Utah State Digest, Vol. 2012, No. 21 (November 1, 2012)

[NOTE:  The Utah State Digest (Digest) is created from the eRules 
filing database used to create the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin).  
While a discrepancy between the Digest and the Bulletin is highly 
unlikely, any discrepancies will be resolved in favor of the Bulletin.  
Please refer to the State Disclaimer ( 
http://www.utah.gov/disclaimer.html ) for more information.]

------------------------------------------------------------

UTAH STATE DIGEST
Summary of the Contents of the Utah State Bulletin


For information filed October 2, 2012, 12:00 AM through October 15, 
2012, 11:59 PM


Volume 2012, No. 21
November 1, 2012


Prepared by
Division of Administrative Rules
Department of Administrative Services


The Utah State Digest (Digest) is an official electronic publication 
of the State of Utah, Department of Administrative Services, Division 
of Administrative Rules.  It is a summary of the information found in 
the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin) of the same volume and issue 
number.  Inquiries concerning the substance or applicability of an 
administrative rule that appear in the Digest should be addressed to 
the contact person for the rule.  Questions about the Digest or the 
rulemaking process may be addressed to:  Division of Administrative 
Rules, 4120 State Office Building, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-1201, 
telephone 801-538-3218, FAX 801-359-0759.  Additional rulemaking 
information, and electronic versions of all administrative rule 
publications are available at:  http://www.rules.utah.gov/ .  The 
Digest is available free of charge online at 
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm and by E-mail Listserv.  




************************************************
Division of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City  84114

Unless otherwise noted, all information presented in this publication 
is in the public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and 
redistributed as desired.  Materials incorporated by reference retain 
the copyright asserted by their respective authors.  Citation to the 
source is requested.



Utah state digest.
  Semimonthly.
  1.  Delegated legislation--Utah--Digests. I.  Utah. Office 
of Administrative Rules.

KFU38.U8
348.792'025--DDC            86-658042
***********************************************




1.  EDITOR'S NOTES

Codification Error of the Amendment to Rule R386-702, DAR No. 36247, 
Effective 08/08/2012
- Michael Broschinsky by phone at 801-538-3003, by FAX at 801-537-
9240, or by Internet E-mail at mbroschi@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/ed153439.htm




2.  SPECIAL NOTICES

Air Quality Impact Analysis of Amendments Made to Rule R307-309, 
Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas for PM10: Fugitive Emissions and 
Fugitive Dust
- Joel Karmazyn by phone at 801-536-4423, by FAX at 801-536-4099, or 
by Internet E-mail at jkarmazyn@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/sn153413.htm

Air Quality Impact of Rule R307-202, Emissions Standards: General 
Burning Amendments
- Joel Karmazyn by phone at 801-536-4423, by FAX at 801-536-4099, or 
by Internet E-mail at jkarmazyn@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/sn153432.htm




3.  EXECUTIVE DOCUMENTS

As part of his or her constitutional duties, the Governor periodically 
issues Executive Documents comprised of Executive Orders, 
Proclamations, and Declarations.  "Executive Orders" set policy for 
the Executive Branch; create boards and commissions; provide for the 
transfer of authority; or otherwise interpret, implement, or give 
administrative effect to a provision of the Constitution, state law or 
executive policy.  "Proclamations" call special or extraordinary 
legislative sessions; designate classes of cities; publish states-of-
emergency; promulgate other official formal public announcements or 
functions; or publicly avow or cause certain matters of state 
government to be made generally known.  "Declarations" designate 
special days, weeks or other time periods;  call attention to or 
recognize people, groups, organizations, functions, or similar actions 
having a public purpose; or invoke specific legislative purposes (such 
as the declaration of an agricultural disaster).  

The Governor's Office staff files Executive Documents that have legal 
effect with the Division of Administrative Rules for publication and 
distribution.  All orders issued by the Governor not in conflict with 
existing laws have the full force and effect of law during a state of 
emergency when a copy of the order is filed with the Division of 
Administrative Rules. (See Section 63K-4-401).


Governor's Proclamation 2012/08/E:  Calling Fifty-Ninth Legislature 
Into the Eighth Extraordinary Session
- Cherilyn Bradford by phone at 801-538-1505, by FAX at 801-538-1528, 
or by Internet E-mail at Cbradford@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/execdocs/2012/ExecDoc153442.htm




4.  NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

A state agency may file a Proposed Rule when it determines the need 
for a new rule, a substantive change to an existing rule, or a repeal 
of an existing rule.  Filings received between October 2, 2012, 12:00 
a.m., and October 15, 2012, 11:59 p.m. are summarized in this, the 
November 1, 2012, issue of the Utah State Digest.

The law requires that an agency accept public comment on Proposed 
Rules published in the November 1, 2012, issue of the Utah State 
Bulletin until at least December 3, 2012 (the Bulletin is the parent 
publication of the Digest).  The agency may accept comment beyond this 
date and will indicate the last day the agency will accept comment in 
the rule information published below.  The agency may also hold public 
hearings.  Additionally, citizens or organizations may request the 
agency hold a hearing on a specific Proposed Rule.  Section 63G-3-302 
requires that a hearing request be received by the agency proposing 
the rule "in writing not more than 15 days after the publication date 
of the proposed rule."

From the end of the public comment period through March 1, 2013, the 
agency may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants 
to make the Proposed Rule effective.  The agency sets the effective 
date.  The date may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the 
close of the public comment period nor more than 120 days after the 
publication date in the Utah State Bulletin.  Alternatively, the 
agency may file a Change in Proposed Rule in response to comments 
received.  If the Division of Administrative Rules does not receive a 
Notice of Effective Date or a Change in Proposed Rule, the Proposed 
Rule lapses and the agency must start the process over.

The public, interest groups, and governmental agencies are invited to 
review and comment on the Proposed Rules listed below.  Comment may be 
directed to the contact person identified with each rule. 

Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-301; Rule R15-2; and 
Sections R15-4-3, R15-4-4, R15-4-5, R15-4-9, and R15-4-10.


AGRICULTURE AND FOOD
REGULATORY SERVICES
No. 36915 (Amendment): R70-320-18. Transport Tanks, Operators.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The main amendment is to make the milk 
hauler permit fee consistent with the Legislature's approved fee 
schedule.  Another proposal is to exempt milk sample transporters from 
the milk hauler licensing requirements.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Division anticipates that the proposed 
exemption for milk sample haulers will reduce the Department's revenue 
about $100 annually.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local governments have no responsibilities in 
manufacturing, production, and processing.  There will be no budgetary 
impact to local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Based on information gained from small raw milk 
producers on 09/13/2012, the changes will reduce their costs for 
getting milk samples from farms and stores to laboratories.  They did 
not quantify the impact.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: The Division has included all stakeholders in 
the preparation of these proposed amendments.  No financial impacts 
have been identified beyond those described above.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Costs of compliance will be 
reduced because producers will not have to use licensed employees to 
transport milk to laboratories.  They will realize savings in 
permitting costs and in having increased options for who is eligible 
to transport the samples.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE 
ON BUSINESSES:  The proposed amendments which bring the rule's permit 
fee to be consistent with the Legislature's approved fee schedule is 
essential.  The other change is based on detailed discussion with the 
industry, academia and other stakeholders.  It should reduce the 
compliance costs for small producers without compromising the public 
health protection.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING 
WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/03/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Kathleen Mathews by phone at 801-538-7103, by FAX at 801-538-7126, 
or by Internet E-mail at kmathews@utah.gov
- Kyle Stephens by phone at 801-538-7102, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or 
by Internet E-mail at kylestephens@utah.gov
- Richard Clark by phone at 801-538-7150, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or 
by Internet E-mail at richardwclark@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36915.htm

No. 36914 (Amendment): R70-330. Raw Milk for Retail.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The main amendment is to make raw milk 
standards and enforcement in the rule to be identical with those in 
statute.  Changes are also proposed to spell out Pasteurized Milk 
Ordinance rather than refer to it as PMO; to change the somatic cell 
standard to 400,000 from 350,000 cells per ml.; to eliminate the 
requirement for an inspection from the Department prior to lifting the 
suspension of a permit; and allow the sale of stored raw milk batches 
which meet testing standards.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The amendments will remove the requirement for a 
Department inspection prior to lifting the suspension of a permit.  No 
impact on the state budget has been identified.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no effect on budget for local 
governments since they have no responsibility for raw milk.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Based on information gained from small raw milk 
producers on 09/13/2012, the changes will reduce their overhead.  They 
did not quantify the impact.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: The Division has included all stakeholders in 
the preparation of these proposed amendments.  No financial impacts 
have been identified beyond those described above.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Costs of compliance will be 
reduced because producers will not have to discard approved milk 
produced in batches prior to the one that causes a suspension.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE 
ON BUSINESSES:  The proposed amendments which bring the rule's raw 
milk standards and enforcement provisions are essential.  The other 
changes are based on detailed discussion with the industry, academia 
and other stakeholders.  They should reduce the overhead and 
compliance costs for small producers without compromising the public 
health protection.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING 
WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/03/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Kathleen Mathews by phone at 801-538-7103, by FAX at 801-538-7126, 
or by Internet E-mail at kmathews@utah.gov
- Kyle Stephens by phone at 801-538-7102, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or 
by Internet E-mail at kylestephens@utah.gov
- Richard Clark by phone at 801-538-7150, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or 
by Internet E-mail at richardwclark@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36914.htm



COMMERCE
OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING
No. 36930 (Amendment): R156-38b. State Construction Registry Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed amendments clarify 
alternate methods for submitting an SCR filing out of the SCR website.  
Otherwise, the substance of the existing rule remains unchanged.  The 
proposed amendments also make technical and clarifying changes.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  These proposed amendments are only a 
clarification of the statutory requirement and therefore, the Division 
has determined the proposed amendments should not have a fiscal impact 
to the state budget beyond those already identified in the  fiscal 
analysis of H.B. 131.  The clarification of alternate submission 
methods to the SCR does not impact other state government agencies.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  These proposed amendments are only a 
clarification of the statutory requirement and therefore, the Division 
has determined the proposed amendments should not have a fiscal impact 
to local governments beyond those already identified in the fiscal 
analysis of H.B. 131.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  These proposed amendments are only a 
clarification of the statutory requirement and therefore the Division 
has determined the proposed amendments should not have a fiscal impact 
to small businesses beyond those already identified in the fiscal 
analysis of H.B. 131.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: These proposed amendments are only a 
clarification of the statutory requirement and therefore the Division 
has determined the proposed amendments should not have a fiscal impact 
to other persons beyond those already identified in the fiscal 
analysis of H.B. 131.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  These proposed amendments are 
only a clarification of the statutory requirement and therefore the 
Division has determined the proposed amendments should not have a 
fiscal impact to affected  persons beyond those already identified in 
the fiscal analysis of H.B. 131.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE 
ON BUSINESSES:  As stated in the rule analysis, the proposed 
amendments give businesses an alternate method for submitting an SCR 
filing.  The amendments do not impose new fees or require compliance 
in a manner that would create new costs.  No fiscal impact to 
businesses is anticipated from this filing.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING 
WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/03/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Tom Harper by phone at 801-530-6288, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by 
Internet E-mail at tharper@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 11/08/2012 03:00 PM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S, Conference Room 
474 (fourth floor), Salt Lake City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36930.htm



