Utah State Digest, Vol. 2012, No. 13 (July 1, 2012)

[NOTE:  The Utah State Digest (Digest) is created from the eRules filing 
database used to create the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin).  While a 
discrepancy between the Digest and the Bulletin is highly unlikely, any 
discrepancies will be resolved in favor of the Bulletin.  Please refer to the 
State Disclaimer ( http://www.utah.gov/disclaimer.html ) for more 
information.]

------------------------------------------------------------

UTAH STATE DIGEST
Summary of the Contents of the Utah State Bulletin


For information filed June 2, 2012, 12:00 AM through June 15, 2012, 11:59 PM


Volume 2012, No. 13
July 1, 2012


Prepared by
Division of Administrative Rules
Department of Administrative Services


The Utah State Digest (Digest) is an official electronic publication of the 
State of Utah, Department of Administrative Services, Division of 
Administrative Rules.  It is a summary of the information found in the Utah 
State Bulletin (Bulletin) of the same volume and issue number.  Inquiries 
concerning the substance or applicability of an administrative rule that 
appear in the Digest should be addressed to the contact person for the rule.  
Questions about the Digest or the rulemaking process may be addressed to:  
Division of Administrative Rules, 5110 State Office Building, Salt Lake City, 
Utah 84114-1201, telephone 801-538-3218, FAX 801-359-0759.  Additional 
rulemaking information, and electronic versions of all administrative rule 
publications are available at:  http://www.rules.utah.gov/ .  The Digest is 
available free of charge online at 
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm and by E-mail Listserv.  




************************************************
Division of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City  84114

Unless otherwise noted, all information presented in this publication is in 
the public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as 
desired.  Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted 
by their respective authors.  Citation to the source is requested.



Utah state digest.
  Semimonthly.
  1.  Delegated legislation--Utah--Digests. I.  Utah. Office 
of Administrative Rules.

KFU38.U8
348.792'025--DDC            86-658042
***********************************************




1.  SPECIAL NOTICES

Rule R307-202, Emission Standards: General Burning -- Section 110(l) 
Demonstration
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/sn152688.htm

Notice for July 2012 Childrens Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/sn152798.htm




2.  EXECUTIVE DOCUMENTS

As part of his or her constitutional duties, the Governor periodically issues 
Executive Documents comprised of Executive Orders, Proclamations, and 
Declarations.  "Executive Orders" set policy for the Executive Branch; create 
boards and commissions; provide for the transfer of authority; or otherwise 
interpret, implement, or give administrative effect to a provision of the 
Constitution, state law or executive policy.  "Proclamations" call special or 
extraordinary legislative sessions; designate classes of cities; publish 
states-of-emergency; promulgate other official formal public announcements or 
functions; or publicly avow or cause certain matters of state government to 
be made generally known.  "Declarations" designate special days, weeks or 
other time periods;  call attention to or recognize people, groups, 
organizations, functions, or similar actions having a public purpose; or 
invoke specific legislative purposes (such as the declaration of an 
agricultural disaster).  

The Governor's Office staff files Executive Documents that have legal effect 
with the Division of Administrative Rules for publication and distribution.  
All orders issued by the Governor not in conflict with existing laws have the 
full force and effect of law during a state of emergency when a copy of the 
order is filed with the Division of Administrative Rules. (See Section 63K-4-
401).

Governor's Executive Order EO/004/2012:  Creating the Disabilities Advisory 
Council
- Ashlee Buchholz by phone at 801-538-1621, by FAX at 801-538-1528, or by 
Internet E-mail at Abuchholz@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/execdocs/2012/ExecDoc152828.htm

Governor's Executive Order EO/005/2012:  Automotive Idling Reduction
- Ashlee Buchholz by phone at 801-538-1621, by FAX at 801-538-1528, or by 
Internet E-mail at Abuchholz@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/execdocs/2012/ExecDoc152817.htm

Governor's Executive Order EO/006/2012:  Wildland Fire Management
- Ashlee Buchholz by phone at 801-538-1621, by FAX at 801-538-1528, or by 
Internet E-mail at Abuchholz@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/execdocs/2012/ExecDoc152818.htm

Governor's Proclamation 2012/4/S:  Calling the Fifty-Ninth Legislature into 
the Fourth Special Session
- Cherilyn Bradford by phone at 801-538-1505, by FAX at 801-538-1528, or by 
Internet E-mail at Cbradford@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/execdocs/2012/ExecDoc152827.htm

Governor's Declaration:  Concerning Fire Danger Throughout Utah
- Ashlee Buchholz by phone at 801-538-1621, by FAX at 801-538-1528, or by 
Internet E-mail at Abuchholz@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/execdocs/2012/ExecDoc152839.htm




3.  NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

A state agency may file a Proposed Rule when it determines the need for a new 
rule, a substantive change to an existing rule, or a repeal of an existing 
rule.  Filings received between June 2, 2012, 12:00 a.m., and June 15, 2012, 
11:59 p.m. are summarized in this, the July 1, 2012, issue of the Utah State 
Digest.

The law requires that an agency accept public comment on Proposed Rules 
published in the July 1, 2012, issue of the Utah State Bulletin until at 
least July 31, 2012 (the Bulletin is the parent publication of the Digest).  
The agency may accept comment beyond this date and will indicate the last day 
the agency will accept comment in the rule information published below.  The 
agency may also hold public hearings.  Additionally, citizens or 
organizations may request the agency hold a hearing on a specific Proposed 
Rule.  Section 63G-3-302 requires that a hearing request be received by the 
agency proposing the rule "in writing not more than 15 days after the 
publication date of the proposed rule."

From the end of the public comment period through October 29, 2012, the 
agency may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants to make 
the Proposed Rule effective.  The agency sets the effective date.  The date 
may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public 
comment period nor more than 120 days after the publication date in the Utah 
State Bulletin.  Alternatively, the agency may file a Change in Proposed Rule 
in response to comments received.  If the Division of Administrative Rules 
does not receive a Notice of Effective Date or a Change in Proposed Rule, the 
Proposed Rule lapses and the agency must start the process over.

The public, interest groups, and governmental agencies are invited to review 
and comment on the Proposed Rules listed below.  Comment may be directed to 
the contact person identified with each rule. 

Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-301; Rule R15-2; and Sections 
R15-4-3, R15-4-4, R15-4-5, R15-4-9, and R15-4-10.


COMMUNITY AND CULTURE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36353 (New Rule): R182-2. Preservation Pro Fee.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The department is committed to maintaining 
Preservation Pro in order to streamline the cultural resource management 
processes.  Therefore, the user fees collected will contribute, along with 
ongoing digitization funds, to the ongoing operation, maintenance, and 
improvement of the application.  This fee is necessary in order to grant the 
department authority to use its discretion in assessing the fee to different 
users.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The department intends to continue to develop the 
Preservation Pro tool in the coming years.  The revenue from the user fee 
will be dedicated to the tool's operation and maintenance costs.  Both of 
these amounts will change based on development and usage rates.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No impact--The components of the Preservation Pro tool 
that are available to the public are provided at no cost.  This fee is 
targeted to the users of protected information.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The primary users of the antiquities section of 
Preservation Pro are consulting firms specializing in cultural resources.  
Within the current constraints, the department has done its best to decrease 
the fee as much as possible in hopes of maintaining a consistent user base.  
This will continue to be an evolving process as the department looks to 
future fiscal years.  The intent of this rule is to establish a process 
whereby the department can adjust user fees to better match usage rates, etc.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No impact--The components of the Preservation Pro tool that are 
available to the public are provided at no cost.  This fee is targeted to the 
users of protected information.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The Preservation Pro fee structure 
for Fiscal Year 2013 is as follows:  1 user, 30 consecutive days:  $100; 1 or 
2 users, July 1 through June 30: $200 total; 3 users, July 1 through June 30: 
$300; 4 users, July 1 through June 30: $400; and Unlimited users: $500.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Most of the capability of this tool is not available to the 
general public.  The primary users of this tool are small businesses that 
benefit from reduced transaction costs and increased access to cultural 
resource information.  The Preservation Pro initiative is an iterative 
process.  As the value of the tool increases, the fee should evolve as well.  
The Division has conducted workshops and surveys of users on the best way to 
assess the fee, and is responding to those comments.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Michael Hansen by phone at 801-245-7204, by FAX at 801-521-4727, or by 
Internet E-mail at mhansen1@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36353.htm


HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE TARGET (HEAT)
No. 36313 (Repeal): R195-1. Energy Assistance:  General Provisions.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Susan Kolthoff by phone at 801-526-9303756, by FAX at 801-526-9292, or by 
Internet E-mail at skolthoff@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36313.htm

No. 36314 (Repeal): R195-2. Energy Assistance Programs Standards.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Susan Kolthoff by phone at 801-526-9303756, by FAX at 801-526-9292, or by 
Internet E-mail at skolthoff@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36314.htm

No. 36315 (Repeal): R195-3. Energy Assistance Income Standards, Income 
Eligibility, and Payment Determination.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.al to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Susan Kolthoff by phone at 801-526-9303756, by FAX at 801-526-9292, or by 
Internet E-mail at skolthoff@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36315.htm

No. 36316 (Repeal): R195-4. Energy Assistance:  Asset Standards.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Susan Kolthoff by phone at 801-526-9303756, by FAX at 801-526-9292, or by 
Internet E-mail at skolthoff@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36316.htm

No. 36317 (Repeal): R195-5. Energy Assistance:  Program Benefits.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Susan Kolthoff by phone at 801-526-9303756, by FAX at 801-526-9292, or by 
Internet E-mail at skolthoff@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36317.htm

No. 36318 (Repeal): R195-6. Energy Assistance:  Eligibility Determination.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Susan Kolthoff by phone at 801-526-9303756, by FAX at 801-526-9292, or by 
Internet E-mail at skolthoff@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36318.htm

No. 36319 (Repeal): R195-7. Energy Assistance:  Records and Benefit 
Management.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Susan Kolthoff by phone at 801-526-9303756, by FAX at 801-526-9292, or by 
Internet E-mail at skolthoff@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36319.htm

No. 36320 (Repeal): R195-8. Energy Assistance:  Special State Programs.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Susan Kolthoff by phone at 801-526-9303756, by FAX at 801-526-9292, or by 
Internet E-mail at skolthoff@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36320.htm


HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
No. 36321 (Repeal): R199-8. Permanent Community Impact Fund Board Review and 
Approval of Applications for Funding Assistance.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Keith Burnett by phone at 801-538-8725, by FAX at 801-538-8888, or by 
Internet E-mail at kjburnett@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36321.htm

No. 36322 (Repeal): R199-9. Policy Concerning Enforceability and Taxability 
of Bonds Purchased.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Keith Burnett by phone at 801-538-8725, by FAX at 801-538-8888, or by 
Internet E-mail at kjburnett@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36322.htm

No. 36323 (Repeal): R199-10. Procedures in Case of Inability to Formulate 
Contract for Alleviation of Impact.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Keith Burnett by phone at 801-538-8725, by FAX at 801-538-8888, or by 
Internet E-mail at kjburnett@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36323.htm

No. 36324 (Repeal): R199-11. Community Development Block Grants (CDBG).
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Keith Heaton by phone at 801-538-8732, by FAX at 801-538-8888, or by 
Internet E-mail at kheaton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36324.htm


HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY SERVICES
No. 36325 (Repeal): R202-100. Community Services Block Grant Rules.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jonathan Hardy by phone at 801-538-8650, by FAX at 801-538-8888, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhardy@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36325.htm

No. 36326 (Repeal): R202-101. Qualified Emergency Food Agencies Fund (QEFAF).
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jonathan Hardy by phone at 801-538-8650, by FAX at 801-538-8888, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhardy@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36326.htm


OLENE WALKER HOUSING TRUST FUND
No. 36327 (Repeal): R235-1. Olene Walker Housing Loan Fund (OWHLF).
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is repealed in its entirety.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this 
proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS 
which has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed repeal.  
Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which has filed a 
new replacement rule identical to this one.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings 
associated with this proposed repeal.  Responsibility for this program has 
been transferred to DWS which has filed a new replacement rule identical to 
this one.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings associated with this proposed 
repeal.  Responsibility for this program has been transferred to DWS which 
has filed a new replacement rule identical to this one.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Shelli Goble by phone at 801-538-8653, by FAX at 801-538-8888, or by 
Internet E-mail at shgoble@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36327.htm



EDUCATION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36364 (New Rule): R277-408. Grants for Online Testing.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The new rule provides definitions, procedures 
for applications for funding, standards for online adaptive testing 
technology, criteria for appropriate use of funding, and procedures for 
distribution of funding.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  Legislative funding is provided and will be distributed to LEAs 
consistent with the law and this rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  Selected LEAs will be provided funding to implement uniform 
online testing.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule applies to public education and does not affect 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  This rule applies to 
LEAs applying for grants to implement online testing and does not affect 
individuals.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  LEAs applying for grants to implement online testing will 
comply with state law and the provisions of this rule to receive funding.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36364.htm

No. 36366 (Amendment): R277-467. Distribution of Funds Appropriated for 
Library Books and Electronic Resources.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The changes to the rule include adding and 
revising definitions and updating terminology throughout the rule.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  Updated terminology throughout the rule does not result in any cost 
or savings to the state.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  Updated terminology throughout the rule does not result in any 
cost or savings to local government or local education agencies.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule applies to public education and does not affect 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to local government.  
Updated terminology throughout the rule does not result in any cost or 
savings to individuals.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There is no anticipated cost or 
savings to local government.  Updated terminology throughout the rule does 
not result in any compliance costs.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36366.htm

No. 36367 (Amendment): R277-470. Charter Schools - General Provisions.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The amendments to this rule include providing 
new definitions, adding a new section on charter school start-up and 
implementation grants, and adding a new section on the charter school 
mentoring program.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  Funding, appropriated by the 2012 Legislature, will be provided to 
charter schools that desire to receive charter school start-up and 
implementation grants and choose to participate in the charter school 
mentoring program.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  Charter schools that desire to receive charter school start-up 
and implementation grants and choose to participate in the charter school 
mentoring program will receive funding appropriated by the 2012 Legislature.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  The amendments to this rule apply to public charter schools and 
do not affect businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  This rule applies to 
public charter schools and does not affect individuals.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  Participating charter schools will comply with state law 
and the provisions of this rule to receive funding.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36367.htm

No. 36368 (Amendment): R277-482. Charter School Timelines and Approval 
Processes.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The amendments to this rule provide an 
expanded description of underserved student populations and new language 
providing a formula for counting online students in charter school counts.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  The changes to the rule are procedural and do not affect total 
funding.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  The changes to the rule are procedural and do not affect overall 
funding.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This amendments to this rule apply to public charter schools and 
do not affect businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  The changes to the 
rule are procedural and do not affect overall funding or affect individuals.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  The changes to the rule are procedural.  Charter schools 
will comply with state law and the provisions of this rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36368.htm

No. 36370 (Amendment): R277-488. Critical Languages Program.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The amendments include making changes to and 
removing definitions, changing the Critical Language Program requirements, 
changing the Dual Language Immersion Program requirements, and making changes 
to USOE responsibilities and funds.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  Funding, as appropriated by the Legislature, will be provided to 
schools that offer and participate in the Critical Language Program and the 
Dual Language Immersion Programs.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  Schools that offer and participate in the Critical Language 
Program and the Dual Language Immersion Program will receive funding, as 
appropriated by the Legislature.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  The amendments to this rule apply to public education and do not 
affect businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  The amendments to this 
rule affect public schools and do not affect individuals.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  Schools participating in the Programs will comply with 
state law and the provisions of this rule to receive funding.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36370.htm

