Utah State Digest, Vol. 2012, No. 22 (November 15, 2012)

[NOTE:  The Utah State Digest (Digest) is created from the eRules filing 
database used to create the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin).  While a 
discrepancy between the Digest and the Bulletin is highly unlikely, any 
discrepancies will be resolved in favor of the Bulletin.  Please refer to the 
State Disclaimer ( http://www.utah.gov/disclaimer.html ) for more 
information.]

------------------------------------------------------------

UTAH STATE DIGEST
Summary of the Contents of the Utah State Bulletin


For information filed October 16, 2012, 12:00 AM through November 1, 2012, 
11:59 PM


Volume 2012, No. 22
November 15, 2012


Prepared by
Division of Administrative Rules
Department of Administrative Services


The Utah State Digest (Digest) is an official electronic publication of the 
State of Utah, Department of Administrative Services, Division of 
Administrative Rules.  It is a summary of the information found in the Utah 
State Bulletin (Bulletin) of the same volume and issue number.  Inquiries 
concerning the substance or applicability of an administrative rule that 
appear in the Digest should be addressed to the contact person for the rule.  
Questions about the Digest or the rulemaking process may be addressed to:  
Division of Administrative Rules, 5110 State Office Building, Salt Lake City, 
Utah 84114-1201, telephone 801-538-3218, FAX 801-359-0759.  Additional 
rulemaking information, and electronic versions of all administrative rule 
publications are available at:  http://www.rules.utah.gov/ .  The Digest is 
available free of charge online at 
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm and by E-mail Listserv.  




************************************************
Division of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City  84114

Unless otherwise noted, all information presented in this publication is in 
the public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as 
desired.  Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted 
by their respective authors.  Citation to the source is requested.



Utah state digest.
  Semimonthly.
  1.  Delegated legislation--Utah--Digests. I.  Utah. Office 
of Administrative Rules.

KFU38.U8
348.792'025--DDC            86-658042
***********************************************




1.  SPECIAL NOTICES

Public Notice of 2013 Board and Committee Meeting Schedules
- W. Ray Walker by phone at 801-530-6256, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by 
Internet E-mail at raywalker@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/sn153498.htm

Notice for December 2012 Medicaid Rate Changes
- Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by 
Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/sn153475.htm




2.  NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

A state agency may file a Proposed Rule when it determines the need for a new 
rule, a substantive change to an existing rule, or a repeal of an existing 
rule.  Filings received between October 16, 2012, 12:00 a.m., and November 1, 
2012, 11:59 p.m. are summarized in this, the November 15, 2012, issue of the 
Utah State Digest.

The law requires that an agency accept public comment on Proposed Rules 
published in the November 15, 2012, issue of the Utah State Bulletin until at 
least December 17, 2012 (the Bulletin is the parent publication of the 
Digest).  The agency may accept comment beyond this date and will indicate 
the last day the agency will accept comment in the rule information published 
below.  The agency may also hold public hearings.  Additionally, citizens or 
organizations may request the agency hold a hearing on a specific Proposed 
Rule.  Section 63G-3-302 requires that a hearing request be received by the 
agency proposing the rule "in writing not more than 15 days after the 
publication date of the proposed rule."

From the end of the public comment period through March 15, 2013, the agency 
may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants to make the 
Proposed Rule effective.  The agency sets the effective date.  The date may 
be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public comment 
period nor more than 120 days after the publication date in the Utah State 
Bulletin.  Alternatively, the agency may file a Change in Proposed Rule in 
response to comments received.  If the Division of Administrative Rules does 
not receive a Notice of Effective Date or a Change in Proposed Rule, the 
Proposed Rule lapses and the agency must start the process over.

The public, interest groups, and governmental agencies are invited to review 
and comment on the Proposed Rules listed below.  Comment may be directed to 
the contact person identified with each rule. 

Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-301; Rule R15-2; and Sections 
R15-4-3, R15-4-4, R15-4-5, R15-4-9, and R15-4-10.


ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION AND MANAGEMENT
No. 37026 (Amendment): R23-14. Management of Roofs on State Buildings.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule provides for the management of 
roofs on state buildings to prevent damage to the roof and to improve 
security of state buildings.  The amendments to this rule will require any 
person accessing a roof to have fall protection equipment as required by any 
applicable authority.  Also, in order to obtain access to buildings managed 
by the Division, a person, who is not an employee of the Division, must 
complete and execute a roof access application/agreement form, which does not 
have to be approved by the Director, but must be approved by another 
appropriate state employee.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  These amendments are for housekeeping purposes and do 
not affect the law significantly.  These rule changes conform to current 
practices of the state.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  These amendments are for housekeeping purposes and do 
not affect the law significantly.  These rule changes conform to current 
practices of the state.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  These amendments are for housekeeping purposes and do 
not affect the law significantly.  These rule changes conform to current 
practices of the state.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: These amendments are for housekeeping purposes and do not affect 
the law significantly.  These rule changes conform to current practices of 
the state.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  These amendments are for housekeeping 
purposes and do not affect the law significantly.  These rule changes conform 
to current practices of the state.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  These amendments are for housekeeping purposes and do not affect 
the law significantly.  These rule changes conform to current practices of 
the state.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Alan Bachman by phone at 801-538-3105, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by 
Internet E-mail at abachman@utah.gov
- Cecilia Niederhauser by phone at 801-538-3261, by FAX at 801-538-9694, or 
by Internet E-mail at cniederhauser@utah.gov
- Chiarina Gleed by phone at 801-538-3240, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by 
Internet E-mail at cgleed@utah.gov
- Priscilla Anderson by phone at 801-538-9595, by FAX at 801-538-3378, or by 
Internet E-mail at phanderson@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37026.htm


FLEET OPERATIONS
No. 36949 (Amendment): R27-3. Vehicle Use Standards.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  As it stands, this rule requires that the 
take home driver, the driver's direct supervisor, and the executive director 
of the agency all sign an authorization form.  This results in as many 
authorization forms as there are authorized take home drivers.  The updated 
rule allows for all drivers to be authorized by the executive director on a 
single spreadsheet.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This rule change modifies the process for take home 
vehicle approval.  This will result in a reduction in paperwork, but the 
anticipated savings are negligible.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This rule change modifies the process for take home 
approval of state vehicles.  Local governments will not be affected.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This rule change modifies the process for take home 
approval of state vehicles.  Small businesses will not be affected.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule change modifies the process for take home approval of 
state vehicles.  Persons other than small businesses will not be affected.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  This rule change modifies the process 
for take home approval of state vehicles.  There are no compliance costs 
associated with this rule change.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This rule change simplifies the take home approval process for 
our agency directors.  There will be no fiscal impact on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Brian Fay by phone at 801-538-3502, by FAX at 801-359-0759, or by Internet 
E-mail at bfay@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36949.htm



AGRICULTURE AND FOOD
ANIMAL INDUSTRY
No. 36962 (Amendment): R58-21. Trichomoniasis.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The changes to the rule include:  changing 
the amount of the citation fine from $1,000 to $200 for owners untested bulls 
that have exposed female cattle.  The citation fines would be changed from 
"per head" to "per violation".
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no change to the state budget as existing 
workforce in the Division of Animal Industry currently handles all issues 
related to trichomoniasis and the proposed rule will not increase or decrease 
workload.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There are no costs to local government at this time 
under the current rule.  All costs to run the program are through the State 
of Utah's general fund and local governments are not involved in the program.  
The proposed changes made to the rule will not require local government 
involvement and will not require costs to be borne by local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Bull owners, if in violation of this rule, will receive 
a citation fine that will be less than those fines that were issued in the 
past.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Bull owners, if in violation of this rule, will receive a citation 
fine that will be less than those fines that were issued in the past.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Bull owners, if in violation of this 
rule, will receive a citation fine that will be less than those fines that 
were issued in the past.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This change to the rule was requested by the Utah Legislature 
and will make the rule and approved "fee" schedule consistent.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Bruce King by phone at 801-538-7162, by FAX at 801-538-7169, or by Internet 
E-mail at bking@utah.gov
- Kathleen Mathews by phone at 801-538-7103, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by 
Internet E-mail at kmathews@utah.gov
- Kyle Stephens by phone at 801-538-7102, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by 
Internet E-mail at kylestephens@utah.gov
- Wyatt Frampton by phone at 801-538-7165, by FAX at 801-538-7169, or by 
Internet E-mail at wframpton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36962.htm



