Utah State Digest, Vol. 2012, No. 14 (July 15, 2012)

[NOTE:  The Utah State Digest (Digest) is created from the eRules filing 
database used to create the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin).  While a 
discrepancy between the Digest and the Bulletin is highly unlikely, any 
discrepancies will be resolved in favor of the Bulletin.  Please refer to the 
State Disclaimer ( http://www.utah.gov/disclaimer.html ) for more 
information.]

------------------------------------------------------------

UTAH STATE DIGEST
Summary of the Contents of the Utah State Bulletin


For information filed June 16, 2012, 12:00 AM through July 2, 2012, 11:59 PM


Volume 2012, No. 14
July 15, 2012


Prepared by
Division of Administrative Rules
Department of Administrative Services


The Utah State Digest (Digest) is an official electronic publication of the 
State of Utah, Department of Administrative Services, Division of 
Administrative Rules.  It is a summary of the information found in the Utah 
State Bulletin (Bulletin) of the same volume and issue number.  Inquiries 
concerning the substance or applicability of an administrative rule that 
appear in the Digest should be addressed to the contact person for the rule.  
Questions about the Digest or the rulemaking process may be addressed to:  
Division of Administrative Rules, 5110 State Office Building, Salt Lake City, 
Utah 84114-1201, telephone 801-538-3218, FAX 801-359-0759.  Additional 
rulemaking information, and electronic versions of all administrative rule 
publications are available at:  http://www.rules.utah.gov/ .  The Digest is 
available free of charge online at 
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm and by E-mail Listserv.  




************************************************
Division of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City  84114

Unless otherwise noted, all information presented in this publication is in 
the public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as 
desired.  Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted 
by their respective authors.  Citation to the source is requested.



Utah state digest.
  Semimonthly.
  1.  Delegated legislation--Utah--Digests. I.  Utah. Office 
of Administrative Rules.

KFU38.U8
348.792'025--DDC            86-658042
***********************************************




1.  SPECIAL NOTICES

Notice for August 2012 Medicaid Rate Changes
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/sn152829.htm




2.  NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

A state agency may file a Proposed Rule when it determines the need for a new 
rule, a substantive change to an existing rule, or a repeal of an existing 
rule.  Filings received between June 16, 2012, 12:00 a.m., and July 2, 2012, 
11:59 p.m. are summarized in this, the July 15, 2012, issue of the Utah State 
Digest.

The law requires that an agency accept public comment on Proposed Rules 
published in the July 15, 2012, issue of the Utah State Bulletin until at 
least August 14, 2012 (the Bulletin is the parent publication of the Digest).  
The agency may accept comment beyond this date and will indicate the last day 
the agency will accept comment in the rule information published below.  The 
agency may also hold public hearings.  Additionally, citizens or 
organizations may request the agency hold a hearing on a specific Proposed 
Rule.  Section 63G-3-302 requires that a hearing request be received by the 
agency proposing the rule "in writing not more than 15 days after the 
publication date of the proposed rule."

From the end of the public comment period through November 12, 2012, the 
agency may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants to make 
the Proposed Rule effective.  The agency sets the effective date.  The date 
may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public 
comment period nor more than 120 days after the publication date in the Utah 
State Bulletin.  Alternatively, the agency may file a Change in Proposed Rule 
in response to comments received.  If the Division of Administrative Rules 
does not receive a Notice of Effective Date or a Change in Proposed Rule, the 
Proposed Rule lapses and the agency must start the process over.

The public, interest groups, and governmental agencies are invited to review 
and comment on the Proposed Rules listed below.  Comment may be directed to 
the contact person identified with each rule. 

Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-301; Rule R15-2; and Sections 
R15-4-3, R15-4-4, R15-4-5, R15-4-9, and R15-4-10.


COMMERCE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36416 (Amendment): R151-4-306. Motion to Recuse or Disqualify a Board or 
Commission Member.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  In particular, this amendment clarifies that 
a motion to recuse or disqualify a board or commission member may be 
accompanied by an affidavit, that a decision on such a motion is not subject 
to interlocutory appeal, and that a board or commission member may recuse 
himself or herself at any time without a motion by a party.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This rule filing clarifies the procedures for filing a 
motion to disqualify a board or commission member from a proceeding.  No 
costs to the state budget are anticipated from these clarifications.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local governments are generally not affected by 
adjudicative proceedings in this agency.  Even if they were, this rule filing 
simply clarifies the procedure for challenges to board or commission member 
participation in proceedings and should result in no costs.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  In the event that small businesses are involved in any 
adjudicative proceedings, this filing is just a clarification of the 
applicable procedure for challenges to board or commission member 
participation in proceedings and should result in no costs.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule filing clarifies the procedures for filing a motion to 
disqualify a board or commission member from a proceeding and should result 
in no costs to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local 
government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  This rule filing clarifies the 
procedures for filing a motion to disqualify a board or commission member 
from a proceeding and should result in no costs to affected persons.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No fiscal impact to businesses is anticipated from this filing 
which clarifies the procedures for challenges to board or commission member 
participation in proceedings.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/14/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Masuda Medcalf by phone at 801-530-7663, by FAX at 801-530-6446, or by 
Internet E-mail at mmedcalf@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/21/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36416.htm


REAL ESTATE
No. 36390 (Amendment): R162-2f. Real Estate Licensing and Practices Rules.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  In Section R162-2f-102, the definition of 
"brokerage records" is amended to specify that trust account records include 
records of deposits and conveyances.  In Section R162-2f-201, new language is 
proposed to require an applicant with criminal history involving violence or 
physical coercion to provide records from which the Commission may assess 
whether the applicant might pose an ongoing threat to the public.  In Section 
R162-2f-202b, existing language is clarified to state that a trust account 
name must contain the term "real estate trust account" or "property 
management trust account" as applicable, and that trust accounts must be 
separate from operating accounts.  Additionally, new language in this 
subsection states that a principal broker license may not be awarded to an 
applicant whose sales agent license is on suspension or probation at the time 
of application.  In several subsections, existing provisions are modified to 
specify that a principal broker is required to inform the Division of where 
trust accounts and brokerage records are maintained, and to clarify that both 
trust and operating accounts must be in a bank or credit union that is 
located in Utah.  Section R162-2f-207 is amended to clarify that a brokerage 
must obtain a new registration whenever a corporate change results in a new 
business license or a new registration with the Division of Corporations and 
Commercial Code.  Other changes in corporate structure or ownership require 
notification to the Division, but do not nullify an existing entity 
registration. In Section R162-2f-401b, licensees are prohibited from making a 
misrepresentation to the Division in an investigation.  They are also 
prohibited from having a seller sign a document allowing the licensee to lien 
the seller's property in a short sale transaction.  Throughout, 
nonsubstantive changes are made to correct numbering and internal references 
as needed due to these proposed amendments as well as changes made to the 
real estate statute (Title 61, Chapter 2f) in the 2012 General Session (H.B. 
191).  In addition, the appendices currently located at the end of Section 
R162-2f-407 are placed in a new, separate section, R162-2f-501.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  These proposed amendments modify existing provisions.  
The division already has budget and staff in place to administer and enforce 
these provisions, and it is not anticipated that the proposed amendments will 
have any effect on those resources.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local governments are not required to comply with or 
enforce the real estate rules.  Therefore, no fiscal impact to local 
government is anticipated.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Under the current rules, small businesses are required 
to maintain brokerage and trust account records and to notify the Division 
when certain changes occur.  These amendments further clarify these 
requirements by adding specificity about which records must be maintained and 
when a notification to the Division is required.  Where the amendments do not 
create uniquely new obligations or impose new fees, no financial impact to 
small businesses is anticipated.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Under the current rules, affected persons are required to maintain 
brokerage and trust account records and to notify the Division of changes.  
These amendments further clarify these requirements by adding specificity 
about which records must be maintained and when a notification to the 
Division is required.  Where the amendments do not create uniquely new 
obligations or impose new fees, no financial impact to affected persons is 
anticipated.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  To comply, affected persons must 
conduct themselves differently if they do not properly maintain records, 
reconcile trust account records, or communicate with the Division.  It is not 
anticipated that an affected person would incur any monetary costs in order 
to make changes in brokerage operations that might be necessary.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No fiscal impact to businesses is anticipated from this rule 
filing, which clarifies existing standards, providing more specificity as to 
the maintenance of trust accounts and client records, Division notification 
requirements, and professional conduct standards.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/14/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jennie Jonsson by phone at 801-530-6706, by FAX at 801-526-4387, or by 
Internet E-mail at jjonsson@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/21/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36390.htm



HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36432 (New Rule): R380-41. Governance Committee Electronic Meetings.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule establishes procedures for 
conducting electronic meetings.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  Using electronic meetings should be budget neutral or 
generate small savings for state participants.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Using electronic meetings should be budget neutral or 
generate small savings for local government participants.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Using electronic meetings has the potential to make it 
easier and less expensive for the public to participate in these meetings.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Using electronic meetings has the potential to make it easier and 
less expensive for the public to participate in these meetings.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Using electronic meetings has the 
potential to make it easier and less expensive for the public to participate 
in these meetings.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Using electronic meetings has the potential to make it easier 
and less expensive for the public to participate in these meetings.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/14/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Robert Rolfs by phone at 801-538-6111, by FAX at 801-538-6306, or by 
Internet E-mail at rrolfs@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/21/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36432.htm


CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
No. 36429 (New Rule): R382-2. Electronic Personal Medical Records for the 
Children's Health Insurance Program.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule states that the Department will 
provide notice to all individuals who receive CHIP services before they 
enroll in cHIE.  The rule also specifies when cHIE enrollment will occur and 
describes how cHIE will address cases for when an individual already declares 
his status with cHIE before enrolling in CHIP.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Department estimates about $20,000 in one-time costs 
for programming changes to existing systems and for mailing notification 
letters to all current CHIP clients.  Costs are covered by a federal grant 
and by a reduction in the Department's payments to the Utah Health 
Information Network (UHIN) for cHIE.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no impact to local governments because they do 
not fund or provide CHIP services to CHIP clients.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The Department does not anticipate any costs or savings 
because this rule does not impose new requirements or administrative expenses 
on small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The Department does not anticipate any costs or savings because 
this rule does not impose new requirements or administrative expenses on CHIP 
providers.  There are also no administrative costs to CHIP clients who choose 
to submit a form if they opt out of cHIE.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The Department does not anticipate 
any costs to a single CHIP provider or to a single UHIN insurer because this 
rule does not impose new requirements or administrative expenses on these 
persons or entities.  There are also no administrative costs to a single CHIP 
client who chooses to submit a form through a provider if the client opts out 
of cHIE.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  H.B. 46, 2012 General Session, requires the Department to 
implement by rule a program to enroll individuals who receive services under 
the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and the Medicaid Program in 
the Clinical Health Information Exchange (cHIE).  This should have a positive 
fiscal impact on providers serving these persons by making treatment records 
available.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/14/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  09/01/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36429.htm


DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
No. 36404 (Amendment): R392-100. Food Service Sanitation.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Subsection R392-100-2(1):  8-302.14(1) text 
had been moved up to a previous subsection, but was not deleted in the 
original subsection.  The division is now deleting this to avoid duplication.  
This does not modify any requirements.  In Subsections R392-100-2(d) and (e), 
inserts food manager requirement under correct section, and deletes the same 
statement from incorrect section.  Also modifies food handler "permit" to 
food handler "card".  No requirement changes.  In Subsection R392-100-
2(2)(m), corrects a subsection numbering error.  In Subsection R392-100-
2(2)(q), removes a requirement for local health departments to contact lowest 
risk food establishments every six months by phone in favor of a uniform 
risk-based schedule.  There are additional subsection renumbering 
corrections, and punctuation corrections, and deletion of extraneous 
meaningless words inadvertently left in text.  In Subsection R392-100-
2(2)(ao), for clarity, the division is ensuring that two subsections B(1) and 
(2) are deleted which were intended to be deleted in the previous amendment 
by deleting section "B" (delete subsections B(1) and (2)).  There may be some 
confusion that subsections 1 and 2 were not deleted.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The adoption of these minor modifications to the rule 
will not cause additional work to the state, and will not impose additional 
costs or savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The proposed changes will not result in a cost savings 
or increase as workload requirements are not modified.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no cost savings or additional costs as the 
proposed changes do not modify requirements for businesses, large or small.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no cost savings or additional costs as the proposed 
changes do not modify requirements for businesses, large or small.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Because there are no aggregate costs 
or savings incurred, there are no expected additional costs or savings for an 
individual person or any individual entities.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Minor, technical changes to rule that are not expected to impose 
any regulatory burden or fiscal impact on business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/14/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Ronald Marsden by phone at 801-538-6191, by FAX at 801-538-6564, or by 
Internet E-mail at rmarsden@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/21/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36404.htm


HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY
No. 36431 (New Rule): R414-8. Electronic Personal Medical Records for the 
Medicaid Program.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule states that all individuals who 
receive Medicaid services are subject to this rule.  The rule also states 
that the Department will provide notice to individuals before they enroll in 
cHIE.  The rule further specifies when cHIE enrollment will occur and 
describes how cHIE will address cases for when an individual already declares 
his status with cHIE before enrolling in Medicaid.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Department estimates about $160,000 in one-time 
costs for programming changes to existing systems and for mailing 
notification letters to all current Medicaid clients.  Costs are covered by a 
federal grant and by a reduction in the Departments payments to the Utah 
Health Information Network (UHIN) for cHIE.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no impact to local governments because they do 
not fund or provide Medicaid services to Medicaid clients.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The Department does not anticipate any costs or savings 
because this rule does not impose new requirements or administrative expenses 
on small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The Department does not anticipate any costs or savings because 
this rule does not impose new requirements or administrative expenses on 
Medicaid providers.  There are also no administrative costs to Medicaid 
clients who choose to submit a form if they opt out of cHIE.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The Department does not anticipate 
any costs to a single Medicaid provider or to a single UHIN insurer because 
this rule does not impose new requirements or administrative expenses on 
these persons or entities.  There are also no administrative costs to a 
single Medicaid client who chooses to submit a form through a provider if the 
client opts out of cHIE.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  H.B. 46, 2012 General Session, requires the Department to 
implement by rule a program to enroll individuals who receive services under 
the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and the Medicaid Program in 
the Clinical Health Information Exchange (cHIE).  This should have a positive 
fiscal impact on providers serving these persons by making treatment records 
available.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/14/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  09/01/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36431.htm