No. 36373 (Amendment): R277-489. Optional Extended Day Kindergarten - 
Responsibilities, Timelines, and Funding.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The amendments include new definitions, a new 
section on Utah State Board of Education (Board)/Utah State Office of 
Education (USOE) responsibilities, new title of "School District 
Responsibilities" to "LEA Responsibilities" and rewriting the section, and 
removing the charter school responsibilities and funding sections.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  The program is funded by the 2012 Legislature and funding will be 
distributed to LEAs for eligible schools.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  Eligible schools will receive funding for early intervention 
programs.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  The amendments to this rule apply to public education and do not 
affect businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  Funding will be 
distributed to LEAs for eligible schools and does not affect individuals.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  Eligible program participants will comply with state law 
and the provisions of this rule to receive funding.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36373.htm

No. 36374 (New Rule): R277-618. Educator Peer Assistance and Review Pilot 
Program (PAR Program).
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule provides definitions, Utah 
State Board of Education responsibilities, school district responsibilities, 
and reporting and accountability requirements.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  Funds appropriated in the 2012 General Session will be distributed 
to participating school districts.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  Participating school districts will receive funding for 
participation in the program.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This new rule applies to public education and does not affect 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  Funds will be 
distributed to school districts and the rule does not affect individuals.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  School districts will comply with state law and the 
provisions of this rule to receive program funding.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36374.htm



HEALTH
HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY
No. 36375 (Amendment): R414-1. Utah Medicaid Program.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Section R414-1-5 is changed to update the 
incorporation of the State Plan by reference to 07/01/2012.  It also 
incorporates by reference State Plan Amendments (SPAs) that become effective 
no later than 07/01/2012.  SPA 12-001-UT, Presumptive Eligibility for 
Children was approved by CMS and became effective during the second quarter 
of calendar year 2012.  This SPA allows presumptive eligibility for 
individuals who are under 19 years of age if a qualified entity determines 
that they are eligible.  This rule change also incorporates by reference the 
Medical Supplies Manual and List and the hospital services provider manual, 
effective 07/01/2012; incorporates by reference both the definitions and the 
attachment for the Private Duty Nursing Acuity Grid found in the Home Health 
Agencies Provider Manual, effective 07/01/2012; incorporates by reference the 
Speech-Language Services Provider Manual, effective 07/01/2012; incorporates 
by reference the Audiology Services Provider Manual, effective 07/01/2012; 
incorporates by reference the Hospice Care Provider Manual, effective 
07/01/2012; incorporates by reference the Long Term Care Services in Nursing 
Facilities Provider Manual, with its attachments, effective 07/01/2012; 
incorporates by reference the Utah Home and Community-Based Waiver Services 
for Individuals 65 or Older Provider Manual, effective 07/01/2012; 
incorporates by reference the Personal Care Provider Manual, with its 
attachments, effective 07/01/2012; incorporates by reference the Utah Home 
and Community-Based Waiver Services for Individuals with Acquired Brain 
Injury Age 18 and Older Provider Manual, effective 07/01/2012; incorporates 
by reference the Utah Home and Community-Based Waiver Services for 
Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities or Other Related Conditions 
Provider Manual, effective 07/01/2012; incorporates by reference the Utah 
Home and Community-Based Waiver Services for Individuals with Physical 
Disabilities Provider Manual, effective 07/01/2012; incorporates by reference 
the Utah Home and Community-Based Waiver Services New Choices Waiver Provider 
Manual, effective 07/01/2012; incorporates by reference the Utah Home and 
Community-Based Waiver Services for Technology Dependent, Medically Fragile 
Individuals Provider Manual, effective 07/01/2012; the Office of Inspector 
General Administrative Hearings Procedures Manual, effective 07/01/2012; and 
the Pharmacy Services Provider Manual with its attachments, effective 
07/01/2012.  This amendment also updates Section R414-1-14 to clarify that 
provider appeals of action initiated by the Office of Inspector General of 
Medicaid Services (OIG) are governed by the OIG Administrative Hearings 
Procedures Manual.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no budget impact because this change only 
fulfills the requirement to incorporate the State Plan by reference.  
Implementation of the State Plan is within legislative budget allotments.  
Further, the rule's incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy described in the 
provider manuals does not create costs or savings to the Department or other 
state agencies.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no budget impact because this change only 
fulfills the requirement to incorporate the State Plan by reference.  
Implementation of the State Plan is within legislative budget allotments.  
Further, the rule's incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy described in the 
provider manuals does not create costs or savings to local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no budget impact because this change only 
fulfills the requirement to incorporate the State Plan by reference.  
Implementation of the State Plan is within legislative budget allotments.  
Further, the rule's incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy described in the 
provider manuals does not create costs or savings to small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no budget impact because this change only fulfills the 
requirement to incorporate the State Plan by reference.  Implementation of 
the State Plan is within legislative budget allotments.  Further, the rule's 
incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy described in the provider manuals 
does not create costs or savings to other persons or entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs because 
this change only fulfills the requirement to incorporate the State Plan by 
reference.  Implementation of the State Plan is within legislative budget 
allotments.  Further, the rule's incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy 
described in the provider manuals does not create costs or savings to a 
single Medicaid recipient or provider.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule should not have a direct fiscal impact on business.  
Incorporation of the State Plan by this rule assures that the Medicaid 
program is implemented through administrative rule.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36375.htm

No. 36377 (Amendment): R414-49. Dental Services.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This change clarifies that limited emergency 
dental services, as mandated by the Legislature, are based on the EPSDT 
Program.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no impact to the state budget because this 
amendment simply clarifies that the provision of limited emergency dental 
services is based on the EPSDT Program.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no impact to local governments because this 
amendment simply clarifies that the provision of limited emergency dental 
services is based on the EPSDT Program.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no impact to small businesses because this 
amendment simply clarifies that the provision of limited emergency dental 
services is based on the EPSDT Program.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no impact to Medicaid providers and to Medicaid clients 
because this amendment simply clarifies that the provision of limited 
emergency dental services is based on the EPSDT Program.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There is no impact to a single 
Medicaid provider or to a single Medicaid client because this amendment 
simply clarifies that the provision of limited emergency dental services is 
based on the EPSDT Program.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Clarifying that services are available through the EPSDT program 
is expected to have no fiscal impact on business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36377.htm

No. 36378 (Amendment): R414-50. Dental, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This change clarifies that limited emergency 
dental services, as mandated by the Legislature, are based on the EPSDT 
Program.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no impact to the state budget because this 
amendment simply clarifies that the provision of limited emergency dental 
services is based on the EPSDT Program.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no impact to local governments because this 
amendment simply clarifies that the provision of limited emergency dental 
services is based on the EPSDT Program.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no impact to small businesses because this 
amendment simply clarifies that the provision of limited emergency dental 
services is based on the EPSDT Program.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no impact to Medicaid providers and to Medicaid clients 
because this amendment simply clarifies that the provision of limited 
emergency dental services is based on the EPSDT Program.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There is no impact to a single 
Medicaid provider or to a single Medicaid client because this amendment 
simply clarifies that the provision of limited emergency dental services is 
based on the EPSDT Program.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Clarifying that services are available through the EPSDT program 
is expected to have no fiscal impact on business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36378.htm

