Utah State Digest, Vol. 2012, No. 12 (June 15, 2012)

[NOTE:  The Utah State Digest (Digest) is created from the eRules filing 
database used to create the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin).  While a 
discrepancy between the Digest and the Bulletin is highly unlikely, any 
discrepancies will be resolved in favor of the Bulletin.  Please refer to the 
State Disclaimer ( http://www.utah.gov/disclaimer.html ) for more 
information.}

------------------------------------------------------------

UTAH STATE DIGEST
Summary of the Contents of the Utah State Bulletin


For information filed May 16, 2012, 12:00 AM through June 1, 2012, 11:59 PM


Volume 2012, No. 12
June 15, 2012


Prepared by
Division of Administrative Rules
Department of Administrative Services


The Utah State Digest (Digest) is an official electronic publication of the 
State of Utah, Department of Administrative Services, Division of 
Administrative Rules.  It is a summary of the information found in the Utah 
State Bulletin (Bulletin) of the same volume and issue number.  Inquiries 
concerning the substance or applicability of an administrative rule that 
appear in the Digest should be addressed to the contact person for the rule.  
Questions about the Digest or the rulemaking process may be addressed to:  
Division of Administrative Rules, 5110 State Office Building, Salt Lake City, 
Utah 84114-1201, telephone 801-538-3218, FAX 801-359-0759.  Additional 
rulemaking information, and electronic versions of all administrative rule 
publications are available at:  http://www.rules.utah.gov/ .  The Digest is 
available free of charge online at 
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm and by E-mail Listserv.  




************************************************
Division of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City  84114

Unless otherwise noted, all information presented in this publication is in 
the public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as 
desired.  Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted 
by their respective authors.  Citation to the source is requested.



Utah state digest.
  Semimonthly.
  1.  Delegated legislation--Utah--Digests. I.  Utah. Office 
of Administrative Rules.

KFU38.U8
348.792'025--DDC            86-658042
***********************************************




1.  SPECIAL NOTICES

Notice for July 2012 Medicaid Rate Changes
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/sn152709.htm

Medicaid Physician Reimbursement
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/sn152721.htm

Federally Qualified Health Centers
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/sn152722.htm

Increase of Dental Benefits
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/sn152723.htm

Rehabilitative Services
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/sn152724.htm

Rural Hospital Disproportionate Share Payments
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/sn152729.htm

Medicaid Will Deny Payment for Provider-Preventable Conditions
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/sn152730.htm

Medicaid Home Health Reimbursement
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/sn152732.htm




2.  EXECUTIVE DOCUMENTS

As part of his or her constitutional duties, the Governor periodically issues 
Executive Documents comprised of Executive Orders, Proclamations, and 
Declarations.  "Executive Orders" set policy for the Executive Branch; create 
boards and commissions; provide for the transfer of authority; or otherwise 
interpret, implement, or give administrative effect to a provision of the 
Constitution, state law or executive policy.  "Proclamations" call special or 
extraordinary legislative sessions; designate classes of cities; publish 
states-of-emergency; promulgate other official formal public announcements or 
functions; or publicly avow or cause certain matters of state government to 
be made generally known.  "Declarations" designate special days, weeks or 
other time periods;  call attention to or recognize people, groups, 
organizations, functions, or similar actions having a public purpose; or 
invoke specific legislative purposes (such as the declaration of an 
agricultural disaster).  

The Governor's Office staff files Executive Documents that have legal effect 
with the Division of Administrative Rules for publication and distribution.  
All orders issued by the Governor not in conflict with existing laws have the 
full force and effect of law during a state of emergency when a copy of the 
order is filed with the Division of Administrative Rules. (See Section 63K-4-
401).

Governor's Executive Order EO/003/2012:  Wildland Fire Management
- Ashlee Buchholz by phone at 801-538-1621, by FAX at 801-538-1528, or by 
Internet E-mail at Abuchholz@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/execdocs/2012/ExecDoc152639.htm




3.  NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

A state agency may file a Proposed Rule when it determines the need for a new 
rule, a substantive change to an existing rule, or a repeal of an existing 
rule.  Filings received between May 16, 2012, 12:00 a.m., and June 1, 2012, 
11:59 p.m. are summarized in this, the June 15, 2012, issue of the Utah State 
Digest.

The law requires that an agency accept public comment on Proposed Rules 
published in the June 15, 2012, issue of the Utah State Bulletin until at 
least July 16, 2012 (the Bulletin is the parent publication of the Digest).  
The agency may accept comment beyond this date and will indicate the last day 
the agency will accept comment in the rule information published below.  The 
agency may also hold public hearings.  Additionally, citizens or 
organizations may request the agency hold a hearing on a specific Proposed 
Rule.  Section 63G-3-302 requires that a hearing request be received by the 
agency proposing the rule "in writing not more than 15 days after the 
publication date of the proposed rule."

From the end of the public comment period through October 13, 2012, the 
agency may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants to make 
the Proposed Rule effective.  The agency sets the effective date.  The date 
may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public 
comment period nor more than 120 days after the publication date in the Utah 
State Bulletin.  Alternatively, the agency may file a Change in Proposed Rule 
in response to comments received.  If the Division of Administrative Rules 
does not receive a Notice of Effective Date or a Change in Proposed Rule, the 
Proposed Rule lapses and the agency must start the process over.

The public, interest groups, and governmental agencies are invited to review 
and comment on the Proposed Rules listed below.  Comment may be directed to 
the contact person identified with each rule. 

Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-301; Rule R15-2; and Sections 
R15-4-3, R15-4-4, R15-4-5, R15-4-9, and R15-4-10.


ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36285 (Amendment): R13-2-4. Requests for Access.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This amendment updates addresses for program 
changes that have been made during the past year.  The Office of State Debt 
Collection was organizationally placed under the Division of Finance.  
Surplus Property was transferred by S.B. 130 (2011) from the Division of 
Fleet Operations to the Division of Purchasing and General Services.  The 
Division of Administrative Rules moved offices.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This amendment will not result in any direct or indirect 
fiscal or nonfiscal cost or savings to state budgets.  This amendment does 
not change the procedures outlined in the rule.  This amendment makes the 
rule consistent with statutory, organizational, and physical changes that 
have already been made.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This amendment will not result in any direct or 
indirect fiscal or nonfiscal cost savings to local government.  This rule 
does not require action by local governments.  This amendment does not change 
the procedures outlined in the rule.  This amendment makes the rule 
consistent with statutory, organizational, and physical changes that have 
already been made.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This amendment will not result in any direct or indirect 
fiscal or nonfiscal cost or savings to small businesses.  This rule does not 
require action by small businesses.  This amendment does not change the 
procedures outlined in the rule.  This amendment makes the rule consistent 
with statutory, organizational, and physical changes that have already been 
made.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This amendment will not result in any direct or indirect fiscal or 
nonfiscal cost or savings to other persons.  This rule does not require 
action by persons.  This amendment does not change the procedures outlined in 
the rule.  This amendment makes the rule consistent with statutory, 
organizational, and physical changes that have already been made.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  This amendment does not affect 
compliance costs.  This rule does not require any action.  It does not change 
the procedures outlined in the rule.  It corrects address information so that 
requests made pursuant to the Government Records Access and Management Act 
(GRAMA) will be directed to the right location for review and response.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This amendment has no fiscal impact on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Kenneth Hansen by phone at 801-538-3777, by FAX at 801-537-9240, or by 
Internet E-mail at khansen@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36285.htm



AGRICULTURE AND FOOD
ANIMAL INDUSTRY
No. 36249 (Repeal): R58-10. Meat and Poultry Inspection.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The repeal of this rule will not affect state budget as 
Section 4-32-2.1, requires Utah to adopt federal rules that govern meat and 
poultry inspection in the State of Utah.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This rule did not affect local governments and the 
repeal of the rule will not affect these entities.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The repeal of this rule will not affect small business 
because they are still bound under the state and federal regulations.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The repeal of this rule will not affect other entities because they 
are still bound under the state and federal regulations.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No compliance cost for affected 
persons with the repeal of this rule because they are still bound under the 
state and federal regulations.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The repeal of Rule R58-10 is needed as the rule is redundant to 
Section 4-32-2.1.  Section 4-32-2.1 allows the Utah Meat and Poultry 
Inspection Program within the Utah Department of Agriculture and Food to 
adopt Federal acts and rules associated with the inspection of meat and 
poultry products as required by the Federal Meat and Poultry Act.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Bruce King by phone at 801-538-7162, by FAX at 801-538-7169, or by Internet 
E-mail at bking@utah.gov
- Kathleen Mathews by phone at 801-538-7103, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by 
Internet E-mail at kmathews@utah.gov
- Kyle Stephens by phone at 801-538-7102, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by 
Internet E-mail at kylestephens@utah.gov
- Wyatt Frampton by phone at 801-538-7165, by FAX at 801-538-7169, or by 
Internet E-mail at wframpton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36249.htm

No. 36248 (Repeal): R58-16. Swine Garbage Feeding.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The repeal of this rule will not affect state budget as 
there have been no garbage feeders licensed by the State of Utah for some 
time.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This rule did not affect local governments and the 
repeal of the rule will not affect these entities.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The repeal of this rule will not affect small businesses 
as there were no garbage feeders licensed with the State of Utah for a number 
of years.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The repeal of this rule will not affect other entities as there has 
been no garbage feeders licensed by the State of Utah for some time.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No compliance cost will be affected 
with the repeal of this rule as there has been no garbage feeders licensed 
with the State of Utah for a number of years.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The repeal of Rule R58-16 is needed as result of passage of H.B. 
505 during the 2012 legislative session that no longer allows the feeding of 
garbage and plate waste to swine.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Bruce King by phone at 801-538-7162, by FAX at 801-538-7169, or by Internet 
E-mail at bking@utah.gov
- Kathleen Mathews by phone at 801-538-7103, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by 
Internet E-mail at kmathews@utah.gov
- Kyle Stephens by phone at 801-538-7102, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by 
Internet E-mail at kylestephens@utah.gov
- Wyatt Frampton by phone at 801-538-7165, by FAX at 801-538-7169, or by 
Internet E-mail at wframpton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36248.htm



ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36271 (Amendment): R81-1-3. General Policies.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule codifies the practice of imposing a 
case handling markup.  It allows flexibility within the DABC to ensure that 
the case handling markup generates revenues to match the actual appropriation 
the DABC receives for warehouse operations and costs to ship the product from 
the warehouse to retail stores.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--This rule codifies existing practice. The DABC 
will continue to manage the markup to ensure it generates revenue to the 
state equivalent to the relevant appropriations.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--Local governments are not involved in the sale or 
warehousing of alcoholic beverages.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--This rule codifies existing practice.  The DABC 
will continue to manage the markup to ensure it generates revenue to the 
state equivalent to the relevant appropriations.  Manufacturers of alcoholic 
beverages will continue to see an across-the-board markup to all alcoholic 
beverages sold in Utah.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: None--This rule codifies existing practice.  The DABC will continue 
to manage the markup to ensure it generates revenue to the state equivalent 
to the relevant appropriations.  Manufacturers of alcoholic beverages will 
continue to see an across-the-board markup to all alcoholic beverages sold in 
Utah.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--This rule codifies existing 
practice regarding the case handling markup.  The DABC will continue to 
manage the markup to ensure it generates revenue to the state equivalent to 
the relevant appropriations.  Manufacturers of alcoholic beverages will 
continue to see an across-the-board markup to all alcoholic beverages sold in 
Utah.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule change codifies what has been the practice for years.  
Utah's case handling markup is the lowest in the nation, and will remain that 
way for the foreseeable future.  This filing will enable the DABC to continue 
to warehouse product in an efficient and transparent manner.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Vickie Ashby by phone at 801-977-6801, by FAX at 801-977-6889, or by 
Internet E-mail at vickieashby@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36271.htm



