since 
the statutes authorizing it have been repealed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This amendment is necessary due to a statutory change made by 
S.B. 243 (2012), thus creating no new fiscal impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or by 
Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36168.htm

No. 36169 (Amendment): R867-2B-4. Uniform Affixing and Displaying of Drug 
Stamps Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Section 59-19-104.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The section is removed since the statute that 
authorizes it has been repealed in S.B. 243 (2012).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in 
S.B. 243 (2012).
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in 
S.B. 243 (2012).
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in 
S.B. 243 (2012).
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: None--Any fiscal impact would have been considered in S.B. 243 
(2012).
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--Any fiscal impact would have 
been considered in S.B. 243 (2012).
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This amendment is necessary due to a statutory change made by 
S.B. 243 (2012), thus creating no new fiscal impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or by 
Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36169.htm


PROPERTY TAX
No. 36174 (Amendment): R884-24P-66. County Board of Equalization Procedures 
and Appeals Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Section 59-2-1004.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed amendment modifies the 
information a property owner must supply a county BOE at the time the 
property owner is applying to appeal the valuation of property for property 
tax purposes.  The amendment requires the property owner provide, at the time 
of application, evidence or documentation that supports the property owner's 
claim for relief.  This differs from the current language that requires 
simply a statement indicating the evidence the property owner will present to 
the BOE and returns to language that was in place prior to 04/12/2012.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--Property tax revenues are local revenues.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--The proposed amendment requires a person 
appealing property tax to provide evidence supporting a claim for relief at 
the time of application as opposed to at the hearing.  This matches language 
in place up to 04/12/2012.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--The proposed amendment requires a person appealing 
property tax to provide evidence supporting a claim for relief at the time of 
application as opposed to at the hearing.  This matches language in place up 
to 04/12/2012.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: None--The proposed amendment requires a person appealing property 
tax to provide evidence supporting a claim for relief at the time of 
application as opposed to at the hearing.  This matches language in place up 
to 04/12/2012.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--The proposed amendment requires 
a person appealing property tax to provide evidence supporting a claim for 
relief at the time of application as opposed to at the hearing.  This matches 
language in place up to 04/12/2012.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This change returns to the practice in place prior to 04/12/2012 
so there should be no fiscal impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or by 
Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36174.htm



TRANSPORTATION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36178 (Amendment): R907-68 (Changed to R940-6). Prioritization of New 
Transportation Capacity Projects.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The change replaces "capacity" with 
"mobility,"  renumbers the rule to fall under Title R940 Transportation 
Commission, Administration," and makes other technical and stylistic changes.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget because the change only aligns the language of the rule with the 
department's strategic initiatives.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government because the change only aligns the language of the rule with the 
department's strategic initiatives.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses because the change only aligns the language of the rule with the 
department's strategic initiatives.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities because the change only 
aligns the language of the rule with the department's strategic initiatives.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no anticipated compliance 
costs for affected persons because the change only aligns the language of the 
rule with the department's strategic initiatives.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated fiscal impact on businesses because the 
change only aligns the language of the rule with the department's strategic 
initiatives.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christine Newman by phone at 801-965-4026, by FAX at 801-965-4338, or by 
Internet E-mail at cwnewman@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36178.htm



WORKFORCE SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36193 (New Rule): R982-401. Energy Assistance:  General Provisions.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R195-1 and will now be R982-401.  The 
statutory references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  
The old department and division names were also changed to reflect the 
changes in H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings were 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings were as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
were as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings were as a result of H.B. 
139 and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be costs or savings to any 
affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings were as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change. There 
are no fees associated with this change. There will be no cost to anyone to 
comply with these changes. There will be no fiscal impact on any business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36193.htm

No. 36194 (New Rule): R982-402. Energy Assistance Programs Standards..
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R195-2 and will now be R982-402.  The 
statutory references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  
The old department and division names were also changed to reflect the 
changes in H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings are 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 
and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no costs or savings to 
any affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and 
any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36194.htm

