Utah State Digest, Vol. 2012, No. 19 (October 1, 2012)

[NOTE:  The Utah State Digest (Digest) is created from the eRules filing 
database used to create the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin).  While a 
discrepancy between the Digest and the Bulletin is highly unlikely, any 
discrepancies will be resolved in favor of the Bulletin.  Please refer to the 
State Disclaimer ( http://www.utah.gov/disclaimer.html ) for more 
information.]

------------------------------------------------------------

UTAH STATE DIGEST
Summary of the Contents of the Utah State Bulletin


For information filed September 1, 2012, 12:00 AM through September 14, 2012, 
11:59 PM


Volume 2012, No. 19
October 1, 2012


Prepared by
Division of Administrative Rules
Department of Administrative Services


The Utah State Digest (Digest) is an official electronic publication of the 
State of Utah, Department of Administrative Services, Division of 
Administrative Rules.  It is a summary of the information found in the Utah 
State Bulletin (Bulletin) of the same volume and issue number.  Inquiries 
concerning the substance or applicability of an administrative rule that 
appear in the Digest should be addressed to the contact person for the rule.  
Questions about the Digest or the rulemaking process may be addressed to:  
Division of Administrative Rules, 5110 State Office Building, Salt Lake City, 
Utah 84114-1201, telephone 801-538-3218, FAX 801-359-0759.  Additional 
rulemaking information, and electronic versions of all administrative rule 
publications are available at:  http://www.rules.utah.gov/ .  The Digest is 
available free of charge online at 
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm and by E-mail Listserv.  




************************************************
Division of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City  84114

Unless otherwise noted, all information presented in this publication is in 
the public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as 
desired.  Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted 
by their respective authors.  Citation to the source is requested.



Utah state digest.
  Semimonthly.
  1.  Delegated legislation--Utah--Digests. I.  Utah. Office 
of Administrative Rules.

KFU38.U8
348.792'025--DDC            86-658042
***********************************************




1.  SPECIAL NOTICES

Notice of Public Comment Period for the Fireworks Exceptional Events
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/sn153267.htm




2.  EXECUTIVE DOCUMENTS

As part of his or her constitutional duties, the Governor periodically issues 
Executive Documents comprised of Executive Orders, Proclamations, and 
Declarations.  "Executive Orders" set policy for the Executive Branch; create 
boards and commissions; provide for the transfer of authority; or otherwise 
interpret, implement, or give administrative effect to a provision of the 
Constitution, state law or executive policy.  "Proclamations" call special or 
extraordinary legislative sessions; designate classes of cities; publish 
states-of-emergency; promulgate other official formal public announcements or 
functions; or publicly avow or cause certain matters of state government to 
be made generally known.  "Declarations" designate special days, weeks or 
other time periods;  call attention to or recognize people, groups, 
organizations, functions, or similar actions having a public purpose; or 
invoke specific legislative purposes (such as the declaration of an 
agricultural disaster).  

The Governor's Office staff files Executive Documents that have legal effect 
with the Division of Administrative Rules for publication and distribution.  
All orders issued by the Governor not in conflict with existing laws have the 
full force and effect of law during a state of emergency when a copy of the 
order is filed with the Division of Administrative Rules. (See Section 63K-4-
401).

Governor's Executive Order EO/09/2012:  Wildland Fire Management
- Ashlee Buchholz by phone at 801-538-1621, by FAX at 801-538-1528, or by 
Internet E-mail at Abuchholz@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/execdocs/2012/ExecDoc153277.htm

Governor's Proclamation 2012/07/E:  Calling the Fifty-Ninth Legislature Into 
the Seventh Extraordinary Session
- Cherilyn Bradford by phone at 801-538-1505, by FAX at 801-538-1528, or by 
Internet E-mail at Cbradford@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/execdocs/2012/ExecDoc153307.htm

Governor's Executive Order EO/10/2012:  Declaring a State of Emergency Due to 
a Breached Dam and Flooding in Washington County
- Ashlee Buchholz by phone at 801-538-1621, by FAX at 801-538-1528, or by 
Internet E-mail at Abuchholz@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/execdocs/2012/ExecDoc153333.htm




3.  NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

A state agency may file a Proposed Rule when it determines the need for a new 
rule, a substantive change to an existing rule, or a repeal of an existing 
rule.  Filings received between September 1, 2012, 12:00 a.m., and September 
14, 2012, 11:59 p.m. are summarized in this, the October 1, 2012, issue of 
the Utah State Digest.

The law requires that an agency accept public comment on Proposed Rules 
published in the October 1, 2012, issue of the Utah State Bulletin until at 
least October 31, 2012 (the Bulletin is the parent publication of the 
Digest).  The agency may accept comment beyond this date and will indicate 
the last day the agency will accept comment in the rule information published 
below.  The agency may also hold public hearings.  Additionally, citizens or 
organizations may request the agency hold a hearing on a specific Proposed 
Rule.  Section 63G-3-302 requires that a hearing request be received by the 
agency proposing the rule "in writing not more than 15 days after the 
publication date of the proposed rule."

From the end of the public comment period through January 29, 2013, the 
agency may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants to make 
the Proposed Rule effective.  The agency sets the effective date.  The date 
may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public 
comment period nor more than 120 days after the publication date in the Utah 
State Bulletin.  Alternatively, the agency may file a Change in Proposed Rule 
in response to comments received.  If the Division of Administrative Rules 
does not receive a Notice of Effective Date or a Change in Proposed Rule, the 
Proposed Rule lapses and the agency must start the process over.

The public, interest groups, and governmental agencies are invited to review 
and comment on the Proposed Rules listed below.  Comment may be directed to 
the contact person identified with each rule. 

Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-301; Rule R15-2; and Sections 
R15-4-3, R15-4-4, R15-4-5, R15-4-9, and R15-4-10.


COMMERCE
OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING
No. 36759 (Amendment): R156-24b. Physical Therapy Practice Act Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  In Subsection R156-24b-303b(2), additional 
options for continuing education are outlined.  The proposed amendment makes 
it possible to complete a maximum of 10 percent of the number of contact 
hours required for renewal for supervision of a physical therapist or 
physical therapist assistant student in an accredited college program.  The 
proposed amendment also makes it possible to complete a maximum of 15 contact 
hours required for renewal for serving as a clinical mentor for a physical 
therapy residency or fellowship training program at a credentialed program.  
In Section R156-24b-305, the Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy 
(FSBPT) recently limited the number of dates throughout the year that 
students may take the National Physical Therapy Examination (NPTE).  As a 
result, graduating students must wait months in some cases before taking the 
first available examination that they need to pass in order to qualify for a 
license.  Section R156-24b-305 is added to outline requirements for issuance 
of a temporary license that graduates may practice with for a limited period 
while they wait for the next available examination.  Section R156-24b-308 
outlines requirements for reinstatement of a license that has been expired 
for over two years.  The Physical Therapy Licensing Board felt that it was 
necessary to outline the requirements in detail beyond that which is provided 
in Section R156-1-308g.  In Section R156-24b-502, the American Physical 
Therapy Association (APTA) replaced the July 2010 versions of the APTA Guide 
for Professional Conduct and the Guide for Professional Conduct of the 
Physical Therapist Assistant with a November 2010 version.  The Physical 
Therapy Licensing Board supports incorporation of the most current edition.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Division will incur minimal costs of approximately 
$100 to print and distribute the rule once the proposed amendments are made 
effective.  Any costs incurred will be absorbed in the Division's current 
budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The proposed amendments only apply to practicing 
physical therapists and physical therapist assistants and applicants for 
these license classifications.  As a result, the proposed amendments do not 
apply to local governments.  Licensees work in a small number of local 
governments; however, the proposed amendments would not directly affect local 
governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The proposed amendments only apply to practicing 
physical therapists and physical therapist assistants and applicants for 
these license classifications.  Issuing temporary licenses under conditions 
outlined in new Section R156-24b-305 will lead some students to become 
employed quicker by small businesses.  Consequently, some small businesses 
may experience a financial benefit; however, the Division is unable to 
estimate how many small businesses may be impacted by the changes nor it is 
able to estimate the financial benefit to the small business.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The proposed amendments only apply to practicing physical 
therapists and physical therapist assistants and applicants for these license 
classifications.  For some licensees, adding options for completing 
continuing education in Section R156-24b-303b will save time and money that 
they would have otherwise spent in efforts to complete other courses.  In 
addition, issuing temporary licenses under conditions outlined in new Section 
R156-24b-305 will lead some students to become employed quicker.  
Consequently, some licensees may experience a financial benefit; however, the 
Division is unable to estimate how many licensees will be impacted by the 
changes nor it is able to estimate the financial benefit to the licensees as 
a result of the proposed amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The proposed amendments only apply to 
practicing physical therapists and physical therapist assistants and 
applicants for these license classifications.  For some licensees, adding 
options for completing continuing education in Section R156-24b-303b will 
save time and money that they would have otherwise spent in efforts to 
complete other courses.  In addition, issuing temporary licenses under 
conditions outlined in new Section R156-24b-305 will lead some students to 
become employed quicker.  Consequently, some licensees may experience a 
financial benefit; however, the Division is unable to estimate how many 
licensees will be impacted by the changes nor it is able to estimate the 
financial benefit to the licensees as a result of the proposed amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule filing makes amendments to the continuing education 
requirements, and adds provisions regarding temporary licensure and 
reinstatement criteria.  As discussed in the rule filing, these changes are 
generally a cost-savings to applicants and licensees.  However, no fiscal 
impact to businesses is anticipated from these amendments.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Rich Oborn by phone at 801-530-6767, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet 
E-mail at roborn@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/22/2012 09:00 AM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S, Conference Room 474 
(fourth floor), Salt Lake City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36759.htm