COMMERCE
OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING
No. 36282 (Amendment): R156-3a. Architect Licensing Act Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The following rule amendments are made 
throughout Rule R156-3a:  capitalization, updating of references, renumbering 
of paragraphs and minor grammatical changes.   Subsection R156-3a-102(13) is 
added to further define the term "technical submissions" as used in proposed 
amendments to Section R156-3a-601.  In Subsection R156-3a-301(2), standards 
for determining equivalency of a foreign degree are further defined.  The 
term "NCARB Certification" replaces "NCARB Council Record" to reflect current 
National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB) terminology.  
In Sections R156-3a-302 and R156-3a-303, the term "NCARB Certification" 
replaces "NCARB Council Record" to reflect current NCARB terminology.  In 
Section R156-3a-304, throughout this section, subsections are renumbered and 
the term "continuing education" replaces "continuing professional education", 
"qualified professional education" and "professional education".   In passing 
H.B. 82, the Legislature intended that the Division adopt National Council of 
Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB) continuing education (CE) standards 
in rule.  The Legislature's intent was communicated by the bill sponsor in 
comments before the Senate Business and Labor Standing Committee on 
02/22/2012.   NCARB recommends that jurisdictions adopt common standards to 
ease the burden on architects licensed in multiple jurisdictions.  The Board 
supports adoption of NCARB's standards.  Adopting the standards requires the 
following rule amendments:  1) changing the end of the period within which CE 
must be completed to December 31 of each odd numbered year; 2) increasing the 
number of CE hours required every 2 years from 16 to 24; 3) requiring 
completion of at least 12 CE hours annually; and 4) requiring that records of 
documented hours be maintained for a minimum of six years.  The majority of 
architects living in Utah already complete over 24 CE hours biannually as 
members of the Utah Chapter of American Institute of Architects (AIA Utah).  
Thirty-six of fifty jurisdictions across the United States already require 
completion of 24 or more CE hours biannually to maintain architect licensure.   
Subsection R156-3a-306(6) is removed to be consistent with the NCARB 
standard.  Subsection R156-3a-306(4), a stylistic change is made and the 
number of CE hours required to activate an inactive license is increased from 
16 to 24 for reasons described above.  In Section R156-3a-502, the proposed 
amendment updates the July 2010 edition of the NCARB "Rules of Conduct" to 
the July 2011 edition.  The differences between the 2010 and 2011 editions 
are limited to document formatting.  In Section R156-3a-601, the current rule 
does not allow for electronic signatures on architectural seals.  The Board 
believes this standard is overly restrictive and supports a proposed 
amendment allowing electronic signatures.  The proposed amendment allows 
electronic signatures, removes unnecessary language and clarifies that sheets 
subsequent to the cover of specifications are not required to be sealed, 
signed, and dated.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Division will incur minimal costs of approximately 
$100 to print and distribute the rule once the proposed amendments are made 
effective.  Any costs incurred will be absorbed in the Division's current 
budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The proposed amendments only apply to licensed 
architects and applicants for licensure in that classification.  Allowing for 
electronic signatures on architectural seals will expedite the building 
permit application process for some local governments which may translate 
into a cost savings; but the Division is unable to estimate the extent of the 
savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The proposed amendments only apply to licensed 
architects and applicants for licensure in that classification.  Allowing for 
electronic signatures on architectural seals will decrease the amount of time 
some architectural firms spend preparing technical submissions for local 
government approval.  This will translate into cost savings for these firms; 
but the Division is unable to estimate the extent of the savings.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The proposed amendments only apply to licensed architects and 
applicants for licensure in that classification.  Allowing for electronic 
signatures on architectural seals will decrease the amount of time some 
architects spend preparing technical submissions for local government 
approval.  This will translate into a cost savings for these architects; but 
the Division is unable to estimate the extent of the savings.  Increasing the 
number of CE hours required biannually from 16 to 24 will not have a cost 
impact on architects that already complete over 24 CE hours.  For example, 
AIA Utah members must complete at least 36 CE hours biannually to maintain 
membership in AIA Utah.  A majority of architects living in Utah are members 
of AIA Utah.  Architects who currently limit completion of CE to the required 
minimum of 16 CE hours biannually will be required to compete eight 
additional CE hours.   The cost of CE ranges from $0 to $40 per CE hour.  It 
is important to note that the rise in the number of CE hours required 
reflects the national NCARB standard and that 36 of 50 jurisdictions across 
the United States have already adopted the standard.  Due to a wide degree of 
circumstances, the Division is not able to determine an aggregate amount for 
licensed architects to obtain additional required continuing education hours.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  (The proposed amendments only apply 
to licensed architects and applicants for licensure in that classification.  
Allowing for electronic signatures on architectural seals will decrease the 
amount of time some architects spend preparing technical submissions for 
local government approval.  This will translate into a cost savings for these 
architects; but the Division is unable to estimate the extent of the savings.  
Increasing the number of CE hours required biannually from 16 to 24 will not 
have a cost impact on architects that already complete over 24 CE hours.  For 
example, AIA Utah members must complete at least 36 CE hours biannually to 
maintain membership in AIA Utah. A majority of architects living in Utah are 
members of AIA Utah.  Architects who currently limit completion of CE to the 
required minimum of 16 CE hours biannually will be required to compete eight 
additional CE hours.  The cost of CE ranges from $0 to $40 per CE hour.  It 
is important to note that the rise in the number of CE hours required 
reflects the national NCARB standard and that 36 of 50 jurisdictions across 
the United States have already adopted the standard.  Due to a wide degree of 
circumstances, the Division is not able to determine an exact cost for 
licensed architects to obtain additional required continuing education hours.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  As indicated in the rule summary, this filing could result in 
cost savings to licensees based on the electronic signature provision.  
Raising the continuing education requirement to 24 hours each 2-year period 
is not expected to have a significant effect on licensees, as it is the 
national standard and most licensees already meet this requirement as part of 
their membership in the professional association.   No impact is anticipated 
from the remaining technical changes made in this filing.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Rich Oborn by phone at 801-530-6767, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet 
E-mail at roborn@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 06/25/2012 10:00 AM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S, Conference Room 474, 
Salt Lake City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36282.htm

No. 36228 (Amendment): R156-60d. Substance Abuse Counselor Act Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The following rule amendments are made 
throughout Rule R156-60d:  capitalization, updating of statutory references 
and license titles due to statutory amendments, and renumbering.  In Section 
R156-60d-102, subsections are renumbered throughout the section.  In 
Subsection R156-60d-102(1), the proposed amendment updates statutory 
references to be consistent with statutory amendments.  The proposed 
amendment also updates the definition of "accredited institution" to include 
any school that has accreditation that is recognized by the Council for 
Higher Education Accreditation of the American Council on Education (CHEA).  
The current definition is outdated.  Subsection R156-60d-102(4) is deleted 
because it is no longer needed due to the statutory amendments.  In 
Subsection R156-60d-102(6), the proposed amendment updates the name of an 
organization that administers licensing examinations.  Subsection R156-60d-
102(9) is deleted because the term "qualified continuing education" is no 
longer used in the rule.  Subsection R156-60d-102(11) is added to provide 
further definition of a new term used in statutory amendments.  In Section 
Subsection R156-60d-302a, the proposed amendments remove text that is no 
longer necessary and add a list of prerequisite courses under authority 
granted in the statutory amendments.   In Section R156-60d-302b, the 
statutory amendments require replacing the current Section R156-60d-302b with 
new language.  The proposed language outlines standards for supervised 
experience similar to standards currently in place.  In Section R156-60d-
302c, the proposed amendment restructures this section due to the creation of 
an additional licensure level in H.B. 496.  Section R156-60d-502 currently 
includes any violation of the 2008 version of the Ethical Standard of 
Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Counselors established by the National Association 
of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Counselors (NAADAC) under the definition of 
unprofessional conduct.  In 2011, NAADAC amended the 2008 version of the 
ethical standards and created a "teaching tool" document that expands on the 
Code of Ethics.  The Board believes that incorporation of the teaching tool 
is needed because the Code of Ethics only provides a list of general 
principles.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Division will incur minimal costs of approximately 
$100 to print and distribute the rule once the proposed amendments are made 
effective.  Any costs incurred will be absorbed in the Division's current 
budget.  Any additional cost impact to the state budget comes as a result of 
statutory amendments and was covered in the fiscal note which was completed 
for H.B. 496 (2012).
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The proposed amendments only apply to substance use 
disorder counselors and applicants for licensure in those classifications.  
As a result, the proposed amendments do not apply to local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The proposed amendments only apply to substance use 
disorder counselors and applicants for licensure in those various 
classifications.  Small businesses that employ substance use disorder 
counselors will be impacted as well.  Any cost impact to small businesses 
comes as a result of statutory amendments and was covered in the fiscal note 
which was completed for H.B. 496 (2012).
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The proposed amendments only apply to substance use disorder 
counselors and applicants for licensure in those various classifications.  
Small businesses that employ substance use disorder counselors will be 
impacted as well.  Any cost impact to substance use disorder counselors and 
applicants for the various substance use disorder license classifications  
comes as a result of statutory amendments and was covered in the fiscal note 
which was completed for H.B. 496 (2012).
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The proposed amendments only apply to 
substance use disorder counselors and applicants for licensure in those 
various classifications.  Small businesses that employ substance use disorder 
counselors will be impacted as well.  Any cost impact to substance use 
disorder counselors and applicants for the various substance use disorder 
license classifications  comes as a result of statutory amendments and was 
covered in the fiscal note which was completed for H.B. 496 (2012).
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule filing implements recent statutory changes and no 
fiscal impact to businesses is anticipated beyond those addressed by the 
legislature during the 2012 General Session.  Additional amendments are 
clarifying in nature and are not expected to result in any fiscal impact to 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Rich Oborn by phone at 801-530-6767, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet 
E-mail at roborn@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 07/11/2012 09:00 AM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S, Conference Room 474, 
Salt Lake City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36228.htm



CORRECTIONS
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36292 (New Rule): R251-115. Contract County Jail Programming Payment.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule outlines the procedures, 
requirements, and standards for the qualification and payment of 73% of the 
final state daily incarceration rate paid for by the department for approved 
programs for state inmates housed at contract jail facilities as funds are 
appropriated.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This rule, and the associated statute, provides for 
payment at higher rate to contract county jail facilities that provide 
programming, approved by the department, to state inmates.  Funding at this 
higher rate is at the discretion of the legislature via appropriations.  If 
funding is not allocated, the higher rate cannot be paid.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  If funding is allocated by the legislature for jail 
contracting and if the county engages in a contract with the State of Utah 
for the housing and approved programming of state inmates, the county may 
therefore be benefited.   Assessing the benefit to the county will be a 
condition of the counties operations and their respective costs to provide 
housing and programming services to state inmates.  Therefore only the county 
governments will be able to access the value of this rule against their 
budgets and operations.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Does not apply--This could only be determined at the 
county level through the county contracting for services.  This is not 
determined by the state.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Does not apply--This could only be determined at the county level 
through the county contracting for services.  This is not determined by the 
state.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs 
associated.  If funds are available and appropriated, the higher payment rate 
would be paid where applicable.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule will not have a fiscal impact on businesses.  The rule 
allows for funds, if available, to flow to contract county jails that provide 
department-approved programming to state inmates.  It is conceivable there 
would be a positive impact on businesses if the contract county jail 
contracts with the private vendors to provide approved programming.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Greg Peay by phone at 801-201-6052, by FAX at 801-545-5572, or by Internet 
E-mail at gpeay@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36292.htm