No. 36196 (New Rule): R982-403. Energy Assistance Income Standards, Income 
Eligibility, and Payment Determination.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R195-3 and will now be R982-403.  The 
statutory references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  
The old department and division names were also changed to reflect the 
changes in H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings are 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 
and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no costs or savings to 
any affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and 
any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36196.htm

No. 36197 (New Rule): R982-404. Energy Assistance:  Asset Standards.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R195-4 and will now be R982-404.  The 
statutory references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  
The old department and division names were also changed to reflect the 
changes in H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings are 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 
and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no costs or savings to 
any affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and 
any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36197.htm

No. 36207 (New Rule): R982-405. Energy Assistance:  Program Benefits.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R195-5 and will now be R982-405.  The 
statutory references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  
The old department and division names were also changed to reflect the 
changes in H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings are 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 
and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no costs or savings to 
any affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and 
any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36207.htm

No. 36209 (New Rule): R982-406. Energy Assistance:  Eligibility 
Determination.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R195-6 and will now be R982-406.  The 
statutory references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  
The old department and division names were also changed to reflect the 
changes in H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings are 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 
and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no costs or savings to 
any affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and 
any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36209.htm

No. 36210 (New Rule): R982-407. Energy Assistance:  Records and Benefit 
Management.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R195-1 and will now be R982-401.  The 
statutory references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  
The old department and division names were also changed to reflect the 
changes in H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings are 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 
and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no costs or savings to 
any affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and 
any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36210.htm

No. 36212 (New Rule): R982-408. Energy Assistance:  Special State Programs.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R195-8 and will now be R982-408.  The 
statutory references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  
The old department and division names were also changed to reflect the 
changes in H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings are 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 
and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no costs or savings to 
any affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and 
any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36212.htm

No. 36213 (New Rule): R982-501. Olene Walker Housing Loan Fund (OWHLF).
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R235-1 and will now be R982-501.  The 
statutory references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  
The old department and division names were also changed to reflect the 
changes in H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings are 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 
and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no costs or savings to 
any affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and 
any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36213.htm


HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
No. 36216 (New Rule): R990-8. Permanent Community Impact Fund Board Review 
and Approval of Applications for Funding Assistance.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R199-8 and will now be R990-8.  The statutory 
references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  The old 
department and division names were also changed to reflect the changes in 
H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings are 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 
and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no costs or savings to 
any affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and 
any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36216.htm

No. 36217 (New Rule): R990-9. Policy Concerning Enforceability and Taxability 
of Bonds Purchased.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R199-9 and will now be R990-9.  The statutory 
references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  The old 
department and division names were also changed to reflect the changes in 
H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings are 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 
and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no costs or savings to 
any affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and 
any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36217.htm

No. 36218 (New Rule): R990-10. Procedures in Case of Inability to Formulate 
Contract for Alleviation of Impact.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R199-10 and will now be R990-10.  The 
statutory references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  
The old department and division names were also changed to reflect the 
changes in H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings are 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 
and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no costs or savings to 
any affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and 
any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36218.htm

No. 36219 (New Rule): R990-11. Community Development Block Grants (CDBG).
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R199-11 and will now be R990-11.  The 
statutory references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  
The old department and division names were also changed to reflect the 
changes in H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings are 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 
and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no costs or savings to 
any affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and 
any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36219.htm

No. 36221 (New Rule): R990-100. Community Services Block Grant Rules.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R202-100 and will now be R990-100.  The 
statutory references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  
The old department and division names were also changed to reflect the 
changes in H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings are 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 
and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no costs or savings to 
any affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and 
any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36221.htm