COMMERCE
REAL ESTATE
No. 36973 (Amendment): R162-2g. Real Estate Appraiser Licensing and 
Certification Administrative Rules.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  Subsection R162-2g-302(7) is deleted.  This 
section sets out deadlines and procedures for re-registering appraiser 
trainees who obtained their initial registrations prior to 01/01/2008.  All 
deadlines have passed and the re-registration process is complete; this 
section is no longer needed.  In Section R162-2g-304d, language is added to 
clarify that experience credit may be awarded only on the basis of appraisal 
report(s) where the applicant's contribution in completing the assignment is 
clearly and conspicuously disclosed.  In Subsection R162-2g-504(4), language 
regarding registration of an expert witness is removed; due to statutory 
changes in the 2012 General Legislative Session, the Division is no longer 
processing such registrations.  In Subsection R162-2g-504(5), language is 
added to clarify that the presiding officer in an adjudicative proceeding may 
require a respondent to provide a witness and exhibit list.  Finally, a new 
section, R162-2g-601, is added to separate the appendices from the 
administrative procedures section.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This rule filing removes moot language and clarifies 
existing provisions.  The state budget will not be affected.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local governments are not required to comply with or 
enforce the appraisal administrative rules.  This filing will have no fiscal 
impact on local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This rule filing is for clarification only. It does not 
impose any new requirements or procedures on small businesses.  Therefore, no 
fiscal impact is anticipated.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This rule filing is for clarification only. It does not impose any 
new requirements or procedures on affected persons.  Therefore, no fiscal 
impact is anticipated.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  This rule filing is for clarification 
only.  To comply, an affected applicant will be required to properly document 
his or her contribution in completing an appraisal assignment in order to 
receive experience credit.  An affected respondent in an administrative 
proceeding may be required to identify his or her witnesses and documentary 
evidence prior to hearing.  No fiscal impact is anticipated.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  As stated in the rule analysis, the proposed amendments clarify 
existing rules regarding experience hours and administrative procedures and 
remove provisions that are no longer necessary.  No fiscal impact to 
businesses is anticipated from this filing.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Mike Palumbo by phone at 801-530-6654, or by Internet E-mail at 
mpalumbo@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36973.htm



FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
ADMINISTRATION
No. 37020 (Amendment): R331-23. Lending Limits for Banks, Industrial Loan 
Corporations.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The change includes in total loans and 
extensions of credit, credit exposure to derivative transaction for purposes 
of limitations on loans and extensions of credit for banks and industrial 
banks.  It provides new definitions for "credit exposure to a derivative 
transaction" and "derivative".  Finally, the change provides that risk 
mitigation and valuation of risk to credit exposure to derivative 
transactions must be appropriately considered by banks and industrial banks 
engaging in derivative transactions.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No impact on the state budget as compliance to the rule 
affects the depository institutions themselves not the department.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local governments are not involved in regulating 
depository institutions and are therefore not subject to this rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Depository institutions, under the jurisdiction of the 
Department, are currently permitted to engage in derivative transactions, 
however, if the proposed amendments are not made, they will be unable to 
engage in such transactions after 01/21/2013.  In addition, the amendments to 
the rule should have minimal budgetary impact.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Depository institutions, under the jurisdiction of the Department, 
are currently permitted to engage in derivative transactions, however, if the 
proposed amendments are not made, they be will unable to engage in such 
transactions after 01/21/2013.  In addition, the amendments to the rule 
should have minimal budgetary impact.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Depository institutions, under the 
jurisdiction of the Department, are currently permitted to engage in 
derivative transactions, however, if the proposed amendments are not made, 
they be will unable to engage in such transactions after 01/21/2013.  In 
addition, the amendments to the rule should have minimal budgetary impact.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Depository institutions, under the jurisdiction of the 
Department, are currently permitted to engage in derivative transactions, 
however, if the proposed amendments are not made, they will unable to engage 
in such transactions after 01/21/2013.  In addition, the amendments to the 
rule should have minimal budgetary impact.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Paul Allred by phone at 801-538-8854, by FAX at 801-538-8894, or by 
Internet E-mail at pallred@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37020.htm



GOVERNOR
PLANNING AND BUDGET, INSPECTOR GENERAL OF MEDICAID SERVICES (OFFICE OF)
No. 36993 (Amendment): R367-1. Office of Inspector General of Medicaid 
Services.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This amendment removes certain provisos for 
fines and assessments, provider agreements, and certain incorporation by 
reference statutes.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The amendment of Rule R367-1 will not have any aggregate 
cost to the state budget.  The rule further clarifies the duties and 
procedures of the OIG outlined in Sections 63J-4a-101 through 63J-4a-602.  
There will be savings to the state budget, this rule will further assist the 
OIG to recoup and recover misappropriated Medicaid funds.  This amount will 
vary year to year based upon the results of the audits.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The amendment of this rule will not result in direct 
and measurable costs for local governments.  Local governments are not 
involved in the Medicaid Program.  Additionally, the OIG will be collecting 
wrongfully acquired Medicaid funds.  These are funds that the local 
governments were not originally entitled to; any funds paid by the local 
government, if any, would be a reimbursement of state and federal money.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The amendment of this rule will not result in direct and 
measurable costs for small businesses.  The OIG will be collecting wrongfully 
acquired Medicaid funds from small and solo practice medical providers.  
These are funds that the providers were not originally entitled to; any 
monies paid by the providers to the OIG, if any, would be a reimbursement of 
state monies.  Therefore, there would be no additional costs to small 
businesses, just a reimbursement to the state.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: The amendment of this rule will not result in direct and measurable 
costs for other entities.  The OIG will be collecting wrongfully acquired 
Medicaid funds from hospitals, large provider groups, pharmacies.  These are 
funds that the providers were not originally entitled to; any monies paid by 
the providers to the OIG, if any, would be a reimbursement of state monies.  
Therefore, there would be no additional costs to other entities, just a 
reimbursement to the state.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The amendment does not create new 
compliance costs for any local government or business.  There are no 
regulatory mandates created by this rule.  This change is made after public 
comment; the changes will remove assessment of civil fines, provider 
agreement language and incorporation by reference.  There are no costs 
associated.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Following public comment, Rule R367-1 has been amended.  It 
addresses several concerns raised by various interested parties in the health 
care field.  I have reviewed this rule and I concur with the changes that 
have been made.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Michael Green by phone at 801-538-6123, by FAX at 801-538-6382, or by 
Internet E-mail at mkgreen@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36993.htm



HEALTH
FAMILY HEALTH AND PREPAREDNESS, WIC SERVICES
No. 37008 (Amendment): R406-100-1. Incorporation of Federal Regulations.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  In Section R406-100-1, changes the section 
title from "Incorporation of Federal Regulations" to "Incorporations by 
Reference".  Updates the revision date of the federal regulation, 7 CFR 246, 
to 01/01/2012 edition.  Adds the incorporation by reference the Fiscal Year 
2013 Utah Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) State Plan of Program Operations 
and Administration including the Utah WIC Policy and Procedures Manual 
effective 10/01/2012.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--WIC is fully federally funded; these changes do 
not have any expected financial impact to the state or to WIC's budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--Local health departments are already funded by 
WIC to comply with these regulations.  This incorporation by reference is an 
annual update of current operating policy.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--No businesses operate WIC clinics.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: None--No businesses operate WIC clinics.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--No businesses operate WIC 
clinics.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Updating incorporation by reference citations should have no 
fiscal impact on business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/18/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Chris Furner by phone at 801-538-6199, by FAX at 801-538-6729, or by 
Internet E-mail at CFURNER@utah.gov
- Rick Wardle by phone at 801-538-6897, by FAX at 801-538-6729, or by 
Internet E-mail at rwardle@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37008.htm