No. 36379 (Amendment): R414-510. Intermediate Care Facility for Individuals 
with Mental Retardation Transition Program.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This amendment specifies the responsibilities 
of the Department of Health and the Division of Services for People with 
Disabilities as they relate to the Transition Program.  It also clarifies 
procedural steps of the transition process and makes appropriate changes to 
terms of disability throughout the text.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Department does not anticipate any cost or savings 
to the state budget because this amendment only clarifies Transition Program 
responsibilities and procedures.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no impact to local governments because they 
neither fund nor provide home and community-based services (HCBS) to Medicaid 
recipients.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The Department does not anticipate any cost or savings 
to small businesses because this amendment only clarifies Transition Program 
responsibilities and procedures.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The Department does not anticipate any cost or savings to HCBS 
providers and to Medicaid recipients because this amendment only clarifies 
Transition Program responsibilities and procedures.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The Department does not anticipate 
any compliance costs to a single HCBS provider or to a Medicaid recipient 
because this amendment only clarifies Transition Program responsibilities and 
procedures.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Updating the process for certain parts of the Community Support 
Waiver does not appear to have any fiscal impact on business.  Updating terms 
will have no fiscal impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36379.htm



NATURAL RESOURCES
WILDLIFE RESOURCES
No. 36363 (New Rule): R657-64. Predator Control Incentives.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The purpose of this rule is to establish 
procedures for targeted predator control and general predator control 
programs administered by the division for the benefit of mule deer and the 
creation and distribution of educational and training materials related to 
mule deer protection.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This new rule defines procedures for participation in 
targeted predator control and general predator control programs.  The 
Division of Wildlife Resources (DWR) determines that this new rule will not 
create any cost or savings impact to the state budget or DWR's budget, and 
will be carried out with the money allocated by the State Legislature under 
the Mule Deer Protection Act.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Since this new rule only sets conditions under which a 
person can be compensated for the removal of predators, this filing does not 
create any direct cost or savings impact to local governments since they are 
not directly affected by the rule.  Nor are local governments indirectly 
impacted because the rule does not create a situation requiring services from 
local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Since this new rule sets conditions under which a person 
can be compensated for the removal of predators, this filing can create a 
direct cost or savings impact to small businesses who participate in the 
program.  This new rule has the ability to create an increased demand for 
ammunition, weapons, predator calls, etc., and may result in increased 
business for sporting goods stores.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Since this new rule sets conditions under which a person can be 
compensated for the removal of predators, this filing can create a direct 
cost or savings impact to other persons who participate in the program.  This 
new rule has the ability to create an increased demand for ammunition, 
weapons, predator calls, etc., and may result in increased cost for those 
persons wanting to participate in the program.  It also has the potential for 
a monetary gain if the person is successful in obtaining predators in the 
areas designated by rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  DWR determines that this new rule may 
create a cost or savings impact to individuals who wish to participate in 
this program.  This new rule has the ability to create an increased demand 
for ammunition, weapons, predator calls, etc., and may result in increased 
cost for those persons wanting to participate in the program.  It also has 
the potential for a monetary gain if the person is successful in obtaining 
predators in the areas designated by rule.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This new rule does not create an impact on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by 
Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36363.htm



PUBLIC SAFETY
DRIVER LICENSE
No. 36331 (Amendment): R708-10. Classified License System.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This change modifies and clarifies the codes 
used for driving restrictions and adds new restriction codes.  (DAR NOTE:  A 
corresponding 120-day (emergency) rule that is effective as of 06/06/2012 is 
under DAR No. 36330 in this issue, July 1, 2012, of the Bulletin.)
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This change will not affect the state budget because 
federal grant funds have been awarded through the FY 2011 Commercial Driver 
License Modernization Grant to fund the costs to modify the restriction 
changes on the commercial driver license certificate.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local government is not affected by the change because 
local government does not issue Utah driver license certificates.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Small business is not affected by the change because 
small business does not issue Utah driver license certificates.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Some drivers who currently hold a Utah Commercial Driver License 
will need a new certificate reflecting the restriction changes.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The drivers who currently hold a Utah 
Commercial Driver License that are affected by the restriction changes will 
not incur any costs because federal grant funds have been awarded through the 
FY 2011 Commercial Driver License Modernization Grant and will be used to 
cover the costs to generate letters explaining the changes, create new 
certificates, and postage.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There will not be a fiscal impact on business as a result of 
this rule change.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jill Laws by phone at 801-964-4469, by FAX at 801-964-4482, or by Internet 
E-mail at jlaws@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/08/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36331.htm

No. 36332 (New Rule): R708-47. Emergency Contact Database.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule sets standards to establish the 
procedures for a Utah license certificate holder, a Utah instruction permit 
holder, or a Utah identification card holder to provide the division with 
emergency contact information on person to be contacted in the event of a 
motor vehicle accident or other emergency situation when the Utah certificate 
holder is unable to make contact with their designated emergency contact 
person and to establish procedures to change the emergency contact 
information.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  H.B. 21 (2012 General Session, Driver License Emergency 
Contact Database, received an appropriation in the amount of $32,000 from the 
Transportation Public Safety Restricted Account to implement the provisions 
of this bill.  Utah Interactive will receive $11,500 to design, build, and 
support the emergency contact web service.  The Department of Technology 
Services will receive $20,000 to cover the programming cost to implement this 
bill.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local government is not affected by this rule because 
they will not play a role in the emergency contact database.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Small businesses are not affected by this rule because 
they will not play a role in the emergency contact database.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Utah Interactive will receive $11,500 to design, build, and support 
the emergency contact database web service.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs for a Utah 
certificate holder to provide emergency contact information.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no costs to businesses other than the one-time $11,500 
that Utah Interactive will receive to design, build, and support the 
emergency contact database web service.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/01/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jill Laws by phone at 801-964-4469, by FAX at 801-964-4482, or by Internet 
E-mail at jlaws@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/08/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36332.htm



TAX COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36361 (Amendment): R861-1A-26. Procedures for Formal Adjudicative 
Proceedings Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Sections 59-1-501 and 63G-4-204 
through 63G-4-209.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed amendment clarifies an attorney 
licensed in a jurisdiction outside Utah may represent a taxpayer before the 
commission without being admitted pro hac vice in Utah.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--The proposed amendment matches long-standing 
agency practice.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--The proposed amendment matches long-standing 
agency practice.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--The proposed amendment matches long-standing 
agency practice.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: None--The proposed amendment matches long-standing agency practice.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--The proposed amendment matches 
long-standing agency practice.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This amendment confirms long standing practice and does not 
create a fiscal impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or by 
Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36361.htm


AUDITING
No. 36362 (Amendment): R865-21U-6. Liability of Purchasers and Receipt For 
Payment to Retailers Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Section 59-12-107.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Prior to the amendment:  1) a purchaser that 
was not required to obtain a sales tax license was required to pay the use 
tax on the purchasers income tax return; and 2) if a purchaser that was 
otherwise not required to obtain a sales tax license had a use tax liability 
that exceeded $400, that purchaser was required to obtain a sales tax license 
and pay the use tax liability on a sales tax return.  The proposed amendment 
provides that regardless of the amount of the use tax liability, a purchaser 
who is otherwise not required to obtain a sales tax license shall pay the use 
tax liability on the purchasers income tax return, defines terms, and 
repeals unnecessary language.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--The proposed amendment indicates the form on which 
certain purchasers shall file and remit use tax.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--The proposed amendment indicates the form on 
which certain purchasers shall file and remit use tax.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--The proposed amendment indicates the form on which 
certain purchasers shall file and remit use tax.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: None--The proposed amendment indicates the form on which certain 
purchasers shall file and remit use tax.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--The proposed amendment relieves 
certain purchasers of the requirement to obtain a sales tax license and 
indicates the forms on which a use tax liability shall be paid.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The amendment specifies a form; it does not create any new 
fiscal impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or by 
Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36362.htm