No. 36220 (New Rule): R990-101. Qualified Emergency Food Agencies Fund 
(QEFAF).
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule text is the same as the old 
rule.  The old rule number was R202-101 and will now be R990-101.  The 
statutory references have been changed to reflect the new code provisions.  
The old department and division names were also changed to reflect the 
changes in H.B. 139.  No other changes were made.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no costs or savings to the state budget by 
this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings are 
as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no costs or savings to any local 
government's budget by this new rule because the rule already existed and any 
costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to any small business 
by this new rule because the rule already existed and any costs or savings 
are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to any persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government entitles by this new rule because 
the rule already existed and any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 
and not this new rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will be no costs or savings to 
any affected persons by this new rule because the rule already existed and 
any costs or savings are as a result of H.B. 139 and not this new rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36220.htm


UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
No. 36223 (Amendment): R994-403. Claim for Benefits.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The current rule allows claimants some time 
before they are required to make four new job contacts per week.  This 
amendment will only allow one week, the waiting week, after which a claimant 
will be denied benefits if he or she does not contact four new employers per 
week.  This proposed amendment also changes some language to make the rule 
more clear and moves some subsections to a different section for clarity.  
Additionally, the definition of suitable work has been taken out of this rule 
but left in Rule R994-405 to avoid duplicity.  (DAR NOTE:  The proposed 
amendment to Rule R994-405 is under DAR No. 36224 in this issue, June 1, 
2012, of the Bulletin.)
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no costs 
or savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no 
costs of savings to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings to small businesses as 
there are no fees associated with this program and it is federally funded.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities as there are no fees 
associated with this program and it is federally funded.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings to any 
affected persons as there are no fees associated with this program and it is 
federally funded.  These changes will not impact any employer's contribution 
rate.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.  These changes will have no impact on any employers contribution 
tax rate.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36223.htm

No. 36224 (Amendment): R994-405. Ineligibility for Benefits.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The current rule provides that work is not 
suitable during the first one-third of the claim unless that work pays the 
highest wage earned during the base period and uses the highest skill level 
of any work during the base period.  This proposed amendment would require a 
claimant to take a job if the pay and skill level are equal to the average 
skill level and wages used or earned during the base period.  It also changes 
the current rule to provide this would be suitable work during the first half 
of the regular claim, not just the first one-third.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no costs 
or savings to the state budget.  It is anticipated that claimants may return 
to work sooner which would result in a decrease in benefit costs for 
employers including the state.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This is a federally funded program so there are no 
costs of savings to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings to small businesses as 
there are no fees associated with this program and it is federally funded.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities as there are no fees 
associated with this program and it is federally funded.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings to any 
affected persons as there are no fees associated with this program and it is 
federally funded.  These changes will not impact any employers contribution 
rate.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change. There 
are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to anyone to 
comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any business.  
These changes will have no impact on any employers contribution tax rate.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/02/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36224.htm




3.  NOTICES OF 120-DAY (EMERGENCY) RULES

An agency may file a 120-Day (Emergency) Rule when it finds that the regular 
rulemaking procedures would:
(a) cause an imminent peril to the public health, safety, or welfare;
(b) cause an imminent budget reduction because of budget restraints or 
federal requirements; or
(c) place the agency in violation of federal or state law (Subsection 63G-3-
304(1)).

A 120-Day Rule is effective at the moment the Division of Administrative 
Rules receives the filing, or on a later date designated by the agency.  A 
120-Day Rule is effective for 120 days or until it is superseded by a 
permanent rule.

Because 120-Day Rules are effective immediately, the law does not require a 
public comment period.  However, when an agency files a 120-Day Rule, it 
usually files a Proposed Rule at the same time, to make the requirements 
permanent.  Comment may be made on the Proposed Rule.

Emergency or 120-Day Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-304; and Section 
R15-4-8.