FAMILY HEALTH AND PREPAREDNESS, EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
No. 36974 (New Rule): R426-1. General Definitions.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact to the state budget because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated fiscal impact to local governments 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated fiscal impact to small businesses because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated fiscal impact to businesses because there are no 
changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No anticipated fiscal impact for 
affected persons because there are no changes in the rule requirements that 
are imposed by these amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified, and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36974.htm

No. 36975 (Repeal and Reenact): R426-2. Air Medical Service Rules.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact to the state budget because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated fiscal impact to local governments 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated fiscal impact to small businesses because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated fiscal impact to businesses because there are no 
changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No anticipated fiscal impact for 
affected persons because there are no changes in the rule requirements that 
are imposed by these amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified, and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36975.htm

No. 36976 (New Rule): R426-3. Licensure.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact to the state budget because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated fiscal impact to local governments 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated fiscal impact to small businesses because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated fiscal impact to businesses because there are no 
changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No anticipated fiscal impact for 
affected persons because there are no changes in the rule requirements that 
are imposed by these amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36976.htm

No. 36977 (New Rule): R426-4. Operations.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact to the state budget because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated change to the fiscal impact for local 
governments because changes made to the drug and equipment list include the 
use of optional items at the discretion of the provider.  Newly required 
supraglottic airway devices and commercial tourniquets may add small costs to 
current ambulance requirements, however, savings in deletion of previously 
required items should off-set or reduce the fiscal impact.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated change to the fiscal impact for small 
businesses.  Several changes made to the drug and equipment list include the 
use of optional items at the discretion of the provider.  Newly required 
supraglottic airway devices and commercial tourniquets may add small costs to 
current ambulance requirements, however, savings in deletion of previously 
required items should off-set or reduce the fiscal impact.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated change to the fiscal impact for businesses.  Several 
changes made to the drug and equipment list include the use of optional items 
at the discretion of the provider.  Newly required supraglottic airway 
devices and commercial tourniquets may add small costs to current ambulance 
requirements, however, savings in deletion of previously required items 
should off-set or reduce the fiscal impact.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Compliance costs for affected 
regulated providers will include the purchase of the newly required 
supraglottic airway devices and commercial tourniquets for permitted 
vehicles.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36977.htm

No. 36988 (Repeal and Reenact): R426-5. Statewide Trauma System Standards.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact to the state budget because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated fiscal impact to local governments 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated fiscal impact to small businesses because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated fiscal impact to businesses because there are no 
changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Compliance costs for affected persons 
include individuals who are seeking certification to become or continue to be 
certified as an Emergency Medical Responder, Emergency Medical Technician, 
Advanced Emergency Technician, or paramedic.  The compliance costs for these 
certified individuals may be lessened, since lower cost options are now 
available.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36988.htm

No. 36978 (Repeal and Reenact): R426-6. Emergency Medical Services 
Competitive Grants Program Rules.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact to state budget because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated fiscal impact to local government 
budgets because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are 
imposed by these amendments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated fiscal impact to small businesses because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated fiscal impact to businesses because there are no 
changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No anticipated fiscal impact because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36978.htm

No. 36979 (Repeal and Reenact): R426-7. Emergency Medical Services 
Prehospital Data System Rules.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact for the state budget 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated fiscal impact for local governments 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated fiscal impact for small businesses 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated fiscal impact for businesses because there are no 
changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No anticipated fiscal impact because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36979.htm

No. 36980 (Repeal and Reenact): R426-8. Emergency Medical Services Per Capita 
Grants Program Rules.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact for state budgets because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated fiscal impact for local governments 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated fiscal impact for small businesses 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated fiscal impacts for businesses because there are no 
changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No anticipated compliance costs for 
affected persons because there are no changes in the rule requirements that 
are imposed by these amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36980.htm

No. 36981 (New Rule): R426-9. Statewide Trauma System Standards.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact to the state budget because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated fiscal impact to local governments 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated fiscal impact to small businesses because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated fiscal impact to businesses because there are no 
changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No anticipated fiscal impact to 
affected persons because there are no changes in the rule requirements that 
are imposed by these amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36981.htm

No. 36982 (Repeal): R426-11. General Provisions.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact to the state budget because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated fiscal impact to local governments 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated fiscal impact to small businesses because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated fiscal impact to businesses because there are no 
changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No anticipated fiscal impact for 
affected persons because there are no changes in the rule requirements that 
are imposed by these amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36982.htm

No. 36983 (Repeal): R426-12. Emergency Medical Services Training and 
Certification Standards.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact to the state budget because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated fiscal impact to local governments 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated fiscal impact to small businesses because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated fiscal impact to businesses because there are no 
changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No anticipated fiscal impact for 
affected persons because there are no changes in the rule requirements that 
are imposed by these amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36983.htm

No. 36984 (Repeal): R426-13. Emergency Medical Services Provider 
Designations.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact to the state budget because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated fiscal impact to local governments 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated fiscal impact to small businesses because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated fiscal impact to businesses because there are no 
changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No anticipated fiscal impact for 
affected persons because there are no changes in the rule requirements that 
are imposed by these amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36984.htm

No. 36985 (Repeal): R426-14. Ambulance Service and Paramedic Service 
Licensure.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact to the state budget because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated fiscal impact to local governments 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated fiscal impact to small businesses because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated fiscal impact to businesses because there are no 
changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No anticipated fiscal impact for 
affected persons because there are no changes in the rule requirements that 
are imposed by these amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36985.htm

No. 36986 (Repeal): R426-15. Licensed and Designated Provider Operations.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact to the state budget because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated fiscal impact to local governments 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated fiscal impact to small businesses because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated fiscal impact to businesses because there are no 
changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No anticipated fiscal impact for 
affected persons because there are no changes in the rule requirements that 
are imposed by these amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36986.htm

No. 36987 (Repeal): R426-16. Emergency Medical Services Ambulance Rates and 
Charges.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The rule change eliminates redundancy, 
provides sequential numbering, and reflects best practice updates for all 
aspects of the Emergency Medical Services Act (Title 26, Chapter 8a).
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  No anticipated fiscal impact to the state budget because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  No anticipated fiscal impact to local governments 
because there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by 
these amendments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  No anticipated fiscal impact to small businesses because 
there are no changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these 
amendments.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: No anticipated fiscal impact to businesses because there are no 
changes in the rule requirements that are imposed by these amendments.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  No anticipated fiscal impact for 
affected persons because there are no changes in the rule requirements that 
are imposed by these amendments.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  In response to the Governor's Executive Order to examine all 
administrative rules and reduce regulatory impact that may be inhibiting 
economic growth, the rules governing Emergency Medical Services providers are 
being repealed, simplified and reenacted.  Fiscal impact is expected to be 
positive for business as the requirements are streamlined and updated.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Guy Dansie by phone at 801-273-6671, by FAX at 801-273-4165, or by Internet 
E-mail at gdansie@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36987.htm