No. 36444 (Amendment): R414-303. Coverage Groups.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This amendment clarifies titles for sections 
in the text, defines the age limit for Aged Medicaid, and updates certain 
federal citations.  It also removes criteria for HCBS waivers to be placed in 
Rule R414-307.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no impact to the state budget because these 
changes are technical in nature and only clarify certain programs.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no impact to local governments because they do 
not determine Medicaid eligibility or fund Medicaid services.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no impact to small businesses because these 
changes are technical in nature and only clarify certain programs.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no impact to Medicaid providers and to Medicaid recipients 
because these changes are technical in nature and only clarify certain 
programs.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There is no impact to a single 
Medicaid provider or to a Medicaid recipient because these changes are 
technical in nature and only clarify certain programs.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Consolidating definitions and standards for Home and Community 
Based Waiver services will have no negative fiscal impact on business and may 
simplify compliance.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/14/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  09/01/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36444.htm

No. 36443 (Amendment): R414-307. Eligibility for Home and Community-Based 
Services Waivers.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This change implements eligibility for the 
new Medicaid Autism HCBS Waiver, incorporates eligibility criteria for other 
HCBS waivers, changes the age limit for eligibility under the New Choices 
Waiver, and makes corrections to match other waiver implementation plans.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Legislature appropriated $4,500,000 for this new 
waiver program.  Other changes to this rule, however, do not create 
additional costs because the Department limits program enrollment to 
available funding.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no impact to local governments because they do 
not determine Medicaid eligibility or fund Medicaid services.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Small businesses may share in the revenue created 
through this appropriation.  At this time, however, the Department cannot 
estimate a revenue amount because there is no data on the number of 
individuals who will receive these new waiver services.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Medicaid providers may share in the revenue created through this 
appropriation.  At this time, however, the Department cannot estimate a 
revenue amount because there is no data on the number of individuals who will 
receive these new waiver services.  Medicaid recipients who are eligible 
under the waiver will save on out-of-pocket expenses.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  A single Medicaid provider may share 
in the revenue created through this appropriation.  At this time, however, 
the Department cannot estimate a revenue amount because there is no data on 
the number of individuals who will receive these new waiver services.  A 
single Medicaid recipient who is eligible under the waiver will save on out-
of-pocket expenses.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Consolidating definitions and standards for Home and Community 
Based Waiver services will have no negative fiscal impact on business and may 
simplify compliance.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/14/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  09/01/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36443.htm

No. 36427 (New Rule): R414-509. Medicaid Autism Waiver Open Enrollment 
Process.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule sets forth eligibility 
requirements for open enrollment in the Medicaid autism waiver program.  It 
also clarifies conditions for open enrollment and specifies open enrollment 
procedures.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Department does not anticipate any impact to the 
state budget because this rule only specifies open enrollment procedures for 
the autism waiver program.  It neither affects waiver services for program 
recipients nor reimbursement for Medicaid providers.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no impact to local governments because they 
neither fund nor provide autism waiver services for Medicaid recipients.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The Department does not anticipate any impact to small 
businesses because this rule only specifies open enrollment procedures for 
the autism waiver program.  It neither affects waiver services for program 
recipients nor reimbursement for Medicaid providers.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The Department does not anticipate any impact to program recipients 
and to Medicaid providers because this rule only specifies open enrollment 
procedures.  It neither affects waiver services for recipients nor provider 
reimbursement.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The Department does not anticipate 
any cost to a single program recipient or to a Medicaid provider because this 
rule only specifies open enrollment procedures.  It neither affects waiver 
services nor provider reimbursement.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This program is limited to available appropriations.  It will 
have a positive fiscal impact for businesses that serve children with autism 
that qualify.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/14/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  09/01/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36427.htm



INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36418 (Amendment): R590-262. Health Data Authority Health Insurance 
Claims Reporting.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The changes made are to clarify that long-
term care insurance and income replacement policies are exempt from the rule; 
to remove redundant definitions; require insurers to permit the Health 
Department to re-disclose specified information; and to clarify a date when 
submissions are due.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The changes are cleanup in nature and for clarification 
purposes.  They will have no fiscal impact on the department or the state's 
budget.  No additional filings or other work will be required of the 
department and no changes will result in department expenses or revenues.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This rule has no fiscal impact on local governments.  
It deals solely with the relationship between the department, its licensees 
and the State Health Department.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This rule impacts large businesses:  insurers and 
employers of 2,500 or more individuals.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The changes to this rule are for clarification purposes only and 
will have no fiscal impact on insurers or their insureds.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The changes to this rule are for 
clarification purposes only and will have no fiscal impact on those regulated 
by it.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule will have no fiscal impact on Utah businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/14/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jilene Whitby by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by 
Internet E-mail at jwhitby@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/21/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36418.htm



NATURAL RESOURCES
WILDLIFE RESOURCES
No. 36394 (Amendment): R657-16. Aquaculture and Fish Stocking.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The amendment to this rule removes the 
definition of "ornamental fish" and replaces it with the definition of 
"ornamental aquatic animal species".
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This amendment only clarifies a definition.  The 
Division of Wildlife (DWR) has determined that this amendment does not create 
a cost or savings impact to the division's budget or the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--This filing does not create any direct cost or 
savings impact to local governments because they are not directly affected by 
the amendment.  Nor are local governments indirectly impacted because the 
amendment does not create a situation requiring services from local 
governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This amendment only clarifies a definition.  The 
division determines that the amendment does not impose any additional 
requirements on other persons, nor generate a cost or savings impact to small 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This amendment only clarifies a definition.  The division 
determines that the amendment does not impose any additional requirements on 
other persons, nor generate a cost or savings impact to other persons.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  This amendment clarifies the 
definition of "ornamental aquatic animal species".  There are not any 
additional compliance costs associated with this amendment.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The amendments to this rule do not create an impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/14/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by 
Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/21/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36394.htm

No. 36393 (Amendment): R657-41. Conservation and Sportsman Permits.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed revisions to the above listed 
rule: 1) establish criteria for determining the number of area conservation 
permits to be issued each year; 2) add additional clarification concerning 
the payment of approved projects; and 3) clarify the definition of "area 
conservation permit".
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This amendment clarifies the process for determining the 
number of  area conservation permits to be issued each year and adds 
clarification concerning the payment of approved projects.  The Division of 
Wildlife Resources (DWR) determines that these amendments do not create a 
cost or savings impact to the state budget or DWR's budget, since the changes 
will not increase workload and can be carried out with existing budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This amendment clarifies the process for determining 
the number of area conservation permits to be issued each year and clarifies 
the use of funds on approved projects.  This should have little to no effect 
on the local government.  This filing does not create any direct cost or 
savings impact to local governments because they are not directly affected by 
the rule.  Nor are local governments indirectly impacted because the rule 
does not create a situation requiring services from local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This amendment clarifies the process for determining the 
number of  area conservation permits to be issued each year and adds 
clarification concerning the payment of approved projects.  Therefore, the 
amendments do not have the potential to generate a cost or savings impact to 
small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This amendment clarifies the process for determining the number of  
area conservation permits to be issued each year and adds clarification 
concerning the payment of approved projects.  Therefore, the amendments do 
not have the potential to generate a cost or savings impact to other persons.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  DWR determines that these amendments 
will not create additional costs for residents and nonresidents wishing to 
hunt in Utah.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The amendments to this rule do not create an impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/14/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by 
Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/21/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36393.htm