AGRICULTURE AND FOOD
ANIMAL INDUSTRY
No. 36143 (Emergency Rule): R58-3. Brucellosis Vaccination Requirements.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Brucellosis vaccination requirements for 
cattle were found in Section 4-31-16.5 which was repealed and the Department 
was given rulemaking authority for the control of bovine brucellosis in Utah 
during the 2012 legislative session.  This change was initiated by actions by 
H.B. 505.
EMERGENCY RULE REASON AND JUSTIFICATION:
REGULAR RULEMAKING PROCEDURES WOULD cause an imminent peril to the public 
health, safety, or welfare.
JUSTIFICATION:  The repeal of Section 4-31-16.5 requires the Department to 
create a rule that outlines the requirements for brucellosis vaccination of 
cattle and bison.  The vaccination of beef cattle for Brucella abortus places 
a barrier between wild elk and bison and the public.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This rule is being enacted as a result of repealing 
Section 4-31-16.5 in the recent legislative session and does not result in 
any increased cost to state government.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The vaccination of cattle and bison has no local 
government input.  If Utah had a brucellosis outbreak in its cattle 
population, local health Departments would be required to investigate human 
brucellosis cases.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Beef cattle producers have been vaccinating their 
replacements heifers for a number of years so this has become a routine herd 
health cost.  The vaccination of replacement heifers has an added value when 
it comes to selling heifers.  If Utah was to have brucellosis in the beef 
cattle population, a large cost for the disease would be borne by producers.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The general public enjoys brucellosis-free meat and milk because of 
the continued disease-free status of Utah beef and dairy cattle which is the 
result of required brucellosis vaccination.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Beef cattle and bison producers will 
bear the burden of the costs associated with the vaccination of their 
animals.  It has been an on-going cost of production, so this rule change 
will not result in any increase.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The Utah Cattlemen's Association as well as individual beef 
cattle producers are requesting that this rule be enacted to replace the 
repealed statute.  A brucellosis-free cattle production in the State of Utah 
is good for the public and the cattle producers.  This rule was reviewed and 
approved by the Agriculture Advisory Board on 05/01/2012.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Bruce King by phone at 801-538-7162, by FAX at 801-538-7169, or by Internet 
E-mail at bking@utah.gov
- Kathleen Mathews by phone at 801-538-7103, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by 
Internet E-mail at kmathews@utah.gov
- Kyle Stephens by phone at 801-538-7102, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by 
Internet E-mail at kylestephens@utah.gov
- Wyatt Frampton by phone at 801-538-7165, by FAX at 801-538-7169, or by 
Internet E-mail at wframpton@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/08/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36143.htm



TRANSPORTATION
PRECONSTRUCTION, RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
No. 36180 (Emergency Rule): R933-2. Control of Outdoor Advertising Signs.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule change defines the word 
"contiguous," defines the concept of a "unified commercial development," and 
specifies what constitutes completed roadway construction for purposes of 
issuing outdoor advertising permits.  These changes will prevent the 
department from being pressured into making permitting decisions before the 
final highway configuration is in place, and clarify the legal distinction 
between what constitutes on-premise verses off-premise advertising.  These 
changes will help the department maintain operational effectiveness of its 
outdoor advertising control program and help ensure compliance with the 
Federal Highway Beautification Act so that eligibility for federal funding is 
not jeopardized.
EMERGENCY RULE REASON AND JUSTIFICATION:
REGULAR RULEMAKING PROCEDURES WOULD cause an imminent budget reduction 
because of budget restraints or federal requirements; and place the agency in 
violation of federal or state law.
JUSTIFICATION:  The rule change is needed immediately to enable the 
department to maintain effective control of outdoor advertising and prevent a 
cut in federal funding for failing to meet requirements of the Federal 
Highway Beautification Act.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  Failing to maintain "effective control" of outdoor 
advertising can trigger a ten percent reduction in total federal highway 
monies received by the state.  This is currently estimated to be in the tens 
of millions of dollars.  Additionally, litigation costs are unknown, but 
expected to be substantial in order to defend against applicants claiming 
inverse commendation for takings arising out of the department not issuing 
outdoor advertising permits in locations where highway construction is 
considered incomplete.  Enacting this rule change will help prevent these 
costs.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government because the rule only applies to outdoor advertising regulated by 
the state.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses because the rule change only clarifies terms used in the rule to 
help the department comply with the Federal Highway Beautification Act.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities because the rule change 
only clarifies terms used in the rule to help the department comply with the 
Federal Highway Beautification Act.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no anticipated costs for 
affected persons except those associated with a possible delay in advertising 
revenue for persons seeking an outdoor advertising permit along a highway 
construction project until construction of the project is completed and a 
permit can be issued.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no anticipated fiscal impacts on businesses except 
those associated with a possible delay in advertising revenue for businesses 
seeking an outdoor advertising permit along a highway construction project 
until construction of the project is completed and a permit can be issued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christine Newman by phone at 801-965-4026, by FAX at 801-965-4338, or by 
Internet E-mail at cwnewman@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/14/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36180.htm