HUMAN SERVICES
SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH
No. 37009 (New Rule): R523-2. Adult Peer Support Specialist Training and 
Certification.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This new rule gives specific instruction on 
the following:  1) certification requirements for PSS training programs; 2) 
division oversight of program; 3) curriculum requirements for PSS training 
programs; 4) requirements to become a PSS; and 5) requirements to remain 
qualified as a PSS.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  It is anticipated that this Certified Peer Support 
Specialist training program will cost approximately $125,000 over a 12 to 18 
month period, through funding that has already been appropriated.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no cost to local governments as a result 
of this program; local governments do not administer this program.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no cost to small businesses as a result of 
this program; small businesses do not administer this program.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Persons seeking to become certified peer support specialists may 
have an initial training cost that is anticipated to be less than $50.  There 
will be some scholarships available to the trainees.  This cost will be 
offset by the new wages earned as a certified peer support specialist.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Compliance cost for the certified 
peer support specialists may include the cost to maintain certification.  It 
is anticipated that this will be less that $20 per year.  This cost will be 
offset by the new wages earned as a certified peer support specialist.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This will provide additional options for substance use disorder 
and mental health treatment providers to provide recovery support services.   
Services will be funded or paid for by insurance and/or existing federal and 
state funding.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
- L Ray Winger by phone at 801-538-4319, by FAX at 801-538-9892, or by 
Internet E-mail at raywinger@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37009.htm

No. 37010 (New Rule): R523-3. Child/Family Peer Support Specialist Training 
and Certification.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule identifies the following:  1) 
certification requirements for PSS training programs; 2) division oversight 
of program; 3) curriculum requirements for Family Resource Facilitator 
training programs; 4) requirements to become a Family Resource Facilitator; 
and 5) requirements to remain qualified as a Family Resource Facilitator.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The cost of this program will be approximately $125,000 
per year through funding that has already been appropriated.  This may 
increase as additional specialists are needed and will continue to be funded 
within existing appropriations.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  There will be no cost to local government mandated as a 
result of this rule; local governments do not administer this program.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no cost to small business mandated as a 
result of this rule; small businesses do not administer this program.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Persons seeking to become certified peer support specialists may 
have an initial training cost that is anticipated to be less than $50.  There 
will be some scholarships available to the trainees.  This cost will be 
offset by the new wages earned as a certified peer support specialist.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There is not a compliance cost for 
these certified peer specialists to maintain certification since it is 
covered in the existing program.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This will provide additional options for substance use disorder 
and mental health treatment providers to provide recovery support services.  
Services will be funded or paid for by insurance and/or existing federal and 
state funding.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
- L Ray Winger by phone at 801-538-4319, by FAX at 801-538-9892, or by 
Internet E-mail at raywinger@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37010.htm



INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 37018 (Amendment): R590-102. Insurance Department Fee Payment Rule.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The following changes are being made to this 
rule:  in Section R590-102-3, Definitions, surplus lines insurers, accredited 
reinsurers, trusted reinsurers, and employee welfare funds, are being 
eliminated from the category of "Other organizations."  In the title of 
Section R590-102-6 the reference to "Other Organization" is being eliminated 
and fees are being called "administrative/service fees."  Here the term 
"renewal" and "application" is being eliminated.  All fees charged on an 
annual basis are referred to as "annual," except the first or initial fee, 
which is referred to as the "initial fee."  Section R590-102-7 is now 
entitled "Other Organization Fee."  Section headings are being renumbered and 
references within the rule are being corrected.  In Section R590-102-12 a 
resident title agency reinstatement license fee of $150 is being added.  In 
Section R590-102-17 a new $50 "late fee" for the fraud assessment is being 
added, the FBI fee is being reduced from $19.25 to $16.50, and an annual 
health insurance actuarial review assessment fee is being added as required 
in Section 31A-30-115 and by H.B. 294, Health System Reform Amendments, 
passed in the 2010 General Session.  In Section R590-102-19, a $250 
"Independent Review Organization" new application fee is being added as a 
result of passage of H.B. 128, Insurance Amendments, in the 2011 General 
Session.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  Two fees that are being added to this rule will affect 
the department's budget.  The late fraud assessment fee of $50 could increase 
the budget by around $750 annually if the same number of insurers fail to pay 
their fee on time as last year.  The Independent Review Organization 
application fee of $250 may bring in $500 annually.  The other fees will not 
affect the budget.  The Title reinstatement License fee of $150 is already 
being charged, the reduction in the FBI fingerprinting fee will not affect 
the budget since it is a pass-through charge and the Annual Health Actuary 
Review Assessment fee will not be assessed at this time since the cost is 
currently covered by a Premium Rate Review Grant from the federal government.  
None of the changes in Sections R590-102-6 and R590-102-7 will create a 
change in department fees.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  The changes to this rule will have no fiscal impact on 
local government.  Collected fees go into the department's budget and will 
not impact local governments.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  The only change to affect small businesses is the new 
Independent Review Organization application fee of $250.  The Department 
anticipates only one or two applications annually from organizations that may 
be small or large employers.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Individuals who apply for a resident insurance license will be 
fingerprinted and charged a $16.50 processing fee, which is a reduction of 
$2.75 from the previous fee of $19.25.  This money is paid to the FBI to run 
a criminal check on the fingerprints.  None of it goes to the department. 
Insurance companies late in paying their fraud assessment will be fined $50, 
a fee not previously assessed.  Last year 15 insurers paid late.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Individuals who apply for a resident 
insurance license and are fingerprinted will now have to pay a processing fee 
reduced by $2.75; insurance companies late in paying their fraud assessment 
will be fined $50; and new Independent Review Organizations who want to do 
business in Utah will charged an application fee of $250 (the Department 
anticipates only one or two applications annually).
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The reduction in the FBI fingerprinting fee will be beneficial 
to those individuals applying for a resident insurance license.  The 
application fee is new to independent review organizations but is fairly low 
and will affect just one or two organizations a year - at most.  The fraud 
late payment fee may be just enough to get the company's attention and remind 
them to pay on time the following year.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jilene Whitby by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by 
Internet E-mail at jwhitby@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37018.htm



LABOR COMMISSION
ADJUDICATION
No. 36989 (Amendment): R602-2-4. Attorney Fees.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The amendment increases the amount of 
attorney fees by 2% to reflect an increase in benefits over the last year.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This amendment does not affect the state in its capacity 
as an employer nor does it increase the state's cost of administering the 
workers' compensation system, consequently no costs or savings to the state 
budget are anticipated.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This amendment does not affect local governments in 
their capacity as employers, consequently no costs or savings to local 
government budgets are anticipated.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This amendment does not affect small businesses in their 
capacity as employers, consequently no costs or savings to small businesses 
are anticipated.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This increase of 2% above previous attorney's fee limits is offset 
by a similar increase in weekly benefits that injured workers are now 
receiving.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  The only compliance costs are the 
higher attorneys fees the injured workers may be required to pay.  As noted, 
this increase is due to (and offset by) increase in benefits paid to injured 
workers over the last year.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The attorney's fees subject to this rule are paid by the injured 
worker, not the employer.  The change should therefore have no fiscal impact 
on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Heather Gunnarson by phone at 801-536-7928, by FAX at 801-530-6333, or by 
Internet E-mail at hgunnarson@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36989.htm


INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
No. 36990 (Amendment): R612-4-2. Premium Rates for the Uninsured Employers' 
Fund and the Employers' Reinsurance Fund.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  For 2013, the proposed amendment reduces the 
ERF's premium assessment rate from 3.0% to 2.9% and increases the UEF's 
premium assessment rate from 0.05% to 0.15%.  These changes offset each 
other, leaving the overall assessment rate unchanged from 2012.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  Because the overall premium assessments rate is 
unchanged, the proposed amendment will not affect the state's expense for 
workers' compensation insurance.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Because the overall premium assessment rate is left 
unchanged, the proposed amendment will not affect local government expense 
for workers' compensation insurance.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Because the overall premium assessments rate is left 
unchanged, the proposed amendment will not affect small business expense for 
workers' compensation insurance.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Because the overall premium assessment rate is left unchanged, the 
proposed amendment will not affect other persons' expense for workers' 
compensation insurance, nor will it affect the workers' compensation benefits 
that may be claimed by such persons.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  By leaving the overall premium 
assessment rate unchanged, the proposed amendment avoids any compliance costs 
for any affected person.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  The proposed assessment rates are based on actuarial studies and 
are believed to be sufficient to support the ERF and UEF during 2013.  The 
proposed overall assessment rate remains unchanged from the previous year, 
thereby contributing to the cost stability of Utah's workers' compensation 
system.  This stability has a positive fiscal impact on businesses.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by 
Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36990.htm