TRANSPORTATION
OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE
No. 36345 (New Rule): R918-6. Maintenance Responsibility at Intersections, 
Overcrossings, and Interchanges Between Class A Roads and Class B or Class C 
Roads.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule clarifies responsibilities for 
maintenance of specific features at intersections of state and local roads 
and is intended to establish consistency and eliminate confusion with regard 
to these responsibilities.  The rule addresses most routine maintenance 
activities including signals, park strips, sidewalks, pedestrian ramps, curb 
and gutter, pavement, islands, striping and messages, lighting, signs, crash 
cushions, sweeping, graffiti, cattle guards, weed control, landscaping, 
drainage facilities, and structure maintenance.  Localized deviations are 
allowed where unusual circumstances or geometry call for it and when mutually 
agreed to by the entities involved.  Written agreements are encouraged for 
significant deviations from the rule.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  It is anticipated that adoption of this rule will result 
in additional net cost to the state budget in the amount of $120,000 annually 
due to:  1) Pavement Messages: $150,000 annual increased cost to UDOT, 
because UDOT will now be responsible for STOP bars and crosswalks on the 
local legs of signalized intersections; 2) Pavement Maintenance: $20,000 
annual savings to UDOT, mainly because the local governments will be 
responsible for pavement maintenance underneath bridges; 3) Signs: $20,000 
annual increased cost to UDOT for replacement and repairs of STOP and YIELD 
signs facing traffic on local streets, and for UDOT accountability for 
retroreflectivity of those same signs; 4) Graffiti: $10,000 annual savings to 
UDOT, because local governments will be responsible for graffiti removal in 
areas that are better accessible to them; and 5) Landscaping: $20,000 annual 
savings to UDOT, because responsibility for most landscape maintenance will 
be shifted to local governments (apart from such maintenance that UDOT 
performs by agreement).  All other maintenance activities identified in the 
rule are unchanged, because the rule merely clarifies existing practice in 
those cases.  There is no net increase in cost to the taxpayer because costs 
are merely shifted between the state budget and the various local government 
budgets.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  It is anticipated that the combined budgets of local 
governments will see a net savings of $120,000 annually based on the division 
of responsibilities as explained above under "State budget".
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses because the rule only applies to UDOT and local government 
entities.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities because the rule only 
applies to UDOT and local government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There is no anticipated compliance 
costs for affected persons because the rule only applies to UDOT and local 
government entities.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated fiscal impact on businesses because the 
rule only clarifies responsibility for maintenance of intersections on public 
streets and only applies to UDOT and local government entities.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christine Newman by phone at 801-965-4026, by FAX at 801-965-4338, or by 
Internet E-mail at cwnewman@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36345.htm




4.  NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

After an agency has published a Proposed Rule in the Utah State Bulletin, it 
may receive public comment that requires the Proposed Rule to be altered 
before it goes into effect.  A Change in Proposed Rule allows an agency to 
respond to comments it receives. 

While the law does not designate a comment period for a Change in Proposed 
Rule, it does provide for a 30-day waiting period.  An agency may accept 
additional comments during this period, and, at its option, may designate a 
comment period or may hold a public hearing.  The 30-day waiting period for 
Changes in Proposed Rules published in Utah State Bulletin ends July 31, 
2012.

From the end of the 30-day waiting period through October 29, 2012, an agency 
may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants to make the 
Change in Proposed Rule effective.  When an agency submits a Notice of 
Effective Date for a Change in Proposed Rule, the Proposed Rule as amended by 
the Change in Proposed Rule becomes the effective rule.  The agency sets the 
effective date.  The date may be no fewer than 30 days nor more than 120 days 
after the publication of the Change in Proposed Rule.  If the agency 
designates a public comment period, the effective date may be no fewer than 
seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period nor more 
than 120 days after the publication date.  Alternatively, the agency may file 
another Change in Proposed Rule in response to additional comments received.  
If the Division of Administrative Rules does not receive a Notice of 
Effective Date or another Change in Proposed Rule by the end of the 120-day 
period after publication, the Change in Proposed Rule filings, along with its 
associated Proposed Rule, lapses and the agency must start the process over. 

Changes in Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-303; Rule R15-2; and 
Sections R15-4-3, R15-4-5, R15-4-7, and R15-4-9.


ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION AND MANAGEMENT
No. 36020 (Change in Proposed Rule): R23-1-40. Acceptable Bid Security; 
Performance and Payment Bonds.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule establishes procedures for the 
procurement of construction by DFCM.  The reason for the change is to modify 
the minimum level of project size for bid security from $50,000 to $100,000, 
while recognizing the new limit may only be suitable to DFCM and not to other 
state agencies.  Special circumstances have been provided in the rule for 
when the DFCM limit may be used by other state agencies that assure the 
proper selection process and agency financial capability.  (DAR NOTE:  This 
change in proposed rule has been filed to make additional changes to a 
proposed amendment that was published in the April 15, 2012, issue of the 
Utah State Bulletin, on page 4.  Underlining in the rule below indicates text 
that has been added since the publication of the proposed rule mentioned 
above; strike-out indicates text that has been deleted.  You must view the 
change in proposed rule and the proposed amendment together to understand all 
of the changes that will be enforceable should the agency make this rule 
effective.)
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This change will have no impact on the state budget, if 
anything there will be a cost savings.  Cost for bonds that are no longer 
required for projects between $50,000 and $100,000 will no longer be passed 
on to the state.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This rule does not apply to local government because 
DFCM is only authorized to regulate construction procurement for state 
government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This rule change will save costs for small businesses.  
Costs for bonds that are no longer required for projects between $50,000 and 
$100,000 will no longer be passed onto the state.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule only results in savings to businesses dealing with the 
state because businesses will not need to use bonds.   Bonds will not be 
required for many projects that are under $100,000.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no added compliance costs, 
however there is savings for projects between $50,000 and $100,000.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule is being changed to reflect inflation and changed 
market conditions.  While some local companies may lose some business, many 
small businesses and taxpayers will save money as bonds will not be required 
for payments between $50,000 and $100,000.  Special circumstances have been 
provided in the rule for when the DFCM limit may be used by other state 
agencies that assure the proper selection process and agency financial 
capability.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Alan Bachman by phone at 801-538-3105, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by 
Internet E-mail at abachman@utah.gov
- Cecilia Niederhauser by phone at 801-538-3261, by FAX at 801-538-9694, or 
by Internet E-mail at cniederhauser@utah.gov
- Chiarina Gleed by phone at 801-538-3240, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by 
Internet E-mail at cgleed@utah.gov
- Priscilla Anderson by phone at 801-538-9595, by FAX at 801-538-3378, or by 
Internet E-mail at phanderson@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36020.htm



ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
AIR QUALITY
No. 35865 (Change in Proposed Rule): R307-107. General Requirements:  
Unavoidable Breakdown.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Subsection R307-107-1(3), which states that, 
for breakdowns involving only emissions that are monitored in accordance with 
Rule R307-170, the reporting requirements of Rule R307-170 satisfy the 
reporting deadlines of Subsections R307-107-1(1) and (2).  (DAR NOTE:  This 
change in proposed rule has been filed to make additional changes to a 
proposed repeal and reenactment that was published in the March 1, 2012, 
issue of the Utah State Bulletin, on page 31.  Underlining in the rule below 
indicates text that has been added since the publication of the proposed rule 
mentioned above; strike-out indicates text that has been deleted.  You must 
view the change in proposed rule and the proposed repeal and reenactment 
together to understand all of the changes that will be enforceable should the 
agency make this rule effective.)
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  Because these changes only change the reporting 
requirements, there are no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Because these changes only change the reporting 
requirements, there are no anticipated costs or savings to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  As this rule predominately applies to larger sources, 
there are no anticipated costs or savings to small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will likely be some additional costs as in some cases there 
may be some minor duplicative reporting; however, since the rule applies to 
only excess emissions, additional filings should not be excessive.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There will likely be some additional 
compliance costs as in some cases there may be some minor duplicative 
reporting; however, since the rule applies to only excess emissions, 
additional filings should not be excessive.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There may be a minor increase due to some additional reporting 
requirements. However, these have been limited in the change of proposed rule 
by the addition of Subsection R307-107-1(3).
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/31/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/35865.htm