4.  FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION

Within five years of an administrative rule's original enactment or last 
five-year review, the agency is required to review the rule.  This review is 
intended to remove obsolete rules from the Utah Administrative Code.  Upon 
reviewing a rule, an agency may:  repeal the rule by filing a Proposed Rule; 
continue the rule as it is by filing a Notice of Review and Statement of 
Continuation (Notice); or amend the rule by filing a Proposed Rule and by 
filing a Notice.  By filing a Notice, the agency indicates that the rule is 
still necessary. 

The rule text that is being continued may be found in the most recent edition 
of the Utah Administrative Code.  The rule text may also be inspected at the 
agency or the Division of Administrative Rules.  Notices are effective upon 
filing.  

Notices are governed by Section 63G-3-305.


ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION AND MANAGEMENT
No. 36145 (5-year Review): R23-1. Procurement of Construction.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule establishes procedures for the procurement of construction by the 
Division.  This rule needs to be extended in order to assure the appropriate 
rules for the procurement of construction exist.  Therefore, this rule should 
be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Alan Bachman by phone at 801-538-3105, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by 
Internet E-mail at abachman@utah.gov
- Cecilia Niederhauser by phone at 801-538-3261, by FAX at 801-538-9694, or 
by Internet E-mail at cniederhauser@utah.gov
- Chiarina Gleed by phone at 801-538-3240, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by 
Internet E-mail at cgleed@utah.gov
- Priscilla Anderson by phone at 801-538-9595, by FAX at 801-538-3378, or by 
Internet E-mail at phanderson@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/03/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36145.htm

No. 36146 (5-year Review): R23-19. Facility Use Rules.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule is needed in order to continue to regulate the use of state 
facilities and grounds.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Alan Bachman by phone at 801-538-3105, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by 
Internet E-mail at abachman@utah.gov
- Cecilia Niederhauser by phone at 801-538-3261, by FAX at 801-538-9694, or 
by Internet E-mail at cniederhauser@utah.gov
- Chiarina Gleed by phone at 801-538-3240, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by 
Internet E-mail at cgleed@utah.gov
- Priscilla Anderson by phone at 801-538-9595, by FAX at 801-538-3378, or by 
Internet E-mail at phanderson@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/03/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36146.htm

No. 36148 (5-year Review): R23-20. Free Speech Activities.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule needs to be continued in order to assure the proper allowance and 
rules regarding free speech activities.  Therefore, this rule should be 
continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Alan Bachman by phone at 801-538-3105, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by 
Internet E-mail at abachman@utah.gov
- Cecilia Niederhauser by phone at 801-538-3261, by FAX at 801-538-9694, or 
by Internet E-mail at cniederhauser@utah.gov
- Chiarina Gleed by phone at 801-538-3240, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by 
Internet E-mail at cgleed@utah.gov
- Priscilla Anderson by phone at 801-538-9595, by FAX at 801-538-3378, or by 
Internet E-mail at phanderson@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/03/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36148.htm



EDUCATION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36153 (5-year Review): R277-612. Foreign Exchange Students.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
State law continues to provide provisions for the Board to make rules to 
administer the cap on the number of foreign exchange students for purposes of 
apportioning state monies for the students.  Therefore, this rule should be 
continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36153.htm



ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
WATER QUALITY
No. 36190 (5-year Review): R317-3. Design Requirements for Wastewater 
Collection, Treatment and Disposal Systems.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule sets design requirements for construction of wastewater collection, 
treatment, and disposal systems. The Water Quality Board is charged with 
review and approval of these systems.  The rule is required to meet this 
charge, and should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Judy Etherington by phone at 801-536-4344, by FAX at 801-536-4301, or by 
Internet E-mail at jetherington@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36190.htm



HEALTH
HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY
No. 36184 (5-year Review): R414-100. Medicaid Primary Care Network Services.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is necessary because it spells out services available to PCN 
recipients and lists their cost sharing responsibilities.  Therefore, this 
rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/14/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36184.htm

No. 36185 (5-year Review): R414-200. Non-Traditional Medicaid Health Plan 
Services.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is necessary because it spells out services available to NTM 
recipients and lists their cost sharing responsibilities.   Therefore, this 
rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/14/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36185.htm



INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36142 (5-year Review): R590-238. Captive Insurance Companies.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule sets forth the financial, reporting, record-keeping, and other 
requirements necessary for the regulation of captive insurance companies as 
required under the Captive Insurance Companies Act, which is Title 31 A, 
Chapter 37.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jilene Whitby by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by 
Internet E-mail at jwhitby@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36142.htm



NATURAL RESOURCES
WILDLIFE RESOURCES
No. 36149 (5-year Review): R657-2. Adjudicative Proceedings.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R657-2 sets forth the standards and procedures governing all 
adjudicative proceedings before the Wildlife Board and the division 
specifically governing the requests for agency action, declaratory orders 
brought pursuant to Section 63G-4-503, requests for species reclassification 
under Rule R657-3, post issuance requests for a variance or amendment to a 
license, permit, tag or certification of registration.  Rule R657-2 sets the 
standard procedure for filing timelines, pre-hearing procedures, Decisions 
and Orders and Judicial Review, this rule helps to govern the legal 
proceedings for the division.  It is imperative that this rule be in order.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by 
Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/04/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36149.htm

No. 36150 (5-year Review): R657-22. Commercial Hunting Areas.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R657-22 provides the procedures and requirements for establishing, 
maintaining, and operating a commercial hunting area.  The procedures adopted 
in this rule have provided an effective and efficient process.  Continuation 
of this rule is necessary for continued success of the commercial hunting 
area program.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by 
Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/04/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36150.htm

No. 36152 (5-year Review): R657-30. Fishing License for the Terminally Ill.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Continuation of Rule R657-30 is necessary to provide an effective and 
efficient process for issuing free fishing licenses to persons who are 
terminally ill.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by 
Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/04/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36152.htm



PUBLIC SAFETY
FIRE MARSHAL
No. 36198 (5-year Review): R710-1. Concerns Servicing Portable Fire 
Extinguishers.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The sales and servicing of portable fire extinguishers has been regulated in 
the State of Utah for the last 40 years and should continue for the next five 
years.  A portable fire extinguisher is the first line of defense to suppress 
a fire when the fire is in it's incipient stage.  The need for a portable 
fire extinguisher to work correctly is paramount to the early suppression of 
a fire and stopping of the possibility of a conflagration.  If portable fire 
extinguishers are not serviced at all or not serviced correctly, they will 
not function in the event of a fire.  The agency does not disagree with the 
comments received about the non-allowance of "rag and taggers" and agreed 
with the Board's decision to not continue with the administrative rule 
amendment.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Brent Halladay by phone at 801-284-6352, by FAX at 801-284-6351, or by 
Internet E-mail at bhallada@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36198.htm



PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36166 (5-year Review): R746-420. Requests for Approval of a Solicitation 
Process.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R746-420 establishes the procedural and informational requirements for a 
solicitation process by which an affected utility constructs or acquires a 
significant energy resource pursuant to the Utah Energy Resource Procurement 
Act.  Rule R746-420 continues to be necessary because Section 54-17-200 
remains in force.  Therefore, the rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- David Clark by phone at 801-530-6708, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by 
Internet E-mail at drexclark@utah.gov
- Sheri Bintz by phone at 801-530-6714, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by 
Internet E-mail at sbintz@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36166.htm