EDUCATION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36308 (New Rule): R277-617. Smart School Technology Program.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The new rule provides definitions, school 
selection criteria, and procedures for Program application and evaluation.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  The 2012 Legislature appropriated funding for the Program.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  Schools selected for participation in the Program will receive 
funding.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule applies to public schools and does not affect 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  Public schools will 
receive funding for participation in the Program.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There is no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  Public schools selected will participate in the Program 
consistent with state law and this rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36308.htm



GOVERNOR
PLANNING AND BUDGET, INSPECTOR GENERAL OF MEDICAID SERVICES (OFFICE OF)
No. 36307 (Amendment): R367-1. Office of Inspector General of Medicaid 
Services.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This amendment removes certain provisos for 
fines and assessments, provider agreements, and certain incorporation by 
reference statutes.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The amendment of Rule R367-1 will not have any aggregate 
cost to the state budget.  The rule further clarifies the duties and 
procedures of the OIG outlined in Sections 63J-4a-101 through 63J-4a-602.  
There will be savings to the state budget, this rule will further assist the 
OIG to recoup and recover misappropriated Medicaid funds.  This amount will 
vary year to year based upon the results of the audits.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The amendment of this rule will not result in direct 
and measurable costs for local governments.  Local governments are not 
involved in the Medicaid Program.  Additionally, the OIG will be collecting 
wrongfully acquired Medicaid funds.  These are funds that the local 
governments were not originally entitled to; any funds paid by the local 
government, if any, would be a reimbursement of state and federal money.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The amendment of this rule will not result in direct and 
measurable costs for small businesses.  The OIG will be collecting wrongfully 
acquired Medicaid funds from small and solo practice medical providers.  
These are funds that the providers were not originally entitled to; any 
monies paid by the providers to the OIG, if any, would be a reimbursement of 
state monies.  Therefore there would be no additional costs to small 
businesses, just a reimbursement to the state.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The amendment of this rule will not result in direct and measurable 
costs for other entities.  The OIG will be collecting wrongfully acquired 
Medicaid funds from hospitals, large provider groups, pharmacies.  These are 
funds that the providers were not originally entitled to; any monies paid by 
the providers to the OIG, if any, would be a reimbursement of state monies.  
Therefore there would be no additional costs to other entities, just a 
reimbursement to the state.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The amendment does not create new 
compliance costs for any local government or business. There are no 
regulatory mandates created by this rule.  This change is made after public 
comment; the changes will remove assessment of civil fines, provider 
agreement language and incorporation by reference.  There are no costs 
associated.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Following public comment, Rule R367-1 has been amended.  It 
addresses several concerns raised by various interested parties in the health 
care field.  I have reviewed this rule and I concur with the changes that 
have been made.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Michael Green by phone at 801-538-6123, by FAX at 801-538-6382, or by 
Internet E-mail at mkgreen@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36307.htm



HEALTH
DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, EPIDEMIOLOGY
No. 36247 (Amendment): R386-702. Communicable Disease Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Modifications to the list of Reportable 
Diseases, Emergency Illnesses, and Health Conditions, (Section R386-702-3) 
were made, including: addition of a nationally-notifiable condition 
(babesiosis), modification of Hantavirus to remove "infection" and require 
reporting of Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome only, removal of Pelvic 
Inflammatory Disease, clarification of reporting requirements for HIV in 
pregnant women, clarification of types of meningitis that are reportable, 
replacement of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever with Spotted fever rickettsioses 
(including Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever) to be consistent with nationally-
notifiable condition language, and clarification of reporting requirements 
for Streptococcal disease.  Also, infant botulism was excluded from the 
immediately-notifiable conditions list (R386-702-4 (4)).  Clarification 
regarding acceptable reporting methodology was included to allow reporting by 
phone, secured fax, secured email, or mail, and to indicate that laboratories 
may report information electronically.  Syphilis was removed from the 
immediately-notifiable condition list since its management does not require 
an immediate response.  Information regarding requirements and authorization 
for full reporting of case information was clarified.  Language was added to 
require notification of USLPH by phone when suspect BT agents are being 
submitted, and notation was made within the list of organisms required to be 
submitted for testing of which are suspect BT agents.  Because USLPH does not 
provide culture testing for Bordatella pertussis, it was removed from the 
list of organisms required to be submitted to USLPH for testing.  Language 
was added to facilitate cooperation by facilities, medical providers, 
laboratories, and other reporters in retrospective surveillance projects.  
Language was also added to clarify the responsibility of cases, carriers, 
contacts, other persons, or entities to cooperate with public health in 
investigation of a case or outbreak, and in carrying out control measures to 
prevent or mitigate spread of disease.  Clarification was made within 
Subsections R386-702-5(5) and R386-702-5(6) to ensure information applies to 
individuals working in any facility related to food or drink, not just those 
related to dairy products.  Clarification was made within the Special 
Measures for Control of Typhoid section (Section R386-702-7) regarding case 
management of cases, carriers, and contacts, as well as to clarify authority 
of the local health officer to impose restrictions, or to approve removal of 
restrictions.  Two references were updated to reflect the most current 
available editions.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There may be some savings related to a decrease in 
resources needed to investigate Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, and there may be 
a small increase in resources needed to investigate reports of babesiosis.  
Also, presumably, case load may increase as laboratories report 
electronically, which may result in more complete case ascertainment.  It is 
not possible to quantify what these costs or savings may be; they are 
expected to be negligible, at least until laboratories uniformly report 
electronically.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There may be some savings related to a decrease in 
resources needed to investigate Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, and there may be 
a small increase in resources needed to investigate reports of babesiosis.  
Also, presumably, case load may increase as laboratories report 
electronically, which may result in more complete case ascertainment.  It is 
not possible to quantify what these costs or savings may be; they are 
expected to be negligible, at least until laboratories uniformly report 
electronically.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Impact should be minimal for small businesses; reporting 
burden for small clinics/facilities should not increase since incidence of 
babesiosis is presumed to be low.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Impact should be minimal; reporting burden should not increase 
significantly since incidence of babesiosis is presumed to be low, and should 
be counteracted by removal of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease from the list of 
reportable conditions.  Laboratories who wish to report electronically may 
incur costs associated with implementation of this reporting method; however, 
this is not mandated and would be on a voluntary basis at this time.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no direct compliance costs 
associated with this amendment.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  My review of the rule supports that there should be either no 
increased cost for business as a result of this rule change, or a small 
decrease as coordination and reporting requirements are simplified.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Melissa Stevens Dimond by phone at 801-538-6810, by FAX at 801-538-9923, or 
by Internet E-mail at melissastevens@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36247.htm


FAMILY HEALTH AND PREPAREDNESS, CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL HEALTH CARE NEEDS
No. 36281 (New Rule): R398-15. Autism Treatment Account.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule includes qualification criteria and 
procedures for selecting children who may qualify for assistance from the 
account, qualifications, criteria, and procedures for evaluating the services 
and providers to include in the program, and provisions to address and avoid 
conflicts of interest that may arise in relation to the committee's work.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  Costs include staff time to administer the account and 
volunteer time from committee members to serve an advisory role, develop 
application process and review applications from treatment providers, and 
monitor reports from providers.  As this is a new program, the division does 
not have records to indicate cost burden or savings.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None anticipated--Funds will be disbursed through 
treatment providers to eligible children.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Cost--Time for providers to prepare applications to 
receive funds to treat eligible children.  As this is a new program, the 
division does not have records to indicate cost burden or savings.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Cost to families--Time to identify contracted providers and enroll 
children for treatment.  Savings to families--Treatment will be provided free 
to families up to the full amount appropriated.  The division estimates that 
approximately 30 children will receive services through the current amount 
appropriated.  As this is a new program, the division does not have records 
to indicate cost burden or savings.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Cost to providers and families--Time 
to complete application processes involved.  As this is a new program, the 
division does not have records to indicate cost burden or savings.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Families fortunate enough to be selected to receive the 
treatment will be greatly benefited by this program.  The committee will 
carefully evaluate the effectiveness of treatment and provide important data 
to guide future public policy in this area.  Provider participation is 
totally voluntary.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Rebecca Giles by phone at 801-538-6259, or by Internet E-mail at 
rgiles@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/30/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36281.htm



HUMAN SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36284 (New Rule): R495-884. Kinship Locate.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Section R495-884-1 contains two subsections. 
The first subsection states the legal authority that has been granted to 
ORS/CSS to create rules.  The second subsection contains a statement 
describing the purpose of this specific rule.  Section R495-884-2 specifies 
who may request a kinship locate services from ORS.  In addition, it defines 
who an authorized person is for kinship locate purposes by incorporation of 
42 USC 653 (2011).  Section R495-884-3 outlines what information must be 
included when making a request for kinship locate.  Section R495-884-4 
explains what resources ORS will use to provide kinship locate services when 
the individual being located is not known on an existing ORS case.   It also 
provides details as to what information may be provided to the requestor when 
a kinship locate is received contingent on what information is found using 
the defined locate resources.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no anticipated savings to the state budget due 
to this administrative rule.  There may be minimal costs associated with the 
time required for workers at the Division of Child and Family Services and 
workers at the Office of Recovery Services to communicate and verify kinship 
locate information when a child is in the custody of the state; however, any 
other costs or savings to the state budget would be due to the underlying 
statute's requirements.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no anticipated costs or savings to local 
government because administrative rules of the Office of Recovery 
Services/Child Support Services (ORS/CSS) do not apply to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The procedures contained in this rule do not affect 
small businesses; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings for 
small business due to this rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no anticipated costs or savings to other persons due to 
the procedures contained in this administrative rule.  Any costs or savings 
to other persons would be due to the underlying statute's requirements.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no anticipated compliance 
costs for affected persons due to the procedures contained in this rule.  Any 
costs to other persons would be due to the underlying statute's requirements.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Businesses are not addressed in the proposed rule, and it is not 
anticipated this rule will create any fiscal impact on them.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Shancie Nance by phone at 801-536-8191, by FAX at 801-536-8833, or by 
Internet E-mail at snance@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36284.htm