No. 36757 (Amendment): R156-60. Mental Health Professional Practice Act Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  In Section R156-60-102, the term "employee" 
appears seven times throughout Title 58, Chapter 60.  In each case, it is 
used in the context of outlining a scope of practice of a licensee who is 
supervised or employed by another person who has the authority to control how 
services provided by the licensee are performed.  The Internal Revenue 
Service requires that these individuals have a W-2 tax status.  As a result, 
the definition of "employee" should be limited to individuals who have W-2 
tax status.  Under the current definition, whether these individuals are 
required to have W-2 tax status is unclear.  The proposed amendment provides 
needed clarification and makes the definition consistent with federal law.  
In Section R156-60-103, the term "Division" is capitalized in this section.  
In Section R156-60-502, in this section regarding unprofessional conduct is 
being deleted in its entirety because each profession licensed under Title 
58, Chapter 60, has its own definition of unprofessional conduct.  As a 
result, it is no longer necessary in this rule.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Division will incur minimal costs of approximately 
$75 to print and distribute the rule once the proposed amendments are made 
effective.  Any costs incurred will be absorbed in the Division's current 
budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The proposed amendments only apply to practicing mental 
health therapists in training and substance use disorder counselors.  As a 
result, the proposed amendments do not apply to local governments.  Some 
licensees work in local government; however, the proposed amendments would 
not directly affect local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The proposed amendments only apply to practicing mental 
health therapists in training and substance use disorder counselors.  The 
clarification of the definition of employee may have cost impact on a small 
number of businesses that currently employ mental health therapists in 
training or substance use disorder counselors as 1099 independent 
contractors.  If that is their current practice, the businesses are in 
violation of federal law.  These employees should have W-2 tax status because 
Title 58, Chapter 60, limits them to supervised practice that the supervisor 
and employer have the right to control.  The Division, however, is not able 
to estimate any cost impact as a result of this proposed amendment.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The proposed amendments only apply to practicing mental health 
therapists in training and substance use disorder counselors.  The 
clarification of the definition of employee may have cost impact on some 
mental health therapists in training or substance use disorder counselors if 
they are currently employed under a 1099 independent contractor tax status.  
However, if that is their current practice, their employer is in violation of 
federal law.  These employees should have W-2 tax status because Title 58, 
Chapter 60, limits them to supervised practice that the supervisor and 
employer have the right to control.  The Division, however, is not able to 
estimate any cost impact as a result of this proposed amendment.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The proposed amendments only apply to 
practicing mental health therapists in training and substance use disorder 
counselors.  The clarification of the definition of employee may have cost 
impact on some mental health therapists in training or substance use disorder 
counselors if they are currently employed under a 1099 independent contractor 
tax status.  However, if that is their current practice, their employer is in 
violation of federal law.  These employees should have W-2 tax status because 
Title 58, Chapter 60, limits them to supervised practice that the supervisor 
and employer have the right to control.  The Division, however, is not able 
to estimate any cost impact as a result of this proposed amendment.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule filing is clarifying in nature and removes an 
unnecessary provision that is already addressed in separate rules for the 
individual mental health professions.  Therefore, no fiscal impact to 
businesses is anticipated from these amendments.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Rich Oborn by phone at 801-530-6767, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet 
E-mail at roborn@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/20/2012 11:59 AM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S, Conference Room 475, 
Salt Lake City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36757.htm

No. 36758 (Amendment): R156-60c. Professional Counselor Licensing Act Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The title of "professional counselor" is 
changed to "clinical mental health counselor" throughout the rule.  In 
Subsection R156-60c-102(1), the definitions of the internship and practicum 
courses are modified.  Text is removed due to further definition of these 
courses in Section R156-60c-302a.  The proposed rule expands on the 
definition of the practicum course to require that it be completed in a 
public or private agency engaged in the practice of mental health therapy and 
under the supervision of a qualified mental health therapist.  These are 
standards that most programs already have in place.  In Section R156-60c-
302a, the proposed changes to Section R156-60c-302a are intended to make the 
education requirements less restrictive and more consistent with the Council 
for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) 
2009 Standards.  With this objective, the proposed rule changes create two 
possible education tracks to licensure.  The first track is completion of a 
master's or doctorate degree in clinical mental health counseling or 
counselor education and supervision from a program accredited by CACREP.  The 
second track is completion of a master's or doctorate degree in clinical 
mental health counseling or an equivalent field from a program affiliated 
with an institution that has accreditation recognized by the Council for 
Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA).  Many course titles are reworded to be 
consistent with course titles used in the CACREP 2009 Standards.  The 
professional roles and functions course requirement is removed because 
courses in professional orientation and ethical practice sufficiently cover 
that topic.  Because the number of semester or quarter credit hours required 
is decreased in several cases, the number of credit hours required in 
counseling-related course work is increased.  Lists of examples of possible 
topics to be covered in courses were removed because the Board felt they were 
unnecessary.  The practicum and internship requirements were combined because 
some programs only include one or the other.  Subsections R156-60c-302a(3) 
and (4) were deleted because the Clinical Mental Health Counselor Licensing 
Board concluded that they were unnecessary.  Subsection R156-60c-302a(5) is 
removed because it restricts issuance of extern licenses beyond what is 
authorized in Section 58-60-117.  In Section R156-60c-304, September 30 is 
the end of the renewal cycle, not the beginning.  For this reason, the 
reference to September 30 is replaced with October 1 in Subsection R156-60c-
304(2).  In Subsection R156-60c-304(5), the phrase "unless otherwise approved 
by the Division" is added to provide licensees in rural areas the option of 
requesting approval to complete more than ten contact hours of continuing 
education in distance learning courses.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Division will incur minimal costs of approximately 
$100 to print and distribute the rule once the proposed amendments are made 
effective.  Any costs incurred will be absorbed in the Division's current 
budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The proposed amendments only apply to practicing 
professional counselors (clinical mental health counselors) and applicants 
for licensure in that category.  As a result, the proposed amendments do not 
apply to local governments.  Some licensees work in local government; 
however, the proposed amendments would not directly affect local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The proposed amendments only apply to practicing 
professional counselors (clinical mental health counselors) and applicants 
for licensure in that category.  The removal of Subsection R156-60c-302a(5) 
will allow some applicants with degrees in counseling related fields to 
obtain extern licenses.  As a result, these applicants will likely become 
licensed and employed quicker which may translate into a financial benefit to 
small businesses that employ them.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The proposed amendments only apply to practicing professional 
counselors (clinical mental health counselors) and applicants for licensure 
in that category.  The consolidation of multiple course requirements may 
translate into cost savings for some applicants.  The removal of Subsection 
R156-60c-302a(5) will allow applicants with degrees in counseling related 
fields to obtain extern licenses.  As a result, these applicants will become 
licensed and employed quicker which may translate into financial benefit to 
them.  The phrase "unless otherwise approved by the Division" is added to 
Subsection R156-60c-304(5) to provide licensees in rural areas the option of 
requesting approval to complete more than ten contact hours of continuing 
education in distance learning courses.  This represents a potential cost 
savings for licensees in rural Utah.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The proposed amendments only apply to 
practicing professional counselors (clinical mental health counselors) and 
applicants for licensure in that category.  The consolidation of multiple 
course requirements may translate into cost savings for some applicants.  The 
removal of Subsection R156-60c-302a(5) will allow applicants with degrees in 
counseling related fields to obtain extern licenses.  As a result, these 
applicants will become licensed and employed quicker which may translate into 
financial benefit to them.  The phrase "unless otherwise approved by the 
Division" is added to Subsection R156-60c-304(5) to provide licensees in 
rural areas the option of requesting approval to complete more than ten 
contact hours of continuing education in distance learning courses.  This 
represents a potential cost savings for licensees in rural Utah.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In addition to changing references to meet new statutory 
amendments, this rule filing makes various amendments to the education and 
continuing education requirements as recommended by the Clinical Mental 
Health Counselor Licensing Board.  Many of these changes are a cost-savings 
to applicants and licensees.  However, no fiscal impact to businesses is 
anticipated from these amendments.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Rich Oborn by phone at 801-530-6767, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet 
E-mail at roborn@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:59 AM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S, Conference Room 475 
(fourth floor), Salt Lake City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36758.htm



EDUCATION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36769 (Amendment): R277-112. Prohibiting Discrimination in the Public 
Schools.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The changes add the Individuals with 
Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 USC 1400, Section 5 of the 
Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments of 2008, and State Board of 
Education Special Education Rules, August 2007, to the list of standards in 
the existing rule.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  The amendments to this rule update standards that are incorporated 
by reference which do not result in a cost or savings.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  The amendments to this rule update standards that are 
incorporated by reference which do not result in a cost or savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule applies to public education and does not affect 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  The amendments to this 
rule update standards that are incorporated by reference which do not result 
in a cost or savings.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  The amendments to this rule update standards that are 
incorporated by reference in which compliance costs are not affected.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36769.htm

No. 36770 (Amendment): R277-420-1. Definitions.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Provides new language to the "State 
Superintendent" definition in Subsection R277-420-1(D).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  The amendment adds a sentence at the end of a definition for 
clarification purposes which does not result in a cost or savings.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  The amendment adds a sentence at the end of a definition for 
clarification purposes which does not result in a cost or savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule applies to public education and does not affect 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  This amendment adds a 
sentence at the end of a definition which does not result in a cost or 
savings.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  The amendment adds a sentence at the end of a definition 
for clarification purposes which does not affect compliance costs.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36770.htm

No. 36771 (Amendment): R277-423. Delivery of Flow Through Money.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Updated terminology is provided throughout 
the rule and an outdated citation is removed.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  The terminology that is updated and removal of an outdated citation 
do not affect cost or savings.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  The terminology that is updated and removal of an outdated 
citation do not affect cost or savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule and the amendments apply to public education and do 
not affect businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  The terminology that 
is updated and removal of an outdated citation do not affect cost or savings.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  The terminology that is updated and removal of an outdated 
citation do not affect cost or savings.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36771.htm

No. 36772 (Amendment): R277-424-1. Definitions.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Provides additional language to "LEA" to make 
the definition in the rule consistent with the definition in other Board 
rules.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  The amendment adds language to make the definition consistent with 
definitions in other Board rules which does not result in a cost or savings.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  The amendment adds language to make the definition consistent 
with definitions in other Board rules which does not result in a cost or 
savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule and the amendment apply to public education and do not 
affect businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  The amendment adds 
language to make the definition consistent with definitions in other Board 
rules which does not result in a cost or savings.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  The amendment adds language to make the definition 
consistent with definitions in other Board rules which does not result in 
compliance costs.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36772.htm