EDUCATION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36946 (Amendment): R277-108-5. Assurances.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  In Subsection R277-108-5A(4), a 
previous requirement in which assurance of compliance is provided is 
removed and a new requirement is inserted.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the 
state budget.  The requirement is for local education agencies to 
provide written assurance of compliance for all requirements is this 
rule.  A new requirement will now be included.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  Local education agencies already provide written 
assurance of compliance for all requirements in this rule.  A new 
requirement will now be included.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule and the amendment apply to a requirement for 
local education agencies and do not affect businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to 
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government 
entities.  The additional requirement applies to local education 
agencies.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There could be compliance 
costs for local education agencies not complying with this 
requirements of this rule.  Compliance costs may include interruption 
of monthly transfers of funds specified for administrative costs under 
Section 53A-17a-108, interruptions of disbursement of state aid under 
Subsection 53A-1-401(3), or withholding of specific program funds.  
Costs are very speculative.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE 
ON BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact 
on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING 
WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/03/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by 
Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36946.htm

No. 36947 (Amendment): R277-422. State Supported Voted Local Levy, 
Board Local Levy and Reading Improvement Program.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  A definition is removed from the rule 
and parts of the rule that are either outdated or currently in statute 
are removed from the rule.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the 
state budget.  The amendments remove outdated language and language 
currently in statute which does not result in a cost or savings.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government.  The amendments remove outdated language and language 
currently in statute which does not result in a cost or savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  The amendments to this rule apply to public education and 
do not affect businesses.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to 
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government 
entities.  The amendments remove outdated language and language 
currently in statute which does not result in a cost or savings.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There is no compliance costs 
for affected persons.  The amendments remove outdated language and 
language currently in statute which does not result in a cost or 
savings.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE 
ON BUSINESSES:  I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact 
on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING 
WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/03/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by 
Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36947.htm



HEALTH
DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, HEALTH PROMOTION
No. 36937 (New Rule): R384-202. Traumatic Spinal Cord and Brain Injury 
Rehabilitation Fund.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule establishes procedure for 
the Traumatic Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Rehabilitation Fund 
Advisory Committee to annually review and establish criteria for 
recommending distribution of funding to charitable clinics to provide 
the services designated in Title 26, Chapter 54.  The rule establishes 
the request for funding applications process, development of the 
guidance, as well as the review, evaluation, recommendation and 
funding award process.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  Total cost is $221,200: estimated $200,000 per 
year from a $20 per impound fee in Section 41-6a-1406 is designated 
for the Traumatic Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Fund for provision of 
Traumatic Spinal Cord and Brain Injury services through charitable 
clinics; and $21,200 general fund for administration of Traumatic 
Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Rehabilitation Fund.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--Political Subdivisions do not provide 
services to these Traumatic Spinal Cord and Brain Injury clients.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--These charitable clinics will be serving 
the spinal cord and brain injury clients that have exhausted their 
insurance coverage, therefore it would not be taking business away 
from other clinics, physical, speech, or occupational therapists.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Cost is $200,000:  charitable clinics will be 
recipients of the funds to treat spinal cord and brain injury clients.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Charitable clinics that apply 
for the funding will be required to prepare a short (five - six page) 
application detailing their out reach efforts, assessments, staffing, 
proposed services and equipment, fee structure and evaluation. It is 
anticipated that it would take approximately five - six hours staff 
time to prepare their application.  These cost would be variable 
depending upon the salary of the staff that will be preparing the 
application.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE 
ON BUSINESSES:  The committee structure set up pursuant to Legislative 
directive will have objective criteria to guide the distribution of 
the funds.  Business should benefit.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING 
WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/03/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Heather Borski by phone at 801-538-9998, by FAX at 801-538-9495, or 
by Internet E-mail at hborski@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36937.htm



HUMAN SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36911 (Amendment): R495-890. Department of Human Services Related 
Parties Conflict Investigation Procedure for Non Contracted Private 
Sector Independent Child Protective Services.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule establishes criteria used to 
determine when conflict investigations are necessary in the Department 
of Human Services and who will conduct the investigations.  It is 
clarified what will happen if there is a lapse in the contract with a 
private provider.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There will be no increase in costs or saving to 
the state budget because these proposed changes clarify practice, but 
do not increase the work already being accomplished by workers.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local government is not a part of the state 
agency which is affected by this rule; therefore there will be no 
increase in costs or saving to local government.  These proposed 
changes clarify practice for the state agency on work already being 
done and local government is not responsible for conflict 
investigations.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Small businesses are not a part of the state 
agency which is affected by this rule; therefore there will be no 
increase in costs or saving to local government.  These proposed 
changes clarify practice for the state agency on work already being 
done and small businesses are not responsible for conflict 
investigations.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings to any other 
persons or government entities because this rule does not apply to 
them.  They are not a part of the state agency which is affected by 
this rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  These proposed changes clarify 
practice for the state agency on work already being done.  Affected 
persons have no compliance costs associated with implementing this 
rule because they are not part of the agency.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE 
ON BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings on businesses 
associated with implementing this rule.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING 
WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/03/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36911.htm


AGING AND ADULT SERVICES
No. 36920 (Amendment): R510-302. Adult Protective Services.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Previously, with the exception of 
issues of sexual abuse, the Long-term Care Ombudsman program 
investigated cases of abuse, neglect, and exploitation involving 
residents of care facilities, while Adult Protective Services 
investigated the same cases outside of facilities.  Due to authority 
and other issues, it was determined that Adult Protective Services 
should investigate all cases of abuse, neglect, and exploitation 
regardless of the setting.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The change moves responsibility from one program 
to another within the Division of Aging and will not result in 
additional costs or savings.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local Long-term Care Ombudsman programs will 
continue to work on other issues within the facilities and will not 
see a savings or new costs as a result.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  These programs are not overseen by small business 
which will see neither a new cost nor a savings as a result.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: The individuals involved have not had costs 
associated with these reports and will not have them with the change.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The individuals involved have 
not had costs associated with these reports and will not have them 
with the change.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE 
ON BUSINESSES:  The update to this rule do not create a savings or new 
cost and should be budget neutral for the agency.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING 
WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/03/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Nels Holmgren by phone at 801-538-3921, by FAX at 801-538-4395, or 
by Internet E-mail at nholmgren@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36920.htm


CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES
No. 36916 (New Rule): R512-52. Drug Testing Copayment for Parents of 
Children in Child and Family Services Custody.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The purpose of this new rule is to 
implement the copayment requirements for drug testing mandated by the 
Utah State Legislature (S. B. 2, Item 87, 2011 General Session).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  Child and Family Services estimates a yearly 
savings to the state budget of $132,600 (based on 2,210 copay drug 
tests per month at $5 per test).
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Child and Family Services determined that local 
governments are not affected by the rule and it will have no fiscal 
impact on them.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Child and Family Services determined that small 
businesses are not affected by the rule and it will have no fiscal 
impact on them.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Child and Family Services estimates a $132,600 
cost to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local 
government entities (based on 2,210 copay drug tests per month at $5 
per test).
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  A $5 copay will be assessed 
per each adult drug test.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE 
ON BUSINESSES:  This rule will have no fiscal impact on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING 
WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/03/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Miller by phone at 801-557-1772, by FAX at 801-538-3993, or by 
Internet E-mail at carolmiller@utah.gov
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36916.htm



LABOR COMMISSION
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
No. 36942 (Amendment): R612-2-5. Regulation of Medical Practitioner 
Fees.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This amendment incorporates by 
reference:  1) Optum Essential RBRVS, 2012 1st Quarter Emergency 
Update, 1761/RBRCU/U1766R/RBRC12/RBRC/U1766R ("RBRVS"); and 2) 2012 
American Medical Association Current Procedural Terminology ("CPT") as 
the method for calculating reimbursement.  Although the titles of 
these incorporated materials have changed from previous versions of 
this rule, their scope remains the same.  The amendment incorporates 
by reference the Labor Commission 2013 Medical Fee Guidelines.  The 
amendment restores conversion rates for various medical disciplines 
that had been reduced last year in order to partially offset increase 
in the RBRVS.  This amendment also removes the reference to a specific 
web site page for the Medical Fee Guidelines, and instead just directs 
readers to the Labor Commission's web site where the Guidelines can be 
downloaded.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The amendment will have no effect on the Labor 
Commission's cost in administering the Utah Workers' Compensation Act.  
With respect to the amendment's fiscal effect on the state in its 
capacity as an employer, changes to the rules conversion rates will 
increase workers' compensation medical expense by approximately 0.9% 
and overall workers' compensation expense by 0.7%.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  As a result of this amendment, local 
governments, in their capacities as employers, can anticipate a net 
increase in workers' compensation medical expenses of approximately 
0.9%, which will in turn result in an increase in overall workers' 
compensation expenses of approximately 0.7%.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  As a result of this amendment, small businesses 
can anticipate a net increase in workers' compensation medical 
expenses of approximately 0.9%, which will in turn result in an 
increase in overall workers' compensation expenses of approximately 
0.7%.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Overall, physicians, therapists and others who 
provide medical services to injured workers can anticipate a 2.9% 
increase in payments for those services.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The proposed rule does not 
impose any additional procedural requirements.  It includes only a 
small increase in workers' compensation medical expenses, which should 
in turn result in only minimal compliance costs for affected persons.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE 
ON BUSINESSES:  With the assistance and approval of the Utah Workers' 
Compensation Advisory Council, this amendment carefully balances the 
cost to employers from slightly higher workers' compensation medical 
payments with the need to maintain a medical fee structure that will 
encourage medical providers to provide services to injured workers.  
While it is anticipated that the amendment will increase workers 
compensation costs by approximately 0.9%, this modest increase is 
unlikely to have any significant fiscal impact on businesses, but is 
necessary to maintain the participation of medical providers within 
Utah's workers' compensation system.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING 
WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/03/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by 
Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36942.htm



PUBLIC SAFETY
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS AND TECHNICAL SERVICES, CRIMINAL 
IDENTIFICATION
No. 36912 (Amendment): R722-300. Concealed Firearm Permit and 
Instructor Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Change the specific fee amount as 
established in statute to general non-specific processing fee.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No aggregate anticipated cost or savings to the 
state budget.  This rule amendment addresses the change in a specific 
fee for a service to a general one as it is already outlined in 
statute.  The rule change will not affect the state budget nor are 
there any anticipated costs or savings.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No aggregate anticipated cost or savings to the 
local government.  This rule amendment addresses the change in a 
specific fee for a service to a general one as it is already outlined 
in statute.  The rule change will not affect local government nor are 
there any anticipated costs or savings.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No aggregate anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses.  This rule amendment addresses the change in a specific 
fee for a service to a general one as it is already outlined in 
statute.  The rule change will not affect small businesses nor are 
there any anticipated costs or savings.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: No aggregate anticipated cost or savings to 
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government 
entities.  This rule amendment addresses the change in a specific fee 
for a service to a general one as it is already outlined in statute.  
The rule change will not affect persons other than small businesses, 
businesses, or local government entities nor are there any anticipated 
costs or savings.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No compliance costs.  As this 
amended rule addresses the change from specific fees, already 
addressed in statute, to general fees there are no anticipated 
compliance costs for affected persons addressed in the answers above.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE 
ON BUSINESSES:  This rule does not have any fiscal impact on 
businesses because it changes specific fees (already in statute) to 
general, non-specific fees.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING 
WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/03/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Alice Moffat by phone at 801-965-4939, by FAX at 801-965-4944, or by 
Internet E-mail at aerickso@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36912.htm



