Utah State Digest, Vol. 2013, No. 2 (January 15, 2013) [NOTE: The Utah State Digest (Digest) is created from the eRules filing database used to create the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin). While a discrepancy between the Digest and the Bulletin is highly unlikely, any discrepancies will be resolved in favor of the Bulletin. Please refer to the State Disclaimer ( http://www.utah.gov/disclaimer.html ) for more information.] ------------------------------------------------------------ UTAH STATE DIGEST Summary of the Contents of the Utah State Bulletin For information filed December 15, 2012, 12:00 AM through December 31, 2012, 11:59 PM Volume 2013, No. 2 January 15, 2013 Prepared by Division of Administrative Rules Department of Administrative Services The Utah State Digest (Digest) is an official electronic publication of the State of Utah, Department of Administrative Services, Division of Administrative Rules. It is a summary of the information found in the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin) of the same volume and issue number. Inquiries concerning the substance or applicability of an administrative rule that appear in the Digest should be addressed to the contact person for the rule. Questions about the Digest or the rulemaking process may be addressed to: Division of Administrative Rules, 5110 State Office Building, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-1201, telephone 801-538-3218. Additional rulemaking information, and electronic versions of all administrative rule publications are available at: http://www.rules.utah.gov/ . The Digest is available free of charge online at http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm and by E-mail Listserv. ************************************************ Division of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City 84114 Unless otherwise noted, all information presented in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as desired. Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted by their respective authors. Citation to the source is requested. Utah state digest. Semimonthly. 1. Delegated legislation--Utah--Digests. I. Utah. Office of Administrative Rules. KFU38.U8 348.792'025--DDC 86-658042 *********************************************** 1. SPECIAL NOTICES Notice for February 2013 Medicaid Rate Changes - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/sn153656.htm 2. NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES A state agency may file a Proposed Rule when it determines the need for a new rule, a substantive change to an existing rule, or a repeal of an existing rule. Filings received between December 15, 2012, 12:00 a.m., and December 31, 2012, 11:59 p.m. are summarized in this, the January 15, 2013, issue of the Utah State Digest. The law requires that an agency accept public comment on Proposed Rules published in the January 15, 2013, issue of the Utah State Bulletin until at least February 14, 2013 (the Bulletin is the parent publication of the Digest). The agency may accept comment beyond this date and will indicate the last day the agency will accept comment in the rule information published below. The agency may also hold public hearings. Additionally, citizens or organizations may request the agency hold a hearing on a specific Proposed Rule. Section 63G-3-302 requires that a hearing request be received by the agency proposing the rule "in writing not more than 15 days after the publication date of the proposed rule." From the end of the public comment period through May 15, 2013, the agency may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants to make the Proposed Rule effective. The agency sets the effective date. The date may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period nor more than 120 days after the publication date in the Utah State Bulletin. Alternatively, the agency may file a Change in Proposed Rule in response to comments received. If the Division of Administrative Rules does not receive a Notice of Effective Date or a Change in Proposed Rule, the Proposed Rule lapses and the agency must start the process over. The public, interest groups, and governmental agencies are invited to review and comment on the Proposed Rules listed below. Comment may be directed to the contact person identified with each rule. Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-301; Rule R15-2; and Sections R15-4-3, R15-4-4, R15-4-5, R15-4-9, and R15-4-10. EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION No. 37145 (Amendment): R277-484. Data Standards. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: Removes Section R277-484-9 from the rule and updates a definition to make it consistent with the definition in other rules. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state budget. The amendment to the rule removes a section and relocates it in another rule which does not result in a cost or savings. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no anticipated cost or savings to local government. The amendment to the rule removes a section and relocates it in another rule which does not result in a cost or savings. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to small businesses. The amendment to the rule applies to public education and does not affect businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities. The amendment to the rule removes a section and relocates it in another rule which does not result in a cost or savings. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no compliance costs for affected persons. The amendment to the rule removes a section and relocates it in another rule which does not result in any compliance costs. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37145.htm No. 37144 (Amendment): R277-487. Public School Student Confidentiality. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The changes include adding new definitions, revising the authority and purpose to reflect specific statutes regarding student information and public education survey data, and to add two new sections to the rule previously in two other rules so that all provisions of the law related to student and educator data are consistent and adequately addressed in one rule. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There is no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget. Minimal funding is provided for the state to administer the pilot online school survey system. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no anticipated costs or savings to local government. The amendments to the rule provide minor clarification for procedures regarding protection of student and educator data within one rule which do not result in a cost or savings. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There is no anticipated costs or savings to small businesses. This rule and the amendments to the rule apply to public education and do not affect businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no anticipated costs or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities. This rule and the amendments to the rule affect state and local government and handling of student and educator data and do not affect individuals. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no compliance costs for affected persons. Local education agencies should have policies in place and provide appropriate training to employees regarding the confidentiality of student and educator data. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37144.htm No. 37146 (Amendment): R277-502. Educator Licensing and Data Retention. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: Removes Section R277-502-8 from the rule and renumbers as appropriate. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state budget. The amendment to the rule removes a section and relocates it in another rule which does not result in a cost or savings to the state. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no anticipated cost or savings to local government. The amendment to the rule removes a section and relocates it in another rule which does not result in a cost or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to small businesses. The amendment to this rule applies to public education and does not affect businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities. The amendment to the rule removes a section and relocates it in another rule which does not result in a cost or savings to individuals. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no compliance costs for affected persons. The amendment to this rule removes a section and relocates it in another rule which does not result in any compliance costs. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37146.htm No. 37147 (New Rule): R277-517. Board and UPPAC Disciplinary Definitions and Actions. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The new rule provides definitions, procedures for Utah Professional Practices Advisory Commission (UPPAC) actions, procedures for Board receipt and review of UPPAC recommendations, and procedures for Board disciplinary actions. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state budget. The changes are procedural for UPPAC and the Board which do not result in a cost or savings. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no anticipated cost or savings to local government. This new rule provides procedures for UPPAC and the Board which do not result in a cost or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to small businesses. This new rule applies to public education and does not affect businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities. This rule provides procedures for UPPAC and the Board and does not affect individuals. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no compliance costs for affected persons. The rule provides procedures for UPPAC and the Board to follow when disciplining licensed educators. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37147.htm HEALTH HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY No. 37122 (Amendment): R414-1-5. Incorporations by Reference. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: Section R414-1-5 is changed to update the incorporation of the State Plan by reference to 01/01/2013 which includes any approved State Plan Amendments (SPAs). SPAs that became effective during the fourth quarter of Calendar Year 2012 include SPA 12-011-UT, Nursing Facility Evacuation Payments, which adds wording to define how payments to facilities will be administered and what payment limits will be in place during a time of a declared disaster; SPA 12-013-UT, Reimbursement for Optometry Services, which clarifies reimbursement methodology and changes the effective date of rates for optometry from 07/01/2007, to 07/01/2012; SPA 12- 014-UT, Reimbursement for Speech Pathology Services, which clarifies reimbursement methodology and changes the effective date of rates for speech pathology from 11/01/2008 to 07/01/2012; SPA 12-015-UT, Reimbursement for Audiology Services, which clarifies reimbursement methodology and changes the effective date of rates for audiology from 11/01/2008, to 07/01/2012; SPA 12- 016-UT, Reimbursement for Chiropractic Services, which clarifies reimbursement methodology and changes the effective date of rates for chiropractic services from 11/01/2008, to 07/01/2012; SPA 12-017-UT, Reimbursement for Eyeglasses Services, which clarifies reimbursement methodology and changes the effective date of rates for eyeglasses from 07/01/2007 to 07/01/2012; SPA 12-018-UT, Reimbursement for Clinic Services, which clarifies reimbursement methodology and changes the effective date of rates for clinic services from 05/25/2010 to 07/01/2012. This SPA also clarifies services and limitations in freestanding birth centers; SPA 12-019- UT, Reimbursement for Physical and Occupational Therapy, which changes the effective date of rates for physical therapy and occupational therapy from 07/01/2009 to 07/01/2012; and SPA 12-020-UT, Reimbursement for Rehabilitative Mental Health Services, which clarifies reimbursement methodology and changes the effective date of rates for rehabilitative mental health services from 01/01/2002 to 07/01/2012. This rule change also incorporates by reference the Medical Supplies Manual and List and the hospital services provider manual, effective 01/01/2013; incorporates by reference both the definitions and the attachment for the Private Duty Nursing Acuity Grid found in the Home Health Agencies Provider Manual, effective 01/01/2013; incorporates by reference the Speech-Language Services Provider Manual, effective 01/01/2013; incorporates by reference the Audiology Services Provider Manual, effective 01/01/2013; incorporates by reference the Hospice Care Provider Manual, effective 01/01/2013; incorporates by reference the Long Term Care Services in Nursing Facilities Provider Manual, with its attachments, effective 01/01/2013; incorporates by reference the Utah Home and Community-Based Waiver Services for Individuals 65 or Older Provider Manual, effective 01/01/2013; incorporates by reference the Personal Care Provider Manual, with its attachments, effective 01/01/2013; incorporates by reference the Utah Home and Community-Based Waiver Services for Individuals with Acquired Brain Injury Age 18 and Older Provider Manual, effective 01/01/2013; incorporates by reference the Utah Home and Community-Based Waiver Services for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities or Other Related Conditions Provider Manual, effective 01/01/2013; incorporates by reference the Utah Home and Community-Based Waiver Services for Individuals with Physical Disabilities Provider Manual, effective 01/01/2013; incorporates by reference the Utah Home and Community-Based Waiver Services New Choices Waiver Provider Manual, effective 01/01/2013; incorporates by reference the Utah Home and Community-Based Waiver Services for Technology Dependent, Medically Fragile Individuals Provider Manual, effective 01/01/2013; the Office of Inspector General Administrative Hearings Procedures Manual, effective 01/01/2013; the Pharmacy Services Provider Manual with its attachments, effective 01/01/2013; and the Coverage and Reimbursement Code Look-up Tool, effective 01/01/2013. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There is no budget impact because this change only fulfills the requirement to incorporate the State Plan by reference. Implementation of the State Plan is within legislative budget allotments. Further, the rule's incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy described in the provider manuals does not create costs or savings to the Department or other state agencies. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no budget impact because this change only fulfills the requirement to incorporate the State Plan by reference. Implementation of the State Plan is within legislative budget allotments. Further, the rule's incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy described in the provider manuals does not create costs or savings to local governments. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There is no budget impact because this change only fulfills the requirement to incorporate the State Plan by reference. Implementation of the State Plan is within legislative budget allotments. Further, the rule's incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy described in the provider manuals does not create costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no budget impact because this change only fulfills the requirement to incorporate the State Plan by reference. Implementation of the State Plan is within legislative budget allotments. Further, the rule's incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy described in the provider manuals does not create costs or savings to other persons or entities. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no compliance costs because this change only fulfills the requirement to incorporate the State Plan by reference. Implementation of the State Plan is within legislative budget allotments. Further, the rule's incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy described in the provider manuals does not create costs or savings to a single Medicaid recipient or provider. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This rule should not have a direct fiscal impact on business. Incorporation of the State Plan by this rule assures that the Medicaid program is implemented through administrative rule. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37122.htm HUMAN SERVICES RECOVERY SERVICES No. 37113 (Amendment): R527-258. Enforcing Child Support When the Obligor is an Ex-Prisoner or in a Treatment Program. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This change deletes the Section 78B-12-212 reference in the Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law section and adds Section 62A-11-326.1, 45 CFR 303.31, and 45 CFR 303.32. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There are no anticipated costs to the state budget because the change to the rule is only to delete a Utah Code Annotated reference and add one new state law reference and two federal regulations, which support the office enforcing an order with a medical support provision. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Administrative rules of the Office of Recovery Services/Child Support Services (ORS/CSS) do not apply to local government; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings for any local businesses due to this amendment. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There are no anticipated costs for small businesses because the change to the rule is only to delete a Utah Code Annotated reference and add one new state law reference and two federal regulations, which support the office enforcing an order with a medical support provision. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There are no anticipated costs for persons because the change to the rule is only to delete a Utah Code Annotated reference and add one new state law reference and two federal regulations, which support the office enforcing an order with a medical support provision. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no costs as the change to the rule is only to delete a Utah Code Annotated reference and add one new state law reference and two federal regulations, which support the office enforcing an order with a medical support provision. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: There is no fiscal impact to businesses as the change to the rule is only to delete a Utah Code Annotated reference and add one new state law reference and two federal regulations, which support the office enforcing an order with a medical support provision. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - LeAnn Wilber by phone at 801-536-8950, by FAX at 801-536-8509, or by Internet E-mail at lwilber@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37113.htm SERVICES FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES No. 37163 (Amendment): R539-3. Rights and Protections. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The additional language in the rule adds privacy protection guidelines for use of electronic surveillance when monitoring persons with disabilities. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: This rule affects providers by requiring criteria for the use of electronic surveillance should they choose to use such a system. Therefore no cost increase is expected in the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This rule affects providers by requiring criteria for the use of electronic surveillance should they choose to use such a system. Therefore no cost increase is expected for local governments. The disability program is run through private contractor provider networks and imposes no burden on local governments. - SMALL BUSINESSES: The Division is not requiring the use of electronic surveillance. While some costs associated with meeting criteria for electronic surveillance privacy measures may be incurred, the rule does not dictate that any electronic surveillance is required. Costs to providers are on an elective basis. Requirements listed in this change are minimal and required for the person's privacy and to meet existing rules and regulations. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: This rule provides privacy protections ensuring that persons cannot be electronically surveilled without prior written consent and approval by the Human Rights Committee. Protections are at no cost to the person. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: No costs expected to affect persons with disabilities, person's families or guardians as part of this rule change. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: There will be no costs or savings associated with this rule. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov - Nathan Wolfley by phone at 801-538-4154, by FAX at 801-538-4279, or by Internet E-mail at nwolfley@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37163.htm INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION No. 37118 (Amendment): R590-164. Uniform Health Billing Rule. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The rule is being updated to incorporate new standards for electronic billing of health insurance claims submitted by health care providers to insurers. Additionally, the revisions adopt the uniform standards for eligibility and coordination of benefits information as required by H.B. 52 (2010). ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The changes to this rule will not change the work load of the Insurance Department nor will they change the revenues or expenses of the department or state. The changes deal with the billing process between insurance companies and health care providers. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: The changes to this rule will not impact local government since they deal with the relationship between insurance companies and health care providers. - SMALL BUSINESSES: The changes to this rule may impact health care providers and insurers that have not kept pace with changes taking place in the uniform medical billing process. These employers may be small, as well as large employer groups. Those not keeping pace with the changes will incur costs to update their existing electronic programs. It should not require the addition or deletion of employees. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: The changes to this rule may impact health care providers and insurers that have not kept up with the changes taking place in the uniform medical billing process. These employers may be small, as well as large employer groups. Those not keeping pace with the changes will incur costs to update their existing electronic programs. It should not require the addition or deletion of employees. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Insurance company and health care provider employers that have not kept pace with changes in uniform medical billing will need to pay to update their existing electronic programs to comply with the new requirements. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: Many of those affected by this rule are keeping up with the changes as they occur. Those that have not will need to catch up by updating their existing electronic computer programs to comply with the new requirements. The cost will vary from employer to employer. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Jilene Whitby by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by Internet E-mail at jwhitby@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37118.htm LABOR COMMISSION INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS No. 37129 (Repeal): R612-1. Workers' Compensation Rules - Procedures. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The existing Rule R612-1 will be repealed in its entirety. The substance of the existing rule will be reenacted in new Rules R612-100 and R612-200. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new Rule R612-100 is under DAR No. 37124, and the proposed new Rule R612-200 is under DAR No. 37125 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The repeal of existing Rule R612-1 and reenactment of its substantive provisions in Rules R612-100 and R612-200 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-1, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in the new Rules R612-100 and R612-200, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37129.htm No. 37130 (Repeal): R612-2. Workers' Compensation Rules - Health Care Providers. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The existing Rule R612-2 will be repealed in its entirety. The substance of the existing rule will be reenacted in new Rules R612-100 and R612-300. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new Rule R612-100 is under DAR No. 37124, and the proposed new Rule R612-300 is under DAR No. 37126 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The repeal of existing Rule R612-2 and reenactment of its substantive provisions in new Rules R612-100 and R612- 300 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-2, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in new Rules R612-100 and R612-300, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37130.htm No. 37131 (Repeal): R612-3. Workers' Compensation Rules - Self-Insurance. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The existing Rule R612-3 will be repealed in its entirety. The substance of the existing rule will be reenacted in new Rules R612-100 and R612-400. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new Rule R612-100 is under DAR No. 37124, and the proposed new Rule R612-400 is under DAR No. 37127 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs of savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The repeal of existing Rule R612-3 and reenactment of its substantive provisions in Rules R612-100 and R612-400 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-3, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in the new Rules R612-100 and R612-400, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37131.htm No. 37132 (Repeal): R612-4. Premium Rates. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The exiting Rule R612-4 will be repealed in its entirety. The substance of the existing rule will be reenacted in new Rules R612-100 and R612-400. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new Rule R612-100 is under DAR No. 37124, and the proposed new Rule R612-400 is under DAR No. 37127 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The repeal of existing Rule R612-4 and reenactment of its substantive provisions in new Rules R612-100 and R612- 400 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-4, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in new Rules R612-100 and R612-400, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37132.htm No. 37133 (Repeal): R612-5. Employee Leasing Company Workers' Compensation Insurance Policy Endorsements. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The existing Rule R612-5 will be repealed in its entirety. The substance of the existing rules will be reenacted in new Rules R612-100 and R612-400. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new Rule R612-100 is under DAR No. 37124, and the proposed new Rule R612-400 is under DAR No. 37127 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The repeal of existing Rule R612-5 and reenactment of its substantive provisions in Rules R612-100 and R612-400 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-5, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in new Rules R612-100 and R612-400, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37133.htm No. 37134 (Repeal): R612-6. Notification of Workers' Compensation Insurance Coverage. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The existing Rule R612-6 will be repealed in its entirety. The substance of the existing rule will be reenacted in new Rule R612-400. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new Rule R612-400 is under DAR No. 37127 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to the local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The repeal of existing Rule R612-6 and reenactment of its substantive provision in Rule R612-400 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-6, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in the new Rule R612-400, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37134.htm No. 37135 (Repeal): R612-7. Impairment Ratings for Industrial Injuries and Diseases. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The existing Rule R612-6 will be repealed in its entirety. The substance of the existing rule will be reenacted in new Rules R612-100 and R612-300. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new Rule R612-100 is under DAR No. 37124, and the proposed new Rule R612-300 is under DAR No. 37126 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The repeal of existing Rule R612-6 and reenactment of its substantive provisions in Rules R612-100 and R612-300 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-6, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in the new Rules R612-100 and R612-300, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37135.htm No. 37136 (Repeal): R612-8. Procedural Guidelines for the Reemployment Act. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The existing Rule R612-8 will be repealed in its entirety. The substance of the existing rule will be reenacted in new Rules R612-100 and R612-500. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new Rule R612-100 is under DAR No. 37124, and the proposed new Rule R612-500 is under DAR No. 37128 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The repeal of existing Rule R612-8 and reenactment of its substantive provisions in Rules R612-100 and R612-500 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-8, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in the new Rules R612-100 and R612-500, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37136.htm No. 37137 (Repeal): R612-9. Designation of the Initial Assessment of Noncompliance Penalties as an "Informal" Proceeding. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The existing Rule R612-9 will be repealed in its entirety. The substance of the existing rule will be reenacted in new Rule R612-100. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new Rule R612-100 is under DAR No. 37124 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The repeal of existing Rule R612-9 and reenactment of its substantive provisions as Rule R612-100 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-9, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in the new Rule R612-100, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37137.htm No. 37138 (Repeal): R612-10. HIV, Hepatitis B and C Testing and Reporting for Emergency Medical Services Providers. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The existing Rule R612-10 will be repealed in its entirety. The substance of the existing rule will be reenacted in new Rule R612-300. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new Rule R612-300 is under DAR No. 37126 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The repeal of existing Rule R612-10 and reenactment of its substantive provisions in Rule R612-300 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-10, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in the new Rule R612-300, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37138.htm No. 37139 (Repeal): R612-11. Prohibition of Direct Payments by Insured Employer. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The existing Rule R612-11 will be repealed in its entirety. The substance of the existing rule will be reenacted in new Rule R612-100. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new Rule R612-100 is under DAR No. 37124 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The repeal of existing Rule R612-11 and reenactment of its substantive provisions in Rule R612-100 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-11, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in the new Rule R612-100, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37139.htm No. 37140 (Repeal): R612-12. Workers' Compensation Coverage Waivers. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The existing Rule R612-12 will be repealed in its entirety. The substance of the existing rule will be reenacted in new Rules R612-100 and R612-400. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new Rule R612-100 is under DAR No. 37124, and the proposed new Rule R612-400 is under DAR No. 37127 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The repeal of existing Rule R612-12 and reenactment of its substantive provisions in Rules R612-100 and R612-400 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-12, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in the new Rules R612-100 and R612-400, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37140.htm No. 37141 (Repeal): R612-13. Proceedings to Impose Non-Reporting Penalties Against Employers. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The existing Rule R612-13 will be repealed in its entirety. The substance of the existing rule will be reenacted in new Rule R612-100. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new Rule R612-100 is under DAR No. 37124 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the existing rule will be reenacted as a new rule, repeal of the existing rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The repeal of existing Rule R612-13 and reenactment of its substantive provisions in Rule R612-100 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-13, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in the new Rule R612-100, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37141.htm No. 37124 (New Rule): R612-100. Workers' Compensation Rules - General Provisions. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The proposed Rule R612-100 contains the authority, definitions, official forms, and the designation of proceedings as informal provisions of existing Rules R612-1, R612-2, R612-3, R612-4, R612-5, R612-7, R612-8, R612-9, R612-11, R612-12, and R612-13, which are being repealed. (DAR NOTE: The proposed repeal of Rule R612-1 is under DAR No. 37129, the proposed repeal of Rule R612-2 is under DAR No. 37130, the proposed repeal of Rule R612-3 is under DAR No. 37131, the proposed repeal of Rule R612-4 is under DAR No. 37132, the proposed repeal of Rule R612-5 is under DAR No. 37133, the proposed repeal of Rule R612-7 is under DAR No. 37135, the proposed repeal of Rule R612-8 is under DAR No. 37136, the proposed repeal of Rule R612-9 is under DAR No. 37137, the proposed repeal of Rule R612-11 is under DAR No. 37139, the proposed repeal of Rule R612-12 is under DAR No. 37140, and the proposed repeal of Rule R612-13 is under DAR No. 37141 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Reenactment of the authority, definitions, official forms, and the designation of proceedings as informal, substantive provisions currently found in Rule R612-1, R612-2, R612-3, R612- 4, R612-5, R612-7, R612-8, R612-9, R612-11, R612-12, and R612-13 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rules R612-1, R612-2, R612-3, R612-4, R612-5, R612-7, R612-8, R612-9, R612-11, R612-12, and R612-13, coupled with reenactment of the rules' substantive provisions in a more logical format is intended to make the rules easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37124.htm No. 37125 (New Rule): R612-200. Workers' Compensation Rules - Filing and Paying Claims. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The proposed Rule R612-200 contains the substance of existing Rule R612-1, which is being repealed. (DAR NOTE: The proposed repeal of Rule R612-1 is under DAR No. 37129 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Reenactment of the substantive provisions currently found in Rule R612-1 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-1, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in a more logical format is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37125.htm No. 37126 (New Rule): R612-300. Workers' Compensation Rules - Medical Care. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The proposed Rule R612-300 contains the substance of existing Rules R612-2 and R612-10, which are being repealed. (DAR NOTE: The proposed repeal of Rule R612-2 is under DAR No. 37130, and the proposed repeal of Rule R612-10 is under DAR No. 37138 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Reenactment of the substantive provisions currently found in Rules R612-2 and R612-10 will not change interested parties’ rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rules R612-2 and R612-10, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in a more logical format, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37126.htm No. 37127 (New Rule): R612-400. Workers' Compensation Insurance, Self- Insurance and Waivers. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The proposed Rule R612-400 contains the substance of existing Rules R612-3, R612-5, R612-6, R612-12, and R612-4, which are being repealed. (DAR NOTE: The proposed repeal of Rule R612-3 is under DAR No. 37131, the proposed repeal of Rule R612-4 is under DAR No. 37132, the proposed repeal of Rule R612-5 is under DAR No. 37133, the proposed repeal of Rule R612-6 is under DAR No. 37134, and the proposed repeal of Rule R612-12 is under DAR No. 37140 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Reenactment of the substantive provisions currently found in Rules R612-3, R612-5, R612-6, R612-12, and R612-4, will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rules R612-3, R612-5, R612-6, R612-12, and R612-4, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in a more logical format, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37127.htm No. 37128 (New Rule): R612-500. Procedural Guidelines for the Reemployment Act. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The proposed Rule R612-500 contains the substance of existing Rule R612-8, which is being repealed. (DAR NOTE: The proposed repeal of Rule R612-8 is under DAR No. 37136 in this issue, January 15, 2013, of the Bulletin.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the substantive provisions of the new rule are the same as an existing rule that is being repealed, enactment of the new rule will not result in costs or savings to other affected persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Reenactment of the substantive provisions currently found in Rule R612-8 will not change interested parties' rights or duties and will not impose any compliance costs on affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The repeal of existing Rule R612-8, coupled with reenactment of the rule's substantive provisions in a more logical format, is intended to make the rule easier to find and use by businesses and all other stakeholders in the workers' compensation system. The Commission does not anticipate that the improved organization of these rules will result in any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ron Dressler by phone at 801-530-6841, by FAX at 801-530-6804, or by Internet E-mail at rdressler@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37128.htm NATURAL RESOURCES WATER RIGHTS No. 37119 (Repeal): R655-7. Administrative Procedures for Notifying the State Engineer of Sewage Effluent Use or Change in the Point of Discharge for Sewage Effluent. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This rule is repealed in its entirety. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: No cost involved, clarification of processing does not require a dollar figure. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: No cost involved, clarification of processing does not require a dollar figure. - SMALL BUSINESSES: No cost involved, clarification of processing does not require a dollar figure. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: No cost involved, clarification of processing does not require a dollar figure. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: None--No individual costs involved. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: No fiscal impact, clarification of process procedures does not require a dollar figure. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Marianne Burbidge by phone at 801-538-7370, by FAX at 801-538-7467, or by Internet E-mail at marianneburbidge@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37119.htm PUBLIC SAFETY HOMELAND SECURITY No. 37117 (New Rule): R704-2. Statewide Mutual Aid Act Activation. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This rule outlines procedures to be followed in the event that the Statewide Mutual Aid Act is activated. Specifically, this rule outlines procedures related to requests for disaster assistance in a state of emergency, agent of the state deployment, providing mutual aid, pre-mobilization of resources, mobilization of resources, demobilization of resources, mutual aid reimbursement, waiver of reimbursement, and reimbursable expenses. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: This is a procedural rule that outlines processes to follow in the event that the Statewide Mutual Aid Act is activated. As such, there is no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This is a procedural rule that outlines processes to follow in the event that the Statewide Mutual Aid Act is activated. As such, there is no anticipated costs or savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: This is a procedural rule that outlines processes to follow in the event that the Statewide Mutual Aid Act is activated. As such, there is no anticipated costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: This is a procedural rule that outlines processes to follow in the event that the Statewide Mutual Aid Act is activated. As such, there is no anticipated costs or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses or local government entities. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no compliance costs for affected persons. This rule strictly outlines procedures to be followed in the event that the Statewide Mutual Aid Act is activated. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: There is no anticipated fiscal impact on businesses associated with this rule. This is a procedural rule that outlines processes associated with Statewide Mutual Aid Act activation. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Jerrianne Kolby by phone at 801-209-7513, or by Internet E-mail at jkolby@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37117.htm PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ADMINISTRATION No. 37116 (Amendment): R746-313. Electric Service Reliability. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The term MAIFI is replaced with MAIFIe in Sections R746-313-2, R746-313-4, R746-313-7. The requirements to report MAIFIe data are clarified in Section R746-313-7 and removed from Section R746-313-8. In addition, the word "reliability" is added in Section R746- 313-7 to clarify the requirements to provide specific information for reliability reporting areas. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: This rule amendment will have no cost effect on the state budget because it only pertains to the reporting of electrical system momentary interruption data by electric corporations. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This rule amendment will have no cost effect on local governments in general or local governments who operate their own municipal electric utility systems because it only pertains to the reporting of electrical system momentary interruption data by electric corporations. - SMALL BUSINESSES: This rule amendment will have no direct cost effect on small businesses because it only pertains to the reporting of electrical system momentary interruption data by electric corporations. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: This rule amendment will have no cost effect on persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities because it only pertains to the reporting of electrical system momentary interruption data by electric corporations. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: This rule amendment reduces reporting requirements for electrical corporations but does not materially effect compliance costs of the entire rule. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This rule amendment will have no fiscal impact on businesses as the amendment provides only for minor changes and clarifications for reporting of electric system outage data applicable only to electric corporations INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 02/14/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - David Clark by phone at 801-530-6708, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by Internet E-mail at drexclark@utah.gov - Sheri Bintz by phone at 801-530-6714, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by Internet E-mail at sbintz@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/21/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37116.htm 3. NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES After an agency has published a Proposed Rule in the Utah State Bulletin, it may receive public comment that requires the Proposed Rule to be altered before it goes into effect. A Change in Proposed Rule allows an agency to respond to comments it receives. While the law does not designate a comment period for a Change in Proposed Rule, it does provide for a 30-day waiting period. An agency may accept additional comments during this period, and, at its option, may designate a comment period or may hold a public hearing. The 30-day waiting period for Changes in Proposed Rules published in Utah State Bulletin ends February 14, 2013. From the end of the 30-day waiting period through May 15, 2013, an agency may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants to make the Change in Proposed Rule effective. When an agency submits a Notice of Effective Date for a Change in Proposed Rule, the Proposed Rule as amended by the Change in Proposed Rule becomes the effective rule. The agency sets the effective date. The date may be no fewer than 30 days nor more than 120 days after the publication of the Change in Proposed Rule. If the agency designates a public comment period, the effective date may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period nor more than 120 days after the publication date. Alternatively, the agency may file another Change in Proposed Rule in response to additional comments received. If the Division of Administrative Rules does not receive a Notice of Effective Date or another Change in Proposed Rule by the end of the 120-day period after publication, the Change in Proposed Rule filings, along with its associated Proposed Rule, lapses and the agency must start the process over. Changes in Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-303; Rule R15-2; and Sections R15-4-3, R15-4-5, R15-4-7, and R15-4-9. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ADMINISTRATION No. 36776 (Change in Proposed Rule): R305-9. Recusal of a Board Member for Conflict of Interest. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: Board members are required under the change to bring to the board any matter that may be prohibited under the Utah Public Officers' and Employees' Ethics Act. As proposed, the rule required board members to bring only matters that were prohibited under the act. (DAR NOTE: This change in proposed rule has been filed to make additional changes to a proposed new rule that was published in the October 1, 2012, issue of the Utah State Bulletin, on page 28. Underlining in the rule below indicates text that has been added since the publication of the proposed rule mentioned above; strike-out indicates text that has been deleted. You must view the change in proposed rule and the proposed new rule together to understand all of the changes that will be enforceable should the agency make this rule effective.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There will be no impact on the state's budget; the only impact will be on the ability of individual board members to participate in the board's decision-making process. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There will be no impact on local government budgets; the only impact will be on the ability of individual board members to participate in the board's decision-making process. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There will be no fiscal impact on small businesses; the only impact will be on the ability of individual board members to participate in the board's decision-making process. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There will be no fiscal impact on other persons; the only impact will be on the ability of individual board members to participate in the board's decision-making process. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The only persons impacted will be individual board members. There will be no compliance costs associated with determinations about their ability to participate in the board's decision- making process. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: There will be no fiscal impact on businesses; the only impact will be on the ability of individual board members to participate in the board's decision-making process. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Debbie Oberndorfer by phone at 801-536-4402, by FAX at 801-536-0061, or by Internet E-mail at doberndorfer@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/15/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/36776.htm 4. NOTICES OF 120-DAY (EMERGENCY) RULES An agency may file a 120-Day (Emergency) Rule when it finds that the regular rulemaking procedures would: (a) cause an imminent peril to the public health, safety, or welfare; (b) cause an imminent budget reduction because of budget restraints or federal requirements; or (c) place the agency in violation of federal or state law (Subsection 63G-3- 304(1)). A 120-Day Rule is effective at the moment the Division of Administrative Rules receives the filing, or on a later date designated by the agency. A 120-Day Rule is effective for 120 days or until it is superseded by a permanent rule. Because 120-Day Rules are effective immediately, the law does not require a public comment period. However, when an agency files a 120-Day Rule, it usually files a Proposed Rule at the same time, to make the requirements permanent. Comment may be made on the Proposed Rule. Emergency or 120-Day Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-304; and Section R15-4-8. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL ADMINISTRATION No. 37114 (Emergency Rule): R81-1-31. Duties of Commission Subcommittees. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The proposed Section R81-1-31 defines the duties of the two commission subcommittees -- the Compliance, Licensing and Enforcement Subcommittee, and the Operations and Procurement Subcommittee. EMERGENCY RULE REASON AND JUSTIFICATION: REGULAR RULEMAKING PROCEDURES WOULD place the agency in violation of federal or state law. JUSTIFICATION: Emergency rulemaking is necessary for the agency to comply with state statute that administrative rules be in place within six months of enactment. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: None--This rule filing simply makes the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (DABC) rules consistent with the new statute. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: None--This rule filing simply makes the DABC rules consistent with the new statute. - SMALL BUSINESSES: None--This rule filing simply makes the DABC rules consistent with the new statute. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: None--Any cost or savings result directly from S.B 66 (2012), not from this rule filing simply makes the DABC rules consistent with the new statute. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: None--Any cost or savings result directly from S.B 66 (2012), not from this rule filing simply makes the DABC rules consistent with the new statute. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: None--This rule filing simply makes the DABC rules consistent with the new statute. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Nina McDermott by phone at 801-977-6805, by FAX at 801-977-6888, or by Internet E-mail at nmcdermott@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/18/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37114.htm No. 37115 (Emergency Rule): R81-2-12. Store Site Selection. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: It is necessary for the commission to write emergency rules to comply with Subsection 32B-2-202(i)(c)(ii), which requires a rule for state store selection. EMERGENCY RULE REASON AND JUSTIFICATION: REGULAR RULEMAKING PROCEDURES WOULD place the agency in violation of federal or state law. JUSTIFICATION: An emergency rule is necessary for the agency to comply with state statute that administrative rules be in place within six months of enactment. Here it has been six months since enactment and no rule has been put in place regarding store site selection as required by Subsection 32B-2- 202(1)(c)(ii). ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: None--This rule simply makes the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (DABC) rules consistent with statute. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: None--This rule simply makes the DABC rules consistent with statute. - SMALL BUSINESSES: None--This rule simply makes the DABC rules consistent with statute. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: None--This rule simply makes the DABC rules consistent with statute. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: None--This rule simply makes the DABC rules consistent with statute. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: None--This rule simply makes the DABC rules consistent with statute. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Nina McDermott by phone at 801-977-6805, by FAX at 801-977-6888, or by Internet E-mail at nmcdermott@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/18/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37115.htm HEALTH HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY No. 37120 (Emergency Rule): R414-303. Coverage Groups. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This change removes coverage for the QI program and for the 12-month Transitional Medicaid program, both of which are due to sunset under federal statute after 12/31/2012. (DAR NOTE: With the passage of Sections 621 and 622 of H.R. 8, American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, signed on 01/02/2013, another emergency rule was filed under DAR No. 37173 that restores these programs as of 01/07/2013, and supersedes this emergency rule. The emergency rule under DAR No. 37173 will be published in the February 1, 2013, issue of the Bulletin.) EMERGENCY RULE REASON AND JUSTIFICATION: REGULAR RULEMAKING PROCEDURES WOULD cause an imminent budget reduction because of budget restraints or federal requirements; and place the agency in violation of federal or state law. JUSTIFICATION: Federal authority to provide medical assistance under both of these coverage groups ends after 12/31/2012. There will be no federal funds to provide medical assistance to anyone under these two coverage groups. The Qualifying Individuals program is 100% federal match dollars, while the 12- month Transitional Medicaid program is at the regular federal match rate of about 70% federal funds, and 30% state funds. (See DAR NOTE under the summary above.