NATURAL RESOURCES
OIL, GAS AND MINING; OIL AND GAS
No. 36992 (Amendment): R649-3-38. Surface Owner Protection Act Provisions.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This rule, in accordance with S.B. 77, passed 
during the 2012 General Session, establishes standards for oil and gas well 
operators and surface owners when there is privately-owned surface land 
overlying a separate party's privately-owned mineral resources.  The rule 
reflects the rights of the well operator to enter upon the surface land and 
oil and gas operations shall also be conducted in a manner to prevent 
unreasonable losses to the private surface land owner.   A surface use bond 
is required if there is not a surface use agreement.  Non-binding mediation 
may be requested by the parties with costs equally shared.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  The Division anticipates one new surface use bond per 
year in addition to the traditional plugging and restoration bonds received 
in the existing rules, but this anticipated small increase will not require 
added staffing expenses to implement.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  Local government is not impacted by this rule since 
they are not private surface owners or mineral owners, and they do not 
operate oil and gas wells.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  Since over 96% of the oil and gas companies drilling in 
Utah in 2012 are larger than small business, it is very unlikely that a small 
business operator will result in the one well to be additionally bonded.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: Private surface land owners who do not own the minerals and who 
encounter a proposal for oil and gas development on their land will only 
incur an added cost if they voluntarily choose to utilize a mediator and 
share this cost, if they are unable to reach a surface use agreement.  A 
mediator cost is estimated at $150 per hour for 4 hours, thus a $600 cost to 
be shared with the well operator.  The mediation is an added opportunity to 
resolve a disagreement but it is not required by statute or rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  Oil and gas companies who are 
drilling on privately-owned surface land overlying privately-owned mineral 
resource, who are not able to achieve a surface use agreement, will encounter 
a new $6,000 bond requirement per well site.  Based on prior history, only 
one new bond is expected when there is no surface use agreement in this 
ownership situation.  The funds are returned after plugging of the well or an 
agreement is reached.  The company may share the estimated $600 cost of a 
mediator with a surface land owner, if a mediator is voluntarily utilized.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  Based on prior history, only one new surface use bond is 
expected to be required of any oil and gas operator each year, when a surface 
use agreement can not be achieved for the case where there is private surface 
land and private minerals.  The new surface use bond of $6,000 has provisions 
in the rule for being returned to the operator if a surface use agreement can 
be reached at a subsequent date.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Steve Schneider by phone at 801-538-5328, by FAX at 801-359-3940, or by 
Internet E-mail at steveschneider@utah.gov
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE:
- 12/05/2012 09:00 AM, DNR, 1594 W North Temple, Salt Lake City, UT
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  01/23/2013
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36992.htm



PUBLIC SAFETY
DRIVER LICENSE
No. 36950 (Amendment): R708-47. Emergency Contact Database.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  This change adds new definitions and 
clarifies the process to add or update information in the Driver License 
Division's Emergency Contact Database.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  There is no cost or savings to the state budget as a 
result of this amendment because the amendment simply adds definitions and 
clarifies procedures.  It does not affect the existing Driver License 
Emergency Contact database.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This amendment does not affect local government because 
local government does not participate in the Driver License Emergency Contact 
Database.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This amendment does not affect small businesses because 
small businesses do not participate in the Driver License Emergency Contact 
Database.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This amendment does not affect persons other than small businesses, 
businesses, or local governments because the amendment simply adds 
definitions and clarifies procedures.  It does not affect the existing 
Emergency Contact database.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  This amendment does not affect 
individuals because there are no compliance costs for persons who choose to 
add information into the Driver License Emergency Contact Database.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This amendment does not have a fiscal impact on businesses 
because businesses do not participate in the Driver License Emergency Contact 
database.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Jill Laws by phone at 801-964-4469, by FAX at 801-964-4482, or by Internet 
E-mail at jlaws@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36950.htm



TAX COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36991 (Amendment): R861-1A-12. Policies and Procedures Regarding Public 
Disclosure Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Sections 41-3-209, 59-1-210, 59-1-403, 
and 59-1-405.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  The current version of the section provides 
for the disclosure of property tax orders, or information about those orders, 
to persons other than the persons described in Section 59-1-404 and Tax 
Commission Section R861-1A-37 if disclosure is required under state law.  
However, current state law under Section 59-1-404 allows, but does not 
require, the disclosure of certain information from property tax orders.  
Accordingly, the proposed amendment clarifies that disclosure of property tax 
orders, or information about those orders, to persons other than the persons 
described in Section 59-1-404 and Tax Commission Section R861-1A-37 may be 
disclosed if the disclosure is required or allowed under state law.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  None--The proposed amendment is consistent with current 
statute.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  None--The proposed amendment is consistent with current 
statute.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  None--The proposed amendment is consistent with current 
statute.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: None--The proposed amendment is consistent with current statute.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  None--The proposed amendment is 
consistent with current statute.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  This amendment creates no fiscal impact as it is consistent with 
current law.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or by 
Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36991.htm



WORKFORCE SERVICES
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
No. 37025 (Amendment): R986-700-710. Income Limits for ES CC.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  SSI recipients were not included in the Child 
Care assistance household nor was the income from an SSI recipient counted in 
determining eligibility for Child Care.  This change will include an SSI 
recipient in the household and their earned and unearned income will be 
counted.  The SSI benefit itself will not be counted.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This applies to federally-funded programs so there are 
no costs or savings to the state budget.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no 
costs or savings to the local government.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs to small businesses to comply 
with these changes because this is a federally-funded program.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs to persons other than small businesses, 
businesses or local government entities to comply with these changes because 
there are no costs or fees associated with these proposed changes.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no compliance costs 
associated with these changes for any affected persons because this is a 
federally-funded program and there are no fees or costs associated with these 
proposed changes.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change. There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37025.htm


UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
No. 37023 (Amendment): R994-305-1201. Offer in Compromise.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  S.B. 129 in the 2012 General Session directed 
the Department to establish rules that would allow employers and claimants to 
compromise debts owed to the Department for past due contributions, interest, 
penalties, and costs and fault and nonfault benefit overpayments.  This 
proposed amendment establishes a procedure and eligibility standards for 
applying for and allowing a compromise.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no costs 
or savings to the state budget.  Any costs associated with the changes would 
be as a result of the statutory change and not this rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no 
costs or savings to any local government budget.  Any costs associated with 
the changes would be as a result of the statutory change and not this rule.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no costs 
or savings to small businesses.  Any costs associated with the changes would 
be as a result of the statutory change and not this rule.  A small business 
with no ability to pay past due contributions may qualify for a compromise.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: There will be no costs or savings to persons other than small 
businesses, businesses, or local government as there are no fees associated 
with this change.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings to any 
affected persons as there are no fees associated with this program and it is 
federally funded.  It is not anticipated that a sufficient number of 
employers or claimants will be eligible for a compromise so it is not likely 
there will be any impact on rates.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.  These changes will have no impact on any employers contribution 
tax rate.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37023.htm