TAX COMMISSION
PROPERTY TAX
No. 36939 (Amendment): R884-24P-53. 2012 Valuation Guides for 
Valuation of Land Subject to the Farmland Assessment Act Pursuant to 
Utah Code Ann. Section 59-2-515.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Section 59-2-515 authorizes the State 
Tax Commission to promulgate rules regarding the Property Tax Act, 
Part 5, Farmland Assessment Act.  Section 59-2-514 authorizes the 
State Tax Commission to receive valuation recommendations from the 
State Farmland Advisory Committee for implementation as outlined in 
Section R884-24P-53.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The amount of savings or cost to state government 
is undetermined.  The state receives tax revenue for assessing and 
collecting and for the Education Fund based on increased or decreased 
real and personal property valuation, including property assessed 
under the Farmland Assessment Act (FAA).  Property valuation (taxable 
value) changes have been recommended by class and by county.  This 
year, 119 class/county valuations will increase, 125 will decrease, 
and 220 will remain unchanged.  No total cost or savings could be 
calculated without an exhaustive study of farmland acreage in each 
county by class, a listing of property newly qualified for FAA 
assessment during 2013, and a listing of property no longer qualifying 
that is removed from FAA during 2012.  However, it is estimated that 
the overall change is minimal due to this amendment.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The amount of saving or cost to local government 
is undetermined.  Local governmental entities receive tax revenue 
based on increased or decreased property valuation, including property 
assessed under FAA.  Property valuation changes have been recommended 
by class and by county.  This year, 119 class/county valuations will 
increase, 125 will decrease, and 220 will remain unchanged.  No total 
cost or savings could be calculated without an exhaustive study of 
farmland acreage in each county by class, a listing of property newly-
qualified for FAA during 2013, and a listing of property no longer 
qualifying that is removed from FAA during 2012.  However, it is 
estimated that the overall change is minimal due to this amendment.  
County assessor offices statewide will be required to input the new 
value indicators into their computer systems to be applied against the 
acreage for individual properties.  This input process is easily 
accomplished on an annual basis and represents no significant cost in 
time or money to the assessors offices.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Each property owner with property eligible for 
assessment under FAA may see a change in value, depending on property 
class and situs county as 119 such value indicators will increase, 125 
will decrease, and 220 will not change.  The effect on the property 
owner will be valuation increase, decrease, or no change depending on 
the mix of property types and situs.  No aggregate compliance cost can 
be determined without an exhaustive study of farmland acreage in each 
county by class, a listing of property newly-qualified for FAA during 
2013, and a listing of property no longer qualifying which is removed 
from FAA during 2012.  I n addition, the compliance cost will further 
be altered by changes to local property tax rates.  However, it is 
estimated that the overall change due to this amendment is minimal.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Each property owner with property eligible for 
assessment under FAA may see a change in value, depending on property 
class and situs county as 119 such value indicators will increase, 125 
will decrease, and 220 will not change.  The effect on the property 
owner will be valuation increase, decrease, or no change depending on 
the mix of property types and situs.  No aggregate compliance cost can 
be determined without an exhaustive study of farmland acreage in each 
county by class, a listing of property newly-qualified for FAA during 
2013, and a listing of property no longer qualifying which is removed 
from FAA during 2012.  In addition, the compliance cost will further 
be altered by changes to local property tax rates.  However, it is 
estimated that the overall change due to this amendment is minimal.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Each property owner with 
property eligible for assessment under FAA may see a change in value, 
depending on property class and situs county as 119 such value 
indicators will increase, 125 will decrease, and 220 will not change.  
The effect on the property owner will be valuation increase, decrease, 
or no change depending on the mix of property types and situs.  No 
aggregate compliance cost can be determined without an exhaustive 
study of farmland acreage in each county by class, a listing of 
property newly-qualified for FAA during 2013, and a listing of 
property no longer qualifying which is removed from FAA during 2012.  
In addition, the compliance cost will further be altered by changes to 
local property tax rates.  However, it is estimated that the overall 
change due to this amendment is minimal.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE 
ON BUSINESSES:  These changes may affect the property values which may 
result in a change of property tax amounts due.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING 
WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/03/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or 
by Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 12/13/2012 09:00 AM, Utah State Tax Commission, 210 N 1950 W, Salt 
Lake City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36939.htm

No. 36940 (Amendment): R884-24P-66. County Board of Equalization 
Procedures and Appeals Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Section 59-2-1004.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The proposed amendment specifies that 
the county shall notify a taxpayer of a defect in the evidence or 
documentation required to achieve standing with the county board of 
equalization in writing.  Due to an oversight in drafting, the 
previous amendment to this section did not require the notice to be in 
writing.  This amendment matches current practice.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--Property tax revenues are local revenues.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--The amendment is consistent with current 
practice.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--The amendment is consistent with current 
practice.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: None--The amendment is consistent with current 
practice.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--The amendment is 
consistent with current practice.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE 
ON BUSINESSES:  This amendment creates no fiscal impact as it reflects 
current practice.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING 
WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/03/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or 
by Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 12/13/2012 09:00 AM, Utah State Tax Commission, 210 N 1950 W, Salt 
Lake City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36940.htm