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The state cost for the number of enrolled persons in these two programs would be about $1,286,013 per month if the Department were to continue coverage after the federal sunset date. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This change does not create costs for local governments because they do not provide Medicaid services. - SMALL BUSINESSES: This change could create a cost for some medical providers who could lose some revenue because they would not be able to provide services to individuals who previously had Medicaid coverage. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: This change creates a cost of about $1,286,013 for individuals who will lose their medical benefits as a result of this change. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: An individual who loses eligibility for the Qualifying Individuals program will incur a cost of $104.90 a month to pay the Medicare Part B premium. An individual losing eligibility for the 12-month Transitional Medicaid program could incur medical costs of any amount because the individual will not have Medicaid coverage. Some individuals losing coverage under the 12-month Transitional Medicaid program may qualify for a different Medicaid program, such as Child Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program, and still have medical assistance. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: Lack of federal funding as of 01/01/2013 necessitates termination of this Medicaid eligibility group. Fiscal impact on businesses that serve Medicaid clients that qualify through this program is unavoidable. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 01/01/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37120.htm No. 37121 (Emergency Rule): R414-306. Program Benefits and Date of Eligibility. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This change removes language about the benefits and coverage period for individuals eligible for the Qualifying Individuals program, which is due to sunset under federal statute after 12/31/2012. (DAR NOTE: With the passage of Section 621 of H.R. 8, American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, signed on 01/02/2013, another emergency rule was filed under DAR No. 37174 that restores this program as of 01/07/2013, and supersedes this emergency rule. The emergency rule under DAR No. 37174 will be published in the February 1, 2013, issue of the Bulletin.) EMERGENCY RULE REASON AND JUSTIFICATION: REGULAR RULEMAKING PROCEDURES WOULD cause an imminent budget reduction because of budget restraints or federal requirements; and place the agency in violation of federal or state law. JUSTIFICATION: Federal authority to provide medical assistance for Qualifying Individuals ends after 12/31/2012. There will be no federal funds to provide medical assistance to anyone under this coverage group. The Qualifying Individuals program is 100% federal match dollars. (See DAR NOTE under the summary above.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The state cost for the number of enrolled persons in the Qualifying Individuals group is about $201,513 per month if the Department were to continue coverage after the federal sunset date. This cost, however, is considered in the companion filing for Rule R414-303, which actually removes coverage for this group. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This change does not create costs for local governments because they do not determine Medicaid eligibility. - SMALL BUSINESSES: This change will not cost small businesses anything because the Qualifying Individuals program only pays the Medicare Part B premium. It does not provide any other benefits. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: This change creates a cost of about $201,513 for individuals who will lose medical benefits as a result of this change. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: An individual who loses eligibility for the Qualifying Individuals program will incur a cost of $104.90 a month to pay the Medicare Part B premium. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: Lack of federal funding as of 01/01/2013 necessitates termination of this Medicaid eligibility group. Fiscal impact on businesses that serve Medicaid clients that qualify through this program is unavoidable. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 01/01/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37121.htm 5. FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION Within five years of an administrative rule's original enactment or last five-year review, the agency is required to review the rule. This review is intended to remove obsolete rules from the Utah Administrative Code. Upon reviewing a rule, an agency may: repeal the rule by filing a Proposed Rule; continue the rule as it is by filing a Notice of Review and Statement of Continuation (Notice); or amend the rule by filing a Proposed Rule and by filing a Notice. By filing a Notice, the agency indicates that the rule is still necessary. The rule text that is being continued may be found in the most recent edition of the Utah Administrative Code. The rule text may also be inspected at the agency or the Division of Administrative Rules. Notices are effective upon filing. Notices are governed by Section 63G-3-305. EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION No. 37142 (5-year Review): R277-484. Data Standards. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule is continued because it provides procedures necessary for certain data collection essential to the operation of statewide educational accountability and financial systems. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37142.htm No. 37143 (5-year Review): R277-487. Public School Student Confidentiality. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule is continued because it provides necessary standards and procedures related to public school student information and confidentiality. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37143.htm PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ADMINISTRATION No. 37112 (5-year Review): R746-346. Operator-Assisted Services. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: Section 54-8b-13 continues to require this rule. This rule ensures that customers of operator-assisted services are informed of rates, surcharges, terms, or conditions of using operator-assisted services. The rule contains requirements for information: to be provided at the telephone set; to inform customers as to which provider is providing the service, or that a call is being transferred to another provider; and requirements for providers of operator-assisted services before a call is completed and when a call is "uncompleted". Requirements for 911 calls, "0" calls, and end-user choice are also provided in this rule. Availability of customer complaint toll-free number requirements are contained in this rule, along with caller access when a call aggregator is involved. This rule also contains enforcement provisions. Therefore, the rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - David Clark by phone at 801-530-6708, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by Internet E-mail at drexclark@utah.gov - Sheri Bintz by phone at 801-530-6714, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by Internet E-mail at sbintz@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/17/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37112.htm 6. NOTICES OF FIVE-YEAR REVIEW EXTENSIONS Rulewriting agencies are required by law to review each of their administrative rules within five years of the date of the rule's original enactment or the date of last review (Section 63G-3-305). If the agency finds that it will not meet the deadline for review of the rule (the five- year anniversary date), it may file an extension with the Division of Administrative Rules. The extension permits the agency to file the review up to 120 days beyond the anniversary date. Agencies have filed extensions for the rules listed below. The "Extended Due Date" is 120 days after the anniversary date. The five-year review extension is governed by Subsections 63G-3-305(4) and (5). EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION No. 37156 (Five-Year Extension): R277-469. Instructional Materials Commission Operating Procedures. EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had all of the rules due in March 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rules to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 07/01/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37156.htm No. 37157 (Five-Year Extension): R277-483. Persistently Dangerous Schools. EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had all of the rules due in March 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rules to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 07/01/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37157.htm No. 37158 (Five-Year Extension): R277-485. Loss of Enrollment. EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had all of the rules due in March 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rules to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 07/01/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37158.htm No. 37159 (Five-Year Extension): R277-508. Employment of Substitute Teachers. EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had