No. 35923 (Change in Proposed Rule): R307-202. Emission Standards:  General 
Burning.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule is changed to add an "Applicability" 
section that clarifies that Rule R307-202 only applies to incorporated 
community under the authority of county or municipal fire authority.  The 
rule is changed by adding language throughout the rule to reinforce that 
burning by permit can only occur when the clearing index is 500 or greater.  
The 30-day burn window is eliminated, and burning by permit in northern 
counties is allowed in the spring between March 30 and May 30 and in the fall 
between September 15 and October 30, and burning by permit in southern 
counties is allowed in the spring between March 1 to May 30 and in the fall 
between September 15 to November 15.   The section heading for Section R307-
202-3 is changed from "Community Waste Disposal" to "Prohibitions," and 
language is added stating that no person shall burn under Rule R307-202 when 
the director issues a public announcement under Rule R307-302 of a mandatory 
no-burn period.  (DAR NOTE:  This change in proposed rule has been filed to 
make additional changes to a proposed repeal and reenactment that was 
published in the April 1, 2012, issue of the Utah State Bulletin, on page 38.  
Underlining in the rule below indicates text that has been added since the 
publication of the proposed rule mentioned above; strike-out indicates text 
that has been deleted.  You must view the change in proposed rule and the 
proposed repeal and reenactment together to understand all of the changes 
that will be enforceable should the agency make this rule effective.)
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There are no anticipated costs or savings to the state 
budget as there will be no additional costs to administer the reenacted rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The repeal and reenactment of Rule R307-202 will not 
affect the costs or savings to local governments, as similar provisions in 
the reenactment of the rule already exist in the current rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  As this rule expands burning windows for some counties, 
there may be some small costs or savings for small businesses who burn in 
those counties; however, it is difficult to estimate what those costs or 
savings would be.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: As this rule expands burning windows for some counties, there may 
be some small costs or savings for small businesses who burn in those 
counties; however, it is difficult to estimate what those costs or savings 
would be.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There may be minimal compliance costs 
for affected persons; however, it is difficult to estimate what those costs 
would be.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Any changes in the costs or benefits for businesses from the 
changes in this rule will be minimal.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  07/31/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/35923.htm




5.  NOTICES OF 120-DAY (EMERGENCY) RULES

An agency may file a 120-Day (Emergency) Rule when it finds that the regular 
rulemaking procedures would:
(a) cause an imminent peril to the public health, safety, or welfare;
(b) cause an imminent budget reduction because of budget restraints or 
federal requirements; or
(c) place the agency in violation of federal or state law (Subsection 63G-3-
304(1)).

A 120-Day Rule is effective at the moment the Division of Administrative 
Rules receives the filing, or on a later date designated by the agency.  A 
120-Day Rule is effective for 120 days or until it is superseded by a 
permanent rule.

Because 120-Day Rules are effective immediately, the law does not require a 
public comment period.  However, when an agency files a 120-Day Rule, it 
usually files a Proposed Rule at the same time, to make the requirements 
permanent.  Comment may be made on the Proposed Rule.

Emergency or 120-Day Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-304; and Section 
R15-4-8.


PUBLIC SAFETY
DRIVER LICENSE
No. 36330 (Emergency Rule): R708-10. Classified License System.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This change modifies and clarifies the codes 
used for driving restrictions and adds new restriction codes.  (DAR NOTE:  A 
corresponding proposed amendment is under DAR No. 36331 in this issue, July 
1, 2012, of the Bulletin.)
EMERGENCY RULE REASON AND JUSTIFICATION:
REGULAR RULEMAKING PROCEDURES WOULD place the agency in violation of federal 
or state law.
JUSTIFICATION:  Federal Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act (MCSIA) defines 
driving restrictions and the corresponding data entry codes.  This rule will 
bring the Utah Driver License Division in compliance with those restrictions 
and codes.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This change will not affect the state budget because 
federal grant funds have been awarded through the FY 2011 Commercial Driver 
License Modernization Grant to fund the costs to modify the restriction 
changes on the commercial driver license certificate.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local government is not affected by the change because 
local government does not issue Utah driver license certificates.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Small business is not affected by the change because 
small businesses do not issue Utah driver license certificates.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Some drivers who currently hold a Utah Commercial Driver License 
will need a new certificate reflecting the restriction changes.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The drivers who currently hold a Utah 
Commercial Driver License that are affected by the restriction changes will 
not incur any costs because federal grant funds have been awarded through the 
FY 2011 Commercial Driver License Modernization Grant and will be used to 
cover the costs to generate letters explaining the changes, create new 
certificates, and postage.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There will not be a fiscal impact on business as a result of 
this rule change.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jill Laws by phone at 801-964-4469, by FAX at 801-964-4482, or by Internet 
E-mail at jlaws@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36330.htm




6.  FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION

Within five years of an administrative rule's original enactment or last 
five-year review, the agency is required to review the rule.  This review is 
intended to remove obsolete rules from the Utah Administrative Code.  Upon 
reviewing a rule, an agency may:  repeal the rule by filing a Proposed Rule; 
continue the rule as it is by filing a Notice of Review and Statement of 
Continuation (Notice); or amend the rule by filing a Proposed Rule and by 
filing a Notice.  By filing a Notice, the agency indicates that the rule is 
still necessary. 

The rule text that is being continued may be found in the most recent edition 
of the Utah Administrative Code.  The rule text may also be inspected at the 
agency or the Division of Administrative Rules.  Notices are effective upon 
filing.  

Notices are governed by Section 63G-3-305.


CAPITOL PRESERVATION BOARD (STATE)
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36359 (5-year Review): R131-3. Use of Magnetometers on Capitol Hill.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule needs to be continued in order for the Board to continue the 
regulation and the use of magnetometers by Capitol Hill security personnel.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Alan Bachman by phone at 801-538-3105, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by 
Internet E-mail at abachman@utah.gov
- Allyson Gamble by phone at 801-537-9156, by FAX at 801-538-3221, or by 
Internet E-mail at agamble@utah.gov
- Chiarina Gleed by phone at 801-538-3240, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by 
Internet E-mail at cgleed@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/13/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36359.htm



COMMERCE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36329 (5-year Review): R151-35. Powersport Vehicle Franchise Act Rule.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule is necessary to administer the registration of franchisees and 
franchisors and to conduct adjudicative proceedings before the Board. 
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Masuda Medcalf by phone at 801-530-7663, by FAX at 801-530-6446, or by 
Internet E-mail at mmedcalf@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/05/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36329.htm


CONSUMER PROTECTION
No. 36360 (5-year Review): R152-34. Postsecondary Proprietary School Act 
Rules.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Continuation of the administrative rule is necessary for the Division to 
fulfill its statutory mandate to administer and enforce the Postsecondary 
Proprietary School Act.  The administrative rule is essential to effective 
implementation of the registration requirements of the Act.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Angela Hendricks by phone at 801-530-6035, by FAX at 801-538-6001, or by 
Internet E-mail at ahendricks@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/14/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36360.htm



COMMUNITY AND CULTURE
LIBRARY
No. 36328 (5-year Review): R223-1. Adjudicative Procedures.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The agency anticipates a continuation of the current programs, and therefore 
feels that a continuation of the rule is necessary in case of a need for an 
adjudicative proceeding.  There were no comments to review.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Stephen Matthews by phone at 801-715-6722, by FAX at 801-715-6767, or by 
Internet E-mail at smatthews@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/05/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36328.htm



CORRECTIONS
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36312 (5-year Review): R251-401. Supervision Fees.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is requested by the Board of Pardons for parolees who are under the 
supervision of the Department of Corrections.  These fees are used to offset 
costs of administration and supervision of the offender while on probation or 
parole.  The rule informs the public and parolee of this obligation.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Greg Peay by phone at 801-201-6052, by FAX at 801-545-5572, or by Internet 
E-mail at gpeay@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/05/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36312.htm



EDUCATION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36365 (5-year Review): R277-467. Distribution of Funds Appropriated for 
Library Books and Electronic Resources.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule continues to be necessary because it provides a formula for 
distribution of funds appropriated by the Legislature for library books and 
electronic resources.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36365.htm