LABOR COMMISSION
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
No. 36306 (Amendment): R614-1-4. Incorporation of Federal Standards.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed amendment revises criteria for 
classifying chemical hazards and also revises labeling requirements to 
include standardized pictograms, hazard statements, and precautionary 
statements.  The amendment specifies the format for safety data sheets and 
requires employee training on labeling and safety data sheets.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  Existing regulations already include standards for 
chemical hazard communications; the proposed modification of those standards 
will not affect Labor Commission costs of administering the standards.  The 
amendment's chemical hazard classification and labeling requirements will 
have no impact on the state.  As to the state in its capacity as an employer, 
the amendment will require employee training on the modified standards for 
labeling and safety data sheets.  This can be incorporated into existing 
safety training at no additional expense.  On the other hand, improved 
communication will reduce employee exposure to hazardous chemicals, thereby 
reducing costs of occupational illnesses and diseases.  On balance, the 
commission anticipates that the proposed amendment will result in net long-
term savings to the state from a reduction in occupational illness and 
injury.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The amendment's chemical hazard classification and 
labeling requirements will have no impact on local governments.  As to local 
governments in their capacity as employers, the amendment will modify 
existing employee training on labeling and safety data sheets.  Such 
modifications can be incorporated into existing safety training at no 
additional expense.  On the other hand, improved chemical hazard 
communication will reduce employee exposure to hazardous chemicals, thereby 
reducing costs of occupational illnesses and diseases.  On balance, the 
commission anticipates that the proposed amendment will result in net long-
term savings to local governments from a reduction in occupational illness 
and injury.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Federal OSHA's detailed analysis of the proposed 
amendment predicts average cost per small business of approximately $50 per 
year, fully offset by savings from reductions in occupational illnesses and 
injuries related to hazardous chemical exposure.  On balance, the commission 
anticipates that the proposed amendment will result in net long-term savings 
to small businesses from the reduction in occupational illness and injury.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Compliance costs are concentrated in the chemical industry, with 
the primary cost arising from the requirement to update and modify chemical 
labels and safety data sheets.  This cost is estimated at an average of $208 
for each subject chemical, multiplied by the number of such chemicals 
produced by any particular chemical manufacturer.  This cost will be fully 
offset by savings from reductions in occupational illnesses and injuries 
related to hazardous chemical exposure.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Apart from the cost of updating 
chemical labels and safety data sheets, discussed above, compliance costs 
will involve updated training of employees who handle hazardous chemicals, 
which can be incorporated at negligible cost into already-existing training 
and safety meeting schedules.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The proposed amendment will reduce business costs for 
occupational disease and injury by improving chemical-hazard information and 
enhancing employee comprehension of such hazards, especially for limited-
literacy employees.  Because the proposed amendment involves modifications of 
existing requirements, it is not expected to have a significant fiscal impact 
on businesses.  Furthermore, because the proposed amendment incorporates 
national and international standards, it would be necessary for Utah's 
chemical industry to follow the modified standards in any event, in order to 
do business in other states and foreign countries.  In summary, the 
modifications will reduce costs and burdens while also improving the quality 
and consistency of information provided to employers and employees regarding 
chemical hazards and associated protective measures.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Louis Silva by phone at 801-530-6872, by FAX at 801-538-6390, or by 
Internet E-mail at lsilva@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36306.htm



NATURAL RESOURCES
PARKS AND RECREATION
No. 36237 (Amendment): R651-201-7. Low Capacity Vessel.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Over the years there have been a number of 
new types of low capacity vessels that have been designed and are currently 
in use.  Additionally, the use of the term has expanded outside of the 
carrying passengers for hire program to the recreational boating program, so 
the definition needs to be moved out of the carrying passengers for hire rule 
and into Rule R651-201.  There is also an inconsistency in the rule 
concerning the number of persons to be considered a low capacity vessel.  The 
Boating Advisory Council felt that low capacity vessels should be considered 
two or fewer occupants.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment 
moves the information from Subsection R651-206-1(11) to Rule R651-201.  (DAR 
NOTE:  The proposed amendment to Rule R651-206 is under DAR No. 36238 in this 
issue, June 15, 2012, of the Bulletin.)
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment 
moves the information from Subsection R651-206-1(11) to Rule R651-201.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment 
moves the information from Subsection R651-206-1(11) to Rule R651-201.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment moves the 
information from Subsection R651-206-1(11) to Rule R651-201.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs. This 
amendment moves the information from Subsection R651-206-1(11) to Rule R651-
201.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tammy Wright by phone at 801-538-7359, by FAX at 801-538-7378, or by 
Internet E-mail at tammywright@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36237.htm

No. 36242 (Amendment): R651-205-2. Deer Creek Reservoir.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  For many years Deer Creek State Park has 
installed wakeless buoys which prohibit any activity above a wakeless speed 
in the bay.  That portion of the lake is narrow and congested, so a wakeless 
area has been managed by the park as a safety precaution.  A rule change is 
needed to accurately reflect the current management of that part of the lake.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost of savings for this 
amendment.  This addresses a zoning clarification only.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost of savings for this 
amendment.  This addresses a zoning clarification only.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost of savings for this 
amendment. This addresses a zoning clarification only.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost of savings for this amendment.  This 
addresses a zoning clarification only.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There is no anticipated cost of 
savings for this amendment. This addresses a zoning clarification only.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No impact anticipated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tammy Wright by phone at 801-538-7359, by FAX at 801-538-7378, or by 
Internet E-mail at tammywright@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36242.htm

No. 36234 (Amendment): R651-205-15. Lost Creek Reservoir.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  There are a number of waterbodies with the 
word "lost" as part of the name.  There has been some confusion as to which 
is zoned.  By adding the county location, future confusion should be 
eliminated.  In addition to the Lost Creek Reservoir in Morgan County, there 
is a Lost Creek Reservoir in Sevier County and two Lost Lakes, one in 
Garfield County and one in Duchesne County.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost of savings for this 
amendment.  This addresses a zoning clarification only.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost of savings for this 
amendment.  This addresses a zoning clarification only.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost of savings for this 
amendment.  This addresses a zoning clarification only.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost of savings for this amendment.  This 
addresses a zoning clarification only.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
this amendment.  This addresses a zoning clarification only.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No impact anticipated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tammy Wright by phone at 801-538-7359, by FAX at 801-538-7378, or by 
Internet E-mail at tammywright@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36234.htm

No. 36238 (Amendment): R651-206-1. Definitions.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Over the years there have been a number of 
new types of low capacity vessels that have been designed and are currently 
in use.  Additionally, the use of the term has expanded outside of the 
carrying passengers for hire program to the recreational boating program, so 
the definition needs to be moved out of the carrying passengers for hire rule 
and into Rule R651-201.  There is also an inconsistency in the rule 
concerning the number of persons to be considered a low capacity vessel.  The 
Boating Advisory Council felt that low capacity vessels should be considered 
two or fewer occupants.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment 
moves the information from Subsection R651-206-1(11) to Rule R651-201.  (DAR 
NOTE:  The proposed amendment to Rule R651-201 is under DAR No. 36237 in this 
issue, June 15, 2012, of the Bulletin.)
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment 
moves the information from Subsection R651-206-1(11) to Rule R651-201.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment 
moves the information from Subsection R651-206-1(11) to Rule R651-201.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment moves the 
information from Subsection R651-206-1(11) to Rule R651-201.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs.  This 
amendment moves the information from Subsection R651-206-1(11) to Rule R651-
201.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tammy Wright by phone at 801-538-7359, by FAX at 801-538-7378, or by 
Internet E-mail at tammywright@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36238.htm

No. 36243 (Amendment): R651-206-3. Utah Captain's/Guides License and Utah 
Boat Crew Permit.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  When the rules were established, the 2005 
standards were current.  Now the agency has moved into the 2010 standards.  
The agency is updating this rule to reflect the most current standards.  The 
avoid changing the rule on a regular basis, the agency proposes changing the 
rule to state that the "most current standard applies".
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be a cost savings by eliminating the need for 
periodic rule changes to keep up with changing standards.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no additional cost or savings to local 
government.  This is a wording change only.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no additional cost or savings.  This is a 
wording change only.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no additional cost or savings.  This is a wording change 
only.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs.  This 
is a wording change only.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tammy Wright by phone at 801-538-7359, by FAX at 801-538-7378, or by 
Internet E-mail at tammywright@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36243.htm

No. 36239 (Amendment): R651-206-4. Additional PFD Requirements for Vessels 
Carrying Passengers for Hire.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Over the years there have been a number of 
new types of low capacity vessels that have been designed and are currently 
in use.  Additionally, the use of the term has expanded outside of the 
carrying passengers for hire program.  There is also an inconsistency in the 
rule concerning the number of persons to be considered a low capacity vessel.  
The Boating Advisory Council felt that low capacity vessels should be 
considered two or fewer occupants.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment 
adds the term "low capacity vessel" and redacts the more restrictive wording 
of "hard-hulled kayak or white water canoe operators", since there are many 
types of low capacity vessels.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment 
adds the term "low capacity vessel" and redacts the more restrictive wording 
of "hard-hulled kayak or white water canoe operators", since there are many 
types of low capacity vessels.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment 
adds the term "low capacity vessel" and redacts the more restrictive wording 
of "hard-hulled kayak or white water canoe operators", since there are many 
types of low capacity vessels.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment adds the 
term "low capacity vessel" and redacts the more restrictive wording of "hard-
hulled kayak or white water canoe operators", since there are many types of 
low capacity vessels.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs.   This 
amendment adds the term "low capacity vessel" and redacts the more 
restrictive wording of "hard-hulled kayak or white water canoe operators" 
since there are many types of low capacity vessels.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tammy Wright by phone at 801-538-7359, by FAX at 801-538-7378, or by 
Internet E-mail at tammywright@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36239.htm

No. 36241 (Amendment): R651-219-3. Spare Propulsion.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Over the years there have been a number of 
new types of "low capacity vessels" that have been designed and are currently 
in use.  Additionally, the use of the term has expanded outside of the 
carrying passengers for hire program to the recreational boating program, so 
the definition needs to be moved out of the carrying passengers for hire rule 
(Rule R651-206) and into Rule R651-201.  There is also an inconsistency in 
the rule concerning the number of persons to be considered a low capacity 
vessel.  The Boating Advisory Council felt that low capacity vessels should 
be considered two or fewer occupants.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment 
coincides with the amendments that move the information from Subsection R651-
206-1(11) to Rule R651-201.  (DAR NOTE:  The proposed amendment to R651-206 
is under DAR No. 36238 and the proposed amendment to Rule R651-201 is under 
DAR No. 36237 in this issue, June 15, 2012, of the Bulletin.)
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment 
coincides with the amendments that move the information information from 
Subsection R651-206-1(11) to Rule R651-201.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment 
coincides with the amendments that move the information information from 
Subsection R651-206-1(11) to Rule R651-201.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no additional cost or savings.  This amendment coincides 
with the amendments that move the information information from Subsection 
R651-206-1(11) to Rule R651-201.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs.  This 
amendment coincides with the amendments that move the information information 
from Subsection R651-206-1(11) to Rule R651-201.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tammy Wright by phone at 801-538-7359, by FAX at 801-538-7378, or by 
Internet E-mail at tammywright@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36241.htm