No. 36397 (Amendment): R657-57. Division Variance Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The amendments to this rule:  1) include the 
definitions for "Harvesting", "Hunt day", "limited entry hunt", "Once-in-a-
lifetime hunt", and "substantially precluded"; 2) set the Division authority 
in granting a variance; 3) allow for group applications to be treated the 
same; 4) set the timeline for filing for a variance; and 5) set the Wildlife 
Board's authority for granting a variance request.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  These rule amendments will set the criteria for granting 
remedial relief to persons precluded from obtaining or using a wildlife 
document because of an event or condition beyond their control.  The Division 
of Wildlife Resources (DWR) determines that these amendments do not create a 
cost or savings impact to the state budget or DWR's budget, since the changes 
will not increase workload and can be carried out with existing budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This filing does not create any direct cost or savings 
impact to local governments because they are not directly affected by the 
rule.  Nor are local governments indirectly impacted because the rule does 
not create a situation requiring services from local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This rule outlines criteria and scope of authority used 
to grant remedial relief to persons precluded from obtaining or using a 
wildlife document because of an event or condition beyond their control.  
Therefore, the amendments do not impose any additional requirements on other 
persons, nor generate a cost or savings impact to small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule outlines criteria and scope of authority used to grant 
remedial relief to persons precluded from obtaining or using a wildlife 
document because of an event or condition beyond their control.  Therefore, 
the amendments do not impose any additional requirements on other persons, 
nor generate a cost or savings impact to other persons.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  DWR determines that these amendments 
do not create a cost or savings impact to individuals who participate in 
wildlife-related activities.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The amendments to this rule do not create an impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/14/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by 
Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/21/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36397.htm

No. 36396 (Amendment): R657-59. Private Fish Ponds.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The amendment to this rule removes the 
definition of "ornamental fish" and replaces it with the definition of 
"ornamental aquatic animal species".
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This amendment only clarifies a definition.   The 
Division of Wildlife Resources (DWR) determines that these amendments do not 
create a cost or savings impact to the state budget or DWR's budget, since 
the changes will not increase workload and can be carried out with existing 
budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--This filing does not create any direct cost or 
savings impact to local governments because they are not directly affected by 
the amendment.  Nor are local governments indirectly impacted because the 
amendment does not create a situation requiring services from local 
governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This amendment only clarifies a definition.  The 
division determines that the amendment does not impose any additional 
requirements on other persons, nor generate a cost or savings impact to small 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This amendment only clarifies a definition. The division determines 
that the amendment does not impose any additional requirements on other 
persons, nor generate a cost or savings impact to other persons.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  This amendment clarifies the 
definition of "ornamental aquatic animal species".  There are not any 
additional compliance costs associated with this amendment.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The amendments to this rule do not create an impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 08/14/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by 
Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/21/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36396.htm




3.  NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

After an agency has published a Proposed Rule in the Utah State Bulletin, it 
may receive public comment that requires the Proposed Rule to be altered 
before it goes into effect.  A Change in Proposed Rule allows an agency to 
respond to comments it receives. 

While the law does not designate a comment period for a Change in Proposed 
Rule, it does provide for a 30-day waiting period.  An agency may accept 
additional comments during this period, and, at its option, may designate a 
comment period or may hold a public hearing.  The 30-day waiting period for 
Changes in Proposed Rules published in Utah State Bulletin ends August 14, 
2012.

From the end of the 30-day waiting period through November 12, 2012, an 
agency may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants to make 
the Change in Proposed Rule effective.  When an agency submits a Notice of 
Effective Date for a Change in Proposed Rule, the Proposed Rule as amended by 
the Change in Proposed Rule becomes the effective rule.  The agency sets the 
effective date.  The date may be no fewer than 30 days nor more than 120 days 
after the publication of the Change in Proposed Rule.  If the agency 
designates a public comment period, the effective date may be no fewer than 
seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period nor more 
than 120 days after the publication date.  Alternatively, the agency may file 
another Change in Proposed Rule in response to additional comments received.  
If the Division of Administrative Rules does not receive a Notice of 
Effective Date or another Change in Proposed Rule by the end of the 120-day 
period after publication, the Change in Proposed Rule filings, along with its 
associated Proposed Rule, lapses and the agency must start the process over. 

Changes in Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-303; Rule R15-2; and 
Sections R15-4-3, R15-4-5, R15-4-7, and R15-4-9.


COMMERCE
REAL ESTATE
No. 36078 (Change in Proposed Rule): R162-57a. Timeshare and Camp Resort 
Rules.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  In Subsection R162-57a-5(10)(c), language is 
clarified to alleviate concern that the filing of an amendment so as to 
disclose the certification of a class in a class-action lawsuit would 
automatically constitute a finding by the division that the project had 
suffered a material adverse effect.  In Subsection R162-57a-11(2)(b)(i), 
language modified to state that a developer "obtains" a purchaser's signature 
on a contract.  In Subsection R162-57a-11(2)(b)(2), language added to clarify 
that the right to cancel must be provided in connection with an offer to sell 
an interest; therefore, it would not necessarily be required to accompany all 
advertising.  (DAR NOTE:  This change in proposed rule has been filed to make 
additional changes to a proposed amendment that was published in the May 1, 
2012, issue of the Utah State Bulletin, on page 27.  Underlining in the rule 
below indicates text that has been added since the publication of the 
proposed rule mentioned above; strike-out indicates text that has been 
deleted.  You must view the change in proposed rule and the proposed 
amendment together to understand all of the changes that will be enforceable 
should the agency make this rule effective.)
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No fiscal impact to the state budget was identified 
under the original filing.  Where the changes proposed here are for 
clarification only, they do not create a fiscal impact.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No fiscal impact to the local government was identified 
under the original filing.  Where the changes proposed here are for 
clarification only, they do not create a fiscal impact.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  In the original filing, it was anticipated that small 
businesses would realize a savings due to clarification of the circumstances 
under which they would be required to reproduce and disseminate certain 
disclosures.  Further clarifying the requirement to reproduce and disseminate 
the disclosure of the right to rescission makes these savings more likely.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No fiscal impact to persons other than small businesses, 
businesses, or local government entities was identified under the original 
filing.  Where the changes proposed here are for clarification only, they do 
not create a fiscal impact.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  As discussed above under "small 
businesses", these changes are intended to make compliance with existing 
provisions less costly.  Therefore, it is anticipated that developers may 
realize a cost savings.  No new costs or compliance burdens are being 
imposed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This change in proposed rule is clarifying in nature and is not 
expected to result in any fiscal impact to businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jennie Jonsson by phone at 801-530-6706, by FAX at 801-526-4387, or by 
Internet E-mail at jjonsson@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  08/21/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36078.htm




4.  NOTICES OF 120-DAY (EMERGENCY) RULES

An agency may file a 120-Day (Emergency) Rule when it finds that the regular 
rulemaking procedures would:
(a) cause an imminent peril to the public health, safety, or welfare;
(b) cause an imminent budget reduction because of budget restraints or 
federal requirements; or
(c) place the agency in violation of federal or state law (Subsection 63G-3-
304(1)).

A 120-Day Rule is effective at the moment the Division of Administrative 
Rules receives the filing, or on a later date designated by the agency.  A 
120-Day Rule is effective for 120 days or until it is superseded by a 
permanent rule.

Because 120-Day Rules are effective immediately, the law does not require a 
public comment period.  However, when an agency files a 120-Day Rule, it 
usually files a Proposed Rule at the same time, to make the requirements 
permanent.  Comment may be made on the Proposed Rule.