No. 37024 (Amendment): R994-406. Fraud, Fault and Nonfault Overpayments.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE:  S.B. 129 in the 2012 General Session directed 
the Department to establish rules that would allow employers and claimants to 
compromise debts owed to the Department for past due contributions, interest, 
penalties and costs, and fault and nonfault benefit overpayments.  This 
proposed amendment establishes a procedure and eligibility standards for 
applying for and allowing a compromise.   These minor changes in this rule 
are to clarify the availability of the procedure.
ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:
- THE STATE BUDGET:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no costs 
or savings to the state budget.  Any costs associated with the changes would 
be as a result of the statutory change and not this rule.
- LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:  This is a federally-funded program so there are no 
costs or savings to small businesses.  Any costs associated with the changes 
would be as a result of the statutory change and not this rule.  A small 
business with no ability to pay past due contributions may qualify for a 
compromise.
- SMALL BUSINESSES:  There will be no costs or savings to persons other than 
small businesses, businesses, or local government as there are no fees 
associated with this change.
- PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL 
ENTITIES: This is a federally-funded program so there are no costs or savings 
to any local government budget.  Any costs associated with the changes would 
be as a result of the statutory change and not this rule.
COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS:  There are no costs or savings to any 
affected persons as there are no fees associated with this program and it is 
federally funded.  It is not anticipated that a sufficient number of 
employers or claimants will be eligible for a compromise so it is not likely 
there will be any impact on rates.
COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 
BUSINESSES:  There are no compliance costs associated with this change.  
There are no fees associated with this change.  There will be no cost to 
anyone to comply with these changes.  There will be no fiscal impact on any 
business.  These changes will have no impact on any employers contribution 
tax rate.
INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN 
COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 12/17/2012
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by 
Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov
THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:  12/24/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37024.htm




3.  FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION

Within five years of an administrative rule's original enactment or last 
five-year review, the agency is required to review the rule.  This review is 
intended to remove obsolete rules from the Utah Administrative Code.  Upon 
reviewing a rule, an agency may:  repeal the rule by filing a Proposed Rule; 
continue the rule as it is by filing a Notice of Review and Statement of 
Continuation (Notice); or amend the rule by filing a Proposed Rule and by 
filing a Notice.  By filing a Notice, the agency indicates that the rule is 
still necessary. 

The rule text that is being continued may be found in the most recent edition 
of the Utah Administrative Code.  The rule text may also be inspected at the 
agency or the Division of Administrative Rules.  Notices are effective upon 
filing.  

Notices are governed by Section 63G-3-305.


HEALTH
FAMILY HEALTH AND PREPAREDNESS, PRIMARY CARE AND RURAL HEALTH
No. 36963 (5-year Review): R434-30. Primary Care Grants Program for Medically 
Underserved Populations.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Continuation of the rule allows the department to proceed in awarding grants 
to public and non-profit entities to provide primary health care services to 
medically underserved populations.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Erin Olsen by phone at 801-273-6618, by FAX at 801-273-4146, or by Internet 
E-mail at elolsen@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36963.htm



HUMAN SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LICENSING
No. 36953 (5-year Review): R501-1. General Provisions.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Sections 62A-2-101 through 62A-2-122 provide for issuance of a license for 
human service programs.  This rule provides guidance to those programs for 
the process of obtaining licenses.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
- Vilma Mosier by phone at 801-538-4041, by FAX at 801-538-4553, or by 
Internet E-mail at vmosier@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36953.htm

No. 36952 (5-year Review): R501-2. Core Rules.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The continued growth of the programs that the division licenses necessitates 
this rule.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
- Vilma Mosier by phone at 801-538-4041, by FAX at 801-538-4553, or by 
Internet E-mail at vmosier@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36952.htm

No. 36954 (5-year Review): R501-7. Child Placing Adoption Agencies.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is required because of the continuing need for child placing 
adoption agencies caused by more children being placed in adoptive homes and 
for the continued protection of these children.  This rule establishes 
standards for those agencies.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
- Vilma Mosier by phone at 801-538-4041, by FAX at 801-538-4553, or by 
Internet E-mail at vmosier@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36954.htm

No. 36955 (5-year Review): R501-8. Outdoor Youth Programs.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The statutory provisions of Section 62A-2-106 still exist and the fact that 
there have been recent incidents in the outdoor youth programs indicate the 
continued need for this rule.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36955.htm

No. 36956 (5-year Review): R501-11. Social Detoxification Programs.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is necessary as a result of the continuing growth of drug and 
alcohol use in today's society.  It is also needed to provide standards for 
Social Detoxification Programs.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
- Vilma Mosier by phone at 801-538-4041, by FAX at 801-538-4553, or by 
Internet E-mail at vmosier@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36956.htm

No. 36957 (5-year Review): R501-12. Child Foster Care.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The statutory provisions of Section 62A-2-101 et seq. dealing with child 
foster care still exist and the rule should be continued because of the 
ongoing need for minimum standards in foster homes.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
- Vilma Mosier by phone at 801-538-4041, by FAX at 801-538-4553, or by 
Internet E-mail at vmosier@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36957.htm

No. 36958 (5-year Review): R501-13. Adult Day Care.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
The statutory provisions of Section 62A-2-101 et seq. dealing with Adult Day 
Care still exist.  This rule is necessary because of the continued need of 
programs that deal with functionally-impaired adults in a protected setting 
and should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
- Vilma Mosier by phone at 801-538-4041, by FAX at 801-538-4553, or by 
Internet E-mail at vmosier@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36958.htm

No. 36959 (5-year Review): R501-16. Intermediate Secure Treatment Programs 
for Minors.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is to be continued to ensure that Intermediate Secure Care 
facilities provide the required minimum standards.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
- Vilma Mosier by phone at 801-538-4041, by FAX at 801-538-4553, or by 
Internet E-mail at vmosier@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36959.htm

No. 36960 (5-year Review): R501-17. Adult Foster Care.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is to be continued to ensure that Adult Foster Care facilities 
provide the required minimum standards.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
- Vilma Mosier by phone at 801-538-4041, by FAX at 801-538-4553, or by 
Internet E-mail at vmosier@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36960.htm


SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH
No. 37022 (5-year Review): R523-1. Procedures.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is required by statute to establish minimum standards and 
procedures for developing policies.  Therefore, this rule should be 
continued.  The division has identified edits to the rule that will require a 
rule amendment.  That process is underway and will be finalized as soon as 
possible.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by 
Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov
- L Ray Winger by phone at 801-538-4319, by FAX at 801-538-9892, or by 
Internet E-mail at raywinger@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  11/01/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37022.htm



LABOR COMMISSION
ADJUDICATION
No. 36965 (5-year Review): R602-3. Procedure and Standards for Approval of 
Assignment of Benefits.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule remains necessary to establish the procedural and substantive 
requirements for Commission approval of any request for transfer of workers' 
compensation payment rights.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Heather Gunnarson by phone at 801-536-7928, by FAX at 801-530-6333, or by 
Internet E-mail at hgunnarson@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/22/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36965.htm


OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
No. 36966 (5-year Review): R614-1. General Provisions.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This specific rule establishes definitions, incorporates federal standards, 
establishes other basic safety rules and addresses inspections, 
confidentiality of information, and penalties.  This rule remains necessary 
to implement the legislative intent underlying enactment of the Utah 
Occupational Safety and Health Act, set forth in Section 34A-6-102, of 
providing for the safety and health of workers and establishing a coordinated 
state plan as effective as the federal Occupational Safety and Health 
program.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Louis Silva by phone at 801-530-68982, by FAX at 801-530-7606, or by 
Internet E-mail at lsilva@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/22/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36966.htm

No. 36967 (5-year Review): R614-2. Drilling Industry.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is necessary to establish specific safety and health standards in 
the drilling industry and related services.  Therefore, this rule should be 
continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Louis Silva by phone at 801-530-68982, by FAX at 801-530-7606, or by 
Internet E-mail at lsilva@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/22/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36967.htm

No. 36968 (5-year Review): R614-3. Farming Operations Standards.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is necessary to establish specific safety standards for farming 
operations and the safety of employees.  Therefore, this rule should be 
continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Louis Silva by phone at 801-530-68982, by FAX at 801-530-7606, or by 
Internet E-mail at lsilva@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/22/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36968.htm