No. 36240 (Amendment): R651-226-2. Safety Vessels Permitted.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  A rowing club seeking to do business on the 
Jordan River, which is in a area designated for non-motorized use, presented 
information to the Boating Advisory Council concerning the scope of need and 
use of safety vessels associated with the sport of rowing.  There is a 
growing interest in Utah for the development of rowing clubs and with the 
proper facilities, even the possibility of local high school and college 
level teams and events.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
amendment.  This change would not affect state budgets and was changed at the 
request of a small business.  It allows for motorized safety vessels to 
accompany non-motorized vessels practicing or competing in events in an area 
designated for non-motorized use.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
amendment.  It was changed at the request of a small business and allows for 
motorized safety vessels to accompany non-motorized vessels practicing or 
competing in events in an area designated for non-motorized use.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Rule was changed at the request of a small business. It 
allows for motorized safety vessels to accompany non-motorized vessels 
practicing or competing in events in an area designated for non-motorized 
use.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no additional costs or savings associated with this 
amendment.  This change would not affect persons other than small businesses 
and was changed at the request of a small business. It allows for motorized 
safety vessels to accompany non-motorized vessels practicing or competing in 
events in an area designated for non-motorized use.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs 
associated with this change.  It allows for motorized safety vessels to 
accompany non-motorized vessels practicing or competing in events in an area 
designated for non-motorized use.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Should help business and events.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tammy Wright by phone at 801-538-7359, by FAX at 801-538-7378, or by 
Internet E-mail at tammywright@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36240.htm

No. 36235 (Amendment): R651-227. Boating Safety Course Fees.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Clarification is needed in the rule stating 
that it is the Division's course that is $12, since our online providers 
charge their own fee not subject to our rules.  The Division also needs to 
update the name of the card issued to "Boating Education Certificate" as the 
Division no longer calls the card a "personal watercraft education 
certificate".
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no additional costs or savings to the state 
budget.  These changes are for clarification purposes only.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no additional costs or savings to local 
government.  These changes are for clarification purposes only.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no additional costs or savings to small 
businesses.  These changes are for clarification purposes only.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no additional costs or savings to other persons.  These 
changes are for clarification purposes only.  The fees remain the same.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs.  These 
changes are for clarification purposes only.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tammy Wright by phone at 801-538-7359, by FAX at 801-538-7378, or by 
Internet E-mail at tammywright@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36235.htm

No. 36233 (Amendment): R651-401-1. Stickers.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Due to the "two sticker" issues, the Division 
of Parks and Recreation OHV program is proposing to go with the display of 
just one annual sticker.  This is a current requirement for the display of 
the non-resident permit sticker and motor vehicles are required to only 
display one annual sticker as well.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no additional costs or savings to the state 
budget associated with this amendment.  The amendment reduces the number of 
stickers for display only.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no additional costs or savings to the local 
government associated with this amendment.  The amendment reduces the number 
of stickers for display only.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no additional costs or savings to small 
businesses associated with this amendment.  The amendment reduces the number 
of stickers for display only.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no additional costs or savings to other persons 
associated with this amendment.  The amendment reduces the number of stickers 
for display only.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs 
associated with this amendment.  The amendment reduces the number of stickers 
for display only.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No impact on business is expected.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tammy Wright by phone at 801-538-7359, by FAX at 801-538-7378, or by 
Internet E-mail at tammywright@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36233.htm

No. 36232 (Amendment): R651-406-1. Annual Registration Fee.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  OHV registration fees are currently set at 
$17 per registration.  In addition to the registration fee, several 
additional fees are charged, including a $2 education fee, a $2 DMV 
electronic payment fee, a 50 cent search and rescue fee, $1.50 towards School 
and Trust Lands Administration and a $1 transaction fee bringing the total 
fee to $17.  OHV owners must also pay a property tax assessment to their 
county of residence prior to registering an OHV.  During calendar year 2011, 
199,070 off-highway vehicles were registered in Utah.  These registrations 
produced a net revenue to the Division of approximately $3,300,000.  
Beginning 07/01/2012, the Utah Highway Patrol Aero Bureau will receive $1 
automatically from each OHV registration, potentially costing the Division 
$199,070 per year at the current registration rates.  The only way for the 
Division to recoup this lost revenue is through a registration fee increase 
for each ATV and OHM.   Simultaneously, by increasing the snowmobile 
registration fee, as identified with the passing and signing of S.B. 15 (2012 
General Session), this will increase revenue by approximately $104,000.  This 
additional revenue will be used exclusively for the snowmobile grooming 
operations.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  In order to offset the $104,000 cut to the OHV Off-
Highway Restricted Fund budget, a $1 fee increase is proposed for each 
registered Off Highway Vehicle.  The snowmobile registration fees will 
increase to $4 to cover operational costs of the snowmobile grooming program.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no additional costs or savings to local 
government.  This affects state government and users only.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This could affect small businesses associated with 
registration of Off-Highway Vehicles.  On each ATV and snowmobile 
registration, the fees will increase $1 to cover the costs associated with 
the Utah Highway Patrol Aero Bureau Division.  On snowmobiles, the 
registration fees will increase $4 to cover operational costs of the 
snowmobile grooming program.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: On each ATV and snowmobile registration, the fees will increase $1 
to cover the costs associated with the Utah Highway Patrol Aero Bureau 
Division.  On snowmobiles the registration fees will increase $4 to cover 
operational costs of the snowmobile grooming program.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  On each ATV and snowmobile 
registration, the fess will increase $1 to cover the costs associated with 
the Utah Highway Patrol Aero Bureau Division.  On snowmobiles the 
registration fees will increase $4 to cover operational costs of the 
snowmobile grooming program.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No impact anticipated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tammy Wright by phone at 801-538-7359, by FAX at 801-538-7378, or by 
Internet E-mail at tammywright@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36232.htm

No. 36230 (Amendment): R651-407-1. Appointment and Description of Vehicle 
Advisory Council Membership.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Currently, this rule defines the OHV Advisory 
Council as an eleven-member council, appointed by the Board of Parks and 
Recreation and representing the varied interests of the OHV community.  One 
member will be from each of the following interests: the Bureau of Land 
Management; the USDA Forest Service; the Utah School and Institutional Trust 
Lands Administration; snowmobiling; motorcycling; all-terrain vehicle usage; 
four-wheel drive vehicle usage; off-highway vehicle dealers; off-highway 
vehicle safety; a youth member and a member-at-large.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no additional cost or savings to the state 
budget, because this amendment addresses membership of the OHV advisory 
council only.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no additional cost or savings to local 
government, because this amendment addresses membership of the OHV advisory 
council only.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no additional cost or savings to small 
businesses, because this amendment addresses membership of the OHV advisory 
council only.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no additional cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses or local government, because this amendment addresses 
adding an at-large member to the OHV advisory council only.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs.  This 
does not affect persons in a budgetary sense.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No effect on business anticipated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tammy Wright by phone at 801-538-7359, by FAX at 801-538-7378, or by 
Internet E-mail at tammywright@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36230.htm

No. 36229 (Repeal): R651-612. Firearms, Traps and Other Weapons.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The legislature has reserved to itself the 
authority to determine where and under what circumstances firearms may be 
discharged, and the Division of Parks and Recreation is acting outside its 
legal authority by enforcing this rule.  The discharge of firearms in state 
parks provisions as found in Section 76-10-508 are sufficient to protect 
visitor health and safety.  Therefore, this rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no cost to the state budget because repealing 
this rule does not affect the budget.  Section 76-10-508 remains the 
enforcing statute.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no cost to local government because repealing 
this rule does not affect them in a budgetary sense.  Section 76-10-508 
remains the enforcing statute.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no cost to small businesses because repealing 
this rule does not affect them in a budgetary sense.  Section 76-10-508 
remains the enforcing statute.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no cost to persons other than small businesses, businesses 
or local government entities because repealing this rule does not affect them 
in a budgetary sense.  Section 76-10-508 remains the enforcing statute.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs 
associated with the repeal of this rule.  Section 76-10-508 remains the 
enforcing statute.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule change should have no impact on business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tammy Wright by phone at 801-538-7359, by FAX at 801-538-7378, or by 
Internet E-mail at tammywright@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36229.htm



PUBLIC SAFETY
DRIVER LICENSE
No. 36231 (Repeal and Reenact): R708-21. Third-Party Testing.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This repeal and reenactment puts the Utah 
Driver License Division into compliance with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety 
Administration (FMCSA) guidelines 383.75 for licensing and regulating of the 
CDL third party testers and examiners.  Removed from the original rule is the 
entire subsection F "Certificate of Driver Competency" because electronically 
sending the scores to Driver License no longer applies.  Subsection H has 
been rewritten to clarify sanction of the new rule. This document contains 
new definitions for the updated language of this rule.  Other items include 
change to the third-party testers that only companies that have been in 
business for at least two years or longer or that has an examiner that has 
been testing CDL drivers two years or longer are qualified to be in this 
program.  The examiners must give at least ten tests a year to stay 
complaint.  The company must designate a person that will maintain all files 
with new and used score sheets, inform Driver license of any personal changes 
and schedule the yearly reviews.  This document updates the third party 
examiner s requirement to have at least three years of driving experience, 
pass a criminal background check, and have physical strength to enter and 
exit a commercial vehicle.  The third-party examiner must take the required 
training and pass the final test with 80% or better.  Upon completion of 
training have a driver license employee watch an acceptable test to verify 
understanding of proper testing.  Processing the completed test has changed 
to help minimize fraud.  The test must be scheduled at least 48 hours on the 
Driver license web application prior to administering the test.  The scores 
are then sent into Driver license electronically within 48 hours of testing 
on Driver license web application.  The used score sheets must be destroyed 
after three years by the third-party tester.  Sections have been added to not 
allow a tester or examiner to withhold test sheets after a test has been 
administered.  Notification of accident has been added to help assure that 
testing routes are suitable and safe for testing.  Grounds for revocation, 
probation, or denial have been updated with language to more define 
consequences of violation of this rule.  Adjudicative proceedings have been 
added.  Changing this rule will adopt the changes recommended by the Utah 
legislative audit. One benefit of this change includes greater security and 
fraud reduction for the program by adding electronic scheduling and reporting 
of the test scores.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The state will see an increase associated with the 
requirement of a background check.  The Department of Public Safety will be 
receiving $20, or the current rate, for every background check.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Costs to local government will be the current price of 
a background check.  The Division cannot provide an estimate of the total 
costs to local government because it is not known how many background checks 
will need to be performed.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Costs to small businesses will be the current price of a 
background check.  The Division cannot provide an estimate of the total costs 
to small businesses because it is not known how many background checks will 
need to be performed.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Costs to individuals will be the current price of a background 
check.  The Division cannot provide an estimate of the total costs because 
the fee may be paid by small business or local government.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The compliance costs are currently 
$20 for each criminal background fee.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There will be a fiscal impact on business in order to be 
compliant with the required back ground check.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Marge Dalton by phone at 801-965-4456, by FAX at 801-957-8502, or by 
Internet E-mail at modalton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36231.htm


PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING
No. 36291 (Repeal and Reenact): R728-401. Requirements for Approval and 
Certification of Peace Officer Basic Training Programs and Applicants.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule change clarifies the requirements 
for establishing an approved basic peace officer training program in Utah.  
The previous rule stated that agencies could conduct a basic peace officer 
training program with approval of the POST council and by complying with POST 
approved procedures. This new rule states what those procedures are. The new 
rule requires an agency show a need for an additional basic peace officer 
training program before one will be approved.  The new rule outlines what is 
required in order to demonstrate a need for a new peace officer training 
program, including: the lack of an established program in the geographical 
region, a written request from a law enforcement agency requesting 
establishment of a new training program, a statement from a currently 
established program indicating they are unable to fill the need, or the 
ability to fulfill a specialized training need.  The new rule also 
establishes that POST will review the qualifications of any new satellite 
academy director.  The new rule clarifies that all applicants to a basic 
peace officer training program must pass the established physical fitness 
requirement.  Deleted from the old rule were references to specific classes 
that could not be missed during the basic training program.  These references 
were replaced with the requirement that no student who had missed more than 
16 hours of the basic course could become certifiable until appropriate 
makeup work has been completed.  The new rule also clarifies that all 
academic requirements must be completed before an individual will be allowed 
to take the certification exam.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The changes affected by the repeal and reenactment of 
this rule neither add any additional work to any state agency nor eliminate 
any work from any state agency.  The changes simply establish and clarify 
what will be considered in a process that is already part of agencies 
responsibility.  Since no additional work or resources are required or 
eliminated we anticipate that there will be no cost or savings to state 
budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The changes affected by the repeal and reenactment of 
this rule neither add nor eliminate any requirements from any local 
government agency.  The changes affect only institutions of higher learning 
wishing to become certified as a basic peace officer training program.  
Public safety agencies affiliated with a local government will not have any 
additional requirements.  Since there are no additional requirements we 
anticipate that there will be no cost or savings to local government because 
of this rule change.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This rule does not apply to or have affect on any small 
business.  Since the rule has no applicability to small business, the 
Division anticipates that there will be no cost or savings to small 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule will require institutions of higher learning to comply 
with procedures established herein should the institution request 
authorization to conduct a basic peace officer training course.  The rule 
will require the institution to provide some additional documentation that 
would likely be contained within just a few pages.  The anticipated 
additional costs to institutions of higher learning will be very minimal.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The changes affected by the repeal 
and reenactment of this rule neither adds nor eliminates any compliance 
requirements to any affected individuals.  Since no additional requirements 
are established, the Division anticipates that there will be no additional 
compliance costs to affected persons.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule affects only interaction between public safety 
agencies, institutions of higher learning and the Department of Public 
Safety, Peace Officer Standards and Training.  The rule does not apply to or 
have affect on businesses.  Therefore, this amendment will have no 
foreseeable fiscal impact on any businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Kelly Sparks by phone at 801-256-2321, by FAX at 801-256-0600, or by 
Internet E-mail at ksparks@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/30/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36291.htm

No. 36290 (Amendment): R728-409. Suspension or Revocation of Peace Officer 
Certification.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The POST Disciplinary Guidelines referenced 
in Section R728-409-16 were amended by the POST Council on 03/22/2012.  This 
amendment adds "and amended on March 22, 2012" in order to reference the 
proper version of the Disciplinary Guidelines.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no foreseeable cost or savings to the state 
budget associated with this amendment as the amendment simply updates the 
reference to the disciplinary guidelines.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no foreseeable cost or savings to local 
government associated with this amendment as the amendment simply updates the 
reference to the disciplinary guidelines.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no foreseeable cost or savings to small 
business associated with this amendment as the amendment simply updates the 
reference to the disciplinary guidelines.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no foreseeable cost or savings to other persons or 
entities associated with this amendment as the amendment simply updates the 
reference to the disciplinary guidelines.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There is no foreseeable cost or 
savings to affected persons associated with this amendment as the amendment 
simply updates the reference to the disciplinary guidelines.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This amendment will have no foreseeable fiscal impact on any 
business as the amendment simply updates the reference to the disciplinary 
guidelines.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Kelly Sparks by phone at 801-256-2321, by FAX at 801-256-0600, or by 
Internet E-mail at ksparks@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/30/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36290.htm



REGENTS (BOARD OF)
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36272 (Repeal): R765-607. Utah Higher Education Tuition Assistance 
Program.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The current year appropriation of $36,200 may be 
reflected as a savings in future budgets unless the legislature provides 
increased funding to any other need-based grant or scholarship program.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no associated costs to local governments in 
this program.  Repealing this program will have no effect to local government 
budgets.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This program and its repeal has no effect on small 
businesses since the program is restricted to higher education students.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Repealing this rule is required by H.B. 285 from the 2012 
legislative general session. Students will no longer be able to receive funds 
from this grant but may still apply for other state grants that could 
possibly have increased funding as a result of the repeal of the Utah Tuition 
Assistance Program.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs 
associated with this action for any person as this rule is being repealed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no fiscal impact to businesses by the repeal of this 
rule.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Ronell Crossley by phone at 801-321-7291, by FAX at 801-321-7299, or by 
Internet E-mail at rcrossley@utahsbr.edu
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36272.htm



SCHOOL AND INSTITUTIONAL TRUST LANDS
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36279 (Amendment): R850-21-300. Lease Application Process.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  A clause is being added to the lease 
application process to allow electronic bidding as a method the agency may 
use to lease trust lands for oil and gas.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no additional costs or savings to the 
state as a result of this rule amendment as any potential costs for using 
this service would be charged to the successful bidder.  This amendment 
simply opens an additional method to the agency for offering oil and gas 
leases.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  It is not anticipated that local government will be 
affected as a result of this rule amendment because local governments 
typically do not participate in oil and gas leasing.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The purpose of this rule amendment is to establish the 
potential for future electronic bidding processes.  Until such time as the 
agency decides to enter into a contract using this method, there are no costs 
or savings to small businesses.  If at some time in the future, the agency 
offers oil and gas leases by electronic bidding, the costs incurred by the 
contractor hosting the web-based auction would be passed along to the 
successful bidder of the lease.  At this time, those costs are unknown as the 
agency has not entered into any contracts and the costs could vary from one 
contract to another.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The purpose of this rule amendment is to establish the potential 
for future electronic bidding processes.  Until such time as the agency 
decides to enter into a contract using this method, there are no costs or 
savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local 
government entities.  If at some time in the future, the agency offers oil 
and gas leases by electronic bidding, the costs incurred by the contractor 
hosting the web-based auction would be passed along to the successful bidder 
of the lease.  At this time, those costs are unknown as the agency has not 
entered into any contracts and the costs could vary from one contract to 
another.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The purpose of this rule amendment is 
to establish the potential for future electronic bidding processes.  Until 
such time as the agency decides to enter into a contract using this method, 
there are no costs for compliance.  If at some time in the future, the agency 
offers oil and gas leases by electronic bidding, the costs incurred by the 
contractor hosting the web-based auction would be passed along to the 
successful bidder of the lease.  At this time, those costs are unknown as the 
agency has not entered into any contracts and the costs could vary from one 
contract to another.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The intent of this rule is to provide another mechanism for 
offering trust lands minerals for lease by the private sector.  As such, no 
adverse fiscal impact for business is anticipated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- LaVonne Garrison by phone at 801-538-5197, by FAX at 801-355-0922, or by 
Internet E-mail at lavonnegarrison@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36279.htm



WORKFORCE SERVICES
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
No. 36304 (Amendment): R986-100-114a. Determining When a Document is 
Considered Received by the Department.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Currently, the received date is the date the 
application is received.  If an application or other documents are received 
after 5 p.m. or on weekends, the rule states they are considered received on 
the next work date.  The Department has moved to an online application 
procedure.  The received date for online applications or other files will be 
the actual time received via the computer, not the next work date.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This applies to federally-funded programs so there are 
no costs or savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no 
costs or savings to the local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs to small businesses to comply 
with these changes because this is a federally-funded program.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs to persons other than small businesses, 
businesses or local government entities to comply with these changes because 
there are no costs or fees associated with these proposed changes.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs 
associated with these changes for any affected persons because this is a 
federally-funded program and there are no fees or costs associated with these 
proposed changes.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change. There 
are no fees associated with this change. There will be no cost to anyone to 
comply with these changes. There will be no fiscal impact on any business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36304.htm

No. 36303 (Amendment): R986-700-712. CC for Certain Homeless Families.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Currently, if a homeless family presents a 
referral from another agency, the department will schedule an interview 
within three days.  The policy will now allow for different procedures making 
sure to approve these applications quickly if eligible.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This applies to federally-funded programs so there are 
no costs or savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no 
costs or savings to the local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs to small businesses to comply 
with these changes because this is a federally-funded program.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs to persons other than small businesses, 
businesses or local government entities to comply with these changes because 
there are no costs or fees associated with these proposed changes.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs 
associated with these changes for any affected persons because this is a 
federally-funded program and there are no fees or costs associated with these 
proposed changes.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change. There 
are no fees associated with this change. There will be no cost to anyone to 
comply with these changes. There will be no fiscal impact on any business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36303.htm

No. 36300 (Amendment): R986-900-902. Options and Waivers.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Certain able-bodied food stamp recipients who 
have no dependent children are required to participate in employment 
activities.  The department opted to not require participation.  The 
department has decided to require those activities.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This applies to federally-funded programs so there are 
no costs or savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no 
costs or savings to the local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs to small businesses to comply 
with these changes because this is a federally-funded program.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs to persons other than small businesses, 
businesses or local government entities to comply with these changes because 
there are no costs or fees associated with these proposed changes.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs 
associated with these changes for any affected persons because this is a 
federally-funded program and there are no fees or costs associated with these 
proposed changes.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/16/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36300.htm




4.  NOTICES OF 120-DAY (EMERGENCY) RULES

An agency may file a 120-Day (Emergency) Rule when it finds that the regular 
rulemaking procedures would:
(a) cause an imminent peril to the public health, safety, or welfare;
(b) cause an imminent budget reduction because of budget restraints or 
federal requirements; or
(c) place the agency in violation of federal or state law (Subsection 63G-3-
304(1)).

A 120-Day Rule is effective at the moment the Division of Administrative 
Rules receives the filing, or on a later date designated by the agency.  A 
120-Day Rule is effective for 120 days or until it is superseded by a 
permanent rule.

Because 120-Day Rules are effective immediately, the law does not require a 
public comment period.  However, when an agency files a 120-Day Rule, it 
usually files a Proposed Rule at the same time, to make the requirements 
permanent.  Comment may be made on the Proposed Rule.

Emergency or 120-Day Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-304; and Section 
R15-4-8.


PUBLIC SAFETY
DRIVER LICENSE
No. 36283 (Emergency Rule): R708-47. Emergency Contact Database.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule sets standards to establish the 
procedures for a Utah license certificate holder, a Utah instruction permit 
holder, or a Utah identification card holder to provide the division with 
emergency contact information on person(s) to be contacted in the event of a 
motor vehicle accident or other emergency situation when the Utah certificate 
holder is unable to make contact with their designated emergency contact 
person(s) and to establish procedures to change the emergency contact 
information.
EMERGENCY RULE REASON AND JUSTIFICATION:
REGULAR RULEMAKING PROCEDURES WOULD place the agency in violation of federal 
or state law.
JUSTIFICATION:  H.B. 21 requires the Utah Driver License Division to 
establish an emergency contact database for Utah certificate holders to have 
the option of including emergency contact information for up to two 
individuals for law enforcment to contact in the event of an emergency and 
the certificate holder is unable to make contact.  This law is effective on 
07/01/2012.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  H.B. 21 received an appropriation in the amount of 
$32,000 from the Transportation Public Safety Restricted Account to implement 
the provisions of this bill.  Utah Interactive will receive $11,500 to 
design, build, and support the emergency contact web service.  The Utah 
Department of Technology Services will receive $20,000 to cover the 
programming cost to implement this bill.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local government is not affected by this rule because 
they do not have a role in the emergency contact database.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Small businesses are not affected by this rule because 
they do not have a role in the emergency contact database.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs to persons other than small businesses, 
businesses or local government entities because they do not have a role in 
the emergency contact database.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs for a Utah 
certificate holder to provide emergency contact information.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no fiscal impacts from this rule on businesses.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jill Laws by phone at 801-964-4469, by FAX at 801-964-4482, or by Internet 
E-mail at jlaws@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/01/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36283.htm




5.  FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION

Within five years of an administrative rule's original enactment or last 
five-year review, the agency is required to review the rule.  This review is 
intended to remove obsolete rules from the Utah Administrative Code.  Upon 
reviewing a rule, an agency may:  repeal the rule by filing a Proposed Rule; 
continue the rule as it is by filing a Notice of Review and Statement of 
Continuation (Notice); or amend the rule by filing a Proposed Rule and by 
filing a Notice.  By filing a Notice, the agency indicates that the rule is 
still necessary. 