No. 36167 (5-year Review): R746-430. Procedural and Informational 
Requirements for Action Plans, for an Approval of a Significant Energy 
Resource, for Determination of Whether to Proceed, and for Waivers of a 
Solicitation Process or of an Approval of a Significant Energy Resource.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R746-430 establishes the procedural and informational requirements for 
review of a utility's action plan for approval of significant energy resource 
decision, and when seeking an order to proceed with an approved significant 
energy resource decision pursuant to the Energy Resource Procurement Act.  
Rule R746-430 continues to be necessary because Sections 54-17-301 through 
54-17-304 remain in force.  Therefore, the rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- David Clark by phone at 801-530-6708, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by 
Internet E-mail at drexclark@utah.gov
- Sheri Bintz by phone at 801-530-6714, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by 
Internet E-mail at sbintz@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120601/36167.htm




5.  NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES

State law provides for agencies to make their rules effective and enforceable 
after publication in the Utah State Bulletin. In the case of Proposed Rules 
or Changes in Proposed Rules with a designated comment period, the law 
permits an agency to file a notice of effective date any time after the close 
of comment plus seven days. In the case of Changes in Proposed Rules with no 
designated comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of 
effective date on any date including or after the thirtieth day after the 
rule's publication date. If an agency fails to file a Notice of Effective 
Date within 120 days from the publication of a Proposed Rule or a related 
Change in Proposed Rule the rule lapses and the agency must start the 
rulemaking process over.

Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301(12), 63G-3-
303, and Sections R15-4-5a and 5b. 


EDUCATION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 35932  (AMD): R277-107-6.  Public Education Employees
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/08/2012

No. 35905  (AMD): R277-419-5.  Student Membership
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/08/2012

No. 35933  (AMD): R277-454.  Construction Management of School Building 
Projects
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/08/2012

No. 35935  (NEW): R277-479.  Charter School Special Education Student Funding 
Formula
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/08/2012

No. 35936  (AMD): R277-485.  Loss of Enrollment
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/08/2012

No. 35937  (AMD): R277-720.  Child Nutrition Programs
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/08/2012

No. 35938  (AMD): R277-916.  Technology, Life, and Careers, and Work-Based 
Learning Programs
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/08/2012



ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
AIR QUALITY
No. 35857  (AMD): R307-840.  Lead-Based Paint Program Purpose, Applicability, 
and Definitions
Published:  03/01/2012
Effective:  05/03/2012

No. 35858  (AMD): R307-841.  Residential Property and Child-Occupied Facility 
Renovation
Published:  03/01/2012
Effective:  05/03/2012

No. 35859  (AMD): R307-842.  Lead-Based Paint Activities
Published:  03/01/2012
Effective:  05/03/2012



HEALTH
CENTER FOR HEALTH DATA, HEALTH CARE STATISTICS
No. 35870  (AMD): R428-10.  Health Data Authority Hospital Inpatient 
Reporting Rule
Published:  03/01/2012
Effective:  05/31/2012



PUBLIC SAFETY
PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING
No. 35568  (REP): R728-408.  POST Academy and the Emergency Vehicle 
Operations Range are Secure Facilities
Published:  01/15/2012
Effective:  05/14/2012



PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 35900  (AMD): R746-100.  Practice and Procedures Governing Formal 
Hearings
Published:  03/15/2012
Effective:  05/07/2012

No. 35896  (AMD): R746-405-2.  Format and Construction of Tariffs
Published:  03/15/2012
Effective:  05/07/2012




6.  RULES INDEX

The Rules Index is a cumulative index that reflects all effective Utah 
administrative rules.  The Rules Index is not included Digest.  However, a 
copy of the current Rules Index is available 
http://www.rules.utah.gov/research.htm .


<<end of file>>