TRANSPORTATION
OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND SAFETY
No. 36948 (Repeal and Reenact): R920-4. Special Road Use.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Changes to the rule include:  adding a 
purpose and authority section, updating form names to reflect current 
form naming conventions, adding a reference to "film-related events", 
removing "DOT" reference and replaces with "the Department," adding 
additional process transparency by adding completion requirements for 
Waiver and Release of damages and Indemnification forms, providing a 
conflict resolution process where double booking problems might 
surface, expanding on record retention responsibilities for Department 
forms, explicitly noting the minimum required liability coverage 
requirements, adding references to related Rules R920-1 and R930-6, 
updating obsolete statutory references, expanding on traffic control 
requirements, outlining public notification requirements, advising on 
contingency plan development and participant notification 
requirements, explaining event route identification and private 
property use requirements, and including provisions to ensure 
applicable municipal, county, or other governmental agency permits are 
acquired.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to the 
state budget because the rule only prescribes the requirements for 
special road uses or events on routes under the jurisdiction of the 
Department and requires applicants to pay a fee and provide liability 
insurance.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to local 
government because the rule only prescribes the requirements for 
special road uses or events on routes under the jurisdiction of the 
Department.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There is no anticipated cost or savings to small 
businesses because the rule only prescribes the requirements for 
special road uses or events on routes under the jurisdiction of the 
Department, except for small businesses applying for a Special Use or 
Event Permit whose costs are described as compliance costs for 
affected persons.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to 
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government 
entities, except for compliance costs for affected persons, because 
the rule only prescribes the requirements for special road uses or 
events on routes under the jurisdiction of the Department.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Compliance costs for affected 
persons include the Special Event Permits fee, as listed within H.B. 2 
New Fiscal Year Supplemental Appropriations Act (2012 General Session) 
(see line 2343 on p.64) which is $30.  Due to the significant life-
safety hazards inherent with allowing pedestrians, or bicycles, in 
close proximity to moving vehicular traffic, the rest of the costs 
associated with obtaining a special event permit are directly related 
to preventative traffic control measures and liability insurance 
coverage.  This amendment seeks to explicitly disclose the 
Department's existing practice of requiring minimum liability 
insurance coverage of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in 
aggregate (per permitted event).  Insurance rates may vary widely 
based on a number of factors including, but not limited to market 
conditions, size, scale, scope, location, dates, duration, number of 
anticipated participants, credit rating, etc.  These are considered 
external cost factors, which the Department does not have direct 
control over, and, therefore must be deliberated by the applicant 
prior to applying for a special event permit.  These external costs 
must be borne by the applicant; otherwise the Department would be 
effectively subsidizing special events, which is not within the 
program mandate, or a part of the Department's strategic performance 
measures.  Although difficult to universally quantify, the specified 
minimum liability insurance coverage requirements tend to average 
around $300 to $500 for an averaged sized special event.  For larger 
events, typical liability coverage insurance average less than $1 per 
participant.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE 
ON BUSINESSES:  The fiscal impacts to businesses applying for a 
Special Use or Event Permit are the same as those described as 
compliance costs for affected persons and include the Special Event 
Permits fee, as listed within H.B. 2 (2012 General Session) the New 
Fiscal Year Supplemental Appropriations Act (see line 2343 on p.64) 
which is $30.  Due to the significant life-safety hazards inherent 
with allowing pedestrians, or bicycles, in close proximity to moving 
vehicular traffic, the rest of the costs associated with obtaining a 
special event permit are directly related to preventative traffic 
control measures and liability insurance coverage.  This amendment 
seeks to explicitly disclose the Department's existing practice of 
requiring minimum liability insurance coverage of $1,000,000 per 
occurrence and $2,000,000 in aggregate (per permitted event).  
Insurance rates may vary widely based on a number of factors 
including, but not limited to market conditions, size, scale, scope, 
location, dates, duration, number of anticipated participants, credit 
rating, etc.  These are considered external cost factors, which the 
Department does not have direct control over, and, therefore must be 
deliberated by the applicant prior to applying for a special event 
permit.  These external costs must be borne by the applicant; 
otherwise the Department would be effectively subsidizing special 
events, which is not within the program mandate, or a part of the 
Department's strategic performance measures.  Although difficult to 
universally quantify, the specified minimum liability insurance 
coverage requirements tend to average around $300 to $500 for an 
averaged sized special event.  For larger events, typical liability 
coverage insurance average less than $1 per participant.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING 
WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/03/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christine Newman by phone at 801-965-4026, by FAX at 801-965-4338, 
or by Internet E-mail at cwnewman@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36948.htm




5.  FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION

Within five years of an administrative rule's original enactment or 
last five-year review, the agency is required to review the rule.  
This review is intended to remove obsolete rules from the Utah 
Administrative Code.  Upon reviewing a rule, an agency may:  repeal 
the rule by filing a Proposed Rule; continue the rule as it is by 
filing a Notice of Review and Statement of Continuation (Notice); or 
amend the rule by filing a Proposed Rule and by filing a Notice.  By 
filing a Notice, the agency indicates that the rule is still 
necessary. 

The rule text that is being continued may be found in the most recent 
edition of the Utah Administrative Code.  The rule text may also be 
inspected at the agency or the Division of Administrative Rules.  
Notices are effective upon filing.  

Notices are governed by Section 63G-3-305.


EDUCATION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36923 (5-year Review): R277-108. Annual Assurance of Compliance by 
Local School Boards.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  This rule is continued because it provides a list of 
laws and rules for local school board action necessary for compliance 
with laws and rules.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by 
Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/05/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36923.htm

No. 36924 (5-year Review): R277-422. State Supported Voted Local Levy, 
Board Local Levy and Reading Improvement Program.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  This rule is continued because it specifies necessary 
requirements, timelines, and clarifications for the state-supported 
voted local levy, board local levy, and reading improvement program.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by 
Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/05/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36924.htm

No. 36925 (5-year Review): R277-509. Licensure of Student Teachers and 
Interns.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  This rule is continued because it specifies necessary 
procedures under which the Board issues licenses to student teachers 
and interns.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by 
Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/05/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36925.htm

No. 36926 (5-year Review): R277-522. Entry Years Enhancements (EYE) 
for Quality Teaching - Level 1 Utah Teachers.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  This rule is continued because it provides a necessary 
outline for entry years enhancements for licensed educators in their 
first three years of employment.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by 
Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/05/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36926.htm

No. 36927 (5-year Review): R277-733. Adult Education Programs.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  This rule is continued because it provides necessary 
standards and operating procedures for the adult education program.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by 
Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/05/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36927.htm



ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
WATER QUALITY
No. 36908 (5-year Review): R317-1. Definitions and General 
Requirements.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  This rule provides definitions and general requirements 
for implementation of the Utah Water Quality Act.  It is central to 
the implementation of the Act, in that it provides the general 
framework for control of water pollution, including the requirements 
for construction permits, compliance with state Water Quality 
Standards, and requirements for waste discharges, and should be 
continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Dave Wham by phone at 801-536-4337, by FAX at 801-536-4301, or by 
Internet E-mail at dwham@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36908.htm