No. 36773 (Amendment): R277-454-1. Definitions.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Provides additional language to "LEA" to make 
the definition in the rule consistent with the definition in other Board 
rules.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  The amendment adds language to make the definition in the rule 
consistent with definitions in other Board rules which does not result in a 
cost or savings.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  The amendment adds language to make the definition in the rule 
consistent with definitions in other Board rules which does not result in a 
cost or savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  The rule and the amendment apply to public education and do not 
affect businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  The amendment adds 
language to make the definition in the rule consistent with definitions in 
other Board rules which does not result in a cost or savings.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  The amendment adds language to make the definition in the 
rule consistent with definitions in other Board rules which does not result 
in compliance costs.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36773.htm

No. 36774 (Amendment): R277-531. Public Educator Evaluation Requirements 
(PEER).
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  A definition is revised to include language 
consistent with other Utah State Board of Education (Board) rules and 
citations are corrected throughout the rule.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state 
budget.  Providing language to a definition to make the rule consistent with 
other Board rules and making corrections to citations do not result in a cost 
or savings.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  Providing language to a definition to make the rule consistent 
with other Board rules and making corrections to citations do not result in a 
cost or savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule and the amendments apply to public education and do 
not affect businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government entities.  Providing language to 
a definition to make the rule consistent with other Board rules and making 
corrections to citations do not result in a cost or savings.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs for 
affected persons.  The language that is added to a definition to make the 
rule consistent with other Board rules and correcting citations does not 
result in compliance costs.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36774.htm



ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36775 (New Rule): R305-8. Board Member Attendance Requirements.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule will establish board meeting 
attendance requirements for DEQ board members:  members may be excused from 
the board if they have two unexcused absences during a one-year period, three 
consecutive absences, or miss more than one third of the board meetings 
during a one-year period.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  Any impact on the state budget as a result of this rule 
will be insignificant.  Because individuals appointed to boards may attend 
more board meetings in order to meet the requirements of this rule, and 
because some board members have those expenses reimbursed by the Department, 
board expenses may increase.  Any such increase would be managed within 
existing budgets.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no fiscal impact to local government; 
local governments are not affected in any way by this rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no fiscal impact to small business; small 
businesses are not affected in any way by this rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Board members are the only persons affected by this rule, and most 
board members are reimbursed by DEQ for their expenses associated with 
attending board meetings.  The compliance costs for board members will 
therefore be insignificant.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Board members are the only persons 
affected by this rule, and most board members are reimbursed by the 
Department for their expenses associated with attending board meetings.  The 
compliance costs for board members will therefore be insignificant.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There will be no fiscal impact to businesses; businesses are not 
affected in any way by this rule.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Laura Lockhart by phone at 801-366-0283, by FAX at 801-366-0292, or by 
Internet E-mail at llockhart@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 03:00 PM, DEQ Board Room, First Floor, 195 N 1950 W, Salt Lake 
City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36775.htm

No. 36776 (New Rule): R305-9. Recusal of a Board Member for Conflict of 
Interest.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule will establish standards and 
procedures for addressing DEQ board member potential conflicts of interest.  
Board members would be prohibited from participating in a matter before the 
board if their participation would violate the Utah Public Officers' and 
Employees' Ethics Act, or if it would violate principles of due process.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no impact on the state's budget; the only 
impact will be on the ability of individual board members to participate in 
the board's decision-making process.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no impact on local government budgets; 
the only impact will be on the ability of individual board members to 
participate in the board's decision-making process.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no fiscal impact on small businesses; the 
only impact will be on the ability of individual board members to participate 
in the board's decision-making process.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no fiscal impact on other persons; the only impact 
will be on the ability of individual board members to participate in the 
board's decision-making process.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The only persons impacted will be 
individual board members.  There will be no compliance costs associated with 
determinations about their ability to participate in the board's decision-
making process.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There will be no fiscal impact on businesses; the only impact 
will be on the ability of individual board members to participate in the 
board's decision-making process.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Laura Lockhart by phone at 801-366-0283, by FAX at 801-366-0292, or by 
Internet E-mail at llockhart@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 03:30 PM, DEQ Board Room, First Floor, 195 N 1950 W, Salt Lake 
City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36776.htm


AIR QUALITY
No. 36723 (Amendment): R307-101-2. Definitions.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Definitions are added for "condensable 
PM2.5", "filterable PM2.5", and "PM2.5 precursor".  The definition for 
"significant" is amended by adding PM2.5 with a rate of emissions that would 
equal or exceed 10 tons per year.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This amendment simply adds definitions to the Utah Air 
Quality rules; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to the 
state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This amendment simply adds definitions to the Utah Air 
Quality rules; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to local 
government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This amendment simply adds definitions to the Utah Air 
Quality rules; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to small 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This amendment simply adds definitions to the Utah Air Quality 
rules; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to persons other 
than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  This amendment simply adds 
definitions to the Utah Air Quality rules; therefore, there are no compliance 
costs for affected persons.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This amendment simply adds definitions to the Utah Air Quality 
rules; therefore, there is no anticipated fiscal impact on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36723.htm

No. 36742 (Amendment): R307-110. General Requirements:  State Implementation 
Plan.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Sections R307-110-31, 32, 34, 35, and 36 are 
amended by changing the date of the last adoption by the Air Quality Board to 
12/05/2012.  The State Implementation Plan Section X is divided into 
subparts.  Part A reflects the history and some of the general requirements 
of the I/M programs and Parts B through E provide a more detailed summary of 
the individual I/M programs.  Because much of the same information was 
duplicated in each of these parts, the division has consolidated the common 
requirements of each part and placed them into Part A, leaving the more 
specific requirements in the county specific parts of Section X.  In Part A, 
which is incorporated by reference under Section R307-110-31, several 
subsections are added to specify recent legislative changes that impacted the 
I/M programs.  One of these changes exempts a motor vehicle that is less than 
two years old as of January 1 of any given year from needing an inspection.  
This proposal adds language to Part A stating that there is reciprocity 
between county I/M programs.  In Part B, which is incorporated by reference 
under Section R307-110-32, the network type, test frequency, and the testing 
procedure that Davis County has implemented were updated.  In Parts B, D, and 
E, obsolete language was removed throughout.  Parts A, B, C, D, and E of 
Section X, together with the referenced appendices, continue to demonstrate 
compliance with the 40 CFR Part 51 provisions for Inspection and Maintenance 
Program Requirements for Davis, Salt Lake, Utah, and Weber Counties and 
produce mobile source emission reductions that are sufficient to demonstrate 
continued maintenance of the applicable CO and 1-hour ozone NAAQS.  In 
addition, the Board is proposing to add a new Part F to Section X that will 
require an I/M program in Cache County and require the county to provide an 
implementation schedule to develop and implement the program.  This Part will 
be incorporated by reference under Section R307-110-36.  Finally, the board 
is proposing to amend Section R307-110-1 to change the language related to 
how the Division of Air Quality provides copies of the SIP to the general 
public.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The vehicle inspection and maintenance programs are 
supervised by affected counties, not the state; therefore, this change does 
not affect the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This change will not affect the budgets of Cache, 
Weber, Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties because the costs to administer 
the inspection and maintenance programs are covered by the counties' share of 
the fees paid by vehicle owners.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Owners of vehicles that are less than two years old or 
newer and are registered in Davis, Weber, or Utah County may save the cost of 
vehicle emissions inspection. Small businesses in Cache County may have to 
pay fees related to being part of an inspection and maintenance (I/M) 
program.  However, these costs have not been determined.  Cache County has 
the authority to design its own program which would include how much the fees 
would be.  This will be part of a separate public review process.  The Utah 
Division of Air Quality has recommended that Cache County officials cap the 
fees at $15 for 1996 and newer vehicles and $20 for 1995 and older vehicles 
and inspection vehicles on biennial basis.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Owners of vehicles that are less than two years old or newer and 
are registered in Davis, Weber, or Utah County may save the cost of vehicle 
emissions inspection.  Other persons in Cache County may have to pay fees 
related to being part of an inspection and maintenance (I/M) program.  
However, these costs have not been determined.  Cache County has the 
authority to design its own program which would include how much the fees 
would be.  This will be part of a separate public review process. UDAQ has 
recommended that Cache County officials cap the fees at $15 for 1996 and 
newer vehicles and $20 for 1995 and older vehicles and inspection vehicles on 
biennial basis.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Owners of vehicles that are less than 
two years old or newer and are registered in Davis, Weber, or Utah County may 
save the cost of vehicle emissions inspection. Other persons in Cache County 
may have to pay fees related to being part of an inspection and maintenance 
(I/M) program.  However, these costs have not been determined.  Cache County 
has the authority to design its own program which would include how much the 
fees  would be.  This will be part of a separate public review process. UDAQ 
has recommended that Cache County officials cap the fees at $15 for 1996 and 
newer vehicles and $20 for 1995 and older vehicles and inspection vehicles on 
biennial basis.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Businesses in Davis, Utah, and Weber County that own vehicles 
less than two years old may not be required to have an inspection and 
therefore would be able to save in inspection costs.  Businesses in Cache 
County may have to pay fees related to being part of an inspection and 
maintenance (I/M) program.  However, these costs have not been determined.  
Cache County has the authority to design its own program which would include 
how much the fees would be.  This will be part of a separate public review 
process. UDAQ has recommended that Cache County officials cap the fees at $15 
for 1996 and newer vehicles and $20 for 1995 and older vehicles and 
inspection vehicles on biennial basis.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36742.htm

No. 36721 (Amendment): R307-110-10. Section IX, Control Measures for Area and 
Point Sources, Part A, Fine Particulate Matter.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The amendment changes the date of Section IX, 
Part A of the SIP most recently adopted by the Air Quality Board that is 
incorporated into the Utah Air Quality Rules.  Section IX, Part A of the SIP 
is amended to add three sections to address PM2.5 in the Salt Lake City, UT; 
Logan, UT - ID; and Provo, UT nonattainment areas.  The new sections identify 
PM2.5 control strategies, the impact the control strategies have on PM2.5 
concentrations in the nonattainment areas, and the tons per day of volatile 
organic compounds and primary particulate that will still need to be 
controlled to attain the standard by 2019.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No costs or savings are anticipated with this rule 
change.  No new requirements were created with this rule change that impact 
the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No costs or savings are anticipated with this rule 
change.  No new requirements were created with this rule change that impact 
local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No costs or savings are anticipated with this rule 
change.  No new requirements were created with this rule change that impact 
small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No costs or savings are anticipated with this rule change.  No new 
requirements were created with this rule change that impact persons other 
than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No compliance costs for affected 
persons are anticipated with this rule change.  No new requirements were 
created with this rule change.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No costs or savings are anticipated with this rule change.  No 
new requirements were created with this rule change that impact businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36721.htm