No. 36969 (5-year Review): R614-4. Hazardous Materials.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is necessary to establish specific safety standards for hazardous 
materials and the safety of employees working with them.  Therefore, this 
rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Louis Silva by phone at 801-530-68982, by FAX at 801-530-7606, or by 
Internet E-mail at lsilva@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/22/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36969.htm

No. 36970 (5-year Review): R614-5. Materials Handling and Storage.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is necessary to establish specific safety standards for conveyors 
and the safety of employees using them.  Therefore, this rule should be 
continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Louis Silva by phone at 801-530-68982, by FAX at 801-530-7606, or by 
Internet E-mail at lsilva@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/22/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36970.htm

No. 36971 (5-year Review): R614-6. Other Operations.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule identifies safety procedures for operations such as "crushing, 
screening, and grinding equipment", "window cleaning", and "industrial 
railroads" (items that are not covered by federal standards).  This rule is 
necessary to ensure the safety of employees in workplaces that involve these 
operations.  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Louis Silva by phone at 801-530-68982, by FAX at 801-530-7606, or by 
Internet E-mail at lsilva@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/22/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36971.htm

No. 36972 (5-year Review): R614-7. Construction Standards.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is necessary to establish specific safety standards for operations 
in hazardous construction areas such as "roofing", and "tar-asphalt 
operations" and the protection of employees engaged in these operations.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Louis Silva by phone at 801-530-68982, by FAX at 801-530-7606, or by 
Internet E-mail at lsilva@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/22/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36972.htm



NATURAL RESOURCES
WATER RESOURCES
No. 36951 (5-year Review): R653-3. Selecting Private Consultants.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
When private consultants are needed for the design and construction of water 
projects, it is necessary to have guidelines in place to govern the selection 
process and the negotiation of contracts for the work required.  Therefore, 
this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Barbara Allen by phone at 801-538-72352, by FAX at 801-538-7279, or by 
Internet E-mail at barbaraallen@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/17/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36951.htm

No. 36961 (5-year Review): R653-4. Investigation Account.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This account is necessary for the Board of Water Resources to fulfill its 
directive to develop the waters of the State of Utah under Section 73-10-4.  
Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Barbara Allen by phone at 801-538-72352, by FAX at 801-538-7279, or by 
Internet E-mail at barbaraallen@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/18/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36961.htm

No. 36964 (5-year Review): R653-5. Cloud Seeding.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Cloud seeding efforts continue to show results of increased snow pack and 
precipitation.  This rule is necessary to allow personnel to legally conduct 
research and implement project sites throughout the state.  Therefore, this 
rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Barbara Allen by phone at 801-538-72352, by FAX at 801-538-7279, or by 
Internet E-mail at barbaraallen@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/19/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36964.htm

No. 37021 (5-year Review): R653-6. Privatization Projects.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule is necessary to provide a form for the implementation of Subsection 
73-10d-6(2).  Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Barbara Allen by phone at 801-538-72352, by FAX at 801-538-7279, or by 
Internet E-mail at barbaraallen@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  11/01/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37021.htm

No. 37017 (5-year Review): R653-7. Administrative Procedures for Informal 
Proceedings.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
This rule must be continued in case of any future adjudicative proceedings 
with regard to Flaming Gorge water rights that were granted by the Board of 
Water Resources.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Barbara Allen by phone at 801-538-72352, by FAX at 801-538-7279, or by 
Internet E-mail at barbaraallen@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/30/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37017.htm



SCHOOL AND INSTITUTIONAL TRUST LANDS
ADMINISTRATION
No. 37019 (5-year Review): R850-83. Administration of Previous Sales to 
Subdivisions of the State.
REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS 
WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY:  
Under Section 65-1-29 and Subsection 65A-7-4(5), which have both been 
repealed, trust lands were sold to subdivisions of the state under a 
determinable fee process whereby the subdivision could purchase land at a 
specific price for a specific purpose.  If the use of the land changed for 
any reason, the land automatically reverted back to the trust.  This rule 
outlines the process whereby a breach of the sale terms is determined and the 
remedies available to the subdivision and trust to cure said 
breach.Therefore, this rule should be continued.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- John Andrews by phone at 801-538-5180, by FAX at 801-538-5118, or by 
Internet E-mail at jandrews@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/31/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37019.htm




4.  NOTICES OF FIVE-YEAR REVIEW EXTENSIONS

Rulewriting agencies are required by law to review each of their 
administrative rules within five years of the date of the rule's original 
enactment or the date of last review (Section 63G-3-305).  If the agency 
finds that it will not meet the deadline for review of the rule (the five-
year anniversary date), it may file an extension with the Division of 
Administrative Rules.  The extension permits the agency to file the review up 
to 120 days beyond the anniversary date.

Agencies have filed extensions for the rules listed below.  The "Extended Due 
Date" is 120 days after the anniversary date.  

The five-year review extension is governed by Subsections 63G-3-305(4) and 
(5).


HEALTH
CENTER FOR HEALTH DATA, VITAL RECORDS AND STATISTICS
No. 36994 (Five-Year Extension): R436-1. Duties of the Department of Health.
EXTENSION REASON:  Due to extenuating health circumstances with the 
division's rulewriter, the division respectfully requests an extension for 
this rule.  New deadline:  03/21/2013.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Janice Houston by phone at 801-538-6262, by FAX at 801-538-7012, or by 
Internet E-mail at jlhouston@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36994.htm

No. 36995 (Five-Year Extension): R436-2. Infants of Unknown Parentage; 
Foundling Registration.
EXTENSION REASON:  Due to extenuating health circumstances with the 
division's rulewriter, the division respectfully requests an extension for 
this rule.  New deadline:  03/21/2013.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Janice Houston by phone at 801-538-6262, by FAX at 801-538-7012, or by 
Internet E-mail at jlhouston@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36995.htm

No. 36996 (Five-Year Extension): R436-3. Amendment of Vital Records.
EXTENSION REASON:  Due to extenuating health circumstances with the 
division's rulewriter, the division respectfully requests an extension for 
this rule.  New deadline:  03/21/2013.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Janice Houston by phone at 801-538-6262, by FAX at 801-538-7012, or by 
Internet E-mail at jlhouston@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36996.htm

No. 36997 (Five-Year Extension): R436-4. Delayed Registration of Birth.
EXTENSION REASON:  Due to extenuating health circumstances with the 
division's rulewriter, the division respectfully requests an extension for 
this rule.  New deadline:  03/21/2013.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Janice Houston by phone at 801-538-6262, by FAX at 801-538-7012, or by 
Internet E-mail at jlhouston@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36997.htm

No. 36998 (Five-Year Extension): R436-7. Death Registration.
EXTENSION REASON:  Due to extenuating health circumstances with the 
division's rulewriter, the division respectfully requests an extension for 
this rule.  New deadline:  03/21/2013.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Janice Houston by phone at 801-538-6262, by FAX at 801-538-7012, or by 
Internet E-mail at jlhouston@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36998.htm

No. 36999 (Five-Year Extension): R436-8. Authorization for Final Disposition 
of Deceased Persons.
EXTENSION REASON:  Due to extenuating health circumstances with the 
division's rulewriter, the division respectfully requests an extension for 
this rule.  New deadline:  03/21/2013.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Janice Houston by phone at 801-538-6262, by FAX at 801-538-7012, or by 
Internet E-mail at jlhouston@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/36999.htm

No. 37000 (Five-Year Extension): R436-9. Persons and Institutions Required to 
Keep Monthly Listings of Vital Statistics Events.
EXTENSION REASON:  Due to extenuating health circumstances with the 
division's rulewriter, the division respectfully requests an extension for 
this rule.  New deadline:  03/21/2013.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Janice Houston by phone at 801-538-6262, by FAX at 801-538-7012, or by 
Internet E-mail at jlhouston@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37000.htm