No. 36907 (5-year Review): R317-2. Standards of Quality for Waters of 
the State.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  This rule classifies waters of the state according to 
their beneficial uses and sets numerical standards of quality for 
those waters.  The existence of the rule is central to implementation 
of water quality protection programs under the Utah Water Quality Act, 
and should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Dave Wham by phone at 801-536-4337, by FAX at 801-536-4301, or by 
Internet E-mail at dwham@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36907.htm

No. 36909 (5-year Review): R317-8. Utah Pollutant Discharge 
Elimination System (UPDES).
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  This rule is required for the Water Quality Board to 
implement Utah's Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES).  It 
provides the structure for the surface water discharge permit.  The 
rule is required to maintain state primacy for administering the UPDES 
program.  If Utah does not obtain and maintain primacy to enforce 
UPDES rules at least equivalent to the federal rules, then the 
Environmental Protection Agency will enforce the federal rules using 
direct implementation procedures.  In promulgating the rule, the Water 
Quality Board made the determination that the UPDES Program is best 
administered at the state level and should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Dave Wham by phone at 801-536-4337, by FAX at 801-536-4301, or by 
Internet E-mail at dwham@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36909.htm



HEALTH
HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY
No. 36935 (5-year Review): R414-2A. Inpatient Hospital Services.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  The Department should continue this rule because it 
establishes requirements for inpatient hospital services that include 
client eligibility, hospital admissions, and the Prepaid Mental Health 
Plan.  The Department should also continue this rule because it 
specifies service coverage and limitations for Medicaid recipients, 
directs Medicaid recipients to the copayment policy, and specifies 
reimbursement methodology for Medicaid providers of inpatient hospital 
services.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, 
or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36935.htm

No. 36910 (5-year Review): R414-2B. Inpatient Hospital Intensive 
Physical Rehabilitation Services.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  This rule should be continued because it sets forth 
program access requirements and prior authorization procedures for 
Medicaid clients who receive intensive physical rehabilitation 
services in an inpatient hospital.  This rule should also be continued 
because it establishes protocols that allow Medicaid recipients to 
receive individualized treatment outside of a hospital setting.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, 
or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/02/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36910.htm

No. 36936 (5-year Review): R414-3A. Outpatient Hospital Services.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  The Department should continue this rule because it 
establishes requirements for outpatient hospital services that include 
client eligibility, program access, and the Prepaid Mental Health 
Plan.  The Department should also continue this rule because it 
specifies service coverage and prior authorization requirements for 
Medicaid recipients, directs Medicaid recipients to the copayment 
policy, and directs Medicaid providers of outpatient hospital services 
to the methodology used for reimbursement.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, 
or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/10/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36936.htm

No. 36929 (5-year Review): R414-29. Client Review/Education and 
Restriction Policy.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  The Department should continue this rule because it 
implements a restriction program for Medicaid recipients who over 
utilize Medicaid services.  The continuation of this rule, therefore, 
will allow the Department to provide cost effective and medically 
necessary services to all Medicaid recipients.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, 
or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/05/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36929.htm



INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36913 (5-year Review): R590-131. Accident and Health Coordination 
of Benefits Rule.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  This rule brings consistency and order when considering 
which health policy covers a claim when there is more than one health 
carrier covering the same individual or group.  It eliminates law 
suits and expedites the payment of health claims.  Therefore, this 
rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jilene Whitby by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or 
by Internet E-mail at jwhitby@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/03/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36913.htm



NATURAL RESOURCES
WATER RESOURCES
No. 36917 (5-year Review): R653-2. Financial Assistance from the Board 
of Water Resources.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  Continued water development is critical to the standard 
of living and socio-economic well being of Utah.  This rule specifies 
the criteria by which water project applications are accepted and 
funded by the Board of Water Resources.  Therefore, this rule should 
be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Barbara Allen by phone at 801-538-72352, by FAX at 801-538-7279, or 
by Internet E-mail at barbaraallen@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/04/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36917.htm



PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES ADVISORY COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36928 (5-year Review): R686-104. Utah Professional Practices 
Advisory Commission Review of License Due to Background Check 
Offenses.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  This rule is continued because it provides necessary 
procedures for applicants to proceed toward educator licensing when an 
application or recommendation for licensing identifies offenses in the 
applicant's criminal background check.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by 
Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/05/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36928.htm



REGENTS (BOARD OF)
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36918 (5-year Review): R765-134. Informal Adjudicative Procedures 
Under the Utah Administrative Procedures Act.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  Continuation of this rule is needed to comply with the 
Administrative Procedures Act as it applies to public institutions of 
higher education in Utah.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Ronell Crossley by phone at 801-321-7291, by FAX at 801-321-7299, or 
by Internet E-mail at rcrossley@utahsbr.edu
EFFECTIVE:  10/04/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36918.htm

No. 36919 (5-year Review): R765-993. Records Access and Management.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  Continuation of the rule is necessary to comply with 
the Government Records Access and Management Act and Utah Code Title 
63G, Chapter 2.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Ronell Crossley by phone at 801-321-7291, by FAX at 801-321-7299, or 
by Internet E-mail at rcrossley@utahsbr.edu
EFFECTIVE:  10/04/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36919.htm


UNIVERSITY OF UTAH, COMMUTER SERVICES
No. 36944 (5-year Review): R810-1. University of Utah Parking 
Regulations.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  This rule should continue because the underlying statue 
continues to permit it.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Solomon Brumbaugh by phone at 801-587-9394, by FAX at 801-587-9667, 
or by Internet E-mail at solomon.brumbaugh@utah.edu
EFFECTIVE:  10/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36944.htm

