Utah State Digest, Vol. 2013, No. 12 (June 15, 2013) [NOTE: The Utah State Digest (Digest) is created from the eRules filing database used to create the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin). While a discrepancy between the Digest and the Bulletin is highly unlikely, any discrepancies will be resolved in favor of the Bulletin. Please refer to the State Disclaimer ( http://www.utah.gov/disclaimer.html ) for more information.] ------------------------------------------------------------ UTAH STATE DIGEST Summary of the Contents of the Utah State Bulletin For information filed May 16, 2013, 12:00 AM through May 31, 2013, 11:59 PM Volume 2013, No. 12 June 15, 2013 Prepared by Division of Administrative Rules Department of Administrative Services The Utah State Digest (Digest) is an official electronic publication of the State of Utah, Department of Administrative Services, Division of Administrative Rules. It is a summary of the information found in the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin) of the same volume and issue number. Inquiries concerning the substance or applicability of an administrative rule that appear in the Digest should be addressed to the contact person for the rule. Questions about the Digest or the rulemaking process may be addressed to: Division of Administrative Rules, 4120 State Office Building, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-1201, telephone 801-538-3218, FAX 801-359-0759. Additional rulemaking information, and electronic versions of all administrative rule publications are available at: http://www.rules.utah.gov/ . The Digest is available free of charge online at http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm and by E-mail Listserv. ************************************************ Division of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City 84114 Unless otherwise noted, all information presented in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as desired. Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted by their respective authors. Citation to the source is requested. Utah state digest. Semimonthly. 1. Delegated legislation--Utah--Digests. I. Utah. Office of Administrative Rules. KFU38.U8 348.792'025--DDC 86-658042 *********************************************** 1. EDITOR'S NOTES Error in Publication of the Expiration of Rule R436-11 - Nancy Lancaster by phone at 801-538-3218, by FAX at 801-537-9240, or by Internet E-mail at nllancaster@utah.gov FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/ed154271.htm 2. SPECIAL NOTICES Notice for July 2013 Medicaid Rate Changes - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/sn154236.htm Podiatric Services - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/sn154247.htm Medicaid Outpatient Upper Payment Limit (UPL) - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/sn154266.htm Dental Services - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/sn154267.htm Home Health Services - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/sn154268.htm Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/sn154269.htm 3. NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES A state agency may file a Proposed Rule when it determines the need for a new rule, a substantive change to an existing rule, or a repeal of an existing rule. Filings received between May 16, 2013, 12:00 a.m., and May 31, 2013, 11:59 p.m. are summarized in this, the June 15, 2013, issue of the Utah State Digest. The law requires that an agency accept public comment on Proposed Rules published in the June 15, 2013, issue of the Utah State Bulletin until at least July 15, 2013 (the Bulletin is the parent publication of the Digest). The agency may accept comment beyond this date and will indicate the last day the agency will accept comment in the rule information published below. The agency may also hold public hearings. Additionally, citizens or organizations may request the agency hold a hearing on a specific Proposed Rule. Section 63G-3-302 requires that a hearing request be received by the agency proposing the rule "in writing not more than 15 days after the publication date of the proposed rule." From the end of the public comment period through October 13, 2013, the agency may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants to make the Proposed Rule effective. The agency sets the effective date. The date may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period nor more than 120 days after the publication date in the Utah State Bulletin. Alternatively, the agency may file a Change in Proposed Rule in response to comments received. If the Division of Administrative Rules does not receive a Notice of Effective Date or a Change in Proposed Rule, the Proposed Rule lapses and the agency must start the process over. The public, interest groups, and governmental agencies are invited to review and comment on the Proposed Rules listed below. Comment may be directed to the contact person identified with each rule. Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-301; Rule R15-2; and Sections R15-4-3, R15-4-4, R15-4-5, R15-4-9, and R15-4-10. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ARCHIVES No. 37658 (Amendment): R17-7. Archival Records Care and Access at the State Archives. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: Section R17-7-5 is removed from the rule. An amendment in Section R17-7-3 gives the research room staff the authority to make sure patrons follow the instructions of the reference staff. Other minor typographical changes in Section R17-7-4 are made to ensure clarity of the language. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There will be no change to state budget as a result of the amendment of this rule. There was no cost to the addition of this section to the rule and there will be none to its removal. The rule affects classification of records already in the custody of the Archives. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There will be no change to any local government budget as a result of the amendment of this rule. There was no cost involved in the addition of this section to the rule and there will be no cost involved in its removal. The rule affects only records already in the custody of the Archives. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Small business are not affected by the amendment of this rule. The rule was amended for government agencies to classify records in the custody of the Archives. There will be no affect on small businesses as a result of this amendment. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Persons are not affected by the amendment of this rule. The possibility for classification of records by the Archives remains within its jurisdiction and small business are not affected by this rule or the amendment. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Persons are not affected by the amendment of this rule. The possibility for classification of records by the Archives remains within its jurisdiction and small business are not affected by this rule or the amendment. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This bill has no fiscal impact on business. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/15/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Susan Mumford by phone at 801-531-3861, by FAX at 801-531-3867, or by Internet E-mail at smumford@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/22/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37658.htm COMMERCE REAL ESTATE No. 37678 (Amendment): R162-2c. Utah Residential Mortgage Practices and Licensing Rules. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The changes: 1) remove the term "principal" from references in the rules to "principal lending manager" that are associated with the National Mortgage Licensing System (NMLS) to reflect the NMLS's description which only identifies a lending manger while the Division of Real Estate further classifies these individuals as a principal lending manager, branch lending manager, or associate lending manager; 2)(a) modify the school certification process by requiring the school to provide an email address for the school, its director, and owner; and by requiring the school to state the type of instruction method used in its courses; 2)(b) remove the initial school certification requirement of listing the offered courses, a schedule of the courses, and proof that the division certified each course; 2)(c) require a school seeking to renew its certification to list proposed courses, a proposed schedule, and supply the same information as required for course certification; 2)(d) for course certification, require that the school provide a copy of each quiz with an answer key; 2)(e) clarifying that prelicensing courses expire and are automatically renewed at the same time as the school certification; 3) require licensees to annually complete a division approved course on Utah law, beginning in the 2014 renewal period; and 4) impose new affirmative duties on schools to provide a course completion certificate to students and ensure that the course materials are current. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The state will save staff time and therefore money where the school provides email addresses because Division staff will spend less time attempting to contact the school's administrators. Minor staff time will be required to review and approve the course on Utah law. Thus, on balance the state budget will not be affected. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Local governments are not required to comply with or enforce the rules governing the mortgage industry. Therefore, no fiscal impact to local government will result from this filing. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Small businesses may have minor effects; specifically, schools would be required to submit new information for course and school certification. However, these costs will be mitigated by the elimination of other requirements. Moreover, schools already retain this new information required to be submitted and should incur minimal cost in providing it to the Division. Finally, schools may see a minimal cost in meeting the new affirmative duties by providing a course completion certificate and keeping their materials up to date. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Small businesses may have minor effects; specifically, schools would be required to submit new information for course and school certification. However, these costs will be mitigated by the elimination of other requirements. Moreover, schools already have this new information required to be submitted and should incur minimal cost in providing it to the Division. Finally, schools may see a minimal cost in meeting the new affirmative duties by providing a course completion certificate and keeping their materials up to date. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Small businesses may have minor effects; specifically, schools would be required to submit new information for course and school certification. However, these costs will be mitigated by the elimination of other requirements. Moreover, schools already have this new information required to be submitted and should incur minimal cost in providing it to the Division. Finally, schools may see a minimal cost in meeting the new affirmative duties by providing a course completion certificate and keeping their materials up to date. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: As stated above, any costs to mortgage education providers that are attendant to the proposed course certification and course content requirements should be offset by the removal of existing language that requires education providers to submit to the Division student evaluations of each course taught. In the balance, businesses are not expected to experience any meaningful costs as a result of these proposed amendments. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/15/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ben Jensen by phone at 801-530-6603, by FAX at 801-526-4387, or by Internet E-mail at bjensen@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/22/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37678.htm No. 37677 (Amendment): R162-2e. Appraisal Management Company Administrative Rules. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This amendment adds a definition for the term "employee" that is derived from the United States tax code and defines the employment relationship for the newly clarified unprofessional conduct provision. The unprofessional conduct provision clarifies that an AMC can act either as an AMC or as an appraisal firm. If acting in the capacity as an AMC, the AMC cannot use its own employee to complete an appraisal assignment. If acting in the capacity as an appraisal firm, the entity cannot use its own employee without first disclosing to the client the capacity in which it is acting. Acting as an appraisal firm or company does not change or impact the requirement that an appraiser who performs the appraisal must be licensed pursuant to Title 61, Chapter 2g. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: No new programs or sections will be necessary to implement this rule change. The Division already has the staff and budget necessary to investigate and enforce this requirement. Therefore, the state budget will not have any cost or savings as a result of this rule amendment. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Local governments are not required to comply with or enforce the rules governing the appraisal industry. Therefore, no fiscal impact to local government will result from this filing. - SMALL BUSINESSES: AMCs and their clients that are small businesses will be affected by this rule amendment. Requiring the disclosure may result in an increased cost to the AMC; however, the client small business may see savings in its compliance cost because it is being informed of the capacity in which the AMC is acting. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: AMCs and their clients will be affected by this rule amendment. Requiring the disclosure may result in an increased cost to the AMC; however, the client small business may see savings in its compliance cost because it is being informed of the capacity in which the AMC is acting. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: AMCs and their clients will be affected by this rule amendment. Requiring the disclosure may result in an increased cost to the AMC; however, the client small business may see savings in its compliance cost because it is being informed of the capacity in which the AMC is acting. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: Any cost an AMC might incur in disclosing to a client the role the entity expects to play in completing an appraisal assignment will vary among companies and cannot be estimated. It is anticipated that a typical AMC will be able to comply with this disclosure requirement by making a one- time amendment to its standard disclosure package. In this situation, there would be no related costs. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/15/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ben Jensen by phone at 801-530-6603, by FAX at 801-526-4387, or by Internet E-mail at bjensen@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/22/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37677.htm GOVERNOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PETE SUAZO UTAH ATHLETIC COMMISSION No. 37672 (Amendment): R359-1. Pete Suazo Utah Athletic Commission Act Rule. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The standing eight-count rule in professional boxing that has been used in professional boxing in Utah is not consistent with the Unified Rules of Professional Boxing adopted by the Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC). ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: This administrative rule change removes the standing eight-count provision within the sport of professional boxing. Removing this provision will have no cost or savings impact to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This administrative rule change removes the standing eight-count provision within the sport of professional boxing. Removing this provision will have no cost or savings impact to the local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: This administrative rule change removes the standing eight-count provision within the sport of professional boxing. Removing this provision will have no cost or savings impact to the small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: This administrative rule change removes the standing eight-count provision within the sport of professional boxing. Removing this provision will have no cost or savings impact to the persons other than small businesses or local governments. Professional boxing referees will have to be informed of the rule change after it is incorporated prior to officiating any professional boxing events. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Removing the standing eight-count will not have any impact on compliance costs for anyone involved with the sport of professional boxing. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The standing eight-count is no longer used in professional boxing in other jurisdictions. It is still used in amateur boxing which is not regulated by the Pete Suazo Utah Athletic Commission. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/15/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Bill Colbert by phone at 801-538-8876, by FAX at 801-538-8888, or by Internet E-mail at bcolbert@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/23/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37672.htm HEALTH HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY No. 37656 (Amendment): R414-14A-26. Payment for Nursing Facility, ICF/ID, and Freestanding Inpatient Hospice Unit Room and Board. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This amendment updates the Medicaid Hospice program to reflect the hospice room and board payment rate at 100% of the amount a child would have received in a skilled nursing facility or an intermediate care facility for persons with intellectual disabilities (ICF/ID). ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Based on an estimate of four children who would elect to receive concurrent hospice care and skilled facility care for one year, the Department anticipates a cost to the General Fund of about $16,000 and a cost in federal funds of about $36,600. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no impact to local governments because they neither fund the Medicaid Hospice program nor provide hospice care services to Medicaid clients. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Small businesses will share some of the total annual revenue noted below for other persons or entities. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Hospice care providers may see an increase in total annual revenue of about $52,600 as a result of this change. Further, Medicaid clients who elect to receive concurrent hospice care and skilled facility care will see out-of-pocket savings based on this total amount. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no compliance costs because this amendment can only result in an increase in revenue to a hospice care provider, and can only result in out-of-pocket savings to a Medicaid client who elects to receive both concurrent hospice care and skilled facility care. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This rule will provide slight increases in reimbursement to providers in long term care facilities and ICFs. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/15/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/22/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37656.htm HUMAN SERVICES CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES No. 37645 (Amendment): R512-41. Qualifying Adoptive Families and Adoption Placement. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This rule is being revised to clarify the requirements of Section 78B-6-137, which states that a foster parent or foster parents must not be cohabiting with another person in a sexual relationship. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There will be no increase in cost or savings to the state budget because these proposed changes do not increase workload that would require additional staff or other costs. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Child and Family Services determined that local governments are not affected by the rule and will have no fiscal impact. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Child and Family Services determined that small businesses are not affected by the rule and will have no fiscal impact. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: While individuals may be foster parents for whom this rule applies, there is no expected fiscal impact for individuals in the category of "persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities." COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Child and Family Services determined that there will be no compliance costs for affected persons because there are no specific costs involved with the changes being made to this rule. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This rule will have no fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/15/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Miller by phone at 801-557-1772, by FAX at 801-538-3993, or by Internet E-mail at carolmiller@utah.gov - Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/22/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37645.htm No. 37646 (Amendment): R512-302. Out-of-Home Services, Responsibilities Pertaining to an Out-of-Home Caregiver. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This rule is being revised to clarify the requirements of Section 78B-6-137, which states that a foster parent or foster parents must not be cohabiting with another person in a sexual relationship. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There will be no increase in cost or savings to the state budget because these proposed changes do not increase workload that would require additional staff or other costs. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Child and Family Services determined that local governments are not affected by the rule and will have no fiscal impact. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Child and Family Services determined that small businesses are not affected by the rule and will have no fiscal impact. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: While individuals may be foster parents for whom this rule applies, there is no expected fiscal impact for individuals in the category of "persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities." COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Child and Family Services determined that there will be no compliance costs for affected persons because there are no specific costs involved with the changes being made to this rule. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This rule will have no fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/15/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Miller by phone at 801-557-1772, by FAX at 801-538-3993, or by Internet E-mail at carolmiller@utah.gov - Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/22/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37646.htm RECOVERY SERVICES No. 37668 (Amendment): R527-5-3. Request for Release of Information. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The change deletes Subsection R527-5-3(3), which allowed written requests for the release of information to be sent by e-mail. No other changes are proposed for this rule. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: No costs are anticipated for the state budget. Receiving all records requests in writing where the agency can be assured of the requester's identity and rights to access agency records provides the agency a greater measure of confidence in the security of the information released. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: No costs or savings are anticipated for local governments because ORS will continue to accept record requests by mail, by fax or by personal delivery. - SMALL BUSINESSES: No costs or savings are anticipated for small businesses because ORS will continue to accept record requests by mail, by fax, and by personal delivery. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Compliance costs of this rule for persons other than small businesses, businesses or local government entities would only include nominal costs to submit a written request to the Agency to obtain records by mail, by fax or by personal delivery. Because most requests for agency records are received by mail, the proposed rule change will not impact the compliance costs for these persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Compliance costs of this rule for affected persons would only include nominal costs to submit a written request to the Agency to obtain records by mail, by fax or by personal delivery. Because most requests for agency records are received by mail, the proposed rule change will not impact the compliance costs for these affected persons. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This rule will have no cost to businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/15/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Catherine Taylor by phone at 801-536-8929, by FAX at 801-536-8509, or by Internet E-mail at catherinetaylor@utah.gov - Kenneth Ransom by phone at 801-536-8948, by FAX at 801-536-8509, or by Internet E-mail at kransom@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/22/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37668.htm NATURAL RESOURCES WILDLIFE RESOURCES No. 37643 (Amendment): R657-44. Big Game Depredation. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The proposed revision to the above listed rule: 1) authorizes the division to include buffer zones around affected properties; and 2) changes "cultivated crop" to include cleared and planted land. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: This amendment allows the division to include a buffer zone around affected property and broadens the criteria for land that can qualify for depredation vouchers, as such DWR determines that these amendments do not create a cost or savings impact to the state budget or DWR's budget, since the changes will not increase workload and can be carried out with existing budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Since this amendment only adds enhanced benefits to landowners' whose land is affected, this should have little to no effect on local governments. This filing does not create any direct cost or savings impact to local governments because they are not directly affected by the rule. Nor are local governments indirectly impacted because the rule does not create a situation requiring services from local governments. - SMALL BUSINESSES: This amendment increases the types of properties that may qualify for mitigation vouchers However, since this amendment requires the same purchase of a depredation or nuisance animal permit it does not increase the cost to small businesses. Therefore, the amendments do not have the potential to generate a cost or savings impact to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: This amendment increases the types of properties that may qualify for mitigation vouchers. However, since this amendment requires the same purchase of a depredation or nuisance animal permit it does not increase the cost to each sportsman. Therefore, the amendments do not have the potential to generate a cost or savings impact to other persons. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: DWR determines that these amendments will not create additional costs for mitigation voucher holders. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The amendments to this rule do not create an impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/15/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/22/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37643.htm PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES ADVISORY COMMISSION ADMINISTRATION No. 37674 (Amendment): R686-101 (Changed to R686-104). Alcohol Related Offenses. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The number of this rule is changed from R686- 101 to R686-104, a new definition is added and existing definitions are revised, and terminology is changed throughout the rule. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state budget. Changes to the rule relate to numbering and terminology which do not result in a cost or savings. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no anticipated cost or savings to local government. Changes to the rule relate to numbering and terminology which do not result in a cost or savings. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to small businesses. This rule and the amendments apply to public education and do not affect businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities. Changes to the rule relate to numbering and terminology which do not result in a cost or savings. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no compliance costs for affected persons. Changes to the rule relate to numbering and terminology which do not result in compliance costs. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/15/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/22/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37674.htm No. 37675 (Amendment): R686-102 (Changed to R686-105). Drug Related Offenses. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The number of this rule is changed from R686- 102 to R686-105, a new definition is added and existing definitions revised, and terminology is changed throughout the rule. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state budget. Changes to the rule relate to numbering and terminology which do not result in a cost or savings. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no anticipated cost or savings to local government. Changes to the rule relate to numbering and terminology which do not result in a cost or savings. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to small businesses. This rule and the amendments apply to public education and do not affect businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities. Changes to the rule relate to numbering and terminology which do not result in a cost or savings. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no compliance costs for affected persons. Changes to the rule relate to numbering and terminology which do not result in compliance costs. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/15/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/22/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37675.htm WORKFORCE SERVICES EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT No. 37644 (Amendment): R986-100-117. Disqualification For Fraud (Intentional Program Violations or IPVs). SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: Prohibits recipients of assistance under the Family Employment Plan from accessing funds through an electronic benefit transfer in a place that exclusively or primarily sells intoxicating liquor, allows gambling, or provides adult entertainment where performers disrobe or perform unclothed. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: This applies to federally-funded programs so there are no costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This is a federally-funded program so there are no costs or savings to the local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There will be no costs to small businesses to comply with these changes because this is a federally-funded program. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There will be no costs to persons other than small businesses, businesses or local government entities to comply with these changes because there are no costs or fees associated with these proposed changes. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no compliance costs associated with these changes for any affected persons because this is a federally-funded program and there are no fees or costs associated with these proposed changes. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: There are no compliance costs associated with this change. There are no fees associated with this change. There will be no cost to anyone to comply with these changes. There will be no fiscal impact on any business. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/15/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/22/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37644.htm UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE No. 37671 (Amendment): R994-403-115c. Period of Ineligibility. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: If a claimant applies for a job as required, this rule requires the Department to use caution in attempting to verify the job contact given that many individuals apply online and employers usually do not keep a record of those applications. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: This is a federally-funded program so there are no costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This is a federally funded program so there are no costs of savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There are no costs or savings to any small businesses as there are no fees associated with this program and it is federally funded. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings to any persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities as there are no fees associated with this program and it is federally funded. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no costs or savings to any affected persons as there are no fees associated with this program and it is federally funded. These changes will not impact any employers contribution rate. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: There are no compliance costs associated with this change. There are no fees associated with this change. There will be no cost to anyone to comply with these changes. There will be no fiscal impact on any business. These changes will have no impact on any employer's contribution tax rate. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/15/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/22/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37671.htm No. 37670 (Amendment): R994-508-102. Time Limits for Filing an Appeal from an Initial Department Determination. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The current rule provides that a party only has 10 days to appeal a Department decision if that decision was hand or electronically delivered to a party. The Department has found that it is most helpful to the parties if the Department can provide the actual date when the appeal is due but it would be extremely difficult and would lead to errors if the Department printed decisions with different due dates depending on whether the decision will be delivered electronically or by the post office. This procedure is complicated by the fact that parties often change from electronic to postal mail. Keeping the date the same, which is what the Department is currently doing, will keep the process easy to navigate for employers and claimants and avoid errors. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: This is a federally-funded program so there are no costs or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This is a federally funded program so there are no costs of savings to local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There are no costs or savings to any small businesses as there are no fees associated with this program and it is federally funded. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There are no costs or savings to any persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities as there are no fees associated with this program and it is federally funded. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no costs or savings to any affected persons as there are no fees associated with this program and it is federally funded. These changes will not impact the contribution rate of any employers. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: There are no compliance costs associated with this change. There are no fees associated with this change. There will be no cost to anyone to comply with these changes. There will be no fiscal impact on any business. These changes will have no impact on any employers contribution tax rate. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 07/15/2013 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/22/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37670.htm 4. NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES After an agency has published a Proposed Rule in the Utah State Bulletin, it may receive public comment that requires the Proposed Rule to be altered before it goes into effect. A Change in Proposed Rule allows an agency to respond to comments it receives. While the law does not designate a comment period for a Change in Proposed Rule, it does provide for a 30-day waiting period. An agency may accept additional comments during this period, and, at its option, may designate a comment period or may hold a public hearing. The 30-day waiting period for Changes in Proposed Rules published in Utah State Bulletin ends July 15, 2013. From the end of the 30-day waiting period through October 13, 2013, an agency may notify the Division of Administrative Rules that it wants to make the Change in Proposed Rule effective. When an agency submits a Notice of Effective Date for a Change in Proposed Rule, the Proposed Rule as amended by the Change in Proposed Rule becomes the effective rule. The agency sets the effective date. The date may be no fewer than 30 days nor more than 120 days after the publication of the Change in Proposed Rule. If the agency designates a public comment period, the effective date may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period nor more than 120 days after the publication date. Alternatively, the agency may file another Change in Proposed Rule in response to additional comments received. If the Division of Administrative Rules does not receive a Notice of Effective Date or another Change in Proposed Rule by the end of the 120-day period after publication, the Change in Proposed Rule filings, along with its associated Proposed Rule, lapses and the agency must start the process over. Changes in Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-303; Rule R15-2; and Sections R15-4-3, R15-4-5, R15-4-7, and R15-4-9. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ADMINISTRATION No. 37447 (Change in Proposed Rule): R746-405. Filing of Tariffs for Gas, Electric, Telephone, and Water Utilities. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The requirement for utilities to use symbols to identify tariff changes is replaced with the requirement to provide marked-up versions of the tariff indicating changes as part of an advice letter filing. The marked-up version of the proposed revised tariff sheet shall indicate deleted text by strike-through and additional text by underline. Utilities with public websites shall provide access to a searchable copy of the utility's presently effective tariff. There will be no formal comment period for this change of the rule. (DAR NOTE: This change in proposed rule has been filed to make additional changes to a proposed amendment that was published in the April 15, 2013, issue of the Utah State Bulletin, on page 38. Underlining in the rule below indicates text that has been added since the publication of the proposed rule mentioned above; strike-out indicates text that has been deleted. You must view the change in proposed rule and the proposed amendment together to understand all of the changes that will be enforceable should the agency make this rule effective.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: This filing codifies practices that exist for tariff filings, and should not impact the operations of any state agencies. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This filing codifies practices that exist for tariff filings, and should not impact the operations of local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: This filing codifies practices that exist for tariff filings, and should not impact the operations of any small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: This filing codifies practices that exist for tariff filings, and should not impact the operations of persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: This filing codifies practices that exist for tariff filings, and should not impact the operations of any affected person. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The rule changes were intended to update the format of tariff filings to be consistent with current technologies. No fiscal impact should result other than a potential unquantifiable cost savings as a result of the additional clarity this rule change provides. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Jordan White by phone at 801-530-6712, or by Internet E-mail at jordanwhite@utah.gov - Sheri Bintz by phone at 801-530-6714, by FAX at 801-530-6796, or by Internet E-mail at sbintz@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 07/15/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37447.htm 5. NOTICES OF 120-DAY (EMERGENCY) RULES An agency may file a 120-Day (Emergency) Rule when it finds that the regular rulemaking procedures would: (a) cause an imminent peril to the public health, safety, or welfare; (b) cause an imminent budget reduction because of budget restraints or federal requirements; or (c) place the agency in violation of federal or state law (Subsection 63G-3- 304(1)). A 120-Day Rule is effective at the moment the Division of Administrative Rules receives the filing, or on a later date designated by the agency. A 120-Day Rule is effective for 120 days or until it is superseded by a permanent rule. Because 120-Day Rules are effective immediately, the law does not require a public comment period. However, when an agency files a 120-Day Rule, it usually files a Proposed Rule at the same time, to make the requirements permanent. Comment may be made on the Proposed Rule. Emergency or 120-Day Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-304; and Section R15-4-8. PUBLIC SAFETY DRIVER LICENSE No. 37657 (Emergency Rule): R708-45. Renewal or Duplicate License for a Utah Resident Temporarily Residing Out of State. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This rule outlines provisions to add a motorcycle endorsement to a Utah driver license for military personnel and their dependents stationed outside of Utah (H.B. 32, 2013 General Legislative Session); clarifies the provisions for the issuance of a license to military personnel and their dependents stationed outside of Utah; and adds provisions for the issuance of a Utah driver license to civilian employees of the U.S. State Department or the U.S. Department of Defense and their dependents stationed outside the United States (H.B. 268, 2012 General Legislative Session). EMERGENCY RULE REASON AND JUSTIFICATION: REGULAR RULEMAKING PROCEDURES WOULD place the agency in violation of federal or state law. JUSTIFICATION: H.B. 32 (2013), Driver License Motorcycle Endorsement Amendments, Section 53-3-205(21) was effective as of 05/14/2013. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The Utah Legislature appropriated $7,000 from the Public Safety Transportation Restricted Account to implement the provisions of H.B. 32 (2013). This cost is associated with statute not this rule. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no fiscal impact to local government because local government does not issue Utah driver licenses. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There is no fiscal impact to small businesses because small businesses do not issue Utah driver licenses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no fiscal impact to persons other than small businesses, businesses or local government entities because these groups do not issue Utah driver licenses. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no compliance costs for affected persons other than the statutorily required license and endorsement application fees. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: I have reviewed this rule and agree this rule does not have a fiscal impact on businesses. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Jill Laws by phone at 801-964-4469, by FAX at 801-964-4482, or by Internet E-mail at jlaws@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/23/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37657.htm 6. FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION Within five years of an administrative rule's original enactment or last five-year review, the agency is required to review the rule. This review is intended to remove obsolete rules from the Utah Administrative Code. Upon reviewing a rule, an agency may: repeal the rule by filing a Proposed Rule; continue the rule as it is by filing a Notice of Review and Statement of Continuation (Notice); or amend the rule by filing a Proposed Rule and by filing a Notice. By filing a Notice, the agency indicates that the rule is still necessary. The rule text that is being continued may be found in the most recent edition of the Utah Administrative Code. The rule text may also be inspected at the agency or the Division of Administrative Rules. Notices are effective upon filing. Notices are governed by Section 63G-3-305. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ARCHIVES No. 37653 (5-year Review): R17-5. Definitions for Rules in Title R17. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The rule should continue as it provides definitions of the acronyms and the terms used in the subsequent sections of the title. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Susan Mumford by phone at 801-531-3861, by FAX at 801-531-3867, or by Internet E-mail at smumford@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/17/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37653.htm No. 37654 (5-year Review): R17-6. Records Storage and Disposal at the State Records Center. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The rule establishes procedures for the management and storage of records pursuant to Section 63A-12-101. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Susan Mumford by phone at 801-531-3861, by FAX at 801-531-3867, or by Internet E-mail at smumford@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/17/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37654.htm No. 37659 (5-year Review): R17-7. Archival Records Care and Access at the State Archives. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The rule provides procedures for the care of and access to archival records under Section 63A-12-101. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Susan Mumford by phone at 801-531-3861, by FAX at 801-531-3867, or by Internet E-mail at smumford@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/28/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37659.htm No. 37655 (5-year Review): R17-8. Application of Microfilm Standards. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule establishes procedures for the microfilming of long term and permanent records as authorized by Section 63A-12-104. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Susan Mumford by phone at 801-531-3861, by FAX at 801-531-3867, or by Internet E-mail at smumford@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/17/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37655.htm AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PLANT INDUSTRY No. 37669 (5-year Review): R68-16. Quarantine Pertaining to Pine Shoot Beetle, Tomicus piniperda. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: Pine Shoot Beetle has a high probability to be artificially transported into Utah and will survive and multiply rapidly. Introduction of this pest will cause serious damage to forests, parks and agricultural tree plantings. This pest is also capable of destroying watershed areas and is a nuisance to the general public. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Clark Burgess by phone at 801-538-7188, by FAX at 801-538-7189, or by Internet E-mail at cburgess@utah.gov - Kathleen Mathews by phone at 801-538-7103, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by Internet E-mail at kmathews@utah.gov - Kyle Stephens by phone at 801-538-7102, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by Internet E-mail at kylestephens@utah.gov - Robert Hougaard by phone at 801-538-7187, by FAX at 801-538-7189, or by Internet E-mail at rhougaard@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/30/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37669.htm ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL ADMINISTRATION No. 37673 (5-year Review): R81-10. Off-Premise Beer Retailers. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: Subsection 32B-7-202(5) requires that there be clear and specific separation of alcoholic beverages from non-alcoholic beverage in off-premise outlets. The rule is necessary to provide guidelines for outlet to follow when placing these products on their premises. It also addresses specific language to be used in alcoholic beverage signage in retail outlets. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Nina McDermott by phone at 801-977-6805, by FAX at 801-977-6888, or by Internet E-mail at nmcdermott@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/31/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37673.htm COMMERCE SECURITIES No. 37660 (5-year Review): R164-31. Administrative Fines. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule should continue because it informs the public and licensees of the guidelines used and factors that will be considered by the Utah Securities Commission when imposing fines in administrative actions filed by the Utah Securities Division. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Charles Lyons by phone at 801-530-6940, by FAX at 801-530-6980, or by Internet E-mail at clyons@utah.gov - Keith Woodwell by phone at 801-530-6606, by FAX at 801-530-6980, or by Internet E-mail at kwoodwell@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/28/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37660.htm GOVERNOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT No. 37666 (5-year Review): R357-3. Refundable Economic Development Tax Credit. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The refundable economic development tax credits as set forth in the statute and the rule are the main tool the agency uses to promote economic development and expansion in the state. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Zachary Derr by phone at 801-538-8746, by FAX at 801-538-8888, or by Internet E-mail at zderr@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/30/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37666.htm HEALTH HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY No. 37665 (5-year Review): R414-508. Requirements for Transfer of Bed Licenses. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The Department will continue this rule because it sets forth requirements for nursing facilities to transfer bed licenses, sets forth requirements for nursing facilities that receives bed licenses, and spells out provisions for license expiration and forfeiture. All of these requirements provide cost effective services for Medicaid recipients. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/30/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37665.htm FAMILY HEALTH AND PREPAREDNESS, CHILD CARE LICENSING No. 37661 (5-year Review): R430-50. Residential Certificate Child Care. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule contains the ongoing operational health and safety standards for residential certificate child care providers. The continuation of this rule is necessary in order for the Department of Health to continue to fulfill its statutory responsibility to regulate child care programs in order to protect the health and safety of the children in these programs. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Simon Bolivar by phone at 801-584-8223, by FAX at 801-584-8467, or by Internet E-mail at sbolivar@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/29/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37661.htm No. 37662 (5-year Review): R430-60. Hourly Child Care Centers. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The continuation of this rule is necessary in order for the Department of Health to continue to fulfill its statutory responsibility to regulate child care programs in order to protect the health and safety of the children in these programs. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Simon Bolivar by phone at 801-584-8223, by FAX at 801-584-8467, or by Internet E-mail at sbolivar@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/29/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37662.htm No. 37663 (5-year Review): R430-90. Licensed Family Child Care. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The continuation of this rule is necessary in order for the Department of Health to continue to fulfill its statutory responsibility to regulate child care programs in order to protect the health and safety of the children in these programs. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Simon Bolivar by phone at 801-584-8223, by FAX at 801-584-8467, or by Internet E-mail at sbolivar@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/29/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37663.htm HUMAN SERVICES CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES No. 37639 (5-year Review): R512-300. Out-of-Home Services. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: Continuation of this rule is necessary in order for the Division of Child and Family Services to provide out-of-home services pursuant to Sections 62A-4a- 105 and 62A-4a-106. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Miller by phone at 801-557-1772, by FAX at 801-538-3993, or by Internet E-mail at carolmiller@utah.gov - Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/16/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37639.htm No. 37640 (5-year Review): R512-301. Out-of-Home Services, Responsibilities Pertaining to a Parent or Guardian. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: Continuation of this rule is necessary in order for the Division of Child and Family Services to provide out-of-home services pursuant to Sections 62A-4a- 105 and 62A-4a-106. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Miller by phone at 801-557-1772, by FAX at 801-538-3993, or by Internet E-mail at carolmiller@utah.gov - Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/16/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37640.htm No. 37641 (5-year Review): R512-302. Out-of-Home Services, Responsibilities Pertaining to an Out-of-Home Caregiver. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: Continuation of this rule is necessary in order for the Division of Child and Family Services to provide out-of-home services pursuant to Sections 62A-4a- 105 and 62A-4a-106. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Miller by phone at 801-557-1772, by FAX at 801-538-3993, or by Internet E-mail at carolmiller@utah.gov - Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/16/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37641.htm No. 37642 (5-year Review): R512-305. Out-of-Home Services, Transition to Adult Services. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: Continuation of this rule is necessary in order for the Division of Child and Family Services to provide out-of-home services, including transition to adult living services, pursuant to Sections 62A-4a-105 and 62A-4a-106. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Miller by phone at 801-557-1772, by FAX at 801-538-3993, or by Internet E-mail at carolmiller@utah.gov - Julene Jones by phone at 801-538-4521, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by Internet E-mail at jhjones@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/16/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37642.htm NATURAL RESOURCES WILDLIFE RESOURCES No. 37667 (5-year Review): R657-53. Amphibian and Reptile Collection, Importation, Transportation and Possession. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: Rule R657-53 is necessary to provide the procedures, protocols, and guidelines for the collection, importation, transportation, possession and propagation of amphibians and reptiles. Continuation of this rule is necessary to provide the standards and procedures from the Wildlife Board. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/30/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37667.htm PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES ADVISORY COMMISSION ADMINISTRATION No. 37637 (5-year Review): R686-101. Alcohol Related Offenses. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule continues to be necessary because it provides procedures for disciplining educators and prospective educators regarding alcohol related offenses. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/16/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37637.htm No. 37638 (5-year Review): R686-102. Drug Related Offenses. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule continues to be necessary because it provides procedures for disciplining educators and prospective educators regarding drug related offenses. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carol Lear by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/16/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37638.htm WORKFORCE SERVICES UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE No. 37652 (5-year Review): R994-306. Charging Benefit Costs to Employers. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The rule is necessary to explain when an employer will be charged for benefit costs, how the employer will be notified, and how the employer can protest those charges. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/16/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37652.htm No. 37651 (5-year Review): R994-307. Social Costs -- Relief of Charges. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The rule is an essential tool for explaining when an employer will be eligible for relief of charges and when benefit costs can be charged to social costs for contributory employers. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/16/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37651.htm No. 37650 (5-year Review): R994-315. Centralized New Hire Registry Reporting. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The new hire registry is mandated by federal and state law and is used to assist in child support and detecting fraud against unemployment benefits. By knowing when individuals have returned to work, the agency can stop benefit payments and protect the trust fund. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/16/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37650.htm No. 37647 (5-year Review): R994-403. Claim for Benefits. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule is essential for providing claimants, employers and Department employees with information regarding eligibility for ongoing benefits including how the statute and court decisions define eligibility terms. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/16/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37647.htm No. 37648 (5-year Review): R994-405. Ineligibility for Benefits. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule is essential for determining when claimants will be eligible for benefits in the event of a discharge or a quit. It contains information from state and federal law regarding eligibility after a separation and what is considered suitable new work. It is also essential for determining when benefits will be allowed in the event of a strike and how vacation and severance payments will be calculated and when they will be disqualifying. It is also essential for determining when educational employees and professional athletes are eligible and alien status. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/16/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37648.htm No. 37649 (5-year Review): R994-508. Appeal Procedures. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule is essential to explain the appeals procedure including when the Department has jurisdiction and how and when appeals may be filed. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Suzan Pixton by phone at 801-526-9645, by FAX at 801-526-9211, or by Internet E-mail at spixton@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 05/16/2013 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2013/20130615/37649.htm 7. NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES State law provides for agencies to make their rules effective and enforceable after publication in the Utah State Bulletin. In the case of Proposed Rules or Changes in Proposed Rules with a designated comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of effective date any time after the close of comment plus seven days. In the case of Changes in Proposed Rules with no designated comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of effective date on any date including or after the thirtieth day after the rule's publication date. If an agency fails to file a Notice of Effective Date within 120 days from the publication of a Proposed Rule or a related Change in Proposed Rule the rule lapses and the agency must start the rulemaking process over. Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301(12), 63G-3- 303, and Sections R15-4-5a and 5b. EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION No. 37413 (AMD): R277-600.Student Transportation Standards and Procedures Published: 04/01/2013 Effective: 05/16/2013 No. 37414 (AMD): R277-610.Released-Time Classes Published: 04/01/2013 Effective: 05/16/2013 No. 37415 (AMD): R277-702.Procedures for the Utah High School Completion Diploma (Effective on July 1, 2009) Published: 04/01/2013 Effective: 05/16/2013 HEALTH HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY No. 37422 (AMD): R414-1-5.Incorporations by Reference Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/29/2013 No. 37085 (CPR): R414-29.Client Review/Education and Restriction Policy Published: 04/01/2013 Effective: 05/16/2013 No. 37085 (AMD): R414-29.Client Review/Education and Restriction Policy Published: 12/15/2012 Effective: 05/16/2013 FAMILY HEALTH AND PREPAREDNESS, EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES No. 37411 (NEW): R426-2.Air Medical Service Rules Published: 04/01/2013 Effective: 05/30/2013 No. 37410 (NEW): R426-6.Emergency Medical Services Competitive Grants Program Rules Published: 04/01/2013 Effective: 05/30/2013 PARDONS (BOARD OF) ADMINISTRATION No. 37438 (AMD): R671-312.Commutation Hearings for Death Penalty Cases Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/22/2013 No. 37439 (NEW): R671-312A.Commutation Procedures Applicable to Persons Sentenced to Death Before April 26, 1992 Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/22/2013 No. 37440 (NEW): R671-312B.Commutation Procedures Applicable to Persons Sentenced to Death After April 26, 1992 Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/22/2013 No. 37455 (AMD): R671-315.Pardons Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/22/2013 No. 37456 (AMD): R671-509.Parole Progress / Violation Reports Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/22/2013 No. 37457 (AMD): R671-510.Evidence for Issuance of Warrants Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/22/2013 No. 37458 (AMD): R671-512.Execution of the Warrant Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/22/2013 No. 37459 (AMD): R671-513.Expedited Determination of Parolee Challenge to Probable Cause Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/22/2013 No. 37460 (AMD): R671-514.Waiver and Pleas of Guilt Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/22/2013 No. 37461 (AMD): R671-515.Timeliness of Parole Revocation Hearings Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/22/2013 No. 37462 (AMD): R671-516.Parole Revocation Hearings Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/22/2013 No. 37463 (AMD): R671-517.Evidentiary Hearings and Proceedings Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/22/2013 No. 37464 (AMD): R671-519.Proceedings When Criminal Charges Result in Acquittal Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/22/2013 No. 37465 (AMD): R671-520.Treatment of Confidential Testimony Published: 04/15/2013 Effective: 05/22/2013 8. RULES INDEX The Rules Index is a cumulative index that reflects all effective Utah administrative rules. The Rules Index is not included Digest. However, a copy of the current Rules Index is available http://www.rules.utah.gov/research.htm . <>