Emergency or 120-Day Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-304; and Section 
R15-4-8.


PUBLIC SAFETY
DRIVER LICENSE
No. 36419 (Emergency Rule): R708-48. Ignition Interlock System Program.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule established minimum standards for 
persons to be licensed to install ignition interlock systems into vehicles of 
restricted drivers as required by Utah law.  Installers and providers will be 
required to have sufficient training and pass a criminal background check to 
ensure devices are installed correctly by licensed installers who have the 
knowledge in current industry standards.  This rule will assist in limiting 
potential fraud by outlining what a provider and installer must do when 
installing or removing an ignition interlock system into vehicles therefore 
promoting public safety.  System providers and installers will be granted 
access to a web based application that allows for reporting of installations 
and removals of an ignition interlock system.  This will allow the Utah 
Driver License Division to send timely notices to drivers that are not 
compliant and would affect their driving privilege.
EMERGENCY RULE REASON AND JUSTIFICATION:
REGULAR RULEMAKING PROCEDURES WOULD place the agency in violation of federal 
or state law.
JUSTIFICATION:  In order to be in compliance with state law, this emergency 
rule is being submitted.  It will be followed up with the regular rulemaking 
procedures.  The statute became effective 07/01/2012.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The state will see an increase associated with the 
different requirements.  Public Safety will be receiving the current rate of 
$20 for every background check.  The Utah Driver License Division will be 
receiving licensing fees from the providers and installers.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local government will see an increase in spending due 
to the various fees associated with the licensing procedures if they choose 
to pay the costs for an individual.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Small business will see an increase in spending due to 
the various fees associated with the licensing procedures.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Possible costs could be incurred by the individual if the licensing 
fees are not covered by the small business entity.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The compliance costs are currently as 
follows:  criminal background fee - $20; installer's license - $30; provider 
license - $100; branch inspection fee - $30; and annual renewal fee for 
installers - $20.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There will be a fiscal impact on business in order to be 
compliant with the required background check and licensing fees.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Marge Dalton by phone at 801-965-4456, by FAX at 801-957-8502, or by 
Internet E-mail at modalton@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/01/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36419.htm




5.  FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION

Within five years of an administrative rule's original enactment or last 
five-year review, the agency is required to review the rule.  This review is 
intended to remove obsolete rules from the Utah Administrative Code.  Upon 
reviewing a rule, an agency may:  repeal the rule by filing a Proposed Rule; 
continue the rule as it is by filing a Notice of Review and Statement of 
Continuation (Notice); or amend the rule by filing a Proposed Rule and by 
filing a Notice.  By filing a Notice, the agency indicates that the rule is 
still necessary. 

The rule text that is being continued may be found in the most recent edition 
of the Utah Administrative Code.  The rule text may also be inspected at the 
agency or the Division of Administrative Rules.  Notices are effective upon 
filing.  

Notices are governed by Section 63G-3-305.


ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
DEBT COLLECTION
No. 36420 (5-year Review): R21-1. Transfer of Collection Responsibility of 
State Agencies.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is to establish the procedures by which agencies shall bill and 
make initial collection efforts according to a coordinated schedule, the 
method to be used by agencies to transfer their delinquent accounts 
receivable to the Office of State Debt Collection or its designee for 
additional collection action, write-off of receivables, and the procedures 
and allocation of costs of collection established pursuant to Subsections 
63A-3-502(4)(g), 63A-3-502(6)(b), and Section R15-1-4, and by the Legislature 
in applicable laws. Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Richard Beckstead by phone at 801-538-3100, by FAX at 801-538-3562, or by 
Internet E-mail at rbeckstead@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/28/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36420.htm

No. 36421 (5-year Review): R21-2. Office of State Debt Collection 
Administrative Procedures.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The purpose of this rule is to establish the form of adjudicative 
proceedings, provide procedures and standards for the conduct of informal 
hearings, and provide procedures and standards for orders resulting from the 
administrative process.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Richard Beckstead by phone at 801-538-3100, by FAX at 801-538-3562, or by 
Internet E-mail at rbeckstead@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/28/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36421.htm

No. 36422 (5-year Review): R21-3. Debt Collection Through Administrative 
Offset.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is to establish procedures to be followed by agencies to reduce or 
eliminate accounts receivable through administrative offset of tax 
overpayments or state payments due to entities.  Therefore, this rule should 
be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Richard Beckstead by phone at 801-538-3100, by FAX at 801-538-3562, or by 
Internet E-mail at rbeckstead@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/28/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36422.htm


PURCHASING AND GENERAL SERVICES
No. 36423 (5-year Review): R33-1. Utah State Procurement Rules Definitions.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The Utah Procurement Code was re-codified during the 2011 General Session and 
significant changes were made in S.B. 153.  These changes will require a re-
write of this administrative rule with and effective date of 05/2013. 
Purchasing has reviewed this rule and believes it needs to remain effective 
until a new rule can be adopted.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Paul Mash by phone at 801-538-3138, by FAX at 801-538-3882, or by Internet 
E-mail at pmash@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36423.htm

No. 36424 (5-year Review): R33-2. Procurement Organization.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The Utah Procurement Code was re-codified during the 2011 General Session and 
significant changes were made in S.B. 153.  These changes will require a re-
write of this administrative rule with and effective date of 05/2013. 
Purchasing has reviewed this rule and believes it needs to remain effective 
until a new rule can be adopted.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Paul Mash by phone at 801-538-3138, by FAX at 801-538-3882, or by Internet 
E-mail at pmash@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36424.htm

No. 36425 (5-year Review): R33-3. Source Selection and Contract Formation.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The Utah Procurement Code was re-codified during the 2011 General Session and 
significant changes were made in S.B. 153.  These changes will require a re-
write of this administrative rule with an effective date of 05/2013. 
Purchasing has reviewed this rule and believes it needs to remain effective 
until a new rule can be adopted.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Paul Mash by phone at 801-538-3138, by FAX at 801-538-3882, or by Internet 
E-mail at pmash@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36425.htm

No. 36426 (5-year Review): R33-4. Specifications.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The Utah Procurement Code was re-codified during the 2011 General Session and 
significant changes were made in S.B. 153.  These changes will require a re-
write of this administrative rule with an effective date of 05/2013. 
Purchasing has reviewed this rule and believes it needs to remain effective 
until a new rule can be adopted.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Paul Mash by phone at 801-538-3138, by FAX at 801-538-3882, or by Internet 
E-mail at pmash@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36426.htm

No. 36428 (5-year Review): R33-5. Construction and Architect-Engineer 
Selection.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The Utah Procurement Code was re-codified during the 2011 General Session and 
significant changes were made in S.B. 153.  These changes will require a re-
write of this administrative rule with an effective date of 05/2013.  
Purchasing has reviewed this rule and believes it needs to remain effective 
until a new rule can be adopted.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Paul Mash by phone at 801-538-3138, by FAX at 801-538-3882, or by Internet 
E-mail at pmash@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36428.htm

No. 36430 (5-year Review): R33-8. Property Management.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The Utah Procurement Code was re-codified during the 2011 General Session and 
significant changes were made in S.B. 153.  These changes will require a re-
write of this administrative rule with an effective date of 05/2013.  
Purchasing has reviewed this rule and believes it needs to remain effective 
until a new rule can be adopted.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Paul Mash by phone at 801-538-3138, by FAX at 801-538-3882, or by Internet 
E-mail at pmash@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36430.htm