The rule text that is being continued may be found in the most recent edition 
of the Utah Administrative Code.  The rule text may also be inspected at the 
agency or the Division of Administrative Rules.  Notices are effective upon 
filing.  

Notices are governed by Section 63G-3-305.


ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
RISK MANAGEMENT
No. 36286 (5-year Review): R37-1. Risk Management General Rules.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule accomplishes the statutory objectives enumerated in Subsection 63A-
4-101(b) and assists covered entities in understanding and fulfilling their 
obligations pertaining to the State Risk Management Fund.  Therefore, this 
rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Brian Nelson by phone at 801-538-9576, by FAX at 801-538-9597, or by 
Internet E-mail at benelson@utah.gov
- Stephen Hewlett by phone at 801-538-9572, by FAX at 801-538-9597, or by 
Internet E-mail at shewlett@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/30/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36286.htm

No. 36287 (5-year Review): R37-2. Risk Management State Workers' Compensation 
Insurance Administration.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule establishes and explains the responsibilities and guidelines 
concerning the acquisition and administration of workers' compensation 
insurance, the allocation of costs, and the required activities or actions of 
covered entities that use this coverage.  This information also creates 
standards that are intended to reduce workers' compensation claims and costs.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Brian Nelson by phone at 801-538-9576, by FAX at 801-538-9597, or by 
Internet E-mail at benelson@utah.gov
- Stephen Hewlett by phone at 801-538-9572, by FAX at 801-538-9597, or by 
Internet E-mail at shewlett@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/30/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36287.htm

No. 36288 (5-year Review): R37-3. Risk Management Adjudicative Proceedings.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The continuation of this rule is essential to ensure that all agency actions, 
which are subject to the Utah Administrative Procedures Act, continue to be 
designated as informal proceedings, because actions concerning coverage, 
premiums, and the interpretation of policies are actions relating to 
contracts for the purchase or sale of goods or services by and for the state 
or by and for an agency of the state and are excluded from coverage by the 
Administrative Procedures Act.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Brian Nelson by phone at 801-538-9576, by FAX at 801-538-9597, or by 
Internet E-mail at benelson@utah.gov
- Stephen Hewlett by phone at 801-538-9572, by FAX at 801-538-9597, or by 
Internet E-mail at shewlett@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/30/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36288.htm

No. 36289 (5-year Review): R37-4. Adjusted Utah Governmental Immunity Act 
Limitations on Judgments.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule should be continued to comply with statute and to adjust the 
limitation of judgment, which protects governmental entities and provides 
increased monetary remedies to eligible individuals and entities.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Stephen Hewlett by phone at 801-538-9572, by FAX at 801-538-9597, or by 
Internet E-mail at shewlett@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/30/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36289.htm



COMMUNITY AND CULTURE
HISTORY
No. 36299 (5-year Review): R212-1. Adjudicative Proceedings.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  It 
is important to have an effective administrative procedure for the Division 
of State History whereby any person aggrieved by a decision or determination 
may have a process by which to formally aggrieve that decision or 
determination.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Lynette Lloyd by phone at 801-533-3553, by FAX at 801-533-3567, or by 
Internet E-mail at lynettelloyd@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/31/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36299.htm

No. 36301 (5-year Review): R212-12. Computerized Record of Cemeteries, Burial 
Locations and Plots, and Granting Matching Funds.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule is required to provide a process and guidelines for granting 
matching funds to groups and organization in the state to create and maintain 
a computerized record of cemeteries and burial locations and to maintain 
those records in a state-coordinated and publicly accessible information 
system.  The rule helps promote, within the communities, an appreciation for 
Utah history.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Lynette Lloyd by phone at 801-533-3553, by FAX at 801-533-3567, or by 
Internet E-mail at lynettelloyd@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/31/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36301.htm



ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
RADIATION CONTROL
No. 36277 (5-year Review): R313-24. Uranium Mills and Source Material Mill 
Tailings Disposal Facility Requirements.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  It 
is necessary to continue this rule because it establishes the requirements 
for the regulation of uranium milling facilities and disposal of uranium mill 
tailings in the state of Utah.  In addition, under an agreement with the U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Division is the regulator and the rule is 
required for the State of Utah to maintain primacy from the U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission.  There are four facilities in Utah that are regulated 
under this rule.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- John Hultquist by phone at 801-536-4623, by FAX at 801-536-4250, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhultquist@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36277.htm


SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE
No. 36246 (5-year Review): R315-15. Standards for the Management of Used Oil.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The state is obligated to administer the Used Oil Management Act to maintain 
primacy in the State of Utah per Title 19 Chapter 6, Part 7 and Title 63G, 
Chapter 3.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Deborah Ng by phone at 801-536-0218, by FAX at 801-536-0222, or by Internet 
E-mail at dng@utah.gov
- Tina Mercer by phone at 801-536-0259, by FAX at 801-536-0222, or by 
Internet E-mail at tmmercer@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/17/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36246.htm



HUMAN SERVICES
JUVENILE JUSTICE SERVICES
No. 36226 (5-year Review): R547-6. Youth Parole Authority Policies and 
Procedures.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The division continues to be responsible for the operation of the Youth 
Parole Authority.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.  Nonsubstantive 
changes will be made in the near future.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Judy Hammer by phone at 801-538-4098, by FAX at 801-538-4334, or by 
Internet E-mail at judyhammer@utah.gov
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/16/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36226.htm

No. 36227 (5-year Review): R547-10. Ex-Offender Policy.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule is a minimum standard designed to prevent adults with a criminal 
history from working directly with youth offenders.  Therefore, this rule 
should be continued.  Nonsubstantive changes may be forthcoming.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Judy Hammer by phone at 801-538-4098, by FAX at 801-538-4334, or by 
Internet E-mail at judyhammer@utah.gov
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/16/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36227.htm



NATURAL RESOURCES
PARKS AND RECREATION
No. 36225 (5-year Review): R651-301. State Recreation Fiscal Assistance 
Programs.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
There were no written comments either in favor or against this rule.  Rule 
R615-301 should be continued because it defines an application process, 
defines the fiscal assistance program requirements, outlines a project 
selection process, and sets priorities for a project selection criteria.  
Without this direction or process listed as a rule, there would be no 
consistency upon awarding fiscal assistance, in the form of grants, to 
communities, other government agencies and/or non-profit organizations, that 
participate in various forms of recreation across the state.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tammy Wright by phone at 801-538-7359, by FAX at 801-538-7378, or by 
Internet E-mail at tammywright@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/16/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36225.htm


WILDLIFE RESOURCES
No. 36280 (5-year Review): R657-4. Possession of Live Game Birds.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R657-4 provides the procedures and requirements for the possession, 
importation, purchase, propagation, sale, barter, trade or disposal of live 
game birds.  The procedures adopted in this rule have provided an effective 
and efficient process.  Continuation of this rule is necessary for continued 
success of this program.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by 
Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/29/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36280.htm



PUBLIC SAFETY
FIRE MARSHAL
No. 36251 (5-year Review): R710-2. Rules Pursuant to the Utah Fireworks Act.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Fireworks are an important part of our citizens' allowance to celebrate our 
freedoms as a nation and a state.  Utah has had a Utah Fireworks Act since 
the early 1980s, that has regulated what is legal for usage as fireworks and 
also those fireworks that are considered as illegal in our state.  Without a 
Utah Fireworks Act, you would have all types of dangerous fireworks being 
discharged in the State of Utah.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.  
The agency disagrees with the comments that were made in 2011 by two specific 
fireworks distributors.  Their opposition to the proposed rule were based on 
their vision of safety, and also for their desire to control a larger portion 
of the market share for the sales of fireworks in the state.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Brent Halladay by phone at 801-284-6352, by FAX at 801-284-6351, or by 
Internet E-mail at bhallada@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/21/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36251.htm

No. 36273 (5-year Review): R710-3. Assisted Living Facilities.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule should be continued for an important part of our society that is 
required to receive assisted living due to age, health, or disability.  
Assisted living and group home assisted living arrangements are established 
for people who can no longer provide full care for themselves and need to 
receive some assistance in their daily lives that they cannot provide for  
themselves.  Due to the fact that they are now under some care by an outside 
caregiver, it is paramount that the living conditions be monitored for fire 
and life safety concerns to insure the client has the safest living 
conditions possible.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Brent Halladay by phone at 801-284-6352, by FAX at 801-284-6351, or by 
Internet E-mail at bhallada@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36273.htm

No. 36278 (5-year Review): R710-4. Buildings Under the Jurisdiction of the 
State Fire Prevention Board.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The Utah State Legislature has mandated by statute that a number of high 
profile occupancies be overseen by the State Fire Marshal's Office.  They are 
state-owned buildings, public and private schools, colleges and universities, 
and all institutional occupancies to include hospitals, nursing homes, 
assisted living facilities, prisons and jails.  Some of the requirements are 
specific enough that they have been housed in Rule R710-4.  This rule deals 
with specific fire alarm requirements, fire drills in schools, and other 
specific requirements with regard to fire and life safety in these 
occupancies.  This rule needs to continue for the next five years.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Brent Halladay by phone at 801-284-6352, by FAX at 801-284-6351, or by 
Internet E-mail at bhallada@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36278.htm

No. 36250 (5-year Review): R710-7. Concerns Servicing Automatic Fire 
Suppression Systems.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The servicing of automatic fire suppression hood systems has been regulated 
in the State of Utah for the last 20 years and should continue for the next 5 
years.  An automatic fire suppression hood system is the only line of defense 
to suppress a fire in the hood system over commercial cooking systems.  If a 
fire occurs in the fan and exhaust system above a commercial cooking system, 
and there is no built in suppression system to stop the fire in that hood 
system, there is a real possibility to have major fire damage to the 
occupancy.  Hood systems extend up through the attic and it is well known 
that if a fire vents into an open attic it is almost impossible to suppress.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Brent Halladay by phone at 801-284-6352, by FAX at 801-284-6351, or by 
Internet E-mail at bhallada@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/21/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36250.htm


PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING
No. 36245 (5-year Review): R728-505. Service Dog Program Rules.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule establishes requirements and procedures for the police service dog 
training program.  It also establishes performance and graduation 
requirements.  It is necessary to continue this rule in order to ensure 
service dogs and service dog handlers are properly trained and meet the 
certification requirements.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Kelly Sparks by phone at 801-256-2321, by FAX at 801-256-0600, or by 
Internet E-mail at ksparks@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/17/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36245.htm