No. 37001 (Five-Year Extension): R436-10. Birth and Death Certificates.
EXTENSION REASON:  Due to extenuating health circumstances with the 
division's rulewriter, the division respectfully requests an extension for 
this rule.  New deadline:  03/21/2013.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Janice Houston by phone at 801-538-6262, by FAX at 801-538-7012, or by 
Internet E-mail at jlhouston@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37001.htm

No. 37002 (Five-Year Extension): R436-12. Certified Copies of Vital 
Statistics Records.
EXTENSION REASON:  Due to extenuating health circumstances with the 
division's rulewriter, the division respectfully requests an extension for 
this rule.  New deadline:  03/21/2013.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Janice Houston by phone at 801-538-6262, by FAX at 801-538-7012, or by 
Internet E-mail at jlhouston@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37002.htm

No. 37003 (Five-Year Extension): R436-13. Disclosure of Records.
EXTENSION REASON:  Due to extenuating health circumstances with the 
division's rulewriter, the division respectfully requests an extension for 
this rule.  New deadline:  03/21/2013.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Janice Houston by phone at 801-538-6262, by FAX at 801-538-7012, or by 
Internet E-mail at jlhouston@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37003.htm

No. 37004 (Five-Year Extension): R436-14. Copies of Data From Vital Records.
EXTENSION REASON:  Due to extenuating health circumstances with the 
division's rulewriter, the division respectfully requests an extension for 
this rule.  New deadline:  03/21/2013.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Janice Houston by phone at 801-538-6262, by FAX at 801-538-7012, or by 
Internet E-mail at jlhouston@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37004.htm

No. 37005 (Five-Year Extension): R436-15. Fees.
EXTENSION REASON:  Due to extenuating health circumstances with the 
division's rulewriter, the division respectfully requests an extension for 
this rule.  New deadline:  03/21/2013.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Janice Houston by phone at 801-538-6262, by FAX at 801-538-7012, or by 
Internet E-mail at jlhouston@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37005.htm

No. 37006 (Five-Year Extension): R436-16. Violation of Rules.
EXTENSION REASON:  Due to extenuating health circumstances with the 
division's rulewriter, the division respectfully requests an extension for 
this rule.  New deadline:  03/21/2013.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Janice Houston by phone at 801-538-6262, by FAX at 801-538-7012, or by 
Internet E-mail at jlhouston@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37006.htm

No. 37007 (Five-Year Extension): R436-17. Review and Approval of Research 
Requests.
EXTENSION REASON:  Due to extenuating health circumstances with the 
division's rulewriter, the division respectfully requests an extension for 
this rule.  New deadline:  03/21/2013.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO:
- Janice Houston by phone at 801-538-6262, by FAX at 801-538-7012, or by 
Internet E-mail at jlhouston@utah.gov
EFFECTIVE:  10/26/2012
FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT:
http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2012/20121115/37007.htm




5.  NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES

State law provides for agencies to make their rules effective and enforceable 
after publication in the Utah State Bulletin. In the case of Proposed Rules 
or Changes in Proposed Rules with a designated comment period, the law 
permits an agency to file a notice of effective date any time after the close 
of comment plus seven days. In the case of Changes in Proposed Rules with no 
designated comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of 
effective date on any date including or after the thirtieth day after the 
rule's publication date. If an agency fails to file a Notice of Effective 
Date within 120 days from the publication of a Proposed Rule or a related 
Change in Proposed Rule the rule lapses and the agency must start the 
rulemaking process over.

Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301(12), 63G-3-
303, and Sections R15-4-5a and 5b. 


AGRICULTURE AND FOOD
ANIMAL INDUSTRY
No. 36683  (NEW): R58-3.  Brucellosis Vaccination Requirements
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/29/2012



HEALTH
HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY
No. 36379  (AMD): R414-510.  Intermediate Care Facility for Individuals with 
Mental Retardation Transition Program
Published:  07/01/2012
Effective:  11/01/2012

No. 36379  (CPR): R414-510.  Intermediate Care Facility for Individuals with 
Mental Retardation Transition Program
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  11/01/2012



HUMAN SERVICES
RECOVERY SERVICES
No. 36678  (AMD): R527-37.  Closure Criteria for Support Cases
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/23/2012

No. 36679  (AMD): R527-253.  Collection of Child Support Judgments
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/23/2012

No. 36680  (AMD): R527-255.  Substantial Change in Circumstances
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/23/2012

No. 36681  (AMD): R527-330.  Posting Priority of Payments Received
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/23/2012



INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36711  (AMD): R590-142.  Continuing Education Rule
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/22/2012

No. 36635  (AMD): R590-167.  Individual, Small Employer, and Group Health 
Benefit Plan Rule
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/16/2012

No. 36656  (AMD): R590-220.  Submission of Accident and Health Insurance 
Filings
Published:  09/01/2012
Effective:  10/16/2012

No. 36708  (NEW): R590-266.  Utah Essential Health Benefits Package
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/25/2012



LABOR COMMISSION
ANTIDISCRIMINATION AND LABOR, ANTIDISCRIMINATION
No. 36690  (REP): R606-3.  Nondiscrimination Clause to be used in Contracts 
Entered into by the State of Utah and its Agencies
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/22/2012

No. 36691  (REP): R606-4.  Advertising
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/22/2012

No. 36692  (REP): R606-5.  Employment Agencies
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/22/2012


INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
No. 36686  (AMD): R612-1-3.  Official Forms
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/22/2012

No. 36685  (AMD): R612-3-4.  Qualifying Requirements
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/22/2012



NATURAL RESOURCES
OIL, GAS AND MINING; OIL AND GAS
No. 36700  (AMD): R649-3-39.  Hydraulic Fracturing
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  11/01/2012


WATER RIGHTS
No. 36455  (AMD): R655-5-4.  Mapping Standards
Published:  08/01/2012
Effective:  10/24/2012

No. 36505  (AMD): R655-10-7A.  Review of Design
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/24/2012

No. 36507  (AMD): R655-11-5A.  Geological and Seismic Study
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/24/2012

No. 36508  (AMD): R655-11-5C.  Method of Analysis
Published:  08/15/2012
Effective:  10/24/2012



PUBLIC SAFETY
DRIVER LICENSE
No. 36693  (AMD): R708-41.  Requirements for Acceptable Documentation, 
Storage and Maintenance
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/24/2012



TAX COMMISSION
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36694  (AMD): R861-1A-20.  Time of Appeal Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. 
Sections 59-1-301, 59-1-501, 59- 2-1007, 59-7-517, 59-10-532, 59-10-533, 59-
10-535, 59-12-114, 59-13-210, 63G-4-201, 63G-4- 401, 68-3-7, and 68-3-8.5
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/25/2012


PROPERTY TAX
No. 36696  (AMD): R884-24P-33.  2012 Personal Property Valuation Guides and 
Schedules Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Section 59-2-301
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/25/2012



TECHNOLOGY SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
No. 36699  (AMD): R895-3.  Computer Software Licensing, Copyright, Control, 
Retention, and Transfer
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/22/2012



TRANSPORTATION
OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND SAFETY
No. 36704  (AMD): R920-1.  Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/23/2012

No. 36705  (REP): R920-2.  Traffic Control Systems for Railroad-Highway Grade 
Crossings
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/23/2012

No. 36706  (REP): R920-3.  Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part VI
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/23/2012

No. 36707  (REP): R920-5.  Manual and Specifications on School Crossing 
Zones.  Supplemental to Part VII of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control 
Devices
Published:  09/15/2012
Effective:  10/23/2012




6.  RULES INDEX

The Rules Index is a cumulative index that reflects all effective Utah 
administrative rules.  The Rules Index is not included Digest.  However, a 
copy of the current Rules Index is available 
http://www.rules.utah.gov/research.htm .


<<end of file>>