No. 36722 (Amendment): R307-110-17. Section IX, Control Measures for Area and 
Point Sources, Part H, Emissions Limits.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This amendment changes the date of Section 
IX, Part H most recently adopted by the Air Quality Board.  Section IX, Part 
H is being amended by adding sections that address the requirement of the 
Clean Air Act to include emission limitations, control measures, and 
schedules for certain large stationary sources in the State Implementation 
Plan for PM2.5.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No costs or savings are anticipated with this rule 
change.  No new requirements were created with this rule change that impact 
the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No costs or savings are anticipated with this rule 
change.  No new requirements were created with this rule change that impact 
local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No cost or savings are anticipated with this rule 
change.  No new requirements were created with this rule change that impacted 
small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No cost or savings are anticipated with this rule change.  No new 
requirements were created with this rule change that impacted persons other 
than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No costs are anticipated with this 
rule change.  No new requirements were created with this rule change.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  No costs are anticipated with this rule change.  No new 
requirements were created with this rule change.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36722.htm

No. 36741 (Amendment): R307-307. Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties:  Road 
Salting and Sanding.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The applicability of this rule is expanded to 
include all persons who apply salt, crushed slag, or sand to roads in Davis, 
Salt Lake, and Utah counties; all portions of the Cache Valley; all regions 
in Weber County west of the Wasatch mountain range; in Box Elder County, from 
the Wasatch mountain range west to the Promontory mountain range and south of 
Portage; and in Tooele County, from the northernmost part of the Oquirrh 
mountain range to the northern most part of the Stansbury mountain range and 
north of Route 199.  Any salt applied to roads in all these areas must be at 
least 92% sodium chloride.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The changes to this rule do not create any new 
requirements for the state; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The majority of cities that apply salt to roads are 
already using salt with a sodium chloride (NaCl) content of 92% or greater.  
Also, prices of salt with a NaCl content of 92% or greater are competitive 
with salts with a lower NaCl content.  Therefore, there are no anticipated 
costs or savings to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Most small businesses that apply salt to roads  are 
already using salt with a sodium chloride (NaCl) content of 92% or greater.  
Also, prices of salt with a NaCl content of 92% or greater are competitive 
with salts with a lower NaCl content.  Therefore, there are no anticipated 
costs or savings to small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Most people who apply salt to roads are already using salt with a 
sodium chloride (NaCl) content of 92% or greater.  Also, prices of salt with 
a NaCl content of 92% or greater are competitive with salts with a lower NaCl 
content.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to persons 
other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Most people applying salts to roads 
are already using salt with a sodium chloride (NaCl) content of 92% or 
greater.  Also, prices of salt with a NaCl content of 92% or greater are 
competitive with salts with a lower NaCl content.  Any cost associated with 
the record keeping requirements of the rule are expected to be minimal.  
Therefore, there are no anticipated compliance costs for affected persons.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Most people applying salts to roads are already using salt with 
a sodium chloride (NaCl) content of 92% or greater.  Also, prices of salt 
with a NaCl content of 92% or greater are competitive with salts with a lower 
NaCl content; and any cost associated with the record keeping requirements of 
the rule are expected to be minimal.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36741.htm

No. 36724 (New Rule): R307-311. Emission Standards for PM2.5 Nonattainment 
Areas.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule applies to any source listed in 
Section IX, Part H.11 of the State Implementation Plan and to sources in the 
PM2.5 nonattainment area.  The rule expands to the PM2.5 nonattainment area 
the visible emission requirements for PM10 nonattainment areas that are 
currently established in Section R307-305-3.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be costs to administer this rule; however, 
those costs are not expected to affect the state budget.  Therefore, there 
are no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no requirements in this rule that affect 
local government; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to 
local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Sources that are unable to meet the emission standards 
established in this rule will have to take action to meet them.  There are 
several control strategies a source can choose to implement to meet the 
standard; therefore, it is difficult to estimate the anticipated additional 
costs to small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to the owner or operator of any source that is 
listed in Section IX, Part H.11 of the State Implementation Plan or located 
in a PM2.5 nonattainment area.  There are no anticipated costs or savings to 
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government 
entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Sources that are unable to meet the 
emission standards established in this rule will have to take action to meet 
them.  There are several control strategies a source can choose to implement 
to meet the standard; therefore, it is difficult to estimate the anticipated 
additional costs to affected persons.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Sources that are unable to meet the emission standards 
established in this rule will have to take action to meet them.  There are 
several control strategies a source can choose to implement to meet the 
standard; therefore, it is difficult to estimate the fiscal impact the rule 
may have on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36724.htm

No. 36740 (New Rule): R307-312. Aggregate Processing Operations for PM2.5 
Nonattainment Areas.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule establishes opacity limits for 
aggregate processing equipment as follows:  all crushers will be required to 
meet an opacity limit of 12%; all screens will be required to meet an opacity 
limit of 7%; and all conveyor transfer points will be required to meet an 
opacity limit of 7%.  Concrete batch plant opacity limits are established at 
7% opacity.  The filterable PM2.5 emission limit from a hot mix asphalt plant 
dryer is 0.024 grains per dscf.  From November 1 to March 1, the production 
of material at hot mix asphalt plants is restricted to 50% of the plant's 
rated capacity during the times that facilities are using a fuel other than 
natural gas or liquified petroleum gas.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  Any additional costs to administer this rule at the 
Division of Air Quality are expected to be minimal; therefore, there are no 
anticipated costs or savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This rule does not create any new requirements for 
local government; therefore there are no anticipated costs or savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Sources that are unable to meet the emission standards 
established in this rule will have to take action to meet them.  There are 
several control strategies a source can choose to implement to meet the 
standard; therefore, it is difficult to estimate the anticipated additional 
costs to small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to all crushers, screens, conveyors, hot mix 
asphalt plants, and concrete batch plants.  There are no anticipated costs or 
savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local 
government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Sources that are unable to meet the 
emission standards established in this rule will have to take action to meet 
them.  There are several control strategies a source can choose to implement 
to meet the standard; therefore, it is difficult to estimate the anticipated 
additional costs.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Sources that are unable to meet the emission standards 
established in this rule will have to take action to meet them.  There are 
several control strategies a source can choose to implement to meet the 
standard; therefore, it is difficult to estimate the anticipated additional 
costs this rule may have on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36740.htm

No. 36739 (New Rule): R307-334. Emissions Standards:  Industrial Baking 
Ovens.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule requires owners and operators of 
industrial baking ovens that process yeast leavened products, have a combined 
rated heat input capacity equal to or greater than three million BTU per 
hour, and that have 25 tons per year of VOC emissions to use a control system 
that reduces VOC emissions by 90% or more.  Owners and operators are also 
required to maintain records for a minimum of two years that the control 
system is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer 
recommendations and is meeting the continuous emission reduction of 90%.  The 
estimated cost on sources to comply with this rule varies with EPA estimating 
the cost to be $2,740 per ton of VOCs removed while industry reporting the 
cost would be somewhere around $9,735 per ton of VOCs removed.  That is why 
during the public comment period, the division is asking for cost information 
from industry.  The Division of Air Quality staff will evaluate cost 
information received during the comment period and make a recommendation to 
the Board.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There may be a slight increase in administrative costs 
to enforce this rule; however, costs will be minimal and will not result in 
increased costs to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Because this rule does not introduce any requirements 
on local governments, there are no anticipated costs or savings to local 
government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The sources in Utah that this rule applies to are 
businesses that employ more than 50 persons.  Therefore, there are no 
anticipated costs or savings to small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to businesses that operate industrial industrial 
baking ovens.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to 
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government 
entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Between $2,740 and $9,735 per ton of 
VOC removed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Businesses that this rule applies to will be required to 
implement a control system to reduce VOC emissions by 90%.  This is estimated 
to cost between $2,740 and $9,735 per ton of VOC removed.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36739.htm

No. 36725 (Repeal): R307-340. Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas:  
Surface Coating Processes.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule is repealed in its entirety.  The 
Air Quality Board has proposed for public comment several individual coatings 
rules to take its place.  (DAR NOTE:  The proposed new Rule R307-344 is under 
DAR No. 36726, the proposed new Rule R307-345 is under DAR No. 36727, the 
proposed new Rule R307-346 is under DAR No. 36728, the proposed new Rule 
R307-347 is under DAR No. 36729, the proposed new Rule R307-348 is under DAR 
No. 36730, the proposed new Rule R307-349 is under DAR No. 36731, the 
proposed new Rule R307-350 is under DAR No. 36732, and the proposed new Rule 
R307-351 is under DAR No. 36733 in this issue, October 1, 2012, of the 
Bulletin.)
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The majority of the requirements of this rule are being 
included in individual coatings rules that have been proposed for public 
comment.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to the state 
budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The majority of the requirements of this rule are being 
included in individual coatings rules that have been proposed for public 
comment.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to local 
government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The majority of the requirements of this rule are being 
included in individual coatings rules that have been proposed for public 
comment.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to small 
businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The majority of the requirements of this real are being included in 
individual coatings rules that have been proposed for public comment.  
Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to persons other than 
small busineses, businesses, or local government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The majority of the requirements of 
this real are being included in individual coatings rules that have been 
proposed for public comment.  Therefore, there are no anticipated compliance 
costs for affected persons.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The majority of the requirements of this real are being included 
in individual coatings rules that have been proposed for public comment.  
Therefore, the repeal of this rule has no anticipated fiscal impact on 
businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36725.htm