COMMERCE
OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING
No. 36405 (5-year Review): R156-22. Professional Engineers and Professional 
Land Surveyors Licensing Act Rule.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule should be continued as it provides a mechanism to inform potential 
licensees of the requirements for licensure as allowed under statutory 
authority provided in Title 58, Chapter 22, with respect to professional 
engineers, professional land surveyors, and professional structural 
engineers.  The rule should also be continued as it provides information to 
ensure applicants for licensure are adequately trained and meet minimum 
licensure requirements and provides licensees with information concerning 
unprofessional conduct, definitions and ethical standards relating to the 
profession.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Rich Oborn by phone at 801-530-6767, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet 
E-mail at roborn@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/25/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36405.htm



ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
WATER QUALITY
No. 36388 (5-year Review): R317-5. Large Underground Wastewater Disposal 
Systems.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule sets design requirements for construction of large underground 
wastewater treatment and disposal systems as defined in the rule.  The Water 
Quality Board is charged with making the rules that provide the guidelines 
for review and approval of these systems.  The rule is required to meet this 
charge and should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Judy Etherington by phone at 801-536-4344, by FAX at 801-536-4301, or by 
Internet E-mail at jetherington@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36388.htm

No. 36389 (5-year Review): R317-550. Rules for Waste Disposal By Liquid 
Scavenger Operations.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is required to regulate Liquid Scavenger Operations in order to 
protect public health and the environment, and should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Judy Etherington by phone at 801-536-4344, by FAX at 801-536-4301, or by 
Internet E-mail at jetherington@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36389.htm

No. 36387 (5-year Review): R317-560. Rules for the Design, Construction, and 
Maintenance of Vault Privies and Earthen Pit Privies.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule regulates the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of 
vault and earthen pit privies to protect public health and and the 
environment and should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Judy Etherington by phone at 801-536-4344, by FAX at 801-536-4301, or by 
Internet E-mail at jetherington@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36387.htm



HEALTH
HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY
No. 36406 (5-year Review): R414-60A. Drug Utilization Review Board.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is necessary because it implements the composition and membership 
requirements of the DUR Board to provide medically necessary and cost 
effective services for Medicaid recipients.  This rule also spells out the 
functions of board members to carry out their responsibilities for the 
Medicaid drug program.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/25/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36406.htm



HUMAN SERVICES
SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH
No. 36383 (5-year Review): R523-22. Utah Standards for Approval of Alcohol 
and Drug Educational Programs for Court-Referred DUI Offenders.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  It 
is necessary to continue this rule in order to administer the requirements of 
Section 62A-15-501.  The division acknowledges that there are several 
statutory citations within this rule that need to be updated.  This updating 
will be accomplished as soon as possible.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
- L Ray Winger by phone at 801-538-4319, by FAX at 801-538-9892, or by 
Internet E-mail at raywinger@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36383.htm

No. 36384 (5-year Review): R523-23. On-Premise Alcohol Training and Education 
Seminar Rules of Administration.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is required to provide guidance to persons who provide Alcohol 
Training and Education Seminar Programs.  Therefore, this rule should be 
continued.  Responses to comments are as follows:  1) The Division added the 
"date the person completed the training" because the system already requires 
it and it is necessary to determine when a person will need to recertify.  It 
may also be needed to prove that an employee was trained within 30 days of 
hire as required by rule; 2) It was suggested that the division ask for the 
expiration date instead of the date the training was completed.  The primary 
reason for not implementing this suggestion is that a person's certification 
is shortened if he/she sells to a minor and is adjudicated for that crime.  
So, the expiration on a certificate could be different than information shown 
on the Division's website due to a sale to a minor, however, the date of 
completion would remain the same.  Entering the date of completion would save 
money and confusion vs. the expiration date; 3) It was suggested that the 
rule require three hours of instruction vs. three hours of class time.  The 
division staff discussed this with the commenting provider and another 
provider and it was decided to leave the requirement at three hours of class 
time.  The reasons are as follows:  1) people learn (and read) at different 
speeds and the Division has to fit the "average" of those speeds and the 
three hours of class time allows for some flexibility; 2) exams and questions 
should be added into the 3 hours because they are also part of the learning 
experience and this should be the same for in person classes; and 3) three 
hours of class time is reasonable to cover the information and allow for the 
final exam; and 4) The Division has always, and plans to always maintain a 
database of trainers and server/sellers and make it available to the public 
online.  It appears that this language was unintentionally removed from the 
rule.  The division has not actually changed the maintaining of the database.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
- L Ray Winger by phone at 801-538-4319, by FAX at 801-538-9892, or by 
Internet E-mail at raywinger@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36384.htm



INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36385 (5-year Review): R590-122. Permissible Arbitration Provisions.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  It 
is important that this rule be continued in force to provide guidance to 
insurance companies about the type of arbitration provisions they may put 
into their policies.  These provisions provide steps to be taken by insureds 
who disagree with the settlement of their claims and would like to involve a 
third party in the settlement of their claims.  The rule gives the department 
the authority to make sure these provisions are fair and nondiscriminatory.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jilene Whitby by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by 
Internet E-mail at jwhitby@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36385.htm

No. 36386 (5-year Review): R590-149. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 
Grievance Procedures.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  It 
is important that this rule be continued in effect to provide that no 
qualified individual with a disability, by reason of such disability, be 
excluded from participation in, or the benefits of, the services, programs 
and activities of the Insurance Department.  The rule needs to remain in 
force so that the department will be in compliance with the federal Americans 
With Disabilities Act.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jilene Whitby by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by 
Internet E-mail at jwhitby@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36386.htm

No. 36417 (5-year Review): R590-173. Credit for Reinsurance.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Credit for reinsurance has relevance for many Utah insurance companies, and 
may be a significant factor in establishing their solvency position.  The 
rule lays out the detailed requirements in this important area.  It provides 
protection to the ceding insurers within the State of Utah and to the 
individuals insured.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jilene Whitby by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by 
Internet E-mail at jwhitby@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/27/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36417.htm



LABOR COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36401 (5-year Review): R600-2. Operations.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  As 
part of its duty to administer the various statutes identified above, the 
Commission is required to establish standards for conduct of Commission 
business, including rules for hours of business and filing of business 
documents.  This rule should be continued for those purposes.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Alan Hennebold by phone at 801-530-6937, by FAX at 801-530-6390, or by 
Internet E-mail at ahennebold@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/19/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36401.htm


ADJUDICATION
No. 36399 (5-year Review): R602-1. General Provisions.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule remains necessary to establishes standards for computing time 
limits and setting witness fees in the Commission's adjudicative process.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Alan Hennebold by phone at 801-530-6937, by FAX at 801-530-6390, or by 
Internet E-mail at ahennebold@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/19/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36399.htm

No. 36400 (5-year Review): R602-2. Adjudication of Workers' Compensation and 
Occupational Disease Claims.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  As 
part of the Commission's continuing responsibility to administer a system for 
adjudication of workers' compensation and occupational disease claims, it is 
necessary for the Commission to establish procedures for pleadings and 
discovery, standards for use and compensation of medical panels, as well as 
standards for awarding attorney's fees and evaluating settlement agreements.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Alan Hennebold by phone at 801-530-6937, by FAX at 801-530-6390, or by 
Internet E-mail at ahennebold@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/19/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36400.htm


INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
No. 36402 (5-year Review): R612-1. Workers' Compensation Rules - Procedures.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  In 
light of the Commission's continuing responsibility to administer Utah's 
workers' compensation system, it remains necessary for the Commission to 
address a wide variety of administrative issues, such as definition of terms, 
designation of official forms, payment standards, and processing of claims.  
It is also necessary for the Commission to address methods for proof of 
claims and to establish the amount of certain benefits, such as burial 
expenses.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by 
Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/19/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36402.htm



NATURAL RESOURCES
WILDLIFE RESOURCES
No. 36392 (5-year Review): R657-44. Big Game Depredation.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Rule R657-44 provides the procedures, standards, requirements, and limits for 
assessing big game depredation and mitigation procedures for big game 
depredation.  The procedures adopted in this rule have provided an effective 
and efficient process.  Continuation of this rule is necessary for continued 
success of the big game depredation program.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by 
Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/19/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36392.htm



PUBLIC SAFETY
HIGHWAY PATROL
No. 36440 (5-year Review): R714-110. Permit to Operate a Motor Vehicle in 
Violation of Equipment Laws.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The department is directed to provide an equipment waiver under certain 
circumstances in Section 41-6a-1602 to allow a vehicle to pass a safety 
inspection.  This is allowed on a temporary basis as outlined in the rule.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Glen Porter by phone at 801-965-4889, by FAX at 801-322-1817, or by 
Internet E-mail at gporter@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36440.htm

No. 36442 (5-year Review): R714-158. Vehicle Safety Inspection Program 
Requirements.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The safety inspection program requires specific procedures to operate the 
program.  This rule lists those requirements.  Therefore, this rule should be 
continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Glen Porter by phone at 801-965-4889, by FAX at 801-322-1817, or by 
Internet E-mail at gporter@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36442.htm

No. 36439 (5-year Review): R714-159. Vehicle Safety Inspection Apprenticeship 
Program Guidelines.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The program guidelines outline the requirements necessary to enter into an 
apprenticeship for vehicle safety inspections as directed in Section 53-8-
204.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Glen Porter by phone at 801-965-4889, by FAX at 801-322-1817, or by 
Internet E-mail at gporter@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36439.htm

No. 36433 (5-year Review): R714-200. Standards for Vehicle Lights and 
Illuminating Devices.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
There are many after-market lighting devices that are sold which do not meet 
the Federal Motor Vehicle Standards.  Also included in this rule are the 
lighting equipment restrictions.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Glen Porter by phone at 801-965-4889, by FAX at 801-322-1817, or by 
Internet E-mail at gporter@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36433.htm

No. 36441 (5-year Review): R714-210. Standards for Motor Vehicle Air 
Conditioning Equipment.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The department outlines the adoption of federal air conditioning standards to 
help protect the occupants of the vehicle and public.  Therefore, this rule 
should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Glen Porter by phone at 801-965-4889, by FAX at 801-322-1817, or by 
Internet E-mail at gporter@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36441.htm

No. 36434 (5-year Review): R714-220. Standards for Protective Headgear.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is needed to ensure protective headgear standards meet federal 
requirements for those who operate a motorcycle or motor-driven cycle.  
Therefore, the rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Glen Porter by phone at 801-965-4889, by FAX at 801-322-1817, or by 
Internet E-mail at gporter@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36434.htm

No. 36435 (5-year Review): R714-230. Standards and Specifications for Vehicle 
Seat Belts and Safety Harnesses.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
There is a need to standardize specifications for vehicle seat belts and 
safety harnesses that are used in vehicles.  Therefore, this rule should be 
continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Glen Porter by phone at 801-965-4889, by FAX at 801-322-1817, or by 
Internet E-mail at gporter@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36435.htm

No. 36437 (5-year Review): R714-240. Standards and Specifications for Child 
Restraint Devices and Safety Belts.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The department outlines the adoption of federal child restraint devices and 
safety belts standards.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Glen Porter by phone at 801-965-4889, by FAX at 801-322-1817, or by 
Internet E-mail at gporter@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36437.htm

No. 36438 (5-year Review): R714-300. Standards for Motor Vehicle Braking 
Systems.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The department outlines the adoption of federal motor vehicle braking system 
standards.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Glen Porter by phone at 801-965-4889, by FAX at 801-322-1817, or by 
Internet E-mail at gporter@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36438.htm

No. 36436 (5-year Review): R714-550. Rule for Spending Fees Provided under 
Section 53-1-117.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule is necessary because Section 53-1-117 authorizes this rule for a 
seven member committee that oversees the spending of this money on DUI 
overtime shifts, DUI equipment for agencies statewide based on their DUI 
enforcement and support of the Breath Alcohol Testing program.  Therefore, 
this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Glen Porter by phone at 801-965-4889, by FAX at 801-322-1817, or by 
Internet E-mail at gporter@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  07/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36436.htm



SCHOOL AND INSTITUTIONAL TRUST LANDS
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36408 (5-year Review): R850-4. Application Fees and Assessments.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule allows the agency to establish a list of fees that may be charged 
in order to recoup some of the costs of doing business.  The assessment of 
these fees is established pursuant to policy set by the Board of Trustees and 
assists the agency in fulfilling its fiduciary responsibility in behalf of 
the various trusts.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- John Andrews by phone at 801-538-5180, by FAX at 801-538-5118, or by 
Internet E-mail at jandrews@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/27/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36408.htm

No. 36409 (5-year Review): R850-5. Payments, Royalties, Audits, and 
Reinstatements.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule sets forth the guidelines and procedures necessary for protecting 
the assets of the various beneficiaries in the course of leasing and selling 
trust assets.  Guidelines for the audit of leases ensures that the trust 
assets are being protected and the trust beneficiaries are receiving full 
value for their lands.  It is important that this rule remain in full force 
and effect.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Ron Carlson by phone at 801-538-5131, by FAX at 801-538-5118, or by 
Internet E-mail at rcarlson@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/27/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36409.htm

No. 36410 (5-year Review): R850-6. Government Records Access and Management.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is required by statute in order to establish guidelines for public 
access to agency records, as well as the protection of confidential 
information provided to the agency in the course of managing the interests of 
the various trust beneficiaries.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- John Andrews by phone at 801-538-5180, by FAX at 801-538-5118, or by 
Internet E-mail at jandrews@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/27/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36410.htm

No. 36411 (5-year Review): R850-30. Special Use Leases.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Statute requires the agency to establish rules outlining procedures for the 
issuance of special use leases on trust lands.  The agency manages a vast 
amount of surface estate for the benefit of the trust beneficiaries and these 
guidelines are crucial to the successful management of that estate.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Kim Christy by phone at 801-538-5183, by FAX at 801-355-0922, or by 
Internet E-mail at kimchristy@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/27/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36411.htm

No. 36412 (5-year Review): R850-40. Easements.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The agency manages a vast amount of surface estate for the benefit of the 
trust beneficiaries.  Easements are one of the many uses for the surface 
estate and statute specifically requires the agency to provide rules for the 
issuance of easements and establish price schedules at fair market value.  
This rule provides the guidelines for these responsibilities.  Therefore, 
this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Kim Christy by phone at 801-538-5183, by FAX at 801-355-0922, or by 
Internet E-mail at kimchristy@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/27/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36412.htm