SCHOOL AND INSTITUTIONAL TRUST LANDS
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36274 (5-year Review): R850-1. Definition of Terms.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
There are many terms that are unique to various programs administered by the 
agency.  This rule enables the School and Institutional Trust Lands 
Administration to define and clarify  terminology used throughout the 
agency's rules in one location rather than creating a substantial amount of 
repetition by defining program-related terms within each individual program 
rule.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- John Andrews by phone at 801-538-5180, by FAX at 801-538-5118, or by 
Internet E-mail at jandrews@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36274.htm

No. 36275 (5-year Review): R850-2. Trust Land Management Objectives.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The lands administered by the School and Institutional Trust Lands 
Administration are held in trust for the benefit of specifically-designated 
beneficiaries.  This rule outlines the objectives of the agency in fulfilling 
its fiduciary duty to those beneficiaries with regard to the use and 
disposition of their respective lands.  The rule also clarifies for the 
general public and other governmental entities the purposes for which these 
lands were granted.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Kevin Carter by phone at 801-538-5101, by FAX at 801-538-5118, or by 
Internet E-mail at kevincarter@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36275.htm

No. 36276 (5-year Review): R850-3. Applicant Qualifications, Application 
Forms, and Application Processing.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is necessary as it sets forth the requirements an applicant must 
meet in order to be qualified as a user of trust lands.  It also sets forth 
guidelines for the agency to follow for consistency in the acceptance or 
rejection of submitted applications.  Therefore, this rule should be 
continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- John Andrews by phone at 801-538-5180, by FAX at 801-538-5118, or by 
Internet E-mail at jandrews@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/23/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36276.htm



WORKFORCE SERVICES
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
No. 36256 (5-year Review): R994-404. Payments Following Workers' 
Compensation.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule is necessary to provide information to claimants on how their claim 
will be handled in the event of a workers' compensation claim.  Therefore, 
this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/22/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36256.htm

No. 36257 (5-year Review): R994-406. Fraud, Fault and Nonfault Overpayments.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule provides information to claimants and Department personnel on how it 
is determined which type of overpayment applies and how that overpayment will 
be collected.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/22/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36257.htm




6.  NOTICES OF FIVE-YEAR REVIEW EXTENSIONS

Rulewriting agencies are required by law to review each of their 
administrative rules within five years of the date of the rule's original 
enactment or the date of last review (Section 63G-3-305).  If the agency 
finds that it will not meet the deadline for review of the rule (the five-
year anniversary date), it may file an extension with the Division of 
Administrative Rules.  The extension permits the agency to file the review up 
to 120 days beyond the anniversary date.

Agencies have filed extensions for the rules listed below.  The "Extended Due 
Date" is 120 days after the anniversary date.  

The five-year review extension is governed by Subsections 63G-3-305(4) and 
(5).


COMMUNITY AND CULTURE
HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE TARGET (HEAT)
No. 36293 (Five-Year Extension): R195-2. Energy Assistance Programs 
Standards.
EXTENSION REASON:  A request was received from Michael Hansen, Deputy 
Director of the Department of Community and Culture (DCC) to extend the 
deadline for the five-year reviews of Rules R195-2 through R195-8.  DCC is in 
the process of preparing repeals for these rules because the responsibility 
for the HEAT program has been moved to the Department of Workforce Services 
and DCC cannot complete them by the current deadline.  The new deadline is 
10/20/2012.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Michael Hansen by phone at 801-245-7204, by FAX at 801-521-4727, or by 
Internet E-mail at mhansen1@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/31/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36293.htm

No. 36294 (Five-Year Extension): R195-3. Energy Assistance Income Standards, 
Income Eligibility, and Payment Determination.
EXTENSION REASON:  A request was received from Michael Hansen, Deputy 
Director of the Department of Community and Culture (DCC) to extend the 
deadline for the five-year reviews of Rules R195-2 through R195-8.  DCC is in 
the process of preparing repeals for these rules because the responsibility 
for the HEAT program has been moved to the Department of Workforce Services 
and DCC cannot complete them by the current deadline.  The new deadline is 
10/20/2012.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Michael Hansen by phone at 801-245-7204, by FAX at 801-521-4727, or by 
Internet E-mail at mhansen1@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/31/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36294.htm

No. 36295 (Five-Year Extension): R195-4. Energy Assistance:  Asset Standards.
EXTENSION REASON:  A request was received from Michael Hansen, Deputy 
Director of the Department of Community and Culture (DCC) to extend the 
deadline for the five-year reviews of Rules R195-2 through R195-8.  DCC is in 
the process of preparing repeals for these rules because the responsibility 
for the HEAT program has been moved to the Department of Workforce Services 
and DCC cannot complete them by the current deadline.  The new deadline is 
10/20/2012.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Michael Hansen by phone at 801-245-7204, by FAX at 801-521-4727, or by 
Internet E-mail at mhansen1@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/31/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36295.htm

No. 36296 (Five-Year Extension): R195-5. Energy Assistance:  Program 
Benefits.
EXTENSION REASON:  A request was received from Michael Hansen, Deputy 
Director of the Department of Community and Culture (DCC) to extend the 
deadline for the five-year reviews of Rules R195-2 through R195-8.  DCC is in 
the process of preparing repeals for these rules because the responsibility 
for the HEAT program has been moved to the Department of Workforce Services 
and DCC cannot complete them by the current deadline.  The new deadline is 
10/20/2012.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Michael Hansen by phone at 801-245-7204, by FAX at 801-521-4727, or by 
Internet E-mail at mhansen1@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/31/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36296.htm

No. 36297 (Five-Year Extension): R195-6. Energy Assistance:  Eligibility 
Determination.
EXTENSION REASON:  A request was received from Michael Hansen, Deputy 
Director of the Department of Community and Culture (DCC) to extend the 
deadline for the five-year reviews of Rules R195-2 through R195-8.  DCC is in 
the process of preparing repeals for these rules because the responsibility 
for the HEAT program has been moved to the Department of Workforce Services 
and DCC cannot complete them by the current deadline.  The new deadline is 
10/23/2012.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Michael Hansen by phone at 801-245-7204, by FAX at 801-521-4727, or by 
Internet E-mail at mhansen1@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/31/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36297.htm

No. 36298 (Five-Year Extension): R195-7. Energy Assistance:  Records and 
Benefit Management.
EXTENSION REASON:  A request was received from Michael Hansen, Deputy 
Director of the Department of Community and Culture (DCC) to extend the 
deadline for the five-year reviews of Rules R195-2 through R195-8.  DCC is in 
the process of preparing repeals for these rules because the responsibility 
for the HEAT program has been moved to the Department of Workforce Services 
and DCC cannot complete them by the current deadline.  The new deadline is 
10/23/2012.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Michael Hansen by phone at 801-245-7204, by FAX at 801-521-4727, or by 
Internet E-mail at mhansen1@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/31/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36298.htm

No. 36302 (Five-Year Extension): R195-8. Energy Assistance:  Special State 
Programs.
EXTENSION REASON:  A request was received from Michael Hansen, Deputy 
Director of the Department of Community and Culture (DCC) to extend the 
deadline for the five-year reviews of Rules R195-2 through R195-8.  DCC is in 
the process of preparing repeals for these rules because the responsibility 
for the HEAT program has been moved to the Department of Workforce Services 
and DCC cannot complete them by the current deadline.  The new deadline is 
10/23/2012.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Michael Hansen by phone at 801-245-7204, by FAX at 801-521-4727, or by 
Internet E-mail at mhansen1@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  05/31/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120615/36302.htm




7.  NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES

State law provides for agencies to make their rules effective and enforceable 
after publication in the Utah State Bulletin. In the case of Proposed Rules 
or Changes in Proposed Rules with a designated comment period, the law 
permits an agency to file a notice of effective date any time after the close 
of comment plus seven days. In the case of Changes in Proposed Rules with no 
designated comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of 
effective date on any date including or after the thirtieth day after the 
rule's publication date. If an agency fails to file a Notice of Effective 
Date within 120 days from the publication of a Proposed Rule or a related 
Change in Proposed Rule the rule lapses and the agency must start the 
rulemaking process over.

Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301(12), 63G-3-
303, and Sections R15-4-5a and 5b. 


ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
FINANCE
No. 35975  (NEW): R25-20.  Indigent Defense Funds Board, Procedures for 
Electronic Meetings
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012



ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL
ADMINISTRATION
No. 35943  (AMD): R81-4A-2.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35944  (AMD): R81-4B-2.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35945  (AMD): R81-4C-2.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35946  (AMD): R81-4D-2.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35947  (AMD): R81-4E-2.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35948  (AMD): R81-4F-2.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35949  (AMD): R81-5-2.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35950  (AMD): R81-6-1.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35951  (AMD): R81-8-1.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35952  (AMD): R81-9-1.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35953  (AMD): R81-10A-3.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35954  (AMD): R81-10C-2.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35955  (AMD): R81-10D-2.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35956  (AMD): R81-11-1.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35957  (AMD): R81-12-1.  Application
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012



COMMERCE
REAL ESTATE
No. 35915  (AMD): R162-2e-402.  Administrative Proceedings
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/23/2012



GOVERNOR
PLANNING AND BUDGET, INSPECTOR GENERAL OF MEDICAID SERVICES (OFFICE OF)
No. 35958  (AMD): R367-1-15.  Administrative Hearings
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/23/2012



HEALTH
HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY
No. 35994  (AMD): R414-1-5.  Incorporations by Reference
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/24/2012



JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 35934  (AMD): R597-3.  Judicial Performance Evaluations
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  06/01/2012



LABOR COMMISSION
BOILER AND ELEVATOR SAFETY
No. 35963  (AMD): R616-2-3.  Safety Codes and Rules for Boilers and Pressure 
Vessels
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35961  (AMD): R616-2-15.  Deputy Boiler/Pressure Vessel Inspectors
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 35962  (AMD): R616-3-3.  Safety Codes for Elevators
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012



NATURAL RESOURCES
OIL, GAS AND MINING; COAL
No. 35995  (AMD): R645-100-200.  Definitions
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/23/2012

No. 35996  (AMD): R645-300-100.  Review, Public Participation, and Approval 
or Disapproval of Permit Applications and Permit Terms and Conditions
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/23/2012

No. 35997  (AMD): R645-301-100.  General Contents
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/23/2012

No. 35998  (AMD): R645-302-200.  Special Categories of Mining
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/23/2012

No. 35999  (AMD): R645-303-300.  Transfer, Assignment, or Sale of Permit 
Rights
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/23/2012

No. 36000  (AMD): R645-400-300.  Provisions of State Enforcement
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/23/2012

No. 36001  (NEW): R645-403.  Alternative Enforcement
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/23/2012



PUBLIC SAFETY
FIRE MARSHAL
No. 36022  (AMD): R710-4-3.  Amendments and Additions
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

No. 36023  (AMD): R710-10-5.  Fire Service Standards and Training Council
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012

Workforce Services
Employment Development
No. 35919  (AMD): R986-200-214.  Assistance for Specified Relatives
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  05/22/2012




8.  RULES INDEX

The Rules Index is a cumulative index that reflects all effective Utah 
administrative rules.  The Rules Index is not included Digest.  However, a 
copy of the current Rules Index is available 
http://www.rules.utah.gov/research.htm .


<<end of file>>