all of the rules due in March 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rules to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 07/01/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37159.htm No. 37148 (Five-Year Extension): R277-518. Career and Technical Education Licenses. EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had all of the rules due in January 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rules to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 05/08/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37148.htm No. 37149 (Five-Year Extension): R277-600. Student Transportation Standards and Procedures. EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had all of the rules due in January 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rules to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 05/08/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37149.htm No. 37150 (Five-Year Extension): R277-605. Coaching Standards and Athletic Clinics. EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had all of the rules due in January 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rules to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 05/08/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37150.htm No. 37151 (Five-Year Extension): R277-610. Released-Time Classes. EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had all of the rules due in January 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rules to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 05/08/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37151.htm No. 37152 (Five-Year Extension): R277-700. The Elementary and Secondary School Core Curriculum. EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had all of the rules due in January 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rules to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 05/08/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37152.htm No. 37153 (Five-Year Extension): R277-702. Procedures for the Utah High School Completion Diploma (Effective on July 1, 2009). EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had all of the rules due in January 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rules to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 05/08/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37153.htm No. 37154 (Five-Year Extension): R277-709. Education Programs Serving Youth in Custody. EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had all of the rules due in January 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rules to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 05/08/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37154.htm No. 37155 (Five-Year Extension): R277-719. Standards for Selling Foods Outside of the Reimbursable Meal in Schools. EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had the rule due in February 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rule to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 06/07/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37155.htm No. 37160 (Five-Year Extension): R277-746. Driver Education Programs for Utah Schools. EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had all of the rules due in March 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rules to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 07/01/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37160.htm No. 37161 (Five-Year Extension): R277-751. Special Education Extended School Year (ESY). EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had all of the rules due in March 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rules to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 07/01/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37161.htm REHABILITATION No. 37162 (Five-Year Extension): R280-200. Rehabilitation. EXTENSION REASON: The agency overlooked one of the pages that had all of the rules due in March 2013 making it impossible for them to get the necessary rules to the Board for review in time. New deadline is 07/01/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/31/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37162.htm NATURAL RESOURCES WATER RIGHTS No. 37123 (Five-Year Extension): R655-7. Administrative Procedures for Notifying the State Engineer of Sewage Effluent Use or Change in the Point of Discharge for Sewage Effluent. EXTENSION REASON: The agency requested an extension because they are in the process of repealing this rule but the process will not be complete before the deadline for the five-year review. The new deadline is 06/01/2013. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Marianne Burbidge by phone at 801-538-7370, by FAX at 801-538-7467, or by Internet E-mail at marianneburbidge@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 12/28/2012 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130115/37123.htm 7. NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES State law provides for agencies to make their rules effective and enforceable after publication in the Utah State Bulletin. In the case of Proposed Rules or Changes in Proposed Rules with a designated comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of effective date any time after the close of comment plus seven days. In the case of Changes in Proposed Rules with no designated comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of effective date on any date including or after the thirtieth day after the rule's publication date. If an agency fails to file a Notice of Effective Date within 120 days from the publication of a Proposed Rule or a related Change in Proposed Rule the rule lapses and the agency must start the rulemaking process over. Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301(12), 63G-3- 303, and Sections R15-4-5a and 5b. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION AND MANAGEMENT No. 37026 (AMD): R23-14.Management of Roofs on State Buildings Published: 11/15/2012 Effective: 12/24/2012 EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION No. 36946 (AMD): R277-108-5.Assurances Published: 11/01/2012 Effective: 12/17/2012 No. 36947 (AMD): R277-422.State Supported Voted Local Levy, Board Local Levy and Reading Improvement Program Published: 11/01/2012 Effective: 12/17/2012 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ADMINISTRATION No. 36775 (NEW): R305-8.Board Member Attendance Requirements Published: 10/01/2012 Effective: 12/19/2012 AIR QUALITY No. 36611 (CPR): R307-302.Solid Fuel Burning Devices in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and Weber Counties Published: 12/01/2012 Effective: 01/01/2013 No. 36611 (AMD): R307-302.Davis, Salt Lake, Utah, Weber Counties: Residential Fireplaces and Stoves Published: 08/15/2012 Effective: 01/01/2013 No. 36483 (AMD): R307-309.Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas for PM10: Fugitive Emissions and Fugitive Dust Published: 08/01/2012 Effective: 01/01/2013 No. 36483 (CPR): R307-309.Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas for PM10 and PM2.5: Fugitive Emissions and Fugitive Dust Published: 12/01/2012 Effective: 01/01/2013 No. 36482 (AMD): R307-335.Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: Degreasing and Solvent Cleaning Operations Published: 08/01/2012 Effective: 01/01/2013 No. 36482 (CPR): R307-335.Degreasing and Solvent Cleaning Operations Published: 12/01/2012 Effective: 01/01/2013 No. 36604 (CPR): R307-356.Appliance Pilot Light Published: 12/01/2012 Effective: 01/01/2013 No. 36604 (NEW): R307-356.Appliance Pilot Light Published: 08/15/2012 Effective: 01/01/2013 FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ADMINISTRATION No. 37020 (AMD): R331-23.Lending Limits for Banks, Industrial Loan Corporations Published: 11/15/2012 Effective: 12/24/2012 GOVERNOR PLANNING AND BUDGET, INSPECTOR GENERAL OF MEDICAID SERVICES (OFFICE OF) No. 36993 (AMD): R367-1.Office of Inspector General of Medicaid Services Published: 11/15/2012 Effective: 12/27/2012 HEALTH FAMILY HEALTH AND PREPAREDNESS, WIC SERVICES No. 37008 (AMD): R406-100-1.Incorporation of Federal Regulations Published: 11/15/2012 Effective: 12/27/2012 HUMAN SERVICES AGING AND ADULT SERVICES No. 36920 (AMD): R510-302.Adult Protective Services Published: 11/01/2012 Effective: 12/21/2012 SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH No. 37009 (NEW): R523-2.Adult Peer Support Specialist Training and Certification Published: 11/15/2012 Effective: 12/27/2012 No. 37010 (NEW): R523-3.Child/Family Peer Support Specialist Training and Certification Published: 11/15/2012 Effective: 12/27/2012 LABOR COMMISSION ADJUDICATION No. 36989 (AMD): R602-2-4.Attorney Fees Published: 11/15/2012 Effective: 12/24/2012 INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS No. 36990 (AMD): R612-4-2.Premium Rates for the Uninsured Employers' Fund and the Employers' Reinsurance Fund Published: 11/15/2012 Effective: 12/24/2012 PUBLIC SAFETY DRIVER LICENSE No. 36950 (AMD): R708-47.Emergency Contact Database Published: 11/15/2012 Effective: 12/26/2012 8. RULES INDEX The Rules Index is a cumulative index that reflects all effective Utah administrative rules. The Rules Index is not included Digest. However, a copy of the current Rules Index is available http://www.rules.utah.gov/research.htm . <>