No. 36413 (5-year Review): R850-50. Range Management.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Statute requires that guidelines for the grazing of livestock on trust lands 
be established.  Range management provides a resource for local ranchers to 
utilize in their agricultural operations as well as an additional source of 
revenue for the trust beneficiaries.  Therefore, this rule should be 
continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Kim Christy by phone at 801-538-5183, by FAX at 801-355-0922, or by 
Internet E-mail at kimchristy@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/27/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36413.htm

No. 36414 (5-year Review): R850-60. Cultural Resources.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  As 
required by statute, this rule provides the guidelines whereby the School and 
Institutional Trust Lands Administration manages the cultural resources on 
trust lands in compliance with Subsection 9-8-305(2) and Section 9-8-404.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Kim Christy by phone at 801-538-5183, by FAX at 801-355-0922, or by 
Internet E-mail at kimchristy@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/27/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36414.htm

No. 36415 (5-year Review): R850-80. Sale of Trust Lands.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule sets forth the procedures and guidelines for determining if and 
when it is in the best interests of the trust beneficiaries to sell portions 
of the surface estate and for establishing and receiving fair market value 
for those lands.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Kim Christy by phone at 801-538-5183, by FAX at 801-355-0922, or by 
Internet E-mail at kimchristy@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  06/27/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36415.htm




6.  NOTICES OF FIVE-YEAR REVIEW EXTENSIONS

Rulewriting agencies are required by law to review each of their 
administrative rules within five years of the date of the rule's original 
enactment or the date of last review (Section 63G-3-305).  If the agency 
finds that it will not meet the deadline for review of the rule (the five-
year anniversary date), it may file an extension with the Division of 
Administrative Rules.  The extension permits the agency to file the review up 
to 120 days beyond the anniversary date.

Agencies have filed extensions for the rules listed below.  The "Extended Due 
Date" is 120 days after the anniversary date.  

The five-year review extension is governed by Subsections 63G-3-305(4) and 
(5).


REGENTS (BOARD OF)
COLLEGE OF EASTERN UTAH
No. 36391 (Five-Year Extension): R767-1. Government Records Access and 
Management Act.
EXTENSION REASON:  The College of Eastern Utah has merged with Utah State 
University and the logistics are still being worked out.  The new deadline is 
10/17/2012.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jan Young by phone at 435-613-5205, by FAX at 435-613-5814, or by Internet 
E-mail at jan.young@ceu.edu
EFFECTIVE:  06/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20120715/36391.htm




7.  NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES

State law provides for agencies to make their rules effective and enforceable 
after publication in the Utah State Bulletin. In the case of Proposed Rules 
or Changes in Proposed Rules with a designated comment period, the law 
permits an agency to file a notice of effective date any time after the close 
of comment plus seven days. In the case of Changes in Proposed Rules with no 
designated comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of 
effective date on any date including or after the thirtieth day after the 
rule's publication date. If an agency fails to file a Notice of Effective 
Date within 120 days from the publication of a Proposed Rule or a related 
Change in Proposed Rule the rule lapses and the agency must start the 
rulemaking process over.

Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301(12), 63G-3-
303, and Sections R15-4-5a and 5b. 


ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
FINANCE
No. 36112  (AMD): R25-7.  Travel-Related Reimbursements for State Employees
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012


FLEET OPERATIONS
No. 36024  (AMD): R27-7.  Safety and Loss Prevention of State Vehicles
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/28/2012



ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36113  (AMD): R81-4F-7.  Sale and Purchase of Alcoholic Beverages
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012

No. 36115  (AMD): R81-4F-13.  Agreement for Alcoholic Beverage Service
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012

No. 36114  (AMD): R81-7.  Single Event Permits
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012

No. 36116  (AMD): R81-10B.  Temporary Special Event Beer Permits
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012



COMMERCE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36104  (AMD): R151-4-306.  Motion to Recuse or Disqualify a Board or 
Commission Member
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  06/21/2012


OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING
No. 36117  (AMD): R156-9.  Funeral Service Licensing Act Rule
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  06/21/2012

No. 36090  (AMD): R156-22.  Professional Engineers and Professional Land 
Surveyors Licensing Act Rule
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  06/21/2012

No. 36089  (AMD): R156-40a.  Athletic Trainer Licensing Act Rule
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  06/28/2012



ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
WATER QUALITY
No. 36135  (AMD): R317-11.  Certification Required to Design, Inspect and 
Maintain Underground Wastewater Disposal Systems, or Conduct Percolation and 
Soil Tests for Underground Wastewater Disposal Systems
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  06/27/2012

No. 35903  (NEW): R317-801.  Utah Sewer Management Program (USMP)
Published:  03/15/2012
Effective:  06/21/2012



GOVERNOR
CRIMINAL AND JUVENILE JUSTICE (STATE COMMISSION ON)
No. 36141  (AMD): R356-1.  Procedures for the Calculation and Distribution of 
Funds to Reimburse County Correctional Facilities Housing State Probationary 
Inmates or State Parole Inmates
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012


ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PETE SUAZO UTAH ATHLETIC COMMISSION
No. 36130  (AMD): R359-1-506.  Drug Tests
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  06/30/2012



HEALTH
HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY
No. 36102  (AMD): R414-1-29.  Provider-Preventable Conditions
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012

No. 36107  (AMD): R414-2A.  Inpatient Hospital Services
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012

No. 36106  (AMD): R414-9-5.  Alternative Payment Method
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012

No. 36105  (AMD): R414-49-3.  Client Eligibility Requirements
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012

No. 36103  (AMD): R414-50.  Dental, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012

No. 36108  (AMD): R414-401-3.  Assessment
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012

No. 36101  (AMD): R414-506.  Hospital Provider Assessments
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012

Center for Health Data, Health Care Statistics
No. 35869  (AMD): R428-5.  Appeal and Adjudicative Proceedings
Published:  03/01/2012
Effective:  06/28/2012

No. 36110  (AMD): R428-12.  Health Data Authority Survey of Enrollees in 
Health Maintenance Organizations
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/02/2012

No. 36111  (AMD): R428-13.  Health Data Authority:  Audit and Reporting of 
HMO Performance Measures
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/02/2012



HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36118  (AMD): R477-1.  Definitions
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/02/2012

No. 36119  (AMD): R477-2.  Administration
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/02/2012

No. 36120  (AMD): R477-3.  Classification
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/02/2012

No. 36121  (AMD): R477-4.  Filling Positions
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/02/2012

No. 36123  (AMD): R477-7.  Leave
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/02/2012

No. 36124  (AMD): R477-8.  Working Conditions
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/02/2012

No. 36125  (AMD): R477-9.  Employee Conduct
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/02/2012

No. 36126  (AMD): R477-11.  Discipline
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/02/2012

No. 36127  (AMD): R477-13.  Volunteer Programs
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/02/2012



PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36029  (AMD): R746-343-4.  Approval of an Application
Published:  05/01/2012
Effective:  06/20/2012



WORKFORCE SERVICES
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
No. 35993  (AMD): R986-900-902.  Options and Waivers
Published:  04/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012


UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
No. 36134  (AMD): R994-405-104.  Quit to Accompany, Follow or Join a Spouse
Published:  05/15/2012
Effective:  07/01/2012




8.  RULES INDEX

The Rules Index is a cumulative index that reflects all effective Utah 
administrative rules.  The Rules Index is not included Digest.  However, a 
copy of the current Rules Index is available 
http://www.rules.utah.gov/research.htm .


<<end of file>>