No. 36738 (Amendment): R307-343. Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas:  
Emissions Standards for Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed rule changes the rule 
applicability from sources that have the potential to emit 25 tons VOC per 
year to sources that have the potential to emit five tons of VOC per year.  
In Section R307-343-4, Emission Standards is changed to clarify source 
requirements to lower VOC emissions.  Sources are required to use a compliant 
coating method as described in the new Table 1 or use a control system method 
that achieves a 90% or greater VOC emissions reduction.  A new section is 
added for application equipment requirements.  This section requires all 
coatings to be applied using equipment that has a minimum 65% transfer 
efficiency and establishes requirements for when conventional air spray 
methods may be used.  A control system operations section is added.  This 
section requires owners and operators of emission to operate and maintain 
control systems in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations; to 
provide certification from the control system manufacturer that the emission 
control system will attain the required efficiency performance; and to 
maintain for two years records of operating and maintenance of the control 
system.  A new section for work practices and recordkeeping is added that 
establish required control techniques to reduce VOC emissions.  A compliance 
schedule is added.  Rule applicability is expanded to include all sources in 
Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Utah, Tooele, and Weber counties.  During 
the public comment period, the Air Quality Board is requesting public input 
on the appropriateness of applying this rule in Tooele and Box Elder 
counties.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No changes in the rule change any requirements for the 
state; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to the state 
budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No changes in the rule change any requirements for the 
local government; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to the 
state budget.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Anticipated cost to sources is approximately $2,260 per 
ton VOC removed.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to wood furniture manufacturing operations that 
have the potential to emit five tons VOC per year.  There are no anticipated 
costs to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government 
entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Anticipated cost to sources is 
approximately $2,260 per ton VOC removed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The cost to business to comply with this rule is approximately 
$2,260 per ton VOC removed.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36738.htm

No. 36726 (New Rule): R307-344. Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule applies to paper, film, and foil 
coating operations, including related cleaning activities, that have the 
potential to emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year and 
that are located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and 
Weber counties.  The rule establishes reasonably available control technology 
requirements to reduce VOC emissions.  Owners and operators have the option 
to reduce VOCs by applying coatings with the VOC limits established in the 
rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at least a 90% VOC reduction.  
During the public comment period, the Air Quality Board is requesting public 
input on the appropriateness of applying this rule in Tooele and Box Elder 
counties.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to the state budget.  (DAR NOTE:  The proposed repeal of Rule R307-
340 is under DAR No. 36725 is this issue, October 1, 2012, of the Bulletin.)
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Anticipated cost to sources is approximately $1,440 per 
ton VOC removed.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to owners and operators of paper, film, and foil 
coatings operations that emit 2.7 tons of VOC per year.  There are no 
anticipated costs or savings to persons other than small businesses, 
businesses, or local government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The compliance cost to implement the 
requirements of this rule is approximately $1,440 per ton VOC removed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The cost to business to comply with this rule is approximately 
$1,440 per ton VOC removed.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36726.htm

No. 36727 (New Rule): R307-345. Fabric and Vinyl Coatings.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule applies to fabric and vinyl coating 
operations, including related cleaning activities, that have the potential to 
emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year and that are 
located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and Weber 
counties.  The rule establishes reasonably available control technology 
requirements to reduce VOC emissions.  Owners and operators have the option 
to reduce VOCs by applying coatings with the VOC limits established in the 
rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at least a 90% VOC reduction.  
During the public comment period, the Air Quality Board is requesting public 
input on the appropriateness of applying this rule in Tooele and Box Elder 
counties.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to the state budget.  (DAR NOTE:  The proposed repeal of Rule R307-
340 is under DAR No. 36725 is this issue, October 1, 2012, of the Bulletin.)
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Anticipated cost to sources is $3,500 per ton VOC 
removed.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to fabric and vinyl coatings operations that emit 
2.7 tons of VOC per year.  There are no anticipated costs or savings to 
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government 
entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The compliance cost to implement the 
requirements of this rule is approximately $3,500 per ton VOC removed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The cost to business to comply with this rule is approximately 
$3,500 per ton VOC removed.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36727.htm

No. 36728 (New Rule): R307-346. Metal Furniture Surface Coatings.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule applies to metal furniture surface 
coating operations, including related cleaning activities, that have the 
potential to emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year and 
that are located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and 
Weber counties.  The rule establishes reasonably available control technology 
requirements to reduce VOC emissions.  Owners and operators have the option 
to reduce VOCs by applying coatings with the VOC limits established in the 
rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at least a 90% VOC reduction.  
During the public comment period, the Air Quality Board is requesting public 
input on the appropriateness of applying this rule in Tooele and Box Elder 
counties.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to the state budget.  (DAR NOTE:  The proposed repeal of Rule R307-
340 is under DAR No. 36725 is this issue, October 1, 2012, of the Bulletin.)
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Anticipated cost to sources is $2,020 per ton VOC 
removed.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to metal furniture coating operations that emit 
2.7 tons of VOC per year.  There are no anticipated costs or savings to 
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government 
entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The compliance cost to implement the 
requirements of this rule is approximately $2,020 per ton VOC removed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The cost to business to comply with this rule is approximately 
$2,020 per ton VOC removed.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36728.htm

No. 36729 (New Rule): R307-347. Large Appliance Surface Coatings.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule applies to large appliance surface 
coating operations, including related cleaning activities, that have the 
potential to emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year and 
that are located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and 
Weber counties.  The rule establishes reasonably available control technology 
requirements to reduce VOC emissions.  Owners and operators have the option 
to reduce VOCs by applying coatings with the VOC limits established in the 
rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at least a 90% VOC reduction.  
During the public comment period, the Air Quality Board is requesting public 
input on the appropriateness of applying this rule in Tooele and Box Elder 
counties.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to the state budget.  (DAR NOTE:  The proposed repeal of Rule R307-
340 is under DAR No. 36725 is this issue, October 1, 2012, of the Bulletin.)
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Anticipated cost to sources is $2,020 per ton VOC 
removed.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to fabric and vinyl coatings operations that emit 
2.7 tons of VOC per year.  There are no anticipated costs or savings to 
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government 
entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The compliance cost to implement the 
requirements of this rule is approximately $2,020 per ton VOC removed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The cost to business to comply with this rule is approximately 
$2,020 per ton VOC removed.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36729.htm

No. 36730 (New Rule): R307-348. Magnet Wire Coatings.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule applies to magnet wire coating 
operations, including related cleaning activities, that have the potential to 
emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year and that are 
located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and Weber 
counties.  The rule establishes reasonably available control technology 
requirements to reduce VOC emissions.  Owners and operators have the option 
to reduce VOCs by applying coatings with the VOC limits established in the 
rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at least a 90% VOC reduction.  
During the public comment period, the Air Quality Board is requesting public 
input on the appropriateness of applying this rule in Tooele and Box Elder 
counties.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to the state budget.  (DAR NOTE:  The proposed repeal of Rule R307-
340 is under DAR No. 36725 is this issue, October 1, 2012, of the Bulletin.)
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Anticipated cost to sources is $6,560 per ton VOC 
removed.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to fabric and vinyl coatings operations that emit 
2.7 tons of VOC per year.  There are no anticipated costs or savings to 
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government 
entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The compliance cost to implement the 
requirements of this rule is approximately $6,560 per ton VOC removed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The cost to business to comply with this rule is approximately 
$6,560 per ton VOC removed.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36730.htm

No. 36731 (New Rule): R307-349. Flat Wood Panel Coatings.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule applies to flat wood panel coating 
operations, including related cleaning activities, that have the potential to 
emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year and that are 
located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah and Weber 
counties.  The rule establishes reasonably available control technology 
requirements to reduce VOC emissions.  Owners and operators have the option 
to reduce VOCs by applying coatings with the VOC limits established in the 
rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at least a 90% VOC reduction.  
During the public comment period, the Air Quality Board is requesting public 
input on the appropriateness of applying this rule in Tooele and Box Elder 
counties.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to the state budget.  (DAR NOTE:  The proposed repeal of Rule R307-
340 is under DAR No. 36725 is this issue, October 1, 2012, of the Bulletin.)
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Anticipated cost to sources is $2,110 per ton VOC 
removed.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to flat wood panel coatings operations that emit 
2.7 tons of VOC per year.  There are no anticipated costs or savings to 
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government 
entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The compliance cost to implement the 
requirements of this rule is approximately $2,110 per ton VOC removed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The cost to business to comply with this rule is approximately 
$2,110 per ton VOC removed.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36731.htm

No. 36732 (New Rule): R307-350. Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products 
Coatings.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule applies to miscellaneous metal 
parts coating operations, including related cleaning activities, that have 
the potential to emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year 
and that are located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and 
Weber counties.  The rule establishes reasonably available control technology 
requirements to reduce VOC emissions.  Owners and operators have the option 
to reduce VOCs by applying coatings with the VOC limits established in the 
rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at least a 90% VOC reduction.  
During the public comment period, the Air Quality Board is requesting public 
input on the appropriateness of applying this rule in Tooele and Box Elder 
counties.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to the state budget.  (DAR NOTE:  The proposed repeal of Rule R307-
340 is under DAR No. 36725 is this issue, October 1, 2012, of the Bulletin.)
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Anticipated cost to sources is between $238 to $6,560 
per ton VOC removed.  These costs are highly dependent on the industrial 
application.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to miscellaneous metal part coatings operations 
that emit 2.7 tons of VOC per year.  There are no anticipated costs or 
savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local 
government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The compliance cost to implement the 
requirements of this rule depends on which industry the rule is being applied 
to.  Estimated costs range from $238 to $6,560 per ton VOC removed.  These 
costs are highly dependent on the industrial application.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The fiscal impact this rule has on business depends on which 
industry the rule is being applied to.  Estimated costs range from $238 to 
$6,560 per ton VOC removed.  This fiscal impact is highly dependent on the 
industrial application.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36732.htm