No. 36369 (5-year Review): R277-488. Critical Languages Program.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule continues to be necessary because it provides standards and 
procedures for schools that participate in the Critical Language Program and 
the Dual Language Immersion Program.  Therefore, this rule should be 
continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36369.htm

No. 36372 (5-year Review): R277-489. Optional Extended-Day Kindergarten - 
Responsibilities, Timelines, and Funding.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule continues to be necessary because it is amended with new language 
for Early Intervention Programs.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36372.htm



ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
AIR QUALITY
No. 36333 (5-year Review): R307-105. General Requirements:  Emergency 
Controls.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R307-105 is required under 40 CFR Section 51.151.  Therefore, this rule 
should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36333.htm

No. 36334 (5-year Review): R307-401. Permit:  New and Modified Sources.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R307-401 is required by Section 19-2-108 and is also required by Section 
II, Review of New and Modified Air Pollution Sources, of the State 
Implementation Plan (SIP), which is incorporated by reference under Rule 
R307-110.  This SIP is required under Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7410 and 40 
CFR 51 subpart I.  Without the SIP, EPA would be required to impose a federal 
implementation plan.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36334.htm

No. 36335 (5-year Review): R307-403. Permits:  New and Modified Sources in 
Nonattainment Areas and Maintenance Areas.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R307-403 is required by Section 19-2-108 and by Section II, Review of 
New and Modified Air Pollution Sources, of the State Implementation Plan 
(SIP), which is incorporated by reference under Rule R307-110.  The SIP is 
required under Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7410 and 40 CFR 51.165.  Without the 
SIP, EPA would be required to impose a federal implementation plan.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36335.htm

No. 36336 (5-year Review): R307-406. Visibility.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R307-406 is required by Section 19-2-108 and by Section XVII, Visibility 
Protection, of the State Implementation Plan (SIP), which is incorporated by 
reference under Rule R307-110.  The SIP is required under Clean Air Act, 42 
U.S.C. 7410 and 40 CFR 51 subpart P.  Without the SIP,  EPA would be required 
to impose a federal implementation plan.  Therefore, this rule should be 
continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36336.htm

No. 36337 (5-year Review): R307-410. Permits:  Emissions Impact Analysis.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R307-410 is required by Section 19-2-108, by Section II, Review of New 
and Modified Air Pollution Sources and by Section XVIII, Demonstration of GEP 
Stack Height, of the State Implementation Plan (SIP), which are incorporated 
by reference under Rule R307-110.  The SIP is required under Clean Air Act, 
42 U.S.C. 7410 and 40 CFR 51 subpart I, and 40 CFR 51.118.  Without the SIP, 
EPA would be required to impose a federal implementation plan.  Therefore, 
this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36337.htm

No. 36338 (5-year Review): R307-414. Permits:  Fees for Approval Orders.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The fees required by Rule R307-414 are allowed under Subsections 19-1-
201(2)(i) and 19- 2-104(3)(o).  The fees required in Rule R307-414, which are 
approved annually by the Legislature, comprise a substantial portion of the 
budget of the Division of Air Quality.  Without these fees, the Division 
would not be able to review and act upon the source.  Therefore, this rule 
should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36338.htm

No. 36339 (5-year Review): R307-415. Permits:  Operating Permit Requirements.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R307-415 is required by Title V of the Clean Air Act; 40 CFR Part 70; 
and Section 19-2-109.1 of the Utah Code.  The fees required by Rule R307-415 
are allowed under Subsection 19-1-201(2)(i) and are approved annually by the 
Legislature.  They comprise a substantial portion of the budget of DAQ.  
Without these fees, DAQ would not be able to issue and enforce operating 
permits.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36339.htm

No. 36340 (5-year Review): R307-417. Permits:  Acid Rain Sources.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R307-417 is required by Title IV and V of the Clean Air Act; 40 CFR Part 
70 and 72; and Section 19-2-109.1 of the Utah Code.  Therefore, this rule 
should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36340.htm

No. 36341 (5-year Review): R307-420. Permits:  Ozone Offset Requirements in 
Davis and Salt Lake Counties.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R307-420 is required to minimize the growth in emissions of ozone 
precursors in Salt Lake and Davis counties.  This rule supports Section IX.D 
(Ozone Maintenance Plan) of the State Implantation Plan, which is 
incorporated by reference in Section R307-110-13.  Therefore, this rule 
should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36341.htm

No. 36342 (5-year Review): R307-421. Permits:  PM10 Offset Requirements in 
Salt Lake County and Utah County.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R307-421 is required to minimize the growth in emissions of PM10 
precursors in Salt Lake County and Utah counties.  The rule supports the PM10 
Maintenance Plan, which is incorporated by reference in Section R307-110-10.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36342.htm

HEALTH
HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY
No. 36309 (5-year Review): R414-310. Medicaid Primary Care Network 
Demonstration Waiver.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is necessary because it implements the PCN Demonstration Waiver to 
provide services to PCN recipients.  It is also necessary because it 
establishes eligibility requirements for waiver enrollment, specifies program 
rights and responsibilities, specifies service limitations, provides 
application procedures, and contains notice and termination provisions.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/04/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36309.htm



HUMAN SERVICES
SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH
No. 36310 (5-year Review): R523-20. Division Rules of Administration.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule needs to be continued because it is required by statute in order to 
provide the minimum standards and procedures for developing policies for the 
local authorities throughout the state.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
- L Ray Winger by phone at 801-538-4319, by FAX at 801-538-9892, or by 
Internet E-mail at raywinger@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/05/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36310.htm


RECOVERY SERVICES
No. 36346 (5-year Review): R527-3. Definitions.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  It 
is necessary to continue this rule to provide the public with knowledge of 
commonly used acronyms and terms associated with ORS or its programs that are 
not available in statue.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- LeAnn Wilber by phone at 801-536-8950, by FAX at 801-536-8833, or by 
Internet E-mail at lwilber@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/12/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36346.htm

No. 36347 (5-year Review): R527-37. Closure Criteria for Support Cases.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The federally-mandated closure criteria are still in effect and do not appear 
in state statute.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- LeAnn Wilber by phone at 801-536-8950, by FAX at 801-536-8833, or by 
Internet E-mail at lwilber@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/12/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36347.htm

No. 36348 (5-year Review): R527-253. Collection of Child Support Judgments.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The state laws and federal regulations cited in this rule are still in 
effect.  This rule also makes it clear that the office is not limited to 
taking only one legal remedy at a time and should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- LeAnn Wilber by phone at 801-536-8950, by FAX at 801-536-8833, or by 
Internet E-mail at lwilber@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/12/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36348.htm

No. 36349 (5-year Review): R527-255. Substantial Change in Circumstances.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule should be continued so that it remains clear what is meant by a 
temporary change in circumstances, what options are available when the change 
is more extended but not permanent, and when proceedings for adjustment of a 
support award must be initiated.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- LeAnn Wilber by phone at 801-536-8950, by FAX at 801-536-8833, or by 
Internet E-mail at lwilber@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/12/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36349.htm

No. 36350 (5-year Review): R527-258. Enforcing Child Support When the Obligor 
is an Ex-Prisoner or in a Treatment Program.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The underlying statutes are still in effect and the program providing for the 
discharge of the IV-A debt when support payments are made as required the 
year following incarceration is still beneficial from a child support 
enforcement perspective, as well as a corrections perspective.  Therefore, 
this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- LeAnn Wilber by phone at 801-536-8950, by FAX at 801-536-8833, or by 
Internet E-mail at lwilber@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/12/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36350.htm

No. 36351 (5-year Review): R527-330. Posting Priority of Payments Received.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule requires an organized approach to dealing with support payments 
paid to ORS and makes current support the first priority for payments not 
designated by the non-custodial parent, so when payments are made, families 
not receiving IV-A case assistance from the State can expect to receive 
financial support for their current family needs.  It also allows the state 
to recover money that has been expended in IV-A cash assistance to families.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- LeAnn Wilber by phone at 801-536-8950, by FAX at 801-536-8833, or by 
Internet E-mail at lwilber@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/12/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36351.htm



INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36344 (5-year Review): R590-240. Procedure to Obtain Exemption of Student 
Health Programs From Insurance Code.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The purpose of this rule is to continue to provide guidance regarding 
procedures that institutions of higher education must follow in order to 
obtain exemption of student health programs from the Insurance Code.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jilene Whitby by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by 
Internet E-mail at jwhitby@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36344.htm



NATURAL RESOURCES
WATER RIGHTS
No. 36376 (5-year Review): R655-1. Wells Used for the Discovery and 
Production of Geothermal Energy in the State of Utah.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The Division of Water Rights maintains jurisdiction and authority to require 
that all wells for the discovery and production of water to be used for 
geothermal energy production of water in the state of Utah; be drilled, 
operated, maintained, and abandoned in a manner as to safeguard life, health, 
property, the public welfare; and to encourage maximum economic recovery.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Marianne Burbidge by phone at 801-538-7370, by FAX at 801-538-7467, or by 
Internet E-mail at marianneburbidge@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36376.htm

No. 36380 (5-year Review): R655-2. Procedure for Administrative Proceedings 
Before the Division of Water Rights Commenced Prior to January 1, 1988.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule should be continued to govern all hearings which are held by the 
State Engineer on matters within his jurisdiction for all adjudicative 
proceedings that commenced prior to 01/01/1988.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Marianne Burbidge by phone at 801-538-7370, by FAX at 801-538-7467, or by 
Internet E-mail at marianneburbidge@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36380.htm

No. 36381 (5-year Review): R655-6. Administrative Procedures for Informal 
Proceedings Before the Division of Water Rights.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule is needed to give direction to presiding officers and staff in 
initiating adjudicative proceedings, conducting informal hearings, and 
rendering decisions authorizing, requiring, or prohibiting an action.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Marianne Burbidge by phone at 801-538-7370, by FAX at 801-538-7467, or by 
Internet E-mail at marianneburbidge@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36381.htm

No. 36382 (5-year Review): R655-15. Administrative Procedures for 
Distribution Systems and Water Commissioners.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule authorizes the State Engineer to make rules governing water 
distribution systems, water commissioners, water measurement, and reporting 
that are consistent with Title 73, Chapter 5, Administration and 
Distribution.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Marianne Burbidge by phone at 801-538-7370, by FAX at 801-538-7467, or by 
Internet E-mail at marianneburbidge@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36382.htm



PUBLIC SAFETY
FIRE MARSHAL
No. 36343 (5-year Review): R710-9. Rules Pursuant to the Utah Fire Prevention 
and Safety Act.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This administrative rule should be continued due to the need and importance 
of the rule.  This rule was enacted in 1993 after the Utah Fire Prevention 
and Safety Act was fully recodified by the Utah State Legislature.  The rule 
establishes conduct at Fire Prevention Board meetings, deputizing Special 
Deputy State Fire Marshals, procedures to amend the state adopted fire code, 
a number of subcommittees that assist the Fire Prevention Board, and the 
various amendments and additions to the state adopted fire code that are 
passed by the Board till the next session of the Utah State Legislature.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Brent Halladay by phone at 801-284-6352, by FAX at 801-284-6351, or by 
Internet E-mail at bhallada@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36343.htm



PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36358 (5-year Review): R746-400. Public Utility Reports.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule needs to remain in effect in order for utilities to provide 
information and for the Public Service Commission and the Division of Public 
Utilities to continue to receive information needed for utility regulation.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- David Clark by phone at 801-530-6708, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by 
Internet E-mail at drexclark@utah.gov
- Sheri Bintz by phone at 801-530-6714, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by 
Internet E-mail at sbintz@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/13/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36358.htm



WORKFORCE SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36354 (5-year Review): R982-101. Americans with Disabilities Complaint 
Procedure.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule is essential to comply with federal law.  The Department would lose 
all of its federal funding without this rule.  Therefore, this rule should be 
continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/12/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36354.htm

No. 36355 (5-year Review): R982-201. Government Records Access and Management 
Act.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule is necessary to ensure that the Department is in compliance with 
Section 63G-2-204.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/12/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36355.htm

No. 36356 (5-year Review): R982-301. Councils.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule is necessary to comply with the requirements of state and federal 
law.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/12/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36356.htm

No. 36357 (5-year Review): R982-601. Provider Code of Conduct.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule is necessary to ensure that all providers paid by the Department 
comply with state law as outlined in this rule.  Therefore, this rule should 
be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/12/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120701/36357.htm




7.  NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES

State law provides for agencies to make their rules effective and enforceable 
after publication in the Utah State Bulletin. In the case of Proposed Rules 
or Changes in Proposed Rules with a designated comment period, the law 
permits an agency to file a notice of effective date any time after the close 
of comment plus seven days. In the case of Changes in Proposed Rules with no 
designated comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of 
effective date on any date including or after the thirtieth day after the 
rule's publication date. If an agency fails to file a Notice of Effective 
Date within 120 days from the publication of a Proposed Rule or a related 
Change in Proposed Rule the rule lapses and the agency must start the 
rulemaking process over.

Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301(12), 63G-3-
303, and Sections R15-4-5a and 5b. 


COMMERCE
OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING
No. 36077  (AMD): R156-1.  General Rule of the Division of Occupational and 
Professional Licensing
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012


REAL ESTATE
No. 36079  (AMD): R162-2c.  Utah Residential Mortgage Practices and Licensing 
Rules
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012



EDUCATION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36067  (R&R): R277-104.  USOE ADA Complaint Procedure
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012

No. 36069  (AMD): R277-419-7.  Student Identification and Tracking
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012

No. 36070  (AMD): R277-420.  Aiding Financially Distressed School Districts
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012

No. 36071  (AMD): R277-483-4.  Identification of Persistently Dangerous 
Schools
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012

No. 36072  (AMD): R277-486.  Professional Staff Cost Program
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012

No. 36073  (AMD): R277-503.  Licensing Routes
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012

No. 36074  (AMD): R277-520-6.  Eminence
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012

No. 36075  (AMD): R277-700.  The Elementary and Secondary School Core 
Curriculum
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012

No. 36076  (AMD): R277-733.  Adult Education Programs
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012


REHABILITATION
No. 36068  (REP): R280-201.  USOR ADA Complaint Procedure
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012



ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
AIR QUALITY
No. 35922  (AMD): R307-214.  National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 
Pollutants
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012



HUMAN SERVICES
CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES
No. 35931  (AMD): R512-60.  Children's Trust Account
Published:  04/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012



TAX COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36061  (AMD): R861-1A-16.  Utah State Tax Commission Management Plan 
Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Section 59-1-207
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/14/2012


MOTOR VEHICLE ENFORCEMENT
No. 36062  (AMD): R877-23V-7.  Misleading Advertising Pursuant to Utah Code 
Ann. Section 41-3-210
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/14/2012

No. 36063  (AMD): R877-23V-22.  Reasonable Cause to Waive, Reduce, or 
Compromise a Penalty Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Section 41-3-704
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/14/2012


PROPERTY TAX
No. 36064  (AMD): R884-24P-68.  Property Tax Exemption for Taxable Tangible 
Personal Property With a Total Aggregate Fair Market Value of $3,500 or Less 
Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Section 59-2-1115
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/14/2012



TRANSPORTATION
OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND SAFETY
No. 36082  (AMD): R920-50.  Ropeway Operation Safety
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/07/2012




8.  RULES INDEX

The Rules Index is a cumulative index that reflects all effective Utah 
administrative rules.  The Rules Index is not included Digest.  However, a 
copy of the current Rules Index is available 
http://www.rules.utah.gov/research.htm .


<<end of file>>