No. 36945 (5-year Review): R810-8. Vendor Regulations.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING 
REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE 
RULE, IF ANY:  This rule should continue because the underlying statue 
continues to permit it.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Solomon Brumbaugh by phone at 801-587-9394, by FAX at 801-587-9667, 
or by Internet E-mail at solomon.brumbaugh@utah.edu
EFFECTIVE:  10/15/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121101/36945.htm




6.  NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES

State law provides for agencies to make their rules effective and 
enforceable after publication in the Utah State Bulletin. In the case 
of Proposed Rules or Changes in Proposed Rules with a designated 
comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of 
effective date any time after the close of comment plus seven days. In 
the case of Changes in Proposed Rules with no designated comment 
period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of effective date 
on any date including or after the thirtieth day after the rule's 
publication date. If an agency fails to file a Notice of Effective 
Date within 120 days from the publication of a Proposed Rule or a 
related Change in Proposed Rule the rule lapses and the agency must 
start the rulemaking process over.

Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301(12), 
63G-3-303, and Sections R15-4-5a and 5b. 


ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
PURCHASING AND GENERAL SERVICES
No. 36657  (NEW): R33-12.  Rules of Procedure for Procurement Policy 
Board and Procurement Appeals Panel
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/08/2012



COMMERCE
OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING
No. 36629  (AMD): R156-1.  General Rule of the Division of 
Occupational and Professional Licensing
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/09/2012

No. 36630  (AMD): R156-46b.  Division Utah Administrative Procedures 
Act Rule
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/09/2012



EDUCATION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36658  (AMD): R277-401.  Child Abuse-Neglect Reporting by 
Education Personnel
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/09/2012

No. 36659  (AMD): R277-407-1.  Definitions
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/09/2012

No. 36660  (AMD): R277-419.  Pupil Accounting
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/09/2012

No. 36661  (AMD): R277-433.  Disposal of Textbooks in the Public 
Schools
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/09/2012

No. 36662  (AMD): R277-445.  Classifying Small Schools as Necessarily 
Existent
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/09/2012

No. 36663  (AMD): R277-475.  Patriotic, Civic and Character Education
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/09/2012

No. 36664  (AMD): R277-477.  Distribution of Funds from the Interest 
and Dividend Account (School LAND Trust Funds) and Administration of 
the School LAND Trust Program
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/09/2012

No. 36665  (AMD): R277-514.  Board Procedures:  Sanctions for Educator 
Misconduct
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/09/2012

No. 36666  (AMD): R277-703.  Centennial Scholarship for Early 
Graduation
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/09/2012

No. 36667  (AMD): R277-709.  Education Programs Serving Youth in 
Custody
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/09/2012

No. 36668  (AMD): R277-713.  Concurrent Enrollment of High School 
Students in College Courses
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/09/2012

No. 36669  (AMD): R277-726.  Statewide Public Education Online Program
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/09/2012



GOVERNOR
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, CONSUMER HEALTH SERVICES
No. 36634  (NEW): R358-1.  Electronic Standards for Transmitting 
Information through the Health Insurance Exchange
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/10/2012



HEALTH
DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
No. 36620  (AMD): R392-510.  Utah Indoor Clean Air Act
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/15/2012

No. 36580  (AMD): R392-700.  Indoor Tanning Bed Sanitation
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/15/2012

Health Care Financing, Coverage and Reimbursement Policy
No. 36567  (R&R): R414-502.  Nursing Facility Levels of Care
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/11/2012



INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36577  (AMD): R590-122.  Permissible Arbitration Provisions
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/03/2012

No. 36633  (AMD): R590-133.  Variable Contracts
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/15/2012

No. 36578  (AMD): R590-151.  Records Access Rule
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/03/2012

No. 36596  (AMD): R590-154.  Unfair Marketing Practices Rule
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/03/2012

No. 36579  (AMD): R590-176.  Health Benefit Plan Enrollment
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/03/2012

No. 36615  (AMD): R590-199.  Plan of Orderly Withdrawal Rule Relating 
to Health Benefit Plans
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/03/2012

No. 36418  (AMD): R590-262.  Health Data Authority Health Insurance 
Claims Reporting
Published:  07/15/2012
Effective:  10/03/2012



PARDONS (BOARD OF)
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36558  (AMD): R671-202.  Notification of Hearings
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/04/2012

No. 36560  (AMD): R671-203.  Victim Input and Notification
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/04/2012

No. 36568  (AMD): R671-301.  Personal Appearance
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/04/2012

No. 36569  (AMD): R671-302.  News Media and Public Access to Hearings
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/04/2012

No. 36570  (AMD): R671-304.  Hearing Record
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/04/2012

No. 36571  (AMD): R671-305.  Notification of Board Decision
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/04/2012

No. 36572  (AMD): R671-309.  Impartial Hearings
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/04/2012

No. 36573  (AMD): R671-311.  Special Attention Hearings and Reviews
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/04/2012

No. 36555  (NEW): R671-313.  Commutation Hearings (Non-Death Penalty 
Cases)
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/04/2012

No. 36574  (AMD): R671-315.  Pardons
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/04/2012

No. 36575  (AMD): R671-316.  Redetermination
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/04/2012

No. 36556  (AMD): R671-402.  Special Conditions of Parole
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/04/2012



PUBLIC SAFETY
FIRE MARSHAL
No. 36631  (AMD): R710-6.  Liquified Petroleum Gas Rules
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/08/2012



TRANSPORTATION
PRECONSTRUCTION
No. 36653  (AMD): R930-6.  Manual of Accommodation of Utility 
Facilities and the Control and Protection of State Highway Rights-of-
Way
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/10/2012

No. 36654  (NEW): R930-7.  Utility Accommodation
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/10/2012




7.  RULES INDEX

The Rules Index is a cumulative index that reflects all effective Utah 
administrative rules.  The Rules Index is not included Digest.  
However, a copy of the current Rules Index is available 
http://www.rules.utah.gov/research.htm .


<<end of file>>