No. 36733 (New Rule): R307-351. Graphic Arts.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Owners and operators of rotogravure, 
flexographic, and specialty printing operations that have the potential to 
emit 25 tons per year of VOC can only operate if the volatile fraction of 
ink, as it is applied to substrate, contains 25% by volume or less of organic 
solvent and 75% by volume or more of water; if the ink as it is applied to 
the substrate, less water, contains 60% by volume or more nonvolatile 
material; or if the owner or operator installs and operates either a carbon 
adsorption system or an incineration system.  Owners and operators of 
flexible packaging printing operations that have the potential to emit 2 tons 
per yer of VOC are required to comply with an 80% overall control efficiency 
or by using the low VOC content materials listed in the rule.  Owners and 
operators of offset lithographic printing and letterpress printing operations 
that have the potential to emit 25 tons per year of VOC are required to 
comply with a 90% control efficiency for the control device on heatset dryers 
or the control device outlet concentration may be reduced to 20 ppmv as 
hexane on a dry basis to accommodate situations where the inlet VOC 
concentration is low or there is no identifiable measurable inlet.  Various 
required alcohol percentages of on-press fountain solution for offset 
lithographic printing and sheet-fed offset lithographic printing operations 
that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year of VOC are established.  
Requirements for cleaning materials for offset lithographic printing and 
letterpress printing operations that emit at least 2.7 tons per year actual 
emissions of VOC are established.  The rule also establishes control 
techniques and work practices that are to be implemented at all times to 
reduce VOC emissions as well as the requirements for when an add-on control 
device is used.  During the public comment period, the Air Quality Board is 
asking for input on the appropriateness of applying this rule in Tooele and 
Box Elder counties.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to the state budget.  (DAR NOTE:  The proposed repeal of Rule R307-
340 is under DAR No. 36725 is this issue, October 1, 2012, of the Bulletin.)
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The majority of the requirements in this rule were 
already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been 
proposed to be repealed.  Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or 
savings to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Anticipated cost to sources is $5,890 per ton VOC 
removed.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to graphic art printing operations.  There are no 
anticipated costs or savings to persons other than small businesses, 
businesses, or local government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The compliance cost to implement the 
requirements of this rule is approximately $5,890 per ton VOC removed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The cost to business to comply with this rule is approximately 
$5,890 per ton VOC removed.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36733.htm

No. 36734 (New Rule): R307-352. Metal Container, Closure, and Coil Coatings.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule applies to coating operations in 
the manufacturing or reconditioning of metal cans, drums, pails, and lids 
that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) 
per year and that are located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, 
Utah, and Weber counties.  The rule establishes reasonably available control 
technology requirements to reduce VOC emissions.  Owners and operators have 
the option to reduce VOCs by applying coatings with the VOC limits 
established in the rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at least a 90% 
VOC reduction.  During the public comment period, the Air Quality Board is 
requesting public input on the appropriateness of applying this rule in 
Tooele and Box Elder counties.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This rule may add to the Division of Air Quality's 
administrative costs; however, those costs will be minimal.  Therefore, there 
are no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This rule does not create any new requirements for 
local government; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to 
local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Anticipated cost to sources is $3,221 per ton VOC 
removed.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to coating operations in the manufacturing or 
reconditioning of metal cans, drums, pails, and lids that have the potential 
to emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year.  There are no 
anticipated costs or savings to persons other than small businesses, 
businesses, or local government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The compliance cost to implement the 
requirements of this rule is approximately $3,221 per ton VOC removed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The cost to business to comply with this rule is approximately 
$3,221 per ton VOC removed.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36734.htm

No. 36735 (New Rule): R307-353. Plastic Part Coatings.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule applies to automobile, truck, and 
business machine plastic part coating line operations that have the potential 
to emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year and that are 
located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and Weber 
counties.  The rule establishes reasonably available control technology 
requirements to reduce VOC emissions.  Owners and operators have the option 
to reduce VOCs by applying coatings with the VOC limits established in the 
rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at least a 90% VOC reduction.  
During the public comment period, the Air Quality Board is requesting public 
input on the appropriateness of applying this rule in Tooele and Box Elder 
counties.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This rule may add to the Division of Air Quality's 
administrative costs; however, those costs will be minimal.  Therefore, there 
are no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This rule does not create any new requirements for 
local government; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to 
local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Anticipated cost to sources is $2,020 per ton VOC 
removed.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to coating operations of in the manufacturing or 
reconditioning of metal cans, drums, pails, and lids that have the potential 
to emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year.  There are no 
anticipated costs or savings to persons other than small businesses, 
businesses, or local government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The compliance cost to implement the 
requirements of this rule is approximately $2,020 per ton VOC removed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The cost to business to comply with this rule is approximately 
$2,020 per ton VOC removed.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36735.htm

No. 36736 (New Rule): R307-354. Automotive Refinishing Coatings.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule applies to automotive refinishing 
coatings operations, including related cleaning activities, that have the 
potential to emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year and 
that are located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and 
Weber counties.  The rule establishes reasonably available control technology 
requirements to reduce VOC emissions.  Owners and operators have the option 
to reduce VOCs by applying coatings with the VOC limits established in the 
rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at least a 90% VOC reduction.  
During the public comment period, the Air Quality Board is requesting public 
input on the appropriateness of applying this rule in Tooele and Box Elder 
counties.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There may some an increase in administrative costs at 
the Division of Air Quality; however, costs should be minimal.  Therefore, 
there are no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This rule does not add any requirements to local 
government; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Anticipated cost to sources is approximately $2,740 per 
ton VOC removed.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to automotive refinishing coatings operations 
that emit 2.7 tons of VOC per year.  There are no anticipated costs or 
savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local 
government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The compliance cost to implement the 
requirements of this rule is approximately $2,740 per ton VOC removed.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The cost to business to comply with this rule is approximately 
$2,740 per ton VOC removed.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36736.htm

No. 36737 (New Rule): R307-355. Control of Emissions from Aerospace 
Manufacture and Rework Facilities.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule applies to aerospace manufacture 
and rework facilities that have the potential to emit five tons of volatile 
organic compounds (VOC) per year and that are located in Box Elder, Cache, 
Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and Weber counties.  The rule establishes 
reasonably available control technology requirements to reduce VOC emissions.  
Owners and operators have the option to reduce VOCs by applying coatings with 
the VOC limits established in the rule or to use add-on controls to achieve 
at least a 95% VOC reduction.  Coating application methods and work practices 
for cleaning materials are established.  Owners and operators are required to 
maintain records from the manufacturer that demonstrate compliance with the 
emission standards in the rule.  Hand-wipe, flush, and spray gun cleaning 
requirements are included in the rule.  During the public comment period, the 
Air Quality Board is requesting public input on the appropriateness of 
applying this rule in Tooele and Box Elder counties and is asking industry to 
provide information on their cost to comply with the rule.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There may some an increase in administrative costs at 
the Division of Air Quality; however, costs should be minimal.  Therefore, 
there are no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This rule does not add any requirements to local 
government; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The division does anticipate a cost to small businesses 
to implement this rule.  However, the division is unsure of what those costs 
would be.  That is why during the public comment period, the Air Quality 
Board is asking that industry provide cost information.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule applies to aerospace manufacture and rework facilities 
that have the potential to emit five tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) 
per year.  There are no anticipated costs or savings to persons other than 
small businesses, businesses, or local government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The division does anticipate 
compliance costs for affected persons.  However, the division is unsure of 
what those costs would be.  That is why during the public comment period, the 
Air Quality Board is asking that industry provide cost information.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The division does anticipate compliance costs for affected 
persons.  However, the division is unsure of what those costs would be.  That 
is why during the public comment period, the Air Quality Board is asking that 
industry provide cost information.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by 
Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/15/2012 11:00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Technology College, 1301 N 600 W,  
Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT
- 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Association of Governments, 586 E 800 N, 
Orem, UT
- 10/17/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
- 10/17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, 195 N 1950 
W,  Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/06/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36737.htm



GOVERNOR
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
No. 36749 (Amendment): R357-6. Technology and Life Science Economic 
Development and Related Tax Credits.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  These changes:  remove capital gains tax 
credit language and add quarterly application deadlines.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--This is an amendment to a program which is 
currently being administered by the Governor's Office of Economic 
Development.  The changes in the rule will not create nor save costs to the 
existing program.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--Local government is not involved in this program 
and would not be affected by the change.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--Small businesses which were previously eligible 
for the tax credits continue to be eligible.  There is no fiscal impact on 
small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: None--There is no application fee for the tax credits and the 
application is similar to what was required in the past.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--There is no application fee for 
the tax credits and the application is similar to what was required in the 
past.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  None--There is no fiscal impact on small businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Zachary Derr by phone at 801-538-8746, by FAX at 801-538-8888, or by 
Internet E-mail at zderr@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36749.htm



HEALTH
FAMILY HEALTH AND PREPAREDNESS, CHILD CARE LICENSING
No. 36715 (Amendment): R430-6. Background Screening.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed change clarifies the definition 
of "involved with child care".  It also clarifies that background screening 
information must be submitted for children who turn 12 and live in a home 
where child care is provided.  Lastly, it specifies the conditions under 
which the Executive Director of the Department of Health may exempt 
individual background screening cases involving misdemeanor offenses.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  Some state agencies operate or sponsor child care 
programs.  However, the Department does not anticipate that this rule will 
result in any new costs or savings to child care programs operated by state 
agencies.  This is because the first two changes are only clarifications and 
do not change current requirements, and the third change is only expected to 
affect one or two individual people once every few years.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Some local governments operate or sponsor child care 
programs.  However, the Department does not anticipate that this rule will 
result in any new costs or savings to child care programs operated by local 
governments.  This is because the first two changes are only clarifications 
and do not change current requirements, and the third change is only expected 
to affect one or two individual people once every few years.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Almost all child care facilities are small businesses.  
However, the Department does not anticipate that this rule will result in any 
new costs or savings to child care programs operated by small businesses.  
This is because the first two changes are only clarifications and do not 
change current requirements, and the third change is only expected to affect 
one or two individual people once every few years.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The Department does not anticipate that this rule will result in 
any new costs or savings to child care programs operated by businesses, 
individuals, local governments, and persons that are not small businesses.  
This is because the first two changes are only clarifications and do not 
change current requirements, and the third change is only expected to affect 
one or two individual people once every few years.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Because this rule does not impose any 
new requirement for child care providers, the Department does not anticipate 
any compliance costs for affected persons.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Background screening is an important tool to protect children 
but should be applied carefully.  Clarity on who must be screened and when a 
finding may be exempted are supported by this rule change.  The possibility 
to hire qualified people with a criminal background that does not present a 
risk to children through the exemption process should have a positive impact 
on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Simon Bolivar by phone at 801-584-8223, by FAX at 801-584-8467, or by 
Internet E-mail at sbolivar@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36715.htm

No. 36716 (Amendment): R430-50. Residential Certificate Child Care.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed change corrects references to 
required first aid and CPR training and clarifies what documentation is 
needed for off-site activities.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No state agencies operate in-home child care programs, 
so there are no anticipated costs or savings to state budgets associated with 
this rule change.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No local governments operate in-home child care 
programs, so there are no anticipated costs or savings to local governments 
associated with this rule change.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Almost all child care facilities are small businesses.  
However, because this amendment would not remove or add to any of the 
requirements for child care programs, the Department does not anticipate that 
this rule will result in any new costs or savings to child care programs 
operated by small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Because this amendment does not add to or remove any of the 
requirements for child care providers, the Department does not anticipate any 
new costs or savings to entities or persons that are not small businesses.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Because this rule does not impose any 
new requirement for child care providers, the Department does not anticipate 
any compliance costs for affected persons.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  These technical and other minor changes will have no fiscal 
impact on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Simon Bolivar by phone at 801-584-8223, by FAX at 801-584-8467, or by 
Internet E-mail at sbolivar@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36716.htm

No. 36717 (Amendment): R430-60. Hourly Child Care Centers.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed change corrects an error that 
refers to assistant caregivers.  Hourly facilities do not have assistant 
caregivers.  The proposed change also corrects outdated references in the 
definitions and records sections.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No state agencies operate hourly child care programs, so 
there are no anticipated costs or savings to state budgets associated with 
this rule change.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Some local government operate hourly care programs.  
The Department does not anticipate a cost or savings to these programs.  
Because this rule does not add or remove any rule requirements, the 
Department does not anticipate any new costs or savings to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Almost all hourly child care programs are small 
businesses.  The Department does not anticipate a cost or savings to these 
programs. Because this rule does not add or remove any rule requirements, the 
Department does not anticipate any new costs or savings to small businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The Department does not anticipate a cost or savings to these 
programs.  Because this rule does not add or remove any rule requirements, 
the Department does not anticipate any new costs or savings to entities or 
persons that are not small businesses.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Because this rule does not impose any 
new requirement for child care providers, the Department does not anticipate 
any compliance costs for affected persons.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  These technical and other minor changes will have no fiscal 
impact on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Simon Bolivar by phone at 801-584-8223, by FAX at 801-584-8467, or by 
Internet E-mail at sbolivar@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36717.htm

No. 36718 (Amendment): R430-70. Out of School Time Child Care Programs.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed change corrects outdated rule 
references, removes requirements for safety glass in mirrors, corrects an 
error in the phase-in schedule for playground improvements, and clarifies the 
language about information to be given to parents.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No state agencies operate out of school time child care 
programs, so there are no anticipated costs or savings to state budgets 
associated with this rule change.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Some local governments operate out of school time child 
care programs.  Not requiring the use of safety guards in mirrors may produce 
some minor savings.  However, because having mirrors is not a requirement and 
the Department has no way of knowing if programs will install or increase the 
number mirrors they use, the Department cannot anticipate what their savings 
from this might be.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Almost all out of school time child care programs are 
small businesses.  Not requiring the use of safety guards in mirrors may 
produce some minor savings.  However, because having mirrors is not a 
requirement and the Department has no way of knowing if programs will install 
or increase the number mirrors they use, the Department cannot anticipate 
what their savings from this might be.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Not requiring the use of safety glass in mirrors may produce some 
savings.  Not requiring the use of safety guards in mirrors may produce some 
minor savings.  However, because having mirrors is not a requirement and the 
Department has no way of knowing if programs will install or increase the 
number mirrors they use, the Department cannot anticipate what their savings 
from this might be.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Because this rule does not impose any 
new requirement for child care providers, the Department does not anticipate 
any compliance costs for affected persons.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  These technical and other minor changes will have no fiscal 
impact on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Simon Bolivar by phone at 801-584-8223, by FAX at 801-584-8467, or by 
Internet E-mail at sbolivar@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36718.htm

No. 36719 (Amendment): R430-90. Licensed Family Child Care.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed changes remove outdated 
references to tuberculosis (TB) testing of staff.  Based on a recommendation 
from the state's TB Advisory Board, the requirement for TB testing was 
previously removed from this rule.  Some language related to TB testing was 
inadvertently left in a different section of the rule.  The proposed changes 
also clarify the requirements for equipment use zones and correct an outdated 
rule reference.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No state agencies operate in-home child care programs, 
so there are no anticipated costs or savings to state budgets associated with 
this rule change.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No local governments operate in-home child care 
programs so there are no anticipated costs or savings to local government 
associated with this rule change.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Almost all in-home child care programs are small 
businesses.  However, because none of the proposed changes add or remove 
content to the current requirements, the Department does not anticipate any 
cost or savings as a result of this change.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Because none of the proposed changes add or remove content to the 
current requirements, the Department does not anticipate any cost or savings 
as a result of this change.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Because this rule does not impose any 
new requirement for child care providers, the Department does not anticipate 
any compliance costs for affected persons.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  These technical and other minor changes will have no fiscal 
impact on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Simon Bolivar by phone at 801-584-8223, by FAX at 801-584-8467, or by 
Internet E-mail at sbolivar@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36719.htm

No. 36720 (Amendment): R430-100. Child Care Centers.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed change removes the requirement 
for safety glass in mirrors and makes lettering corrections.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  Some state agencies operate child care centers.    Not 
requiring the use of safety glass in mirrors may produce some minor savings.  
However, because having mirrors is not a requirement and the Department has 
no way of knowing if programs will install or increase the number mirrors 
they use, the Department cannot anticipate what their savings from this might 
be.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Some local governments operate child care centers.  Not 
requiring the use of safety glass in mirrors may produce some minor savings.  
However, because having mirrors is not a requirement and the Department has 
no way of knowing if programs will install or increase the number mirrors 
they use, the Department cannot anticipate what their savings from this might 
be.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Almost all child care centers are small businesses.  Not 
requiring the use of safety glass in mirrors may produce some minor savings.  
However, because having mirrors is not a requirement and the Department has 
no way of knowing if programs will install or increase the number mirrors 
they use, the Department cannot anticipate what their savings from this might 
be.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Not requiring the use of safety glass in mirrors may produce some 
minor savings.  However, because having mirrors is not a requirement and the 
Department has no way of knowing if programs will install or increase the 
number mirrors they use, the Department cannot anticipate what their savings 
from this might be.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Because this rule does not impose any 
new requirement for child care providers, the Department does not anticipate 
any compliance costs for affected persons.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  These technical and other minor changes will have no fiscal 
impact on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Simon Bolivar by phone at 801-584-8223, by FAX at 801-584-8467, or by 
Internet E-mail at sbolivar@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36720.htm



HERITAGE AND ARTS
HISTORY
No. 36762 (Amendment): R455-4. Ancient Human Remains.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The majority of ancient human remains that 
are discovered are located in areas that are inconvenient to the media, but 
when they are found in more urban areas, departmental staff involved in the 
recovery find themselves struggling to conduct their work because of the time 
they have to invest in trying to maintain cultural sensitivity.  The purpose 
of this rule amendment is to clarify the process by which department 
personnel conduct their excavations.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The existing recovery process is funded as part of the 
department's regular operating expenses.  Other than a one-time cost for the 
screening material (which has already been purchased), there will be no new 
cost or savings to the state budget.  This rule will result in greater 
cultural sensitivity, as well as greater efficiency for the excavation 
process.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local governments don't participate in the cost of 
remains recovery and repatriation.  It is anticipated that there will be no 
additional costs to local government with the proposed rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Small businesses don't participate in the cost of 
remains recovery and repatriation.  It is anticipated that there will be no 
additional costs to local government with the proposed rule.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The existing recovery process is funded as part of the department's 
regular operating expenses.  It is anticipated that there will be no 
additional costs resulting from this rule amendment to any public or private 
entity.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--The screening equipment has 
already been purchased by the Division of History.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule doesn't restrict the media from photographing 
excavation sites, but is intended only to restrict photos of culturally 
sensitive items (human remains).
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Michael Hansen by phone at 801-245-7204, by FAX at 801-521-4727, or by 
Internet E-mail at mhansen1@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/09/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36762.htm



INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36745 (New Rule): R590-265. Hazardous Financial Condition Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule is to set forth the standards the 
commissioner may use to identify insurers found to be in such condition as to 
render the continuance of their business hazardous to the policyholder, 
creditor, and general public.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This rule will not change the workload of the 
department.  It simply identifies additional ways financial examiners and 
analysts can spot hazardous financial condition and hopefully take steps 
sooner to have the insurer take corrective action.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This rule will have no impact on local governments 
since it deals solely with relationship between the department and insurance 
companies licensed through them.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This rule does not deal with small businesses.  It 
regulates the financial standing of insurers that are large insurers licensed 
through the department.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule follows the national standard set through the NAIC.  It 
will have no fiscal impact on insurers nor increase their workload.  It is a 
guide and standard that will help the Department identify insurers in a 
financially hazardous condition. Awareness of the standards in the rule may 
also help insurers to avoid or more quickly identify a financial hazardous 
condition.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The rule will have no financial 
impact on insurers nor increase their workload.  It is a guide and standard 
that will help the Department identify insurers in a financially hazardous 
condition.  Awareness of the standards in the rule may also help insurers to 
avoid or more quickly identify a financially hazardous condition.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule will not add costs or additional workload to 
businesses under the Department's regulatory authority.  It may help them 
avoid a financially hazardous condition or take early corrective action.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jilene Whitby by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by 
Internet E-mail at jwhitby@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 10/25/2012 11:00 AM, State Office Building, 450 N State St, Room 3112, Salt 
Lake City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36745.htm



WORKFORCE SERVICES
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
No. 36761 (Amendment): R986-200-247. Utah Back to Work Pilot Program (BWP).
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The Department has been offering a Back to 
Work program in an effort to help people move from unemployment to work more 
quickly.  The Department does not have the funds to operate the program at 
the present time and it will no longer be offered.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This applies to federally-funded programs so there are 
no costs or savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no 
costs or savings to the local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs to small businesses, to comply 
with these changes because there are no costs or fees associated with these 
proposed changes.  Any employer currently participating will be paid 
according to the contract.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs to persons other than small businesses, 
businesses or local government entities to comply with these changes because 
there are no costs or fees associated with these proposed changes.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs 
associated with these changes for any affected persons because this is a 
federally-funded program and there are no fees or costs associated with these 
proposed changes.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36761.htm


UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
No. 36760 (Amendment): R994-406-302. Repayment and Collection of Fault 
Overpayments.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The Department has decided to participate in 
a federal program which will allow the Department to intercept federal income 
tax refunds for fraud and fault overpayments when the claimant failed to 
report wages.  This will only apply to claimants who have failed to make 
payments as agreed and the Department has obtained a warrant.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no costs 
or savings to the state budget.  Although it is anticipated the Department 
will collect more outstanding and overdue overpayments, and those collections 
will be returned to the state where the state paid the benefits, it is not 
anticipated this will generate sufficient sums to affect the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no 
costs of savings to local government.  However it is anticipated the 
Department will collect more overpayments which will be refunded to the 
appropriate employer account.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There are no costs or savings to small businesses as 
there are no fees associated with this program and it is federally funded.  
However it is anticipated the Department will collect more overpayments which 
will be refunded to the appropriate employer account.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings to any other persons or small 
businesses as there are no fees associated with this program and it is 
federally funded.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings to any 
affected persons as there are no fees associated with this program and it is 
federally funded.  These changes will not impact any employer's contribution 
rate however it is anticipated the Department will collect more overpayments 
which will be refunded to the appropriate employer account.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business. These changes will have no impact on any employers contribution tax 
rate.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  11/07/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36760.htm




4.  FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION

Within five years of an administrative rule's original enactment or last 
five-year review, the agency is required to review the rule.  This review is 
intended to remove obsolete rules from the Utah Administrative Code.  Upon 
reviewing a rule, an agency may:  repeal the rule by filing a Proposed Rule; 
continue the rule as it is by filing a Notice of Review and Statement of 
Continuation (Notice); or amend the rule by filing a Proposed Rule and by 
filing a Notice.  By filing a Notice, the agency indicates that the rule is 
still necessary. 

The rule text that is being continued may be found in the most recent edition 
of the Utah Administrative Code.  The rule text may also be inspected at the 
agency or the Division of Administrative Rules.  Notices are effective upon 
filing.  

Notices are governed by Section 63G-3-305.


EDUCATION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36763 (5-year Review): R277-419. Pupil Accounting.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is continued because it provides necessary pupil accounting 
procedures used to apportion and distribute state funds for education.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  09/14/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36763.htm

No. 36764 (5-year Review): R277-420. Aiding Financially Distressed School 
Districts.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is continued because it provides necessary procedures to specify 
eligibility requirements for nonrecurring or nonroutine interfund transfers 
for financially distressed school districts.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  09/14/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36764.htm

No. 36765 (5-year Review): R277-423. Delivery of Flow Through Money.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is continued because it provides necessary procedures to disburse 
flow through money to local education agencies.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  09/14/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36765.htm

No. 36766 (5-year Review): R277-424. Indirect Costs for State Programs.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is continued because it provides necessary standards for local 
education agencies to claim indirect costs for state programs.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  09/14/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36766.htm

No. 36767 (5-year Review): R277-426. Definition of Private and Non-Profit 
Schools for Federal Program Services.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is continued because it provides necessary requirements for 
private, non-public, and non-profit schools to receive services under federal 
laws requiring the public education system to serve students in identified 
schools.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  09/14/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36767.htm

No. 36768 (5-year Review): R277-454. Construction Management of School 
Building Projects.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is continued because it provides necessary standards for local 
boards of education to follow for school construction/building projects.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet 
E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  09/14/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36768.htm



FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
BANKS
No. 36714 (5-year Review): R333-7. Investment by a State-Chartered Bank in 
Shares of Open-End Investment Companies.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule permits a state-chartered bank to purchase for its own account 
shares of open-end investment companies subject to certain restrictions. The 
rule expands eligible classes and types of investments for state-chartered 
banks and gives them rights, privileges, and powers granted to national 
banks, and should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Paul Allred by phone at 801-538-8854, by FAX at 801-538-8894, or by 
Internet E-mail at pallred@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  09/05/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36714.htm


CREDIT UNIONS
No. 36713 (5-year Review): R337-2. Conversion from a Federal to a State-
Chartered Credit Union.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule establishes the requirements and procedures for converting from a 
federally-chartered credit union to a state-chartered credit union and should 
be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Paul Allred by phone at 801-538-8854, by FAX at 801-538-8894, or by 
Internet E-mail at pallred@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  09/05/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36713.htm

No. 36712 (5-year Review): R337-5. Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses - 
Credit Unions.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The rule is necessary because it requires an allowance account for loan 
losses and prescribes the optional methods of determining the required 
amount.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Paul Allred by phone at 801-538-8854, by FAX at 801-538-8894, or by 
Internet E-mail at pallred@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  09/05/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36712.htm



NATURAL RESOURCES
WILDLIFE RESOURCES
No. 36747 (5-year Review): R657-12. Hunting and Fishing Accommodations for 
People With Disabilities.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The standards and procedures adopted in Rule R657-12 have worked well in 
providing fairness to all concerned individuals.  The provisions of this rule 
have provided an effective and efficient process for persons to obtain a 
certificate of registration for taking wildlife from a vehicle and persons to 
obtain a fishing license as authorized under Subsection 23-19-36(1).  
Continuation of this rule is necessary for continued success of the program.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by 
Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  09/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36747.htm



TRANSPORTATION
PRECONSTRUCTION, RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
No. 36756 (5-year Review): R933-5. Utah-Federal Agreement for the Control of 
Outdoor Advertising.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The Utah-Federal Agreement is derived from the Federal Highway Beautification 
Act, which compels the states to "effectively control" outdoor advertising.  
Ten percent of all federal highway funding in the State of Utah is tied to 
the continuation of Rule R933-5.  Failing to continue this rule would place 
the State of Utah in default violation of the Federal Highway Beautification 
Act, which would result in a ten percent reduction of all available federal 
highway funding.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christine Newman by phone at 801-965-4026, by FAX at 801-965-4338, or by 
Internet E-mail at cwnewman@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  09/12/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121001/36756.htm





5.  NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES

State law provides for agencies to make their rules effective and enforceable 
after publication in the Utah State Bulletin. In the case of Proposed Rules 
or Changes in Proposed Rules with a designated comment period, the law 
permits an agency to file a notice of effective date any time after the close 
of comment plus seven days. In the case of Changes in Proposed Rules with no 
designated comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of 
effective date on any date including or after the thirtieth day after the 
rule's publication date. If an agency fails to file a Notice of Effective 
Date within 120 days from the publication of a Proposed Rule or a related 
Change in Proposed Rule the rule lapses and the agency must start the 
rulemaking process over.

Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301(12), 63G-3-
303, and Sections R15-4-5a and 5b. 


ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
DEBT COLLECTION
No. 36495  (AMD): R21-1.  Transfer of Collection Responsibility of State 
Agencies
Published:  08/01/2012
Effective:  09/07/2012



COMMERCE
OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING
No. 36484  (AMD): R156-20a.  Environmental Health Scientist Act Rule
Published:  08/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012



COMMUNITY AND CULTURE
HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE TARGET (HEAT)
No. 36313  (REP): R195-1.  Energy Assistance:  General Provisions
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012

No. 36314  (REP): R195-2.  Energy Assistance Programs Standards
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012

No. 36315  (REP): R195-3.  Energy Assistance Income Standards, Income 
Eligibility, and Payment Determination
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012

No. 36316  (REP): R195-4.  Energy Assistance:  Asset Standards
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012

No. 36317  (REP): R195-5.  Energy Assistance:  Program Benefits
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012

No. 36318  (REP): R195-6.  Energy Assistance:  Eligibility Determination
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012

No. 36319  (REP): R195-7.  Energy Assistance:  Records and Benefit Management
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012

No. 36320  (REP): R195-8.  Energy Assistance:  Special State Programs
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012


HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
No. 36321  (REP): R199-8.  Permanent Community Impact Fund Board Review and 
Approval of Applications for Funding Assistance
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012

No. 36322  (REP): R199-9.  Policy Concerning Enforceability and Taxability of 
Bonds Purchased
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012

No. 36323  (REP): R199-10.  Procedures in Case of Inability to Formulate 
Contract for Alleviation of Impact
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012

No. 36324  (REP): R199-11.  Community Development Block Grants (CDBG)
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012


HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNITY SERVICES
No. 36325  (REP): R202-100.  Community Services Block Grant Rules
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012

No. 36326  (REP): R202-101.  Qualified Emergency Food Agencies Fund (QEFAF)
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012



ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE AND REMEDIATION
No. 36496  (AMD): R311-201-12.  UST Operator Training and Registration
Published:  08/01/2012
Effective:  09/14/2012

No. 36497  (AMD): R311-206.  Underground Storage Tanks:  Financial Assurance 
Mechanisms
Published:  08/01/2012
Effective:  09/14/2012



HEALTH
DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
No. 36404  (AMD): R392-100.  Food Service Sanitation
Published:  07/15/2012
Effective:  09/10/2012



INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36493  (AMD): R590-130.  Rules Governing Advertisements of Insurance
Published:  08/01/2012
Effective:  09/11/2012

No. 36458  (AMD): R590-225-7.  Procedures for Form Filings
Published:  08/01/2012
Effective:  09/10/2012



NATURAL RESOURCES
WILDLIFE RESOURCES
No. 36494  (AMD): R657-3.  Collection, Importation, Transportation, and 
Possession of Zoological Animals
Published:  08/01/2012
Effective:  09/10/2012



WORKFORCE SERVICES
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
No. 36499  (AMD): R986-900-902.  Options and Waivers
Published:  08/01/2012
Effective:  10/01/2012


HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
No. 36487  (NEW): R990-12.  State Small Business Credit Initiative Program 
Fund
Published:  08/01/2012
Effective:  09/12/2012




6.  RULES INDEX

The Rules Index is a cumulative index that reflects all effective Utah 
administrative rules.  The Rules Index is not included Digest.  However, a 
copy of the current Rules Index is available 
http://www.rules.utah.gov/research.htm .


<<end